How to display soft deleted users when searching through searchkick?
I am using searchkick to perform search for users. However it does not display the soft-deleted user's record. I have tried using unscoped too, but that does not work either.
User.unscoped.all.search search_param, fields: [:id, :email, :first_name, :last_name], match: :word_middle
Is there a way I could display soft-deleted users record when using searchkick?
ruby-on-rails ruby elasticsearch ruby-on-rails-5 searchkick
add a comment |
I am using searchkick to perform search for users. However it does not display the soft-deleted user's record. I have tried using unscoped too, but that does not work either.
User.unscoped.all.search search_param, fields: [:id, :email, :first_name, :last_name], match: :word_middle
Is there a way I could display soft-deleted users record when using searchkick?
ruby-on-rails ruby elasticsearch ruby-on-rails-5 searchkick
Why and how are soft-deleted users excluded from the query in the first place? Did you implement this feature yourself or do you use a gem (which one)?
– spickermann
Nov 20 '18 at 9:50
It's the spree_user model. When querying through, it omits the user whose deleted_at field is not nil. However unscoping it shows the result for all on normal active record query but does not work with searchkick.
– Bibek Khadka
Nov 20 '18 at 9:53
Is it possible that the problem is that the soft-deleted records are not in the elastic search index at all? Perhaps there's a hook somewhere removing them when they're soft-deleted?
– Emil Kampp
Nov 20 '18 at 13:15
add a comment |
I am using searchkick to perform search for users. However it does not display the soft-deleted user's record. I have tried using unscoped too, but that does not work either.
User.unscoped.all.search search_param, fields: [:id, :email, :first_name, :last_name], match: :word_middle
Is there a way I could display soft-deleted users record when using searchkick?
ruby-on-rails ruby elasticsearch ruby-on-rails-5 searchkick
I am using searchkick to perform search for users. However it does not display the soft-deleted user's record. I have tried using unscoped too, but that does not work either.
User.unscoped.all.search search_param, fields: [:id, :email, :first_name, :last_name], match: :word_middle
Is there a way I could display soft-deleted users record when using searchkick?
ruby-on-rails ruby elasticsearch ruby-on-rails-5 searchkick
ruby-on-rails ruby elasticsearch ruby-on-rails-5 searchkick
asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:35
Bibek KhadkaBibek Khadka
578
578
Why and how are soft-deleted users excluded from the query in the first place? Did you implement this feature yourself or do you use a gem (which one)?
– spickermann
Nov 20 '18 at 9:50
It's the spree_user model. When querying through, it omits the user whose deleted_at field is not nil. However unscoping it shows the result for all on normal active record query but does not work with searchkick.
– Bibek Khadka
Nov 20 '18 at 9:53
Is it possible that the problem is that the soft-deleted records are not in the elastic search index at all? Perhaps there's a hook somewhere removing them when they're soft-deleted?
– Emil Kampp
Nov 20 '18 at 13:15
add a comment |
Why and how are soft-deleted users excluded from the query in the first place? Did you implement this feature yourself or do you use a gem (which one)?
– spickermann
Nov 20 '18 at 9:50
It's the spree_user model. When querying through, it omits the user whose deleted_at field is not nil. However unscoping it shows the result for all on normal active record query but does not work with searchkick.
– Bibek Khadka
Nov 20 '18 at 9:53
Is it possible that the problem is that the soft-deleted records are not in the elastic search index at all? Perhaps there's a hook somewhere removing them when they're soft-deleted?
– Emil Kampp
Nov 20 '18 at 13:15
Why and how are soft-deleted users excluded from the query in the first place? Did you implement this feature yourself or do you use a gem (which one)?
– spickermann
Nov 20 '18 at 9:50
Why and how are soft-deleted users excluded from the query in the first place? Did you implement this feature yourself or do you use a gem (which one)?
– spickermann
Nov 20 '18 at 9:50
It's the spree_user model. When querying through, it omits the user whose deleted_at field is not nil. However unscoping it shows the result for all on normal active record query but does not work with searchkick.
– Bibek Khadka
Nov 20 '18 at 9:53
It's the spree_user model. When querying through, it omits the user whose deleted_at field is not nil. However unscoping it shows the result for all on normal active record query but does not work with searchkick.
– Bibek Khadka
Nov 20 '18 at 9:53
Is it possible that the problem is that the soft-deleted records are not in the elastic search index at all? Perhaps there's a hook somewhere removing them when they're soft-deleted?
– Emil Kampp
Nov 20 '18 at 13:15
Is it possible that the problem is that the soft-deleted records are not in the elastic search index at all? Perhaps there's a hook somewhere removing them when they're soft-deleted?
– Emil Kampp
Nov 20 '18 at 13:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
got the same experience on mongoid_paranoia gem. when you call the model#destroy method, it removes the record from the elasticsearch as well. so one solution is to reindex the model using "after_destroy" callback.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53390010%2fhow-to-display-soft-deleted-users-when-searching-through-searchkick%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
got the same experience on mongoid_paranoia gem. when you call the model#destroy method, it removes the record from the elasticsearch as well. so one solution is to reindex the model using "after_destroy" callback.
add a comment |
got the same experience on mongoid_paranoia gem. when you call the model#destroy method, it removes the record from the elasticsearch as well. so one solution is to reindex the model using "after_destroy" callback.
add a comment |
got the same experience on mongoid_paranoia gem. when you call the model#destroy method, it removes the record from the elasticsearch as well. so one solution is to reindex the model using "after_destroy" callback.
got the same experience on mongoid_paranoia gem. when you call the model#destroy method, it removes the record from the elasticsearch as well. so one solution is to reindex the model using "after_destroy" callback.
answered Jan 16 at 5:05
OshanzOshanz
603819
603819
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53390010%2fhow-to-display-soft-deleted-users-when-searching-through-searchkick%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why and how are soft-deleted users excluded from the query in the first place? Did you implement this feature yourself or do you use a gem (which one)?
– spickermann
Nov 20 '18 at 9:50
It's the spree_user model. When querying through, it omits the user whose deleted_at field is not nil. However unscoping it shows the result for all on normal active record query but does not work with searchkick.
– Bibek Khadka
Nov 20 '18 at 9:53
Is it possible that the problem is that the soft-deleted records are not in the elastic search index at all? Perhaps there's a hook somewhere removing them when they're soft-deleted?
– Emil Kampp
Nov 20 '18 at 13:15