Online sources without “last edited” date field
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:
- Date of original publication
- Date of last edit
- date of visiting the website
Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?
date
- ???
urldate
In the end, an entry should look something like
Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)
where the dates correspond to the above definitions as
- 1996
- 2008-04-36
- 2018-01-29
How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note
field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".
EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.
biblatex format for online sources
What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?
Biblatex: Custom date fields
I shall investigate them further.
biblatex date
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:
- Date of original publication
- Date of last edit
- date of visiting the website
Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?
date
- ???
urldate
In the end, an entry should look something like
Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)
where the dates correspond to the above definitions as
- 1996
- 2008-04-36
- 2018-01-29
How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note
field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".
EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.
biblatex format for online sources
What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?
Biblatex: Custom date fields
I shall investigate them further.
biblatex date
Are you usingbiblatex
as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with abiblatex
-specific solution?
– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35
@moewe Yes, I am usingbiblatex
. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38
Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50
@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00
1
@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:
- Date of original publication
- Date of last edit
- date of visiting the website
Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?
date
- ???
urldate
In the end, an entry should look something like
Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)
where the dates correspond to the above definitions as
- 1996
- 2008-04-36
- 2018-01-29
How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note
field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".
EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.
biblatex format for online sources
What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?
Biblatex: Custom date fields
I shall investigate them further.
biblatex date
My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:
- Date of original publication
- Date of last edit
- date of visiting the website
Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?
date
- ???
urldate
In the end, an entry should look something like
Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)
where the dates correspond to the above definitions as
- 1996
- 2008-04-36
- 2018-01-29
How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note
field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".
EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.
biblatex format for online sources
What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?
Biblatex: Custom date fields
I shall investigate them further.
biblatex date
biblatex date
edited Jan 30 at 3:35
Peter Mortensen
53336
53336
asked Jan 29 at 10:31
thymaro
766423
766423
Are you usingbiblatex
as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with abiblatex
-specific solution?
– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35
@moewe Yes, I am usingbiblatex
. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38
Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50
@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00
1
@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49
|
show 1 more comment
Are you usingbiblatex
as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with abiblatex
-specific solution?
– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35
@moewe Yes, I am usingbiblatex
. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38
Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50
@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00
1
@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49
Are you using
biblatex
as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex
-specific solution?– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35
Are you using
biblatex
as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex
-specific solution?– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35
@moewe Yes, I am using
biblatex
. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38
@moewe Yes, I am using
biblatex
. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38
Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50
Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50
@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00
@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00
1
1
@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49
@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx
file to make the new lasteditdate
known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate
to the URL/URL date macro.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@online{elk,
author = {Anne Elk},
title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
urldate = {2018-01-29},
}
end{filecontents*}
begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
lasteditdate,
}
DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
lasteditday,
lasteditendday,
lasteditendhour,
lasteditendminute,
lasteditendmonth,
lasteditendsecond,
lasteditendtimezone,
lasteditendyear,
lastedithour,
lasteditminute,
lasteditmonth,
lasteditsecond,
lastedittimezone,
lastedityear,
}
end{filecontents*}
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
usepackage{hyperref}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
lastchanged = {last changed},
}
DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}
renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
usebibmacro{url}%
iffieldundef{lastedityear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
printlasteditdate}%
iffieldundef{urlyear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
usebibmacro{urldate}}}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
I getWARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same forlasteditmonth
andlastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else thanyyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
1
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an olderbiblatex
version.
– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx
file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel
attribute given to biblatex
. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf
command:
! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.
Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.
Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f412663%2fonline-sources-without-last-edited-date-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx
file to make the new lasteditdate
known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate
to the URL/URL date macro.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@online{elk,
author = {Anne Elk},
title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
urldate = {2018-01-29},
}
end{filecontents*}
begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
lasteditdate,
}
DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
lasteditday,
lasteditendday,
lasteditendhour,
lasteditendminute,
lasteditendmonth,
lasteditendsecond,
lasteditendtimezone,
lasteditendyear,
lastedithour,
lasteditminute,
lasteditmonth,
lasteditsecond,
lastedittimezone,
lastedityear,
}
end{filecontents*}
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
usepackage{hyperref}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
lastchanged = {last changed},
}
DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}
renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
usebibmacro{url}%
iffieldundef{lastedityear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
printlasteditdate}%
iffieldundef{urlyear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
usebibmacro{urldate}}}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
I getWARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same forlasteditmonth
andlastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else thanyyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
1
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an olderbiblatex
version.
– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx
file to make the new lasteditdate
known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate
to the URL/URL date macro.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@online{elk,
author = {Anne Elk},
title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
urldate = {2018-01-29},
}
end{filecontents*}
begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
lasteditdate,
}
DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
lasteditday,
lasteditendday,
lasteditendhour,
lasteditendminute,
lasteditendmonth,
lasteditendsecond,
lasteditendtimezone,
lasteditendyear,
lastedithour,
lasteditminute,
lasteditmonth,
lasteditsecond,
lastedittimezone,
lastedityear,
}
end{filecontents*}
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
usepackage{hyperref}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
lastchanged = {last changed},
}
DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}
renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
usebibmacro{url}%
iffieldundef{lastedityear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
printlasteditdate}%
iffieldundef{urlyear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
usebibmacro{urldate}}}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
I getWARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same forlasteditmonth
andlastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else thanyyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
1
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an olderbiblatex
version.
– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx
file to make the new lasteditdate
known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate
to the URL/URL date macro.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@online{elk,
author = {Anne Elk},
title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
urldate = {2018-01-29},
}
end{filecontents*}
begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
lasteditdate,
}
DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
lasteditday,
lasteditendday,
lasteditendhour,
lasteditendminute,
lasteditendmonth,
lasteditendsecond,
lasteditendtimezone,
lasteditendyear,
lastedithour,
lasteditminute,
lasteditmonth,
lasteditsecond,
lastedittimezone,
lastedityear,
}
end{filecontents*}
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
usepackage{hyperref}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
lastchanged = {last changed},
}
DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}
renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
usebibmacro{url}%
iffieldundef{lastedityear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
printlasteditdate}%
iffieldundef{urlyear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
usebibmacro{urldate}}}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx
file to make the new lasteditdate
known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate
to the URL/URL date macro.
RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@online{elk,
author = {Anne Elk},
title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
urldate = {2018-01-29},
}
end{filecontents*}
begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
lasteditdate,
}
DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
lasteditday,
lasteditendday,
lasteditendhour,
lasteditendminute,
lasteditendmonth,
lasteditendsecond,
lasteditendtimezone,
lasteditendyear,
lastedithour,
lasteditminute,
lasteditmonth,
lasteditsecond,
lastedittimezone,
lastedityear,
}
end{filecontents*}
documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
usepackage{hyperref}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}
NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
lastchanged = {last changed},
}
DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}
renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
usebibmacro{url}%
iffieldundef{lastedityear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
printlasteditdate}%
iffieldundef{urlyear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
usebibmacro{urldate}}}
begin{document}
nocite{*}
printbibliography
end{document}
edited Jan 30 at 8:25
answered Jan 29 at 10:52
moewe
84.7k9108327
84.7k9108327
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
I getWARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same forlasteditmonth
andlastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else thanyyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
1
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an olderbiblatex
version.
– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
add a comment |
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
I getWARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same forlasteditmonth
andlastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else thanyyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
1
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an olderbiblatex
version.
– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 11:18
I get
WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth
and lastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
I get
WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online'
from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth
and lastedityear
. I use biber with--validate_datamodel
and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd
. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?– thymaro
Jan 29 at 23:26
1
1
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older
biblatex
version.– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
@thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older
biblatex
version.– moewe
Jan 30 at 8:26
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
– thymaro
Jan 31 at 21:09
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx
file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel
attribute given to biblatex
. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf
command:
! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.
Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.
Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx
file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel
attribute given to biblatex
. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf
command:
! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.
Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.
Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx
file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel
attribute given to biblatex
. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf
command:
! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.
Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.
Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)
I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx
file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel
attribute given to biblatex
. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf
command:
! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.
Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.
Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)
answered Dec 6 at 14:29
MagicLegend
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f412663%2fonline-sources-without-last-edited-date-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you using
biblatex
as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with abiblatex
-specific solution?– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35
@moewe Yes, I am using
biblatex
. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38
Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50
@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00
1
@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49