Calculating no. of solutions within some bounds
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Find the total number of non-negative integral ordered triplets for-
$$x_1+x_2+x_3=11$$
under the bounds,
$x_1in (2,6)$ and
$x_2 in (3,7)$.
I was generally able to solve such problems involving bounds by introducing a new variable but that was only in case of a single boundary condition.
How do I proceed when there are two?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Find the total number of non-negative integral ordered triplets for-
$$x_1+x_2+x_3=11$$
under the bounds,
$x_1in (2,6)$ and
$x_2 in (3,7)$.
I was generally able to solve such problems involving bounds by introducing a new variable but that was only in case of a single boundary condition.
How do I proceed when there are two?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Find the total number of non-negative integral ordered triplets for-
$$x_1+x_2+x_3=11$$
under the bounds,
$x_1in (2,6)$ and
$x_2 in (3,7)$.
I was generally able to solve such problems involving bounds by introducing a new variable but that was only in case of a single boundary condition.
How do I proceed when there are two?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
Find the total number of non-negative integral ordered triplets for-
$$x_1+x_2+x_3=11$$
under the bounds,
$x_1in (2,6)$ and
$x_2 in (3,7)$.
I was generally able to solve such problems involving bounds by introducing a new variable but that was only in case of a single boundary condition.
How do I proceed when there are two?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
combinatorics discrete-mathematics
edited Nov 19 at 15:41
Tianlalu
2,9901936
2,9901936
asked Nov 19 at 14:52
Sameer Thakur
142
142
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I have figured out an approach using Multinomial Theorem-
We can find the coefficient of x^11 in (x^3+x^4+x^5)(x^4+x^5++x^6)(x^1+x^2+x^3+x^4).
This comes out to be 8.
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This can be solved using Bose-Einstein, which is also known as Bars and Stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_bars_(combinatorics).
In your case, you have 11 dots, and basically you want to put this 11 dots into 3 boxes. You only care how many dots are going in each box. For this you can use:
$$binom{n + k - 1}{k-1}$$ and in your case: $$binom{11 + 3 - 1}{2}$$ This is including the solutions where you have 0
as possible value for some variables, so you might want to exclude those.
First let's get all the possible solutions that match the lower bound.
Smallest value for x1 is 3 and for x2 is 4. We can mark x1 and x2 as:
$$x1 = y1 + 3\
x2 = y2 + 4
$$
The new equation becomes: $$ y1 + 3 + y2 + 4 + x3 = 11 <=> y1 + y2 + x3 = 4 $$
Now all the possible values are:
$$ binom{4 + 3 - 1}{3 - 1}$$
From this ones you need to substract all the values that have either x1 > 6 or x2 > 7. (They can't be both greater since the sum would be over the boundaries). So you can replace x1 with y1 + 6
and x2 with y2 + 7
and apply the same principle. After that you can substract these results from the total.
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I have figured out an approach using Multinomial Theorem-
We can find the coefficient of x^11 in (x^3+x^4+x^5)(x^4+x^5++x^6)(x^1+x^2+x^3+x^4).
This comes out to be 8.
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have figured out an approach using Multinomial Theorem-
We can find the coefficient of x^11 in (x^3+x^4+x^5)(x^4+x^5++x^6)(x^1+x^2+x^3+x^4).
This comes out to be 8.
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I have figured out an approach using Multinomial Theorem-
We can find the coefficient of x^11 in (x^3+x^4+x^5)(x^4+x^5++x^6)(x^1+x^2+x^3+x^4).
This comes out to be 8.
I have figured out an approach using Multinomial Theorem-
We can find the coefficient of x^11 in (x^3+x^4+x^5)(x^4+x^5++x^6)(x^1+x^2+x^3+x^4).
This comes out to be 8.
answered Nov 19 at 16:05
Sameer Thakur
142
142
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
add a comment |
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
Can someone guide me as to whether this is a correct approach?
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 16:10
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This can be solved using Bose-Einstein, which is also known as Bars and Stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_bars_(combinatorics).
In your case, you have 11 dots, and basically you want to put this 11 dots into 3 boxes. You only care how many dots are going in each box. For this you can use:
$$binom{n + k - 1}{k-1}$$ and in your case: $$binom{11 + 3 - 1}{2}$$ This is including the solutions where you have 0
as possible value for some variables, so you might want to exclude those.
First let's get all the possible solutions that match the lower bound.
Smallest value for x1 is 3 and for x2 is 4. We can mark x1 and x2 as:
$$x1 = y1 + 3\
x2 = y2 + 4
$$
The new equation becomes: $$ y1 + 3 + y2 + 4 + x3 = 11 <=> y1 + y2 + x3 = 4 $$
Now all the possible values are:
$$ binom{4 + 3 - 1}{3 - 1}$$
From this ones you need to substract all the values that have either x1 > 6 or x2 > 7. (They can't be both greater since the sum would be over the boundaries). So you can replace x1 with y1 + 6
and x2 with y2 + 7
and apply the same principle. After that you can substract these results from the total.
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This can be solved using Bose-Einstein, which is also known as Bars and Stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_bars_(combinatorics).
In your case, you have 11 dots, and basically you want to put this 11 dots into 3 boxes. You only care how many dots are going in each box. For this you can use:
$$binom{n + k - 1}{k-1}$$ and in your case: $$binom{11 + 3 - 1}{2}$$ This is including the solutions where you have 0
as possible value for some variables, so you might want to exclude those.
First let's get all the possible solutions that match the lower bound.
Smallest value for x1 is 3 and for x2 is 4. We can mark x1 and x2 as:
$$x1 = y1 + 3\
x2 = y2 + 4
$$
The new equation becomes: $$ y1 + 3 + y2 + 4 + x3 = 11 <=> y1 + y2 + x3 = 4 $$
Now all the possible values are:
$$ binom{4 + 3 - 1}{3 - 1}$$
From this ones you need to substract all the values that have either x1 > 6 or x2 > 7. (They can't be both greater since the sum would be over the boundaries). So you can replace x1 with y1 + 6
and x2 with y2 + 7
and apply the same principle. After that you can substract these results from the total.
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This can be solved using Bose-Einstein, which is also known as Bars and Stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_bars_(combinatorics).
In your case, you have 11 dots, and basically you want to put this 11 dots into 3 boxes. You only care how many dots are going in each box. For this you can use:
$$binom{n + k - 1}{k-1}$$ and in your case: $$binom{11 + 3 - 1}{2}$$ This is including the solutions where you have 0
as possible value for some variables, so you might want to exclude those.
First let's get all the possible solutions that match the lower bound.
Smallest value for x1 is 3 and for x2 is 4. We can mark x1 and x2 as:
$$x1 = y1 + 3\
x2 = y2 + 4
$$
The new equation becomes: $$ y1 + 3 + y2 + 4 + x3 = 11 <=> y1 + y2 + x3 = 4 $$
Now all the possible values are:
$$ binom{4 + 3 - 1}{3 - 1}$$
From this ones you need to substract all the values that have either x1 > 6 or x2 > 7. (They can't be both greater since the sum would be over the boundaries). So you can replace x1 with y1 + 6
and x2 with y2 + 7
and apply the same principle. After that you can substract these results from the total.
This can be solved using Bose-Einstein, which is also known as Bars and Stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_bars_(combinatorics).
In your case, you have 11 dots, and basically you want to put this 11 dots into 3 boxes. You only care how many dots are going in each box. For this you can use:
$$binom{n + k - 1}{k-1}$$ and in your case: $$binom{11 + 3 - 1}{2}$$ This is including the solutions where you have 0
as possible value for some variables, so you might want to exclude those.
First let's get all the possible solutions that match the lower bound.
Smallest value for x1 is 3 and for x2 is 4. We can mark x1 and x2 as:
$$x1 = y1 + 3\
x2 = y2 + 4
$$
The new equation becomes: $$ y1 + 3 + y2 + 4 + x3 = 11 <=> y1 + y2 + x3 = 4 $$
Now all the possible values are:
$$ binom{4 + 3 - 1}{3 - 1}$$
From this ones you need to substract all the values that have either x1 > 6 or x2 > 7. (They can't be both greater since the sum would be over the boundaries). So you can replace x1 with y1 + 6
and x2 with y2 + 7
and apply the same principle. After that you can substract these results from the total.
edited Nov 19 at 19:29
answered Nov 19 at 15:04
Erik Cristian Seulean
456
456
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
add a comment |
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
I have edited the question.
– Sameer Thakur
Nov 19 at 15:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005023%2fcalculating-no-of-solutions-within-some-bounds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown