Bind enabled property of WPF user control to child controls
Let's say I have a UserControl with one or more child controls on it.
How can I disable those child controls when the UserControl is disabled, and enable them when it is enabled? My UserControl does not have a ViewModel, but is simply using the code-behind because it is quite simple.
I attempted to do something like this:
<UserControl>
<ListBox IsEnabled="{Binding IsEnabled}" >
</ListBox>
</UserControl>
but it doesn't work.
c# wpf xaml
add a comment |
Let's say I have a UserControl with one or more child controls on it.
How can I disable those child controls when the UserControl is disabled, and enable them when it is enabled? My UserControl does not have a ViewModel, but is simply using the code-behind because it is quite simple.
I attempted to do something like this:
<UserControl>
<ListBox IsEnabled="{Binding IsEnabled}" >
</ListBox>
</UserControl>
but it doesn't work.
c# wpf xaml
This is entirely unnecessary. When a parent element is disabled, its child elements are automatically disabled too.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
@Clemens I agree totally. @ian93 Bind theUserControl
andListBox(es)
to the same property.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 10:26
@arcticwhite No, do not bind the ListBox's IsEnabled property at all.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 10:29
@Clemens Yes I agree he should not do that, but if he wants that type of solution he can do it.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 11:14
add a comment |
Let's say I have a UserControl with one or more child controls on it.
How can I disable those child controls when the UserControl is disabled, and enable them when it is enabled? My UserControl does not have a ViewModel, but is simply using the code-behind because it is quite simple.
I attempted to do something like this:
<UserControl>
<ListBox IsEnabled="{Binding IsEnabled}" >
</ListBox>
</UserControl>
but it doesn't work.
c# wpf xaml
Let's say I have a UserControl with one or more child controls on it.
How can I disable those child controls when the UserControl is disabled, and enable them when it is enabled? My UserControl does not have a ViewModel, but is simply using the code-behind because it is quite simple.
I attempted to do something like this:
<UserControl>
<ListBox IsEnabled="{Binding IsEnabled}" >
</ListBox>
</UserControl>
but it doesn't work.
c# wpf xaml
c# wpf xaml
asked Nov 16 at 6:14
ian93
87831732
87831732
This is entirely unnecessary. When a parent element is disabled, its child elements are automatically disabled too.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
@Clemens I agree totally. @ian93 Bind theUserControl
andListBox(es)
to the same property.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 10:26
@arcticwhite No, do not bind the ListBox's IsEnabled property at all.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 10:29
@Clemens Yes I agree he should not do that, but if he wants that type of solution he can do it.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 11:14
add a comment |
This is entirely unnecessary. When a parent element is disabled, its child elements are automatically disabled too.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
@Clemens I agree totally. @ian93 Bind theUserControl
andListBox(es)
to the same property.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 10:26
@arcticwhite No, do not bind the ListBox's IsEnabled property at all.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 10:29
@Clemens Yes I agree he should not do that, but if he wants that type of solution he can do it.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 11:14
This is entirely unnecessary. When a parent element is disabled, its child elements are automatically disabled too.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
This is entirely unnecessary. When a parent element is disabled, its child elements are automatically disabled too.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
@Clemens I agree totally. @ian93 Bind the
UserControl
and ListBox(es)
to the same property.– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 10:26
@Clemens I agree totally. @ian93 Bind the
UserControl
and ListBox(es)
to the same property.– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 10:26
@arcticwhite No, do not bind the ListBox's IsEnabled property at all.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 10:29
@arcticwhite No, do not bind the ListBox's IsEnabled property at all.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 10:29
@Clemens Yes I agree he should not do that, but if he wants that type of solution he can do it.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 11:14
@Clemens Yes I agree he should not do that, but if he wants that type of solution he can do it.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 11:14
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
On your ListBox's ItemContainerStyle
add a binding
<ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled"
Value="{Binding Path=IsEnabled,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ListBox}}"/>
</Style>
</ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
add a comment |
I realized what my mistake was.
I was trying to bind the IsEnabled property on the instance of the UserControl to a value in my datacontext.
However, when binding to a UserControl, you have to do something like this:
IsEnabled="{Binding DataContext.IsWatermarkEnabled, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
This solved the problem.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53332403%2fbind-enabled-property-of-wpf-user-control-to-child-controls%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
On your ListBox's ItemContainerStyle
add a binding
<ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled"
Value="{Binding Path=IsEnabled,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ListBox}}"/>
</Style>
</ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
add a comment |
On your ListBox's ItemContainerStyle
add a binding
<ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled"
Value="{Binding Path=IsEnabled,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ListBox}}"/>
</Style>
</ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
add a comment |
On your ListBox's ItemContainerStyle
add a binding
<ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled"
Value="{Binding Path=IsEnabled,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ListBox}}"/>
</Style>
</ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
On your ListBox's ItemContainerStyle
add a binding
<ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled"
Value="{Binding Path=IsEnabled,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ListBox}}"/>
</Style>
</ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
edited Nov 16 at 9:54
Clemens
87.7k885170
87.7k885170
answered Nov 16 at 7:07
heap1
598
598
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
add a comment |
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
This does not answer the question, which was how to disable the ListBox when the parent UserControl is disabled. Besides that it is not necessary at all. When a ListBox is disabled, all íts ListBoxItems are disabled automatically.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
add a comment |
I realized what my mistake was.
I was trying to bind the IsEnabled property on the instance of the UserControl to a value in my datacontext.
However, when binding to a UserControl, you have to do something like this:
IsEnabled="{Binding DataContext.IsWatermarkEnabled, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
This solved the problem.
add a comment |
I realized what my mistake was.
I was trying to bind the IsEnabled property on the instance of the UserControl to a value in my datacontext.
However, when binding to a UserControl, you have to do something like this:
IsEnabled="{Binding DataContext.IsWatermarkEnabled, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
This solved the problem.
add a comment |
I realized what my mistake was.
I was trying to bind the IsEnabled property on the instance of the UserControl to a value in my datacontext.
However, when binding to a UserControl, you have to do something like this:
IsEnabled="{Binding DataContext.IsWatermarkEnabled, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
This solved the problem.
I realized what my mistake was.
I was trying to bind the IsEnabled property on the instance of the UserControl to a value in my datacontext.
However, when binding to a UserControl, you have to do something like this:
IsEnabled="{Binding DataContext.IsWatermarkEnabled, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
This solved the problem.
answered Nov 16 at 15:39
ian93
87831732
87831732
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53332403%2fbind-enabled-property-of-wpf-user-control-to-child-controls%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is entirely unnecessary. When a parent element is disabled, its child elements are automatically disabled too.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 9:59
@Clemens I agree totally. @ian93 Bind the
UserControl
andListBox(es)
to the same property.– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 10:26
@arcticwhite No, do not bind the ListBox's IsEnabled property at all.
– Clemens
Nov 16 at 10:29
@Clemens Yes I agree he should not do that, but if he wants that type of solution he can do it.
– arcticwhite
Nov 16 at 11:14