Highest bite force of a wolf?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Some sites say wolves can bite around 400 psi. But this site claims that when facing a peril they can deliver upto 1200 ?https://plexidors.com/myths-around-dog-bite-force/(skip to the 'How does that measure compared to cousins in the wild?' portion to save time)
-That's a huge range, and could in theory put them on par with big cats.Is what the site says true?
-I looked online extensively in the internet but I only came across a reddit post where they discuss this and it wasn't conclusive.Why is there a maximum bite force of other animals like crocodiles,gorillas,hyenas etc but not for wolves?
bio-mechanics
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Some sites say wolves can bite around 400 psi. But this site claims that when facing a peril they can deliver upto 1200 ?https://plexidors.com/myths-around-dog-bite-force/(skip to the 'How does that measure compared to cousins in the wild?' portion to save time)
-That's a huge range, and could in theory put them on par with big cats.Is what the site says true?
-I looked online extensively in the internet but I only came across a reddit post where they discuss this and it wasn't conclusive.Why is there a maximum bite force of other animals like crocodiles,gorillas,hyenas etc but not for wolves?
bio-mechanics
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
@Specter writes about other units: PSI (pounds per square inch), but I don't know how it counts to N (newton).
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 12:04
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Some sites say wolves can bite around 400 psi. But this site claims that when facing a peril they can deliver upto 1200 ?https://plexidors.com/myths-around-dog-bite-force/(skip to the 'How does that measure compared to cousins in the wild?' portion to save time)
-That's a huge range, and could in theory put them on par with big cats.Is what the site says true?
-I looked online extensively in the internet but I only came across a reddit post where they discuss this and it wasn't conclusive.Why is there a maximum bite force of other animals like crocodiles,gorillas,hyenas etc but not for wolves?
bio-mechanics
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
Some sites say wolves can bite around 400 psi. But this site claims that when facing a peril they can deliver upto 1200 ?https://plexidors.com/myths-around-dog-bite-force/(skip to the 'How does that measure compared to cousins in the wild?' portion to save time)
-That's a huge range, and could in theory put them on par with big cats.Is what the site says true?
-I looked online extensively in the internet but I only came across a reddit post where they discuss this and it wasn't conclusive.Why is there a maximum bite force of other animals like crocodiles,gorillas,hyenas etc but not for wolves?
bio-mechanics
bio-mechanics
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
asked Nov 26 at 8:53
Specter
161
161
@Specter writes about other units: PSI (pounds per square inch), but I don't know how it counts to N (newton).
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 12:04
add a comment |
@Specter writes about other units: PSI (pounds per square inch), but I don't know how it counts to N (newton).
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 12:04
@Specter writes about other units: PSI (pounds per square inch), but I don't know how it counts to N (newton).
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 12:04
@Specter writes about other units: PSI (pounds per square inch), but I don't know how it counts to N (newton).
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 12:04
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
The range from mean to maximum of wolve's bite force is huge.
Is it really? According to this Wikipedia page, (Scully, C. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Applied Dental Sciences. p. 151) claims that human masticatory forces range from 70 N to 700 N. Also, (Kim et al., 2018) claims that domestic dogs have a bite force of (147-3417) N, so I don't think it's too implausible for wolves to have the value of (774-2255) N of wolves that @Olga_Swider claims. We see also, on Table 4 on p. 550 of (Eng et al., 2013), the estimated maximum bite force (MBF) spread over the $M^2$ area of the jaw. Eng claims that Gorillas and Chimpanzees have MBFs of 3200 N and 1800 N respectively. I think there's quite a large degree of control of masticatory muscles, which wouldn't make it too surprising that you can have a large range of forces.
This range of wolves' bite forces could put them on par with big cats.
According to p. 621 of (Wroe et al., 2005), lions have a bite force of around 1768 N, while tigers have a bite force of 1525 N. So, it seems that wolves have a significantly smaller mean bite force than big cats. But bear in mind that while dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size, lions jaws are much larger so their bite force is spread over a much greater area. So exercise caution when comparing them. Similarly, note that PSI is a unit of pressure (force over area), while newtons are a unit of force.
Why isn't there a maximum bite force for wolves?
Says who? Of course there's a maximum. Wolves can't make arbitrarily large forces with their mouths, that's physically impossible.
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In this article (Bite forces and evolutionary adaptation to feeding ecology in Carnivores) they say, that bite forces of wolf (Canis lupus) is 774 N. Literature (Maximum estimated bite force, skull morphology, and primary prey size in North American Carnivores) gives that: "the wolf had a mean maximum
estimated bite force of 2255 N".
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
The range from mean to maximum of wolve's bite force is huge.
Is it really? According to this Wikipedia page, (Scully, C. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Applied Dental Sciences. p. 151) claims that human masticatory forces range from 70 N to 700 N. Also, (Kim et al., 2018) claims that domestic dogs have a bite force of (147-3417) N, so I don't think it's too implausible for wolves to have the value of (774-2255) N of wolves that @Olga_Swider claims. We see also, on Table 4 on p. 550 of (Eng et al., 2013), the estimated maximum bite force (MBF) spread over the $M^2$ area of the jaw. Eng claims that Gorillas and Chimpanzees have MBFs of 3200 N and 1800 N respectively. I think there's quite a large degree of control of masticatory muscles, which wouldn't make it too surprising that you can have a large range of forces.
This range of wolves' bite forces could put them on par with big cats.
According to p. 621 of (Wroe et al., 2005), lions have a bite force of around 1768 N, while tigers have a bite force of 1525 N. So, it seems that wolves have a significantly smaller mean bite force than big cats. But bear in mind that while dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size, lions jaws are much larger so their bite force is spread over a much greater area. So exercise caution when comparing them. Similarly, note that PSI is a unit of pressure (force over area), while newtons are a unit of force.
Why isn't there a maximum bite force for wolves?
Says who? Of course there's a maximum. Wolves can't make arbitrarily large forces with their mouths, that's physically impossible.
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
The range from mean to maximum of wolve's bite force is huge.
Is it really? According to this Wikipedia page, (Scully, C. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Applied Dental Sciences. p. 151) claims that human masticatory forces range from 70 N to 700 N. Also, (Kim et al., 2018) claims that domestic dogs have a bite force of (147-3417) N, so I don't think it's too implausible for wolves to have the value of (774-2255) N of wolves that @Olga_Swider claims. We see also, on Table 4 on p. 550 of (Eng et al., 2013), the estimated maximum bite force (MBF) spread over the $M^2$ area of the jaw. Eng claims that Gorillas and Chimpanzees have MBFs of 3200 N and 1800 N respectively. I think there's quite a large degree of control of masticatory muscles, which wouldn't make it too surprising that you can have a large range of forces.
This range of wolves' bite forces could put them on par with big cats.
According to p. 621 of (Wroe et al., 2005), lions have a bite force of around 1768 N, while tigers have a bite force of 1525 N. So, it seems that wolves have a significantly smaller mean bite force than big cats. But bear in mind that while dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size, lions jaws are much larger so their bite force is spread over a much greater area. So exercise caution when comparing them. Similarly, note that PSI is a unit of pressure (force over area), while newtons are a unit of force.
Why isn't there a maximum bite force for wolves?
Says who? Of course there's a maximum. Wolves can't make arbitrarily large forces with their mouths, that's physically impossible.
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
The range from mean to maximum of wolve's bite force is huge.
Is it really? According to this Wikipedia page, (Scully, C. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Applied Dental Sciences. p. 151) claims that human masticatory forces range from 70 N to 700 N. Also, (Kim et al., 2018) claims that domestic dogs have a bite force of (147-3417) N, so I don't think it's too implausible for wolves to have the value of (774-2255) N of wolves that @Olga_Swider claims. We see also, on Table 4 on p. 550 of (Eng et al., 2013), the estimated maximum bite force (MBF) spread over the $M^2$ area of the jaw. Eng claims that Gorillas and Chimpanzees have MBFs of 3200 N and 1800 N respectively. I think there's quite a large degree of control of masticatory muscles, which wouldn't make it too surprising that you can have a large range of forces.
This range of wolves' bite forces could put them on par with big cats.
According to p. 621 of (Wroe et al., 2005), lions have a bite force of around 1768 N, while tigers have a bite force of 1525 N. So, it seems that wolves have a significantly smaller mean bite force than big cats. But bear in mind that while dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size, lions jaws are much larger so their bite force is spread over a much greater area. So exercise caution when comparing them. Similarly, note that PSI is a unit of pressure (force over area), while newtons are a unit of force.
Why isn't there a maximum bite force for wolves?
Says who? Of course there's a maximum. Wolves can't make arbitrarily large forces with their mouths, that's physically impossible.
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
The range from mean to maximum of wolve's bite force is huge.
Is it really? According to this Wikipedia page, (Scully, C. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Applied Dental Sciences. p. 151) claims that human masticatory forces range from 70 N to 700 N. Also, (Kim et al., 2018) claims that domestic dogs have a bite force of (147-3417) N, so I don't think it's too implausible for wolves to have the value of (774-2255) N of wolves that @Olga_Swider claims. We see also, on Table 4 on p. 550 of (Eng et al., 2013), the estimated maximum bite force (MBF) spread over the $M^2$ area of the jaw. Eng claims that Gorillas and Chimpanzees have MBFs of 3200 N and 1800 N respectively. I think there's quite a large degree of control of masticatory muscles, which wouldn't make it too surprising that you can have a large range of forces.
This range of wolves' bite forces could put them on par with big cats.
According to p. 621 of (Wroe et al., 2005), lions have a bite force of around 1768 N, while tigers have a bite force of 1525 N. So, it seems that wolves have a significantly smaller mean bite force than big cats. But bear in mind that while dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size, lions jaws are much larger so their bite force is spread over a much greater area. So exercise caution when comparing them. Similarly, note that PSI is a unit of pressure (force over area), while newtons are a unit of force.
Why isn't there a maximum bite force for wolves?
Says who? Of course there's a maximum. Wolves can't make arbitrarily large forces with their mouths, that's physically impossible.
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
edited Nov 26 at 16:14
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
answered Nov 26 at 12:16
Jam
1,113313
1,113313
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
add a comment |
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
I did not carry out these tests. I gave the data after literature. In addition, the values given refer to the mean. In another chart, in the second item I cited, it can be read that the "maximum estimated bite force" does not exceed 3000 N.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:16
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
By the way: I do not think that we can measure the maximum bite strength. You will not get the animal to do it. Only estimation remains.
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 13:25
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
@Olga I never said you recorded it, I said you claimed it. Also, it's redundant whether the second paper is claiming that "the value is 2255 N" or "the value is estimated as 2255 N"; it's the same effect. There's tonnes of stuff in science that you can't measure directly but have to estimate.
– Jam
Nov 26 at 14:20
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
Re "dogs and wolves might have a fairly similar jaw size", that depends on the breed of dog. A malamute or husky might have a similar jaw size to a wolf, but a Pekinese or an Irish Wolfhound? Which probably accounts for the wide variation in dog bite force cited.
– jamesqf
Nov 26 at 18:48
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
@Jam - You wrote that you doubt the presented results. I just made it clea,r that it was difficult for me to discuss it, because I did not estimate or measure it. Have a nice day...
– Olga Świder
Nov 27 at 8:42
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In this article (Bite forces and evolutionary adaptation to feeding ecology in Carnivores) they say, that bite forces of wolf (Canis lupus) is 774 N. Literature (Maximum estimated bite force, skull morphology, and primary prey size in North American Carnivores) gives that: "the wolf had a mean maximum
estimated bite force of 2255 N".
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In this article (Bite forces and evolutionary adaptation to feeding ecology in Carnivores) they say, that bite forces of wolf (Canis lupus) is 774 N. Literature (Maximum estimated bite force, skull morphology, and primary prey size in North American Carnivores) gives that: "the wolf had a mean maximum
estimated bite force of 2255 N".
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
In this article (Bite forces and evolutionary adaptation to feeding ecology in Carnivores) they say, that bite forces of wolf (Canis lupus) is 774 N. Literature (Maximum estimated bite force, skull morphology, and primary prey size in North American Carnivores) gives that: "the wolf had a mean maximum
estimated bite force of 2255 N".
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
In this article (Bite forces and evolutionary adaptation to feeding ecology in Carnivores) they say, that bite forces of wolf (Canis lupus) is 774 N. Literature (Maximum estimated bite force, skull morphology, and primary prey size in North American Carnivores) gives that: "the wolf had a mean maximum
estimated bite force of 2255 N".
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
edited Nov 26 at 9:31
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
answered Nov 26 at 9:07
Olga Świder
887
887
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Biology Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79304%2fhighest-bite-force-of-a-wolf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@Specter writes about other units: PSI (pounds per square inch), but I don't know how it counts to N (newton).
– Olga Świder
Nov 26 at 12:04