Irreducible primary ideal in Noetherian local ring (Sharp, Exercise 8.29)
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(R,M)$ be a Noetherian local ring, and let $Q$ be an $M$-primary ideal of $R$. Note that the $R$-module $(Q:M)/Q$ is annihilated by $M$ so it can be regarded as an $R/M$-vector space. Show that the following statement are equivalent
i) $Q$ is irreducible
ii) $dim_{R/M} (Q:M)/Q=1$
iii) The set of all ideals of $R$ which strictly contain $Q$ admits $(Q:M)$ as smallest element.
I can see that $i) Rightarrow ii)$ by the fact that there exists $n in mathbb{N}$ such that $M^n subset Q$ but i can't indicate other cases. Can anyone help me?
commutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(R,M)$ be a Noetherian local ring, and let $Q$ be an $M$-primary ideal of $R$. Note that the $R$-module $(Q:M)/Q$ is annihilated by $M$ so it can be regarded as an $R/M$-vector space. Show that the following statement are equivalent
i) $Q$ is irreducible
ii) $dim_{R/M} (Q:M)/Q=1$
iii) The set of all ideals of $R$ which strictly contain $Q$ admits $(Q:M)$ as smallest element.
I can see that $i) Rightarrow ii)$ by the fact that there exists $n in mathbb{N}$ such that $M^n subset Q$ but i can't indicate other cases. Can anyone help me?
commutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(R,M)$ be a Noetherian local ring, and let $Q$ be an $M$-primary ideal of $R$. Note that the $R$-module $(Q:M)/Q$ is annihilated by $M$ so it can be regarded as an $R/M$-vector space. Show that the following statement are equivalent
i) $Q$ is irreducible
ii) $dim_{R/M} (Q:M)/Q=1$
iii) The set of all ideals of $R$ which strictly contain $Q$ admits $(Q:M)$ as smallest element.
I can see that $i) Rightarrow ii)$ by the fact that there exists $n in mathbb{N}$ such that $M^n subset Q$ but i can't indicate other cases. Can anyone help me?
commutative-algebra
Let $(R,M)$ be a Noetherian local ring, and let $Q$ be an $M$-primary ideal of $R$. Note that the $R$-module $(Q:M)/Q$ is annihilated by $M$ so it can be regarded as an $R/M$-vector space. Show that the following statement are equivalent
i) $Q$ is irreducible
ii) $dim_{R/M} (Q:M)/Q=1$
iii) The set of all ideals of $R$ which strictly contain $Q$ admits $(Q:M)$ as smallest element.
I can see that $i) Rightarrow ii)$ by the fact that there exists $n in mathbb{N}$ such that $M^n subset Q$ but i can't indicate other cases. Can anyone help me?
commutative-algebra
commutative-algebra
edited Nov 19 at 21:58
user26857
39.2k123882
39.2k123882
asked Nov 19 at 14:23
Desunkid
16510
16510
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I will reduce to the Artinian case, and assume that $Q=0$.
We need to show that the following are equivalent.
i) $0$ is irreducible;
ii) $dim_{(R/M)} 0:M = 1$;
iii) Every non-zero ideal of $R$ contains $0:M$.
You already showed that $i=>ii$.
($ii=>iii$:) If $Q'$ is a non-zero non-unit ideal, then $dim_{(R/M)} Q' < infty$. Thus, we may find an element $x in Q'$ such that $dim_{(R/M)} (x) = 1$. Therefore, $xM = 0$, so $(x) subset 0:M$. Since both ideals have the same length (the $R/M$-vector space dimension), we have the equality.
($iii=>i$:) Suppose that $0$ is reducible, say $0 = P cap P'$ for some nonzero ideals $P,P'$. By iii), both ideals contain $0:M$. Then $0 neq 0:M subset P cap P' = 0$, and this is a contradiction.
I would like to point out that the conditions above are the defining property of $R$ (or $R/Q$ as in your post) being an Artinian Gorenstein ring.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I will reduce to the Artinian case, and assume that $Q=0$.
We need to show that the following are equivalent.
i) $0$ is irreducible;
ii) $dim_{(R/M)} 0:M = 1$;
iii) Every non-zero ideal of $R$ contains $0:M$.
