“Different” looking question mark
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm in a situation where I have a concept in my document that is traditionally represented using the question mark ?
.
However, for visual clarity, I would like to differentiate between the ordinary punctuation ?
, and my "special" use of it as a symbol.
I have tried mathbb
, mathcal
, and most of the other typical math font modes, but all of them seem to render ?
in an identical way (at least under the default options of the acmart
class).
Is there some way that I can get a fancy ?
symbol? Bold, italic, black board, calligraphy, I'm open to different options. The inverted question mark is not an option, as it already carries meaning in my particular field.
EDIT:
For reference, if I do this:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb}
begin{document}
$mathsf{?} ? mathbf{?} mathit{?} mathbb{?} mathcal{?}$
end{document}
It renders as this: i.e. there is no difference between the symbols.
The font used is Libertine, specifically the Libertine option of newtxmath
, maybe this is part of the problem?
math-mode fonts symbols libertine newtxmath
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm in a situation where I have a concept in my document that is traditionally represented using the question mark ?
.
However, for visual clarity, I would like to differentiate between the ordinary punctuation ?
, and my "special" use of it as a symbol.
I have tried mathbb
, mathcal
, and most of the other typical math font modes, but all of them seem to render ?
in an identical way (at least under the default options of the acmart
class).
Is there some way that I can get a fancy ?
symbol? Bold, italic, black board, calligraphy, I'm open to different options. The inverted question mark is not an option, as it already carries meaning in my particular field.
EDIT:
For reference, if I do this:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb}
begin{document}
$mathsf{?} ? mathbf{?} mathit{?} mathbb{?} mathcal{?}$
end{document}
It renders as this: i.e. there is no difference between the symbols.
The font used is Libertine, specifically the Libertine option of newtxmath
, maybe this is part of the problem?
math-mode fonts symbols libertine newtxmath
This is a bit vague.
– egreg
Dec 3 at 22:39
@DavidCarlisle Yes, this is in math. I've updated to question to clarify thatmathbf
andmathit
seem to do nothing.
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:43
@DavidCarlisle: exact same results on overleaf with a minimal complete document (question updated to include self-contained example)
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:52
@jmite yes well my initial comment was not as accurate as it could have been:-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 22:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I'm in a situation where I have a concept in my document that is traditionally represented using the question mark ?
.
However, for visual clarity, I would like to differentiate between the ordinary punctuation ?
, and my "special" use of it as a symbol.
I have tried mathbb
, mathcal
, and most of the other typical math font modes, but all of them seem to render ?
in an identical way (at least under the default options of the acmart
class).
Is there some way that I can get a fancy ?
symbol? Bold, italic, black board, calligraphy, I'm open to different options. The inverted question mark is not an option, as it already carries meaning in my particular field.
EDIT:
For reference, if I do this:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb}
begin{document}
$mathsf{?} ? mathbf{?} mathit{?} mathbb{?} mathcal{?}$
end{document}
It renders as this: i.e. there is no difference between the symbols.
The font used is Libertine, specifically the Libertine option of newtxmath
, maybe this is part of the problem?
math-mode fonts symbols libertine newtxmath
I'm in a situation where I have a concept in my document that is traditionally represented using the question mark ?
.
However, for visual clarity, I would like to differentiate between the ordinary punctuation ?
, and my "special" use of it as a symbol.
I have tried mathbb
, mathcal
, and most of the other typical math font modes, but all of them seem to render ?
in an identical way (at least under the default options of the acmart
class).
Is there some way that I can get a fancy ?
symbol? Bold, italic, black board, calligraphy, I'm open to different options. The inverted question mark is not an option, as it already carries meaning in my particular field.
EDIT:
For reference, if I do this:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb}
begin{document}
$mathsf{?} ? mathbf{?} mathit{?} mathbb{?} mathcal{?}$
end{document}
It renders as this: i.e. there is no difference between the symbols.
The font used is Libertine, specifically the Libertine option of newtxmath
, maybe this is part of the problem?
math-mode fonts symbols libertine newtxmath
math-mode fonts symbols libertine newtxmath
edited Dec 3 at 22:50
asked Dec 3 at 22:26
jmite
6111618
6111618
This is a bit vague.
– egreg
Dec 3 at 22:39
@DavidCarlisle Yes, this is in math. I've updated to question to clarify thatmathbf
andmathit
seem to do nothing.
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:43
@DavidCarlisle: exact same results on overleaf with a minimal complete document (question updated to include self-contained example)
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:52
@jmite yes well my initial comment was not as accurate as it could have been:-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 22:55
add a comment |
This is a bit vague.
– egreg
Dec 3 at 22:39
@DavidCarlisle Yes, this is in math. I've updated to question to clarify thatmathbf
andmathit
seem to do nothing.
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:43
@DavidCarlisle: exact same results on overleaf with a minimal complete document (question updated to include self-contained example)
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:52
@jmite yes well my initial comment was not as accurate as it could have been:-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 22:55
This is a bit vague.
– egreg
Dec 3 at 22:39
This is a bit vague.
– egreg
Dec 3 at 22:39
@DavidCarlisle Yes, this is in math. I've updated to question to clarify that
mathbf
and mathit
seem to do nothing.– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:43
@DavidCarlisle Yes, this is in math. I've updated to question to clarify that
mathbf
and mathit
seem to do nothing.– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:43
@DavidCarlisle: exact same results on overleaf with a minimal complete document (question updated to include self-contained example)
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:52
@DavidCarlisle: exact same results on overleaf with a minimal complete document (question updated to include self-contained example)
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:52
@jmite yes well my initial comment was not as accurate as it could have been:-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 22:55
@jmite yes well my initial comment was not as accurate as it could have been:-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 22:55
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use the text fonts or images
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
begin{document}
$?,textbf{?},textit{?},textsf{?},includegraphics[height=.7em]{q}$
end{document}
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
1
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
The behavior of the character ?
in math is defined by
DeclareMathSymbol{?}{mathclose}{operators}{"3F}
so it isn't affected by math alphabet changing commands such as mathsf
. You can define
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
Example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} % not really used here
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
DeclareMathAlphabet{mathbbold}{U}{bbold}{m}{n}
begin{document}
[
qmquadmathrm{qm}quad
mathit{qm}quadmathsf{qm}quad
mathtt{qm}quadmathbbold{qm}
]
end{document}
A different approach: find a font that has the glyph that suits your need and do something like
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{qm}{text{usefont{OT1}{iwona}{m}{n}?}}
begin{document}
[
qm
]
end{document}
Differently from using textbf
or textit
, both approaches will not be affected by the font current at the time math mode was entered. For instance, in a theorem statement, typically using italics, $textbf{?}$
would be typeset in boldface italic.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use the text fonts or images
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
begin{document}
$?,textbf{?},textit{?},textsf{?},includegraphics[height=.7em]{q}$
end{document}
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
1
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use the text fonts or images
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
begin{document}
$?,textbf{?},textit{?},textsf{?},includegraphics[height=.7em]{q}$
end{document}
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
1
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
up vote
6
down vote
accepted
You can use the text fonts or images
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
begin{document}
$?,textbf{?},textit{?},textsf{?},includegraphics[height=.7em]{q}$
end{document}
You can use the text fonts or images
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
begin{document}
$?,textbf{?},textit{?},textsf{?},includegraphics[height=.7em]{q}$
end{document}
answered Dec 3 at 22:54
David Carlisle
480k3811121847
480k3811121847
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
1
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
add a comment |
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
1
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
Yep, that'll do it, thanks!
