How would I go about proving that the language accepted by a regular expression is subset of the language...
$begingroup$
Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:
- cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$
- cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
- cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$
- cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).
For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.
discrete-mathematics proof-writing recursion context-free-grammar regular-expressions
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:
- cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$
- cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
- cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$
- cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).
For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.
discrete-mathematics proof-writing recursion context-free-grammar regular-expressions
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:
- cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$
- cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
- cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$
- cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).
For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.
discrete-mathematics proof-writing recursion context-free-grammar regular-expressions
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
$endgroup$
Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:
- cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions
- cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$
- cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
- cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$
- cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$
The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).
For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.
discrete-mathematics proof-writing recursion context-free-grammar regular-expressions
discrete-mathematics proof-writing recursion context-free-grammar regular-expressions
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
asked Dec 6 '18 at 1:01
digiHarmoniousdigiHarmonious
303
303
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027894%2fhow-would-i-go-about-proving-that-the-language-accepted-by-a-regular-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027894%2fhow-would-i-go-about-proving-that-the-language-accepted-by-a-regular-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
