Quantifier difference
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
What s the difference between $ n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$ and $ forall n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$
Is this true:
$ (n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z) implies forall n in Z; n(n+1) =2k $ such that$ k in Z$
quantifiers
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
What s the difference between $ n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$ and $ forall n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$
Is this true:
$ (n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z) implies forall n in Z; n(n+1) =2k $ such that$ k in Z$
quantifiers
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
None, in that I cannot understand either: why have you introduced a $k$, only to use it in the expression $2k/k$ which merely simplifies to $2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 19 at 7:15
/ means such that in my case
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:19
Impossible to understand ... The first one is an equation : $dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:32
The second one is a formula : $(dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k) to forall n (dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k)$ whose truth value depends on $n$ and $k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:33
Rewritten in an unambiguous way
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 10:47
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
What s the difference between $ n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$ and $ forall n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$
Is this true:
$ (n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z) implies forall n in Z; n(n+1) =2k $ such that$ k in Z$
quantifiers
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
What s the difference between $ n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$ and $ forall n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z$
Is this true:
$ (n in Z implies n(n+1) =2k $ such that $k in Z) implies forall n in Z; n(n+1) =2k $ such that$ k in Z$
quantifiers
quantifiers
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
edited Nov 19 at 10:45
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
asked Nov 19 at 6:45
J.Moh
395
395
None, in that I cannot understand either: why have you introduced a $k$, only to use it in the expression $2k/k$ which merely simplifies to $2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 19 at 7:15
/ means such that in my case
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:19
Impossible to understand ... The first one is an equation : $dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:32
The second one is a formula : $(dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k) to forall n (dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k)$ whose truth value depends on $n$ and $k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:33
Rewritten in an unambiguous way
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 10:47
|
show 1 more comment
None, in that I cannot understand either: why have you introduced a $k$, only to use it in the expression $2k/k$ which merely simplifies to $2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 19 at 7:15
/ means such that in my case
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:19
Impossible to understand ... The first one is an equation : $dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:32
The second one is a formula : $(dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k) to forall n (dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k)$ whose truth value depends on $n$ and $k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:33
Rewritten in an unambiguous way
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 10:47
None, in that I cannot understand either: why have you introduced a $k$, only to use it in the expression $2k/k$ which merely simplifies to $2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 19 at 7:15
None, in that I cannot understand either: why have you introduced a $k$, only to use it in the expression $2k/k$ which merely simplifies to $2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 19 at 7:15
/ means such that in my case
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:19
/ means such that in my case
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:19
Impossible to understand ... The first one is an equation : $dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:32
Impossible to understand ... The first one is an equation : $dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:32
The second one is a formula : $(dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k) to forall n (dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k)$ whose truth value depends on $n$ and $k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:33
The second one is a formula : $(dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k) to forall n (dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k)$ whose truth value depends on $n$ and $k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:33
Rewritten in an unambiguous way
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 10:47
Rewritten in an unambiguous way
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 10:47
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Is this true that :
$(n ∈ mathbb Z ⟹ dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k ) ⟹ ∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k text { , for } k ∈ mathbb Z$ ?
The formula :
$dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$
is about two unspecified numbers $n$ and $k$; it can be either true or false, according to the values we assign to them.
Specifically, the formula is true only for $n=k=0$.
This means that the consequent : $∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$ is false.
Thus the original formula is false for $n=k=0$ (because in that case we have $text T to text F$, which is $text F$) and true in all other cases (because $text F to text F$ is $text T$).
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Is this true that :
$(n ∈ mathbb Z ⟹ dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k ) ⟹ ∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k text { , for } k ∈ mathbb Z$ ?
The formula :
$dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$
is about two unspecified numbers $n$ and $k$; it can be either true or false, according to the values we assign to them.
Specifically, the formula is true only for $n=k=0$.
This means that the consequent : $∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$ is false.
Thus the original formula is false for $n=k=0$ (because in that case we have $text T to text F$, which is $text F$) and true in all other cases (because $text F to text F$ is $text T$).
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Is this true that :
$(n ∈ mathbb Z ⟹ dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k ) ⟹ ∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k text { , for } k ∈ mathbb Z$ ?
The formula :
$dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$
is about two unspecified numbers $n$ and $k$; it can be either true or false, according to the values we assign to them.
Specifically, the formula is true only for $n=k=0$.
This means that the consequent : $∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$ is false.
Thus the original formula is false for $n=k=0$ (because in that case we have $text T to text F$, which is $text F$) and true in all other cases (because $text F to text F$ is $text T$).
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Is this true that :
$(n ∈ mathbb Z ⟹ dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k ) ⟹ ∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k text { , for } k ∈ mathbb Z$ ?
The formula :
$dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$
is about two unspecified numbers $n$ and $k$; it can be either true or false, according to the values we assign to them.
Specifically, the formula is true only for $n=k=0$.
This means that the consequent : $∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$ is false.
Thus the original formula is false for $n=k=0$ (because in that case we have $text T to text F$, which is $text F$) and true in all other cases (because $text F to text F$ is $text T$).
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
Is this true that :
$(n ∈ mathbb Z ⟹ dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k ) ⟹ ∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k text { , for } k ∈ mathbb Z$ ?
The formula :
$dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$
is about two unspecified numbers $n$ and $k$; it can be either true or false, according to the values we assign to them.
Specifically, the formula is true only for $n=k=0$.
This means that the consequent : $∀n ∈ mathbb Z dfrac {n}{(n+1)} = 2k$ is false.
Thus the original formula is false for $n=k=0$ (because in that case we have $text T to text F$, which is $text F$) and true in all other cases (because $text F to text F$ is $text T$).
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
edited Nov 19 at 10:55
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
answered Nov 19 at 7:13
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
63.8k448110
63.8k448110
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
add a comment |
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
/ doesn t mean division in my case, it means such that
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004598%2fquantifier-difference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
None, in that I cannot understand either: why have you introduced a $k$, only to use it in the expression $2k/k$ which merely simplifies to $2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 19 at 7:15
/ means such that in my case
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 8:19
Impossible to understand ... The first one is an equation : $dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:32
The second one is a formula : $(dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k) to forall n (dfrac {n}{n+1}=2k)$ whose truth value depends on $n$ and $k$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Nov 19 at 10:33
Rewritten in an unambiguous way
– J.Moh
Nov 19 at 10:47