If $f$ is monotone increasing on an interval and has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$, show that the jump is...
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If $f$ is monotone increasing on an interval and has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ in the interior of the domain show that the jump is bounded above by $f(x_1) - f(x_2)$ for any two points $x_1$, $x_2$ of the domain surrounding $x_0$, $x_1 < x_0 < x_2$.
So I've I tried solving this here is what I have:
Let $f$ be monotone increasing on an interval $A$ that has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ on the interior of the domain where $x_0 in A$. Let there be any $x_1, x_2 in A$ where $x_1< x_0 < x_2$. Then by definition of monotone increasing $f(x_1) leq f (x_2)$.
From here I want to say that $f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) rightarrow f(x_1) - f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) - f(x_1)$ and that $f(x_0) leq f(x_2) -f(x_2)$. But I'm not sure if I'm going in the right direction since I can't say for sure that $f(x_0)$ is really less than $f(x_2)-f(x_1)$. Or would I need to do something like $f(x_0)-f(x_1)leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$ and go from there. Any help would be appreciated as I'm somewhat unsure on this problem!
real-analysis functions continuity
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If $f$ is monotone increasing on an interval and has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ in the interior of the domain show that the jump is bounded above by $f(x_1) - f(x_2)$ for any two points $x_1$, $x_2$ of the domain surrounding $x_0$, $x_1 < x_0 < x_2$.
So I've I tried solving this here is what I have:
Let $f$ be monotone increasing on an interval $A$ that has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ on the interior of the domain where $x_0 in A$. Let there be any $x_1, x_2 in A$ where $x_1< x_0 < x_2$. Then by definition of monotone increasing $f(x_1) leq f (x_2)$.
From here I want to say that $f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) rightarrow f(x_1) - f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) - f(x_1)$ and that $f(x_0) leq f(x_2) -f(x_2)$. But I'm not sure if I'm going in the right direction since I can't say for sure that $f(x_0)$ is really less than $f(x_2)-f(x_1)$. Or would I need to do something like $f(x_0)-f(x_1)leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$ and go from there. Any help would be appreciated as I'm somewhat unsure on this problem!
real-analysis functions continuity
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If $f$ is monotone increasing on an interval and has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ in the interior of the domain show that the jump is bounded above by $f(x_1) - f(x_2)$ for any two points $x_1$, $x_2$ of the domain surrounding $x_0$, $x_1 < x_0 < x_2$.
So I've I tried solving this here is what I have:
Let $f$ be monotone increasing on an interval $A$ that has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ on the interior of the domain where $x_0 in A$. Let there be any $x_1, x_2 in A$ where $x_1< x_0 < x_2$. Then by definition of monotone increasing $f(x_1) leq f (x_2)$.
From here I want to say that $f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) rightarrow f(x_1) - f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) - f(x_1)$ and that $f(x_0) leq f(x_2) -f(x_2)$. But I'm not sure if I'm going in the right direction since I can't say for sure that $f(x_0)$ is really less than $f(x_2)-f(x_1)$. Or would I need to do something like $f(x_0)-f(x_1)leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$ and go from there. Any help would be appreciated as I'm somewhat unsure on this problem!
real-analysis functions continuity
If $f$ is monotone increasing on an interval and has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ in the interior of the domain show that the jump is bounded above by $f(x_1) - f(x_2)$ for any two points $x_1$, $x_2$ of the domain surrounding $x_0$, $x_1 < x_0 < x_2$.
So I've I tried solving this here is what I have:
Let $f$ be monotone increasing on an interval $A$ that has a jump discontinuity at $x_0$ on the interior of the domain where $x_0 in A$. Let there be any $x_1, x_2 in A$ where $x_1< x_0 < x_2$. Then by definition of monotone increasing $f(x_1) leq f (x_2)$.
