You really don't want to learn this language











up vote
12
down vote

favorite












This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!



Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!



But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, you wouldn't want to learn it, that defeats its purpose!



What am I talking about?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    I think you underestimate the capabilities of the brain and the determination of some people. I have seen the claim by some that they could read this language on the fly. I find the claim believable.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:01












  • @RossMillikan No I can believe it! My draft had 'never' and 'nobody' ... but then I thought ... better put 'very rarely' and 'hardly anybody' because there's probably That Guy ... :-)
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:09












  • Some of the stage calculators were reputed to know the multiplication table up to $100 times 100$, which is a lot of facts. If you read a lot of this language you will learn the most common tens of English words by sight. You can then work out others quickly with practice. I know many of the letter correspondences but cannot form words from them easily.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:19










  • @RossMillikan I don't doubt that you can! But unlike 100x100, you might actually have a reason to avoid learning (or unlearn) this
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:26










  • @RossMillikan To be fair, there's a lot of repetition in the tables.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Dec 4 at 13:54















up vote
12
down vote

favorite












This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!



Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!



But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, you wouldn't want to learn it, that defeats its purpose!



What am I talking about?










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    I think you underestimate the capabilities of the brain and the determination of some people. I have seen the claim by some that they could read this language on the fly. I find the claim believable.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:01












  • @RossMillikan No I can believe it! My draft had 'never' and 'nobody' ... but then I thought ... better put 'very rarely' and 'hardly anybody' because there's probably That Guy ... :-)
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:09












  • Some of the stage calculators were reputed to know the multiplication table up to $100 times 100$, which is a lot of facts. If you read a lot of this language you will learn the most common tens of English words by sight. You can then work out others quickly with practice. I know many of the letter correspondences but cannot form words from them easily.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:19










  • @RossMillikan I don't doubt that you can! But unlike 100x100, you might actually have a reason to avoid learning (or unlearn) this
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:26










  • @RossMillikan To be fair, there's a lot of repetition in the tables.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Dec 4 at 13:54













up vote
12
down vote

favorite









up vote
12
down vote

favorite











This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!



Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!



But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, you wouldn't want to learn it, that defeats its purpose!



What am I talking about?










share|improve this question













This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!



Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!



But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, you wouldn't want to learn it, that defeats its purpose!



What am I talking about?







riddle






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 4 at 2:52









deep thought

2,206529




2,206529








  • 1




    I think you underestimate the capabilities of the brain and the determination of some people. I have seen the claim by some that they could read this language on the fly. I find the claim believable.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:01












  • @RossMillikan No I can believe it! My draft had 'never' and 'nobody' ... but then I thought ... better put 'very rarely' and 'hardly anybody' because there's probably That Guy ... :-)
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:09












  • Some of the stage calculators were reputed to know the multiplication table up to $100 times 100$, which is a lot of facts. If you read a lot of this language you will learn the most common tens of English words by sight. You can then work out others quickly with practice. I know many of the letter correspondences but cannot form words from them easily.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:19










  • @RossMillikan I don't doubt that you can! But unlike 100x100, you might actually have a reason to avoid learning (or unlearn) this
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:26










  • @RossMillikan To be fair, there's a lot of repetition in the tables.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Dec 4 at 13:54














  • 1




    I think you underestimate the capabilities of the brain and the determination of some people. I have seen the claim by some that they could read this language on the fly. I find the claim believable.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:01












  • @RossMillikan No I can believe it! My draft had 'never' and 'nobody' ... but then I thought ... better put 'very rarely' and 'hardly anybody' because there's probably That Guy ... :-)
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:09












  • Some of the stage calculators were reputed to know the multiplication table up to $100 times 100$, which is a lot of facts. If you read a lot of this language you will learn the most common tens of English words by sight. You can then work out others quickly with practice. I know many of the letter correspondences but cannot form words from them easily.
    – Ross Millikan
    Dec 4 at 5:19










  • @RossMillikan I don't doubt that you can! But unlike 100x100, you might actually have a reason to avoid learning (or unlearn) this
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 5:26










  • @RossMillikan To be fair, there's a lot of repetition in the tables.
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Dec 4 at 13:54








1




1




I think you underestimate the capabilities of the brain and the determination of some people. I have seen the claim by some that they could read this language on the fly. I find the claim believable.
– Ross Millikan
Dec 4 at 5:01






I think you underestimate the capabilities of the brain and the determination of some people. I have seen the claim by some that they could read this language on the fly. I find the claim believable.
– Ross Millikan
Dec 4 at 5:01














@RossMillikan No I can believe it! My draft had 'never' and 'nobody' ... but then I thought ... better put 'very rarely' and 'hardly anybody' because there's probably That Guy ... :-)
– deep thought
Dec 4 at 5:09






@RossMillikan No I can believe it! My draft had 'never' and 'nobody' ... but then I thought ... better put 'very rarely' and 'hardly anybody' because there's probably That Guy ... :-)
– deep thought
Dec 4 at 5:09














Some of the stage calculators were reputed to know the multiplication table up to $100 times 100$, which is a lot of facts. If you read a lot of this language you will learn the most common tens of English words by sight. You can then work out others quickly with practice. I know many of the letter correspondences but cannot form words from them easily.
– Ross Millikan
Dec 4 at 5:19




Some of the stage calculators were reputed to know the multiplication table up to $100 times 100$, which is a lot of facts. If you read a lot of this language you will learn the most common tens of English words by sight. You can then work out others quickly with practice. I know many of the letter correspondences but cannot form words from them easily.
– Ross Millikan
Dec 4 at 5:19












@RossMillikan I don't doubt that you can! But unlike 100x100, you might actually have a reason to avoid learning (or unlearn) this
– deep thought
Dec 4 at 5:26




@RossMillikan I don't doubt that you can! But unlike 100x100, you might actually have a reason to avoid learning (or unlearn) this
– deep thought
Dec 4 at 5:26












@RossMillikan To be fair, there's a lot of repetition in the tables.
– Rushabh Mehta
Dec 4 at 13:54




@RossMillikan To be fair, there's a lot of repetition in the tables.
– Rushabh Mehta
Dec 4 at 13:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
14
down vote



accepted










I'm going to go out on a limb and say...




although not technically a "language" per se, ROT13, mainly because it fits the clues well.

This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!

rot13 is often written down, but it is never communicated verbally as it is very rare that something encoded with rot13 is remotely pronounceable.

Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!

rot13 is commonly used for basic encryption and can be found all over puzzling.SE to encode spoilers in comments.

But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, learning it defeats its purpose!

No one can usually "read" rot13 simply by looking at it, they usually go through an online decoder. "Learning" to read rot13 would defeat its' main purpose, since it exists to hide spoilers.







share|improve this answer





















  • Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 3:07










  • @deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 4:19










  • Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Dec 4 at 14:08










  • @IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 14:34











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76028%2fyou-really-dont-want-to-learn-this-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
14
down vote



accepted










I'm going to go out on a limb and say...




although not technically a "language" per se, ROT13, mainly because it fits the clues well.

This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!

rot13 is often written down, but it is never communicated verbally as it is very rare that something encoded with rot13 is remotely pronounceable.

Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!

rot13 is commonly used for basic encryption and can be found all over puzzling.SE to encode spoilers in comments.

But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, learning it defeats its purpose!

No one can usually "read" rot13 simply by looking at it, they usually go through an online decoder. "Learning" to read rot13 would defeat its' main purpose, since it exists to hide spoilers.







share|improve this answer





















  • Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 3:07










  • @deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 4:19










  • Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Dec 4 at 14:08










  • @IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 14:34















up vote
14
down vote



accepted










I'm going to go out on a limb and say...




although not technically a "language" per se, ROT13, mainly because it fits the clues well.

This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!

rot13 is often written down, but it is never communicated verbally as it is very rare that something encoded with rot13 is remotely pronounceable.

Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!

rot13 is commonly used for basic encryption and can be found all over puzzling.SE to encode spoilers in comments.

But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, learning it defeats its purpose!

No one can usually "read" rot13 simply by looking at it, they usually go through an online decoder. "Learning" to read rot13 would defeat its' main purpose, since it exists to hide spoilers.







share|improve this answer





















  • Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 3:07










  • @deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 4:19










  • Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Dec 4 at 14:08










  • @IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 14:34













up vote
14
down vote



accepted







up vote
14
down vote



accepted






I'm going to go out on a limb and say...




although not technically a "language" per se, ROT13, mainly because it fits the clues well.

This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!

rot13 is often written down, but it is never communicated verbally as it is very rare that something encoded with rot13 is remotely pronounceable.

Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!

rot13 is commonly used for basic encryption and can be found all over puzzling.SE to encode spoilers in comments.

But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, learning it defeats its purpose!

No one can usually "read" rot13 simply by looking at it, they usually go through an online decoder. "Learning" to read rot13 would defeat its' main purpose, since it exists to hide spoilers.







share|improve this answer












I'm going to go out on a limb and say...




although not technically a "language" per se, ROT13, mainly because it fits the clues well.

This language is written, very rarely (maybe never) spoken. In fact, it would be difficult to pronounce!

rot13 is often written down, but it is never communicated verbally as it is very rare that something encoded with rot13 is remotely pronounceable.

Still, it's a common language. In fact, you've probably come across it here (puzzling.SE) often!

rot13 is commonly used for basic encryption and can be found all over puzzling.SE to encode spoilers in comments.

But, hardly anybody (maybe nobody) learns this language. In fact, learning it defeats its purpose!

No one can usually "read" rot13 simply by looking at it, they usually go through an online decoder. "Learning" to read rot13 would defeat its' main purpose, since it exists to hide spoilers.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 4 at 2:57









Hugh

1,325615




1,325615












  • Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 3:07










  • @deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 4:19










  • Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Dec 4 at 14:08










  • @IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 14:34


















  • Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
    – deep thought
    Dec 4 at 3:07










  • @deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 4:19










  • Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
    – Ilmari Karonen
    Dec 4 at 14:08










  • @IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
    – Hugh
    Dec 4 at 14:34
















Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
– deep thought
Dec 4 at 3:07




Well that didn't take long :-) Well done.
– deep thought
Dec 4 at 3:07












@deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
– Hugh
Dec 4 at 4:19




@deepthought I'm surprised that was right! I loved the riddle since it was nice and easy, and had a connection to PSE.
– Hugh
Dec 4 at 4:19












Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 4 at 14:08




Sbe jung vg'f jbegu, vg'f abg gung uneq gb yrnea gb ernq egb13. V pna qb vg nyzbfg nf snfg nf V pna ernq Terrx be Plevyyvp yrggref. Vg qbrf fgvyy freir vgf checbfr, fvapr (rkprcg sbe n srj pbzzba cuenfrf) V fgvyy arrq gb pbapragengr gb or noyr gb ernq vg.
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 4 at 14:08












@IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
– Hugh
Dec 4 at 14:34




@IlmariKaronen I guess the point is, you really can't read it as easily as English.
– Hugh
Dec 4 at 14:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76028%2fyou-really-dont-want-to-learn-this-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?