Fourier Transforms of functions on a finite interval











up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












I would like to find the fourier transform of $sin(ax)$ which is non zero only on $-cle x le c$.



Calculating, I get an answer with sines and cosines but I'm not sure if this is correct... Should I be using the delta function in my answer? Or is that if the interval is infinite?






fourier-transform







share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    -2
    down vote

    favorite












    I would like to find the fourier transform of $sin(ax)$ which is non zero only on $-cle x le c$.



    Calculating, I get an answer with sines and cosines but I'm not sure if this is correct... Should I be using the delta function in my answer? Or is that if the interval is infinite?






    fourier-transform







    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      -2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      -2
      down vote

      favorite











      I would like to find the fourier transform of $sin(ax)$ which is non zero only on $-cle x le c$.



      Calculating, I get an answer with sines and cosines but I'm not sure if this is correct... Should I be using the delta function in my answer? Or is that if the interval is infinite?






      fourier-transform







      share|cite|improve this question















      I would like to find the fourier transform of $sin(ax)$ which is non zero only on $-cle x le c$.



      Calculating, I get an answer with sines and cosines but I'm not sure if this is correct... Should I be using the delta function in my answer? Or is that if the interval is infinite?






      fourier-transform




      fourier-transform






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Tianlalu

      2,170631




      2,170631










      asked 2 hours ago









      MathematicianP

      3115




      3115






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          You can represent your function as
          $$
          f(x)=[theta(x+c)-theta(x-c)]sin(ax)
          $$
          being $theta(x)$ the Heaviside step function. Then, the Fourier integral becomes rather easy as
          $$
          {cal F}(f)(k)=int_{-infty}^infty dx e^{ikx}f(x)=int_{-c}^c dx e^{ikx}sin(ax).
          $$
          The latter integral is very well-known and rather easy to evaluate.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • Yes, it is correct.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago










          • Perfect! Thank you so much!
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • If you like the answer, please accept it.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995488%2ffourier-transforms-of-functions-on-a-finite-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest


















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          You can represent your function as
          $$
          f(x)=[theta(x+c)-theta(x-c)]sin(ax)
          $$
          being $theta(x)$ the Heaviside step function. Then, the Fourier integral becomes rather easy as
          $$
          {cal F}(f)(k)=int_{-infty}^infty dx e^{ikx}f(x)=int_{-c}^c dx e^{ikx}sin(ax).
          $$
          The latter integral is very well-known and rather easy to evaluate.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • Yes, it is correct.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago










          • Perfect! Thank you so much!
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • If you like the answer, please accept it.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          You can represent your function as
          $$
          f(x)=[theta(x+c)-theta(x-c)]sin(ax)
          $$
          being $theta(x)$ the Heaviside step function. Then, the Fourier integral becomes rather easy as
          $$
          {cal F}(f)(k)=int_{-infty}^infty dx e^{ikx}f(x)=int_{-c}^c dx e^{ikx}sin(ax).
          $$
          The latter integral is very well-known and rather easy to evaluate.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • Yes, it is correct.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago










          • Perfect! Thank you so much!
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • If you like the answer, please accept it.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago













          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          You can represent your function as
          $$
          f(x)=[theta(x+c)-theta(x-c)]sin(ax)
          $$
          being $theta(x)$ the Heaviside step function. Then, the Fourier integral becomes rather easy as
          $$
          {cal F}(f)(k)=int_{-infty}^infty dx e^{ikx}f(x)=int_{-c}^c dx e^{ikx}sin(ax).
          $$
          The latter integral is very well-known and rather easy to evaluate.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You can represent your function as
          $$
          f(x)=[theta(x+c)-theta(x-c)]sin(ax)
          $$
          being $theta(x)$ the Heaviside step function. Then, the Fourier integral becomes rather easy as
          $$
          {cal F}(f)(k)=int_{-infty}^infty dx e^{ikx}f(x)=int_{-c}^c dx e^{ikx}sin(ax).
          $$
          The latter integral is very well-known and rather easy to evaluate.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Jon

          4,29511022




          4,29511022












          • Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • Yes, it is correct.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago










          • Perfect! Thank you so much!
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • If you like the answer, please accept it.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago


















          • Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • Yes, it is correct.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago










          • Perfect! Thank you so much!
            – MathematicianP
            1 hour ago










          • If you like the answer, please accept it.
            – Jon
            1 hour ago
















          Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
          – MathematicianP
          1 hour ago




          Thank you for your reply! I get an integral involving sin(ac) and cos(kc),does this sound correct?
          – MathematicianP
          1 hour ago












          Yes, it is correct.
          – Jon
          1 hour ago




          Yes, it is correct.
          – Jon
          1 hour ago












          Perfect! Thank you so much!
          – MathematicianP
          1 hour ago




          Perfect! Thank you so much!
          – MathematicianP
          1 hour ago












          If you like the answer, please accept it.
          – Jon
          1 hour ago




          If you like the answer, please accept it.
          – Jon
          1 hour ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995488%2ffourier-transforms-of-functions-on-a-finite-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest






































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

          Image
          3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
          Read more

          Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

          Image
          0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
          Read more

          Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

          Image
          up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
          Read more