How to prove an equivalence of two equations?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.
I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:
It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
“$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$
So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.
For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:
Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.
I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.
So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.
Could anyone please help?
Thanks
Best regards
Asg
proof-verification divisibility greatest-common-divisor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.
I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:
It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
“$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$
So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.
For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:
Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.
I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.
So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.
Could anyone please help?
Thanks
Best regards
Asg
proof-verification divisibility greatest-common-divisor
What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44
Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.
I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:
It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
“$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$
So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.
For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:
Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.
I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.
So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.
Could anyone please help?
Thanks
Best regards
Asg
proof-verification divisibility greatest-common-divisor
Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.
I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:
It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
“$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$
So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.
For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:
Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.
I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.
So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.
Could anyone please help?
Thanks
Best regards
Asg
proof-verification divisibility greatest-common-divisor
proof-verification divisibility greatest-common-divisor
edited Nov 19 at 9:38
asked Nov 19 at 7:41
Asg
84
84
What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44
Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46
add a comment |
What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44
Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46
What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44
What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44
Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46
Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. There are several issues.
- You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$
- The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. There are several issues.
- You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$
- The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. There are several issues.
- You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$
- The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
No, it is not correct. There are several issues.
- You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$
- The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.
No, it is not correct. There are several issues.
- You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$
- The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.
answered Nov 19 at 8:26
José Carlos Santos
145k22115214
145k22115214
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
add a comment |
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004624%2fhow-to-prove-an-equivalence-of-two-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44
Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46