You already showed that $i=>ii$.
($ii=>iii$:) If $Q'$ is a non-zero non-unit ideal, then $dim_{(R/M)} Q' < infty$. Thus, we may find an element $x in Q'$ such that $dim_{(R/M)} (x) = 1$. Therefore, $xM = 0$, so $(x) subset 0:M$. Since both ideals have the same length (the $R/M$-vector space dimension), we have the equality.
($iii=>i$:) Suppose that $0$ is reducible, say $0 = P cap P'$ for some nonzero ideals $P,P'$. By iii), both ideals contain $0:M$. Then $0 neq 0:M subset P cap P' = 0$, and this is a contradiction.
I would like to point out that the conditions above are the defining property of $R$ (or $R/Q$ as in your post) being an Artinian Gorenstein ring.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I will reduce to the Artinian case, and assume that $Q=0$.
We need to show that the following are equivalent.
i) $0$ is irreducible;
ii) $dim_{(R/M)} 0:M = 1$;
iii) Every non-zero ideal of $R$ contains $0:M$.
You already showed that $i=>ii$.
($ii=>iii$:) If $Q'$ is a non-zero non-unit ideal, then $dim_{(R/M)} Q' < infty$. Thus, we may find an element $x in Q'$ such that $dim_{(R/M)} (x) = 1$. Therefore, $xM = 0$, so $(x) subset 0:M$. Since both ideals have the same length (the $R/M$-vector space dimension), we have the equality.
($iii=>i$:) Suppose that $0$ is reducible, say $0 = P cap P'$ for some nonzero ideals $P,P'$. By iii), both ideals contain $0:M$. Then $0 neq 0:M subset P cap P' = 0$, and this is a contradiction.
I would like to point out that the conditions above are the defining property of $R$ (or $R/Q$ as in your post) being an Artinian Gorenstein ring.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I will reduce to the Artinian case, and assume that $Q=0$.
We need to show that the following are equivalent.
i) $0$ is irreducible;
ii) $dim_{(R/M)} 0:M = 1$;
iii) Every non-zero ideal of $R$ contains $0:M$.
You already showed that $i=>ii$.
($ii=>iii$:) If $Q'$ is a non-zero non-unit ideal, then $dim_{(R/M)} Q' < infty$. Thus, we may find an element $x in Q'$ such that $dim_{(R/M)} (x) = 1$. Therefore, $xM = 0$, so $(x) subset 0:M$. Since both ideals have the same length (the $R/M$-vector space dimension), we have the equality.
($iii=>i$:) Suppose that $0$ is reducible, say $0 = P cap P'$ for some nonzero ideals $P,P'$. By iii), both ideals contain $0:M$. Then $0 neq 0:M subset P cap P' = 0$, and this is a contradiction.
I would like to point out that the conditions above are the defining property of $R$ (or $R/Q$ as in your post) being an Artinian Gorenstein ring.
I will reduce to the Artinian case, and assume that $Q=0$.
We need to show that the following are equivalent.
i) $0$ is irreducible;
ii) $dim_{(R/M)} 0:M = 1$;
iii) Every non-zero ideal of $R$ contains $0:M$.
You already showed that $i=>ii$.
($ii=>iii$:) If $Q'$ is a non-zero non-unit ideal, then $dim_{(R/M)} Q' < infty$. Thus, we may find an element $x in Q'$ such that $dim_{(R/M)} (x) = 1$. Therefore, $xM = 0$, so $(x) subset 0:M$. Since both ideals have the same length (the $R/M$-vector space dimension), we have the equality.
($iii=>i$:) Suppose that $0$ is reducible, say $0 = P cap P'$ for some nonzero ideals $P,P'$. By iii), both ideals contain $0:M$. Then $0 neq 0:M subset P cap P' = 0$, and this is a contradiction.
I would like to point out that the conditions above are the defining property of $R$ (or $R/Q$ as in your post) being an Artinian Gorenstein ring.
answered Nov 21 at 20:53
Youngsu
1,786715
1,786715
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004994%2firreducible-primary-ideal-in-noetherian-local-ring-sharp-exercise-8-29%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown