Proving N-derivative test
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked Nov 19 at 3:55
HD5450
63
63
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17
add a comment |
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
answered Nov 19 at 4:12
Red shoes
4,676621
4,676621
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
add a comment |
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17