genealogytree: no child for a second marriage in the heart of a genealogy tree
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have to describe this tree:
Father
and Mother
had a child Daughter
.
Daughter
married Husband
.
Husband
married previously Other wife
and has Child
with Other wife
.
If I write
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
g{Daughter}
p{Husband}
union{
g{Other wife}
c{Child}
}
}
}
Child
is connected to Daughter
and Other wife
instead to be connected to Husband
and Other wife
. Can you help me please to give Husband
what is Husband
's?
genealogytree
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have to describe this tree:
Father
and Mother
had a child Daughter
.
Daughter
married Husband
.
Husband
married previously Other wife
and has Child
with Other wife
.
If I write
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
g{Daughter}
p{Husband}
union{
g{Other wife}
c{Child}
}
}
}
Child
is connected to Daughter
and Other wife
instead to be connected to Husband
and Other wife
. Can you help me please to give Husband
what is Husband
's?
genealogytree
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have to describe this tree:
Father
and Mother
had a child Daughter
.
Daughter
married Husband
.
Husband
married previously Other wife
and has Child
with Other wife
.
If I write
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
g{Daughter}
p{Husband}
union{
g{Other wife}
c{Child}
}
}
}
Child
is connected to Daughter
and Other wife
instead to be connected to Husband
and Other wife
. Can you help me please to give Husband
what is Husband
's?
genealogytree
I have to describe this tree:
Father
and Mother
had a child Daughter
.
Daughter
married Husband
.
Husband
married previously Other wife
and has Child
with Other wife
.
If I write
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
g{Daughter}
p{Husband}
union{
g{Other wife}
c{Child}
}
}
}
Child
is connected to Daughter
and Other wife
instead to be connected to Husband
and Other wife
. Can you help me please to give Husband
what is Husband
's?
genealogytree
genealogytree
asked Sep 20 at 15:15
VMM
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
There are only tree kinds of trees with genealogytree: child, parent and sandclock.
When you want to include extensions to relatives outside of that you need to make several trees and then connect them. Here are two trees connected by having the same person "Daughter" in both of them and putting her/them in the same position. The second tree has "Husband" as main person, so can include the extra persons.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{genealogytree}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
genealogytree{
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
% p{Husband}
g[id=daughter1]{Daughter}
}
}
}
genealogytree[
set position=daughter2 at daughter1]{
child{
p[pivot=parent]{Other wife}
g{Husband}
c{Child}
union{
p[id=daughter2]{Daughter}
}
}
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
There are only tree kinds of trees with genealogytree: child, parent and sandclock.
When you want to include extensions to relatives outside of that you need to make several trees and then connect them. Here are two trees connected by having the same person "Daughter" in both of them and putting her/them in the same position. The second tree has "Husband" as main person, so can include the extra persons.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{genealogytree}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
genealogytree{
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
% p{Husband}
g[id=daughter1]{Daughter}
}
}
}
genealogytree[
set position=daughter2 at daughter1]{
child{
p[pivot=parent]{Other wife}
g{Husband}
c{Child}
union{
p[id=daughter2]{Daughter}
}
}
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
There are only tree kinds of trees with genealogytree: child, parent and sandclock.
When you want to include extensions to relatives outside of that you need to make several trees and then connect them. Here are two trees connected by having the same person "Daughter" in both of them and putting her/them in the same position. The second tree has "Husband" as main person, so can include the extra persons.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{genealogytree}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
genealogytree{
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
% p{Husband}
g[id=daughter1]{Daughter}
}
}
}
genealogytree[
set position=daughter2 at daughter1]{
child{
p[pivot=parent]{Other wife}
g{Husband}
c{Child}
union{
p[id=daughter2]{Daughter}
}
}
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
There are only tree kinds of trees with genealogytree: child, parent and sandclock.
When you want to include extensions to relatives outside of that you need to make several trees and then connect them. Here are two trees connected by having the same person "Daughter" in both of them and putting her/them in the same position. The second tree has "Husband" as main person, so can include the extra persons.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{genealogytree}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
genealogytree{
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
% p{Husband}
g[id=daughter1]{Daughter}
}
}
}
genealogytree[
set position=daughter2 at daughter1]{
child{
p[pivot=parent]{Other wife}
g{Husband}
c{Child}
union{
p[id=daughter2]{Daughter}
}
}
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
There are only tree kinds of trees with genealogytree: child, parent and sandclock.
When you want to include extensions to relatives outside of that you need to make several trees and then connect them. Here are two trees connected by having the same person "Daughter" in both of them and putting her/them in the same position. The second tree has "Husband" as main person, so can include the extra persons.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{genealogytree}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
genealogytree{
child{
g{Father}
p{Mother}
child{
% p{Husband}
g[id=daughter1]{Daughter}
}
}
}
genealogytree[
set position=daughter2 at daughter1]{
child{
p[pivot=parent]{Other wife}
g{Husband}
c{Child}
union{
p[id=daughter2]{Daughter}
}
}
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered Dec 1 at 16:51
pst
2,522823
2,522823
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
add a comment |
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
I tried this but the first tree is very large and all the placement of nodes is perturbed around Daughter. I finally eliminate Other wife, to represent Daughter and Husband as parents of Child, remove parent link from Daughter to Child and I reconstruct manually the link from Daughter to Husband. [...] genealogytree[remove parent=D from F]{ child{ g{Father} p{Mother} child[id=F]{ p[id=H]{Husband} g[id=D]{Daughter} c{Child1} c{Child2} } } } draw (H.east) -- (D.west); [...]
– VMM
Dec 2 at 19:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f451738%2fgenealogytree-no-child-for-a-second-marriage-in-the-heart-of-a-genealogy-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown