STIX 2.0 font declaration
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Today the STIX v2.0 was released. What is the proper font declaration to make use of various optical sizes etc with unicode-math?
xetex luatex unicode-math stix
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Today the STIX v2.0 was released. What is the proper font declaration to make use of various optical sizes etc with unicode-math?
xetex luatex unicode-math stix
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
2
What's the basis for your view that Stix Two provides optically sized font variants (subfamilies)?
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:39
1
@Mico Was hoping for the best.:-( May I ask then, which math fonts do contain the optical sizes, apart from Minion Math?
– Sapere aude
Dec 1 '16 at 17:45
3
For one, Latin Modern Math, a direct descendant of Computer Modern. :-)
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:51
@Mico How do you tell that?otfinfodoesn't seem to recognise it.
– cfr
Dec 2 '16 at 2:25
1
@cfr -- Givescalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} $aaazzz$andscalebox{2}{tiny Hello} Helloa try. (Requiresgraphicxforscaleboxmacro.)
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 5:47
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Today the STIX v2.0 was released. What is the proper font declaration to make use of various optical sizes etc with unicode-math?
xetex luatex unicode-math stix
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
Today the STIX v2.0 was released. What is the proper font declaration to make use of various optical sizes etc with unicode-math?
xetex luatex unicode-math stix
xetex luatex unicode-math stix
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
asked Dec 1 '16 at 17:29
Sapere aude
926
926
2
What's the basis for your view that Stix Two provides optically sized font variants (subfamilies)?
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:39
1
@Mico Was hoping for the best.:-( May I ask then, which math fonts do contain the optical sizes, apart from Minion Math?
– Sapere aude
Dec 1 '16 at 17:45
3
For one, Latin Modern Math, a direct descendant of Computer Modern. :-)
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:51
@Mico How do you tell that?otfinfodoesn't seem to recognise it.
– cfr
Dec 2 '16 at 2:25
1
@cfr -- Givescalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} $aaazzz$andscalebox{2}{tiny Hello} Helloa try. (Requiresgraphicxforscaleboxmacro.)
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 5:47
add a comment |
2
What's the basis for your view that Stix Two provides optically sized font variants (subfamilies)?
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:39
1
@Mico Was hoping for the best.:-( May I ask then, which math fonts do contain the optical sizes, apart from Minion Math?
– Sapere aude
Dec 1 '16 at 17:45
3
For one, Latin Modern Math, a direct descendant of Computer Modern. :-)
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:51
@Mico How do you tell that?otfinfodoesn't seem to recognise it.
– cfr
Dec 2 '16 at 2:25
1
@cfr -- Givescalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} $aaazzz$andscalebox{2}{tiny Hello} Helloa try. (Requiresgraphicxforscaleboxmacro.)
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 5:47
2
2
What's the basis for your view that Stix Two provides optically sized font variants (subfamilies)?
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:39
What's the basis for your view that Stix Two provides optically sized font variants (subfamilies)?
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:39
1
1
@Mico Was hoping for the best.:-( May I ask then, which math fonts do contain the optical sizes, apart from Minion Math?
– Sapere aude
Dec 1 '16 at 17:45
@Mico Was hoping for the best.:-( May I ask then, which math fonts do contain the optical sizes, apart from Minion Math?
– Sapere aude
Dec 1 '16 at 17:45
3
3
For one, Latin Modern Math, a direct descendant of Computer Modern. :-)
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:51
For one, Latin Modern Math, a direct descendant of Computer Modern. :-)
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:51
@Mico How do you tell that?
otfinfo doesn't seem to recognise it.– cfr
Dec 2 '16 at 2:25
@Mico How do you tell that?
otfinfo doesn't seem to recognise it.– cfr
Dec 2 '16 at 2:25
1
1
@cfr -- Give
scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} $aaazzz$ and scalebox{2}{tiny Hello} Hello a try. (Requires graphicx for scalebox macro.)– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 5:47
@cfr -- Give
scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} $aaazzz$ and scalebox{2}{tiny Hello} Hello a try. (Requires graphicx for scalebox macro.)– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 5:47
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You don’t need to do any thing to get the optical sizes included in the math font. They are associated with the ssty feature which unicode-math will enable it for script and scriptscript font sizes.
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$}and$aaazzz$differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
[For your convenience: You can download STIX v2.0.0 from GitHub]
You don’t have to change anything because the release does not include optical sizes. The new ssty feature which offers special sub- and superscript glyphs is selected automatically by unicode-math. See the release notes:
WHAT IS NEW IN THIS RELEASE?
In addition to the overall visual redesign, STIX Two incorporates a
number of significant improvements and additions. Special attention
has been given to implementing accepted best practices for OpenType
fonts, such as the use of font features to access variant glyph shapes
that were previously only available via the Unicode Private Use Areas.
The letterspacing and kerning of the text fonts have been
significantly improved.
True small capital variants (Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek), accessible
via the OpenType font feature smcp, have been added for all text
fonts.
Text (lowercase or oldstyle) numerals, available via the font features
pnum and onum, have been added, in addition to natural-spacing
figures.
Alphabetic superscripts and numeric sub- and superscripts, accessible
via the subs and sups font features, have been added.
Fractions are available via the frac feature, as well as numerators
(numr) and denominators (dnom).
The OpenType MATH table has been completely rewritten and extended.
Additions have been made to these Unicode blocks:
Latin-1 Supplement U+0080 - U+00FF
Latin Extended-A U+0100 - U+017F
Latin Extended Additional U+0180 - U+024F
Cyrillic U+0400 - U+04FF
Greek and Coptic U+0370 - U+03FF
IPA blocks U+0250 - U+02AF
Full details of included glyphs and supported font features are
available in the included spreadsheet.
Addendum: As pointed out by Khaled and misinterpreted by me, there are some optical sizes available in STIX2 which were not present in STIX1, namely for sub- and superscripts in math mode. I misinterpreted this because for me optical sizes means the Adobe definition of optical size. In addition to Khaled’s answer here is a snippet showing the difference for sub- and superscripts in math mode while showing that there is no difference in text mode.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{unicode-math}
setmainfont{STIX2Text-Regular.otf}
setmathfont{STIX2Math.otf}
begin{document}
setbox0=hbox{$abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptstyle abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptscriptstyle abc$}
setbox0=hbox{abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{scriptsize abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{tiny abc}
end{document}
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
1
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
1
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For messtyis only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.
– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
2
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the thesstyfeature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You don’t need to do any thing to get the optical sizes included in the math font. They are associated with the ssty feature which unicode-math will enable it for script and scriptscript font sizes.
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$}and$aaazzz$differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You don’t need to do any thing to get the optical sizes included in the math font. They are associated with the ssty feature which unicode-math will enable it for script and scriptscript font sizes.
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$}and$aaazzz$differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
You don’t need to do any thing to get the optical sizes included in the math font. They are associated with the ssty feature which unicode-math will enable it for script and scriptscript font sizes.
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
You don’t need to do any thing to get the optical sizes included in the math font. They are associated with the ssty feature which unicode-math will enable it for script and scriptscript font sizes.
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
answered Dec 2 '16 at 1:27
Khaled Hosny
21.4k172108
21.4k172108
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$}and$aaazzz$differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
add a comment |
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$}and$aaazzz$differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.
– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?
scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} and $aaazzz$ differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
Is version 2.0.0 of STIX Math maybe still a bit buggy?
scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} and $aaazzz$ differ wildly in size, though (after further rescaling) not so much in the glyph shapes.– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 6:41
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
@Mico: All known issues with STIX fonts should be fixed in this version. The optical sizes do have weight and size differences, it might be subtler than in Computer Modern but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:31
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
[For your convenience: You can download STIX v2.0.0 from GitHub]
You don’t have to change anything because the release does not include optical sizes. The new ssty feature which offers special sub- and superscript glyphs is selected automatically by unicode-math. See the release notes:
WHAT IS NEW IN THIS RELEASE?
In addition to the overall visual redesign, STIX Two incorporates a
number of significant improvements and additions. Special attention
has been given to implementing accepted best practices for OpenType
fonts, such as the use of font features to access variant glyph shapes
that were previously only available via the Unicode Private Use Areas.
The letterspacing and kerning of the text fonts have been
significantly improved.
True small capital variants (Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek), accessible
via the OpenType font feature smcp, have been added for all text
fonts.
Text (lowercase or oldstyle) numerals, available via the font features
pnum and onum, have been added, in addition to natural-spacing
figures.
Alphabetic superscripts and numeric sub- and superscripts, accessible
via the subs and sups font features, have been added.
Fractions are available via the frac feature, as well as numerators
(numr) and denominators (dnom).
The OpenType MATH table has been completely rewritten and extended.
Additions have been made to these Unicode blocks:
Latin-1 Supplement U+0080 - U+00FF
Latin Extended-A U+0100 - U+017F
Latin Extended Additional U+0180 - U+024F
Cyrillic U+0400 - U+04FF
Greek and Coptic U+0370 - U+03FF
IPA blocks U+0250 - U+02AF
Full details of included glyphs and supported font features are
available in the included spreadsheet.
Addendum: As pointed out by Khaled and misinterpreted by me, there are some optical sizes available in STIX2 which were not present in STIX1, namely for sub- and superscripts in math mode. I misinterpreted this because for me optical sizes means the Adobe definition of optical size. In addition to Khaled’s answer here is a snippet showing the difference for sub- and superscripts in math mode while showing that there is no difference in text mode.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{unicode-math}
setmainfont{STIX2Text-Regular.otf}
setmathfont{STIX2Math.otf}
begin{document}
setbox0=hbox{$abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptstyle abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptscriptstyle abc$}
setbox0=hbox{abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{scriptsize abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{tiny abc}
end{document}
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
1
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
1
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For messtyis only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.
– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
2
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the thesstyfeature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
[For your convenience: You can download STIX v2.0.0 from GitHub]
You don’t have to change anything because the release does not include optical sizes. The new ssty feature which offers special sub- and superscript glyphs is selected automatically by unicode-math. See the release notes:
WHAT IS NEW IN THIS RELEASE?
In addition to the overall visual redesign, STIX Two incorporates a
number of significant improvements and additions. Special attention
has been given to implementing accepted best practices for OpenType
fonts, such as the use of font features to access variant glyph shapes
that were previously only available via the Unicode Private Use Areas.
The letterspacing and kerning of the text fonts have been
significantly improved.
True small capital variants (Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek), accessible
via the OpenType font feature smcp, have been added for all text
fonts.
Text (lowercase or oldstyle) numerals, available via the font features
pnum and onum, have been added, in addition to natural-spacing
figures.
Alphabetic superscripts and numeric sub- and superscripts, accessible
via the subs and sups font features, have been added.
Fractions are available via the frac feature, as well as numerators
(numr) and denominators (dnom).
The OpenType MATH table has been completely rewritten and extended.
Additions have been made to these Unicode blocks:
Latin-1 Supplement U+0080 - U+00FF
Latin Extended-A U+0100 - U+017F
Latin Extended Additional U+0180 - U+024F
Cyrillic U+0400 - U+04FF
Greek and Coptic U+0370 - U+03FF
IPA blocks U+0250 - U+02AF
Full details of included glyphs and supported font features are
available in the included spreadsheet.
Addendum: As pointed out by Khaled and misinterpreted by me, there are some optical sizes available in STIX2 which were not present in STIX1, namely for sub- and superscripts in math mode. I misinterpreted this because for me optical sizes means the Adobe definition of optical size. In addition to Khaled’s answer here is a snippet showing the difference for sub- and superscripts in math mode while showing that there is no difference in text mode.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{unicode-math}
setmainfont{STIX2Text-Regular.otf}
setmathfont{STIX2Math.otf}
begin{document}
setbox0=hbox{$abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptstyle abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptscriptstyle abc$}
setbox0=hbox{abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{scriptsize abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{tiny abc}
end{document}
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
1
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
1
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For messtyis only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.
– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
2
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the thesstyfeature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
[For your convenience: You can download STIX v2.0.0 from GitHub]
You don’t have to change anything because the release does not include optical sizes. The new ssty feature which offers special sub- and superscript glyphs is selected automatically by unicode-math. See the release notes:
WHAT IS NEW IN THIS RELEASE?
In addition to the overall visual redesign, STIX Two incorporates a
number of significant improvements and additions. Special attention
has been given to implementing accepted best practices for OpenType
fonts, such as the use of font features to access variant glyph shapes
that were previously only available via the Unicode Private Use Areas.
The letterspacing and kerning of the text fonts have been
significantly improved.
True small capital variants (Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek), accessible
via the OpenType font feature smcp, have been added for all text
fonts.
Text (lowercase or oldstyle) numerals, available via the font features
pnum and onum, have been added, in addition to natural-spacing
figures.
Alphabetic superscripts and numeric sub- and superscripts, accessible
via the subs and sups font features, have been added.
Fractions are available via the frac feature, as well as numerators
(numr) and denominators (dnom).
The OpenType MATH table has been completely rewritten and extended.
Additions have been made to these Unicode blocks:
Latin-1 Supplement U+0080 - U+00FF
Latin Extended-A U+0100 - U+017F
Latin Extended Additional U+0180 - U+024F
Cyrillic U+0400 - U+04FF
Greek and Coptic U+0370 - U+03FF
IPA blocks U+0250 - U+02AF
Full details of included glyphs and supported font features are
available in the included spreadsheet.
Addendum: As pointed out by Khaled and misinterpreted by me, there are some optical sizes available in STIX2 which were not present in STIX1, namely for sub- and superscripts in math mode. I misinterpreted this because for me optical sizes means the Adobe definition of optical size. In addition to Khaled’s answer here is a snippet showing the difference for sub- and superscripts in math mode while showing that there is no difference in text mode.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{unicode-math}
setmainfont{STIX2Text-Regular.otf}
setmathfont{STIX2Math.otf}
begin{document}
setbox0=hbox{$abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptstyle abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptscriptstyle abc$}
setbox0=hbox{abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{scriptsize abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{tiny abc}
end{document}
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
[For your convenience: You can download STIX v2.0.0 from GitHub]
You don’t have to change anything because the release does not include optical sizes. The new ssty feature which offers special sub- and superscript glyphs is selected automatically by unicode-math. See the release notes:
WHAT IS NEW IN THIS RELEASE?
In addition to the overall visual redesign, STIX Two incorporates a
number of significant improvements and additions. Special attention
has been given to implementing accepted best practices for OpenType
fonts, such as the use of font features to access variant glyph shapes
that were previously only available via the Unicode Private Use Areas.
The letterspacing and kerning of the text fonts have been
significantly improved.
True small capital variants (Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek), accessible
via the OpenType font feature smcp, have been added for all text
fonts.
Text (lowercase or oldstyle) numerals, available via the font features
pnum and onum, have been added, in addition to natural-spacing
figures.
Alphabetic superscripts and numeric sub- and superscripts, accessible
via the subs and sups font features, have been added.
Fractions are available via the frac feature, as well as numerators
(numr) and denominators (dnom).
The OpenType MATH table has been completely rewritten and extended.
Additions have been made to these Unicode blocks:
Latin-1 Supplement U+0080 - U+00FF
Latin Extended-A U+0100 - U+017F
Latin Extended Additional U+0180 - U+024F
Cyrillic U+0400 - U+04FF
Greek and Coptic U+0370 - U+03FF
IPA blocks U+0250 - U+02AF
Full details of included glyphs and supported font features are
available in the included spreadsheet.
Addendum: As pointed out by Khaled and misinterpreted by me, there are some optical sizes available in STIX2 which were not present in STIX1, namely for sub- and superscripts in math mode. I misinterpreted this because for me optical sizes means the Adobe definition of optical size. In addition to Khaled’s answer here is a snippet showing the difference for sub- and superscripts in math mode while showing that there is no difference in text mode.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{unicode-math}
setmainfont{STIX2Text-Regular.otf}
setmathfont{STIX2Math.otf}
begin{document}
setbox0=hbox{$abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptstyle abc$}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{$scriptscriptstyle abc$}
setbox0=hbox{abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{copy0}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{scriptsize abc}
resizebox{!}{ht0}{tiny abc}
end{document}
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
edited Dec 3 at 19:55
andselisk
6662621
6662621
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
answered Dec 1 '16 at 17:36
Henri Menke
68.5k7153257
68.5k7153257
1
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
1
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For messtyis only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.
– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
2
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the thesstyfeature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
1
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
1
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For messtyis only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.
– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
2
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the thesstyfeature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
1
1
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
What part of the text you are quoting says it does not include optical sizes?
– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 1:26
1
1
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For me
ssty is only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
@KhaledHosny Sorry about that, I clarified my answer. I was (and still am) thinking of optical sizes the Adobe way. For me
ssty is only a font feature and not like the true subfamilies which are available for math and text in, e.g., Computer Modern.– Henri Menke
Dec 2 '16 at 11:06
2
2
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the the
ssty feature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
For OpenType math fonts, the canonical way to handle optical sizes is through the the
ssty feature. For text fonts you indeed need separate font files, and it is true that STIX does not provide optical sizes for the text fonts.– Khaled Hosny
Dec 2 '16 at 19:30
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f341894%2fstix-2-0-font-declaration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
What's the basis for your view that Stix Two provides optically sized font variants (subfamilies)?
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:39
1
@Mico Was hoping for the best.:-( May I ask then, which math fonts do contain the optical sizes, apart from Minion Math?
– Sapere aude
Dec 1 '16 at 17:45
3
For one, Latin Modern Math, a direct descendant of Computer Modern. :-)
– Mico
Dec 1 '16 at 17:51
@Mico How do you tell that?
otfinfodoesn't seem to recognise it.– cfr
Dec 2 '16 at 2:25
1
@cfr -- Give
scalebox{2}{$scriptscriptstyle aaazzz$} $aaazzz$andscalebox{2}{tiny Hello} Helloa try. (Requiresgraphicxforscaleboxmacro.)– Mico
Dec 2 '16 at 5:47