If the square of every element of a ring is in the center, must the ring be commutative?












8














Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?



(I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)






abstract-algebra ring-theory







share|cite|improve this question





























    8














    Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?



    (I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)






    abstract-algebra ring-theory







    share|cite|improve this question



























      8












      8








      8


      3





      Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?



      (I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)






      abstract-algebra ring-theory







      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that the square of any element belongs to the center of $R$. Is it necessary true that $R$ is commutative?



      (I can show that for any $x,yin R$, $2(xy-yx) =0 $ but I cannot prove commutativity of $R$.)






      abstract-algebra ring-theory




      abstract-algebra ring-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 8 at 7:36









      Eric Wofsey

      179k12204331




      179k12204331










      asked Dec 8 at 7:15









      Sara.T

      1449




      1449






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbb{F}_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has ${1,x,y,xy,yx}$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.



          I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbb{F}_2$) we have
          $$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:34










          • Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:36










          • Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 7:45








          • 1




            @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
            – Eric Wofsey
            Dec 8 at 8:11












          • @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 8:24











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030793%2fif-the-square-of-every-element-of-a-ring-is-in-the-center-must-the-ring-be-comm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbb{F}_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has ${1,x,y,xy,yx}$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.



          I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbb{F}_2$) we have
          $$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:34










          • Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:36










          • Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 7:45








          • 1




            @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
            – Eric Wofsey
            Dec 8 at 8:11












          • @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 8:24
















          7














          Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbb{F}_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has ${1,x,y,xy,yx}$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.



          I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbb{F}_2$) we have
          $$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:34










          • Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:36










          • Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 7:45








          • 1




            @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
            – Eric Wofsey
            Dec 8 at 8:11












          • @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 8:24














          7












          7








          7






          Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbb{F}_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has ${1,x,y,xy,yx}$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.



          I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbb{F}_2$) we have
          $$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Here's a counterexample. Consider the $mathbb{F}_2$-algebra $R$ generated by two elements $x,y$ modulo relations that $x^2=y^2=0$ and every word of length $3$ formed by $x$ and $y$ is $0$. Explicitly, $R$ has ${1,x,y,xy,yx}$ as a basis and any product of basis elements that would give a word not in this set is $0$. Since $xyneq yx$, $R$ is not commutative.



          I now claim that the square of every element of $R$ is central. Indeed, for an element $r=a+bx+cy+dxy+eyxin R$ ($a,b,c,d,einmathbb{F}_2$) we have
          $$r^2 = a^2 + bcxy + bcyx.$$ To show that such an element is central, it suffices to show that $xy+yx$ is central. But this is trivial, since $xy+yx$ annihilates both $x$ and $y$ on both sides.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 8 at 7:35

























          answered Dec 8 at 7:29









          Eric Wofsey

          179k12204331




          179k12204331












          • Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:34










          • Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:36










          • Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 7:45








          • 1




            @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
            – Eric Wofsey
            Dec 8 at 8:11












          • @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 8:24


















          • Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:34










          • Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
            – Ovi
            Dec 8 at 7:36










          • Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 7:45








          • 1




            @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
            – Eric Wofsey
            Dec 8 at 8:11












          • @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
            – Sara.T
            Dec 8 at 8:24
















          Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
          – Ovi
          Dec 8 at 7:34




          Since you are giving a specific example, I'm assuming that the answer is no, it doesn't have to be commutative?
          – Ovi
          Dec 8 at 7:34












          Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
          – Ovi
          Dec 8 at 7:36




          Ok just got that it's not commutative from your edit, was confused on that before lol since I thought it was commutative.
          – Ovi
          Dec 8 at 7:36












          Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
          – Sara.T
          Dec 8 at 7:45






          Thanks, Out of curiosity, is there a matrix representation for your algebra ? I mean an explicit matrix ring example.
          – Sara.T
          Dec 8 at 7:45






          1




          1




          @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
          – Eric Wofsey
          Dec 8 at 8:11






          @Sara.T: Well, you can just let it act on itself by left multiplication to get a representation by $5times 5$ matrices. If you further mod out $yx$ there is a nice representation by $3times 3$ matrices though, with $x$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$ and $y$ being $begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0end{pmatrix}$. They generate the ring of upper-triangular $3times 3$ matrices with constant diagonal.
          – Eric Wofsey
          Dec 8 at 8:11














          @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
          – Sara.T
          Dec 8 at 8:24




          @EricWofsey thanks, I like that.
          – Sara.T
          Dec 8 at 8:24


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030793%2fif-the-square-of-every-element-of-a-ring-is-in-the-center-must-the-ring-be-comm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Image
          3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
          Read more

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

          Image
          up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
          Read more

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Image
          0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
          Read more