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:59
1
1
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
@jmite do you want to buy that original mspaint artwork brushstroke? :-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 23:14
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
The behavior of the character ?
in math is defined by
DeclareMathSymbol{?}{mathclose}{operators}{"3F}
so it isn't affected by math alphabet changing commands such as mathsf
. You can define
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
Example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} % not really used here
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
DeclareMathAlphabet{mathbbold}{U}{bbold}{m}{n}
begin{document}
[
qmquadmathrm{qm}quad
mathit{qm}quadmathsf{qm}quad
mathtt{qm}quadmathbbold{qm}
]
end{document}
A different approach: find a font that has the glyph that suits your need and do something like
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{qm}{text{usefont{OT1}{iwona}{m}{n}?}}
begin{document}
[
qm
]
end{document}
Differently from using textbf
or textit
, both approaches will not be affected by the font current at the time math mode was entered. For instance, in a theorem statement, typically using italics, $textbf{?}$
would be typeset in boldface italic.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
The behavior of the character ?
in math is defined by
DeclareMathSymbol{?}{mathclose}{operators}{"3F}
so it isn't affected by math alphabet changing commands such as mathsf
. You can define
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
Example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} % not really used here
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
DeclareMathAlphabet{mathbbold}{U}{bbold}{m}{n}
begin{document}
[
qmquadmathrm{qm}quad
mathit{qm}quadmathsf{qm}quad
mathtt{qm}quadmathbbold{qm}
]
end{document}
A different approach: find a font that has the glyph that suits your need and do something like
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{qm}{text{usefont{OT1}{iwona}{m}{n}?}}
begin{document}
[
qm
]
end{document}
Differently from using textbf
or textit
, both approaches will not be affected by the font current at the time math mode was entered. For instance, in a theorem statement, typically using italics, $textbf{?}$
would be typeset in boldface italic.
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
The behavior of the character ?
in math is defined by
DeclareMathSymbol{?}{mathclose}{operators}{"3F}
so it isn't affected by math alphabet changing commands such as mathsf
. You can define
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
Example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} % not really used here
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
DeclareMathAlphabet{mathbbold}{U}{bbold}{m}{n}
begin{document}
[
qmquadmathrm{qm}quad
mathit{qm}quadmathsf{qm}quad
mathtt{qm}quadmathbbold{qm}
]
end{document}
A different approach: find a font that has the glyph that suits your need and do something like
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{qm}{text{usefont{OT1}{iwona}{m}{n}?}}
begin{document}
[
qm
]
end{document}
Differently from using textbf
or textit
, both approaches will not be affected by the font current at the time math mode was entered. For instance, in a theorem statement, typically using italics, $textbf{?}$
would be typeset in boldface italic.
The behavior of the character ?
in math is defined by
DeclareMathSymbol{?}{mathclose}{operators}{"3F}
so it isn't affected by math alphabet changing commands such as mathsf
. You can define
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
Example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} % not really used here
DeclareMathSymbol{qm}{mathalpha}{operators}{"3F}
DeclareMathAlphabet{mathbbold}{U}{bbold}{m}{n}
begin{document}
[
qmquadmathrm{qm}quad
mathit{qm}quadmathsf{qm}quad
mathtt{qm}quadmathbbold{qm}
]
end{document}
A different approach: find a font that has the glyph that suits your need and do something like
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{qm}{text{usefont{OT1}{iwona}{m}{n}?}}
begin{document}
[
qm
]
end{document}
Differently from using textbf
or textit
, both approaches will not be affected by the font current at the time math mode was entered. For instance, in a theorem statement, typically using italics, $textbf{?}$
would be typeset in boldface italic.
answered Dec 3 at 23:48
egreg
704k8618753154
704k8618753154
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463052%2fdifferent-looking-question-mark%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is a bit vague.
– egreg
Dec 3 at 22:39
@DavidCarlisle Yes, this is in math. I've updated to question to clarify that
mathbf
andmathit
seem to do nothing.– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:43
@DavidCarlisle: exact same results on overleaf with a minimal complete document (question updated to include self-contained example)
– jmite
Dec 3 at 22:52
@jmite yes well my initial comment was not as accurate as it could have been:-)
– David Carlisle
Dec 3 at 22:55