From here I want to say that $f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) rightarrow f(x_1) - f(x_1) leq f(x_0) leq f(x_2) - f(x_1)$ and that $f(x_0) leq f(x_2) -f(x_2)$. But I'm not sure if I'm going in the right direction since I can't say for sure that $f(x_0)$ is really less than $f(x_2)-f(x_1)$. Or would I need to do something like $f(x_0)-f(x_1)leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$ and go from there. Any help would be appreciated as I'm somewhat unsure on this problem!
real-analysis functions continuity
real-analysis functions continuity
edited Nov 19 at 6:24
Taroccoesbrocco
4,92761838
4,92761838
asked Nov 19 at 5:05
Nolando
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$x_1$ and $x_2$ are supposed to be given points. You cannot let $x_2 to x_1$. If $x_0<t<x_2$ then $f(t) leq f(x_2)$. Let $t to x_0$ to get $f(x_0+) leq f(x_2)$. [ $f(x_0+)$ is the right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$]. Similarly prove that $f(x_0-) geq f(x_1)$. From these two se get $f(x_0+)-f(x_0-) leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$.
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
First of all you have to define " the jump at $x_0$ "
It means $$lim _{xto x_0+}f(x) -lim _{xto x_0-}f(x) $$
The above limits exist due to the monotonicity of $f(x)$
The rest is not too complicated to prove and you can do it.
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$x_1$ and $x_2$ are supposed to be given points. You cannot let $x_2 to x_1$. If $x_0<t<x_2$ then $f(t) leq f(x_2)$. Let $t to x_0$ to get $f(x_0+) leq f(x_2)$. [ $f(x_0+)$ is the right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$]. Similarly prove that $f(x_0-) geq f(x_1)$. From these two se get $f(x_0+)-f(x_0-) leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$.
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$x_1$ and $x_2$ are supposed to be given points. You cannot let $x_2 to x_1$. If $x_0<t<x_2$ then $f(t) leq f(x_2)$. Let $t to x_0$ to get $f(x_0+) leq f(x_2)$. [ $f(x_0+)$ is the right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$]. Similarly prove that $f(x_0-) geq f(x_1)$. From these two se get $f(x_0+)-f(x_0-) leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$.
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
$x_1$ and $x_2$ are supposed to be given points. You cannot let $x_2 to x_1$. If $x_0<t<x_2$ then $f(t) leq f(x_2)$. Let $t to x_0$ to get $f(x_0+) leq f(x_2)$. [ $f(x_0+)$ is the right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$]. Similarly prove that $f(x_0-) geq f(x_1)$. From these two se get $f(x_0+)-f(x_0-) leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$.
$x_1$ and $x_2$ are supposed to be given points. You cannot let $x_2 to x_1$. If $x_0<t<x_2$ then $f(t) leq f(x_2)$. Let $t to x_0$ to get $f(x_0+) leq f(x_2)$. [ $f(x_0+)$ is the right hand limit of $f$ at $x_0$]. Similarly prove that $f(x_0-) geq f(x_1)$. From these two se get $f(x_0+)-f(x_0-) leq f(x_2)-f(x_1)$.
answered Nov 19 at 5:15
Kavi Rama Murthy
45.9k31854
45.9k31854
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
add a comment |
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
Thanks! That is very helpful
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
First of all you have to define " the jump at $x_0$ "
It means $$lim _{xto x_0+}f(x) -lim _{xto x_0-}f(x) $$
The above limits exist due to the monotonicity of $f(x)$
The rest is not too complicated to prove and you can do it.
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
First of all you have to define " the jump at $x_0$ "
It means $$lim _{xto x_0+}f(x) -lim _{xto x_0-}f(x) $$
The above limits exist due to the monotonicity of $f(x)$
The rest is not too complicated to prove and you can do it.
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
First of all you have to define " the jump at $x_0$ "
It means $$lim _{xto x_0+}f(x) -lim _{xto x_0-}f(x) $$
The above limits exist due to the monotonicity of $f(x)$
The rest is not too complicated to prove and you can do it.
First of all you have to define " the jump at $x_0$ "
It means $$lim _{xto x_0+}f(x) -lim _{xto x_0-}f(x) $$
The above limits exist due to the monotonicity of $f(x)$
The rest is not too complicated to prove and you can do it.
edited Nov 19 at 5:44
answered Nov 19 at 5:18
Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
40.3k41958
40.3k41958
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
add a comment |
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
Thanks you! That definitely helps
– Nolando
Nov 19 at 5:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004546%2fif-f-is-monotone-increasing-on-an-interval-and-has-a-jump-discontinuity-at-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown