Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?












0












$begingroup$


Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?



The Theorem is the following.



" X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions



1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.



2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.



3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "



$X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?



Can anyone please make me understand ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?



    The Theorem is the following.



    " X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions



    1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.



    2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.



    3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "



    $X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?



    Can anyone please make me understand ?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?



      The Theorem is the following.



      " X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions



      1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.



      2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.



      3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "



      $X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?



      Can anyone please make me understand ?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?



      The Theorem is the following.



      " X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions



      1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.



      2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.



      3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "



      $X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?



      Can anyone please make me understand ?







      general-topology compactness






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 30 '18 at 16:23









      Henno Brandsma

      117k349127




      117k349127










      asked Dec 30 '18 at 15:30









      cmicmi

      1,159313




      1,159313






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.



          Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.



          So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.



          To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056935%2fwhy-it-is-needed-to-show-x-is-a-subspace-of-y-in-the-one-point-compactificat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.



            Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.



            So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.



            To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.



              Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.



              So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.



              To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.



                Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.



                So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.



                To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.



                Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.



                So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.



                To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 30 '18 at 16:03

























                answered Dec 30 '18 at 15:55









                drhabdrhab

                104k545136




                104k545136






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056935%2fwhy-it-is-needed-to-show-x-is-a-subspace-of-y-in-the-one-point-compactificat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?