Solving an DE involving a logarithm
$begingroup$
I've the following DE, describing a physical phenomenon. And the prupose is to solve that DE:
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
The intial conditon is equal to $x(0)=x_0$.
For the constants (because that is maybe important for an approximation):
$r$ can be very large;
$l$ can be very large;
$a$ is round about $0.02526$;
$b$ is very small, round about $300cdot10^{-6}$;
$x_0$ can be very large
I've no idea where to start what so ever. Thanks for any help or ideas
ordinary-differential-equations functions logarithms physics mathematical-physics
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've the following DE, describing a physical phenomenon. And the prupose is to solve that DE:
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
The intial conditon is equal to $x(0)=x_0$.
For the constants (because that is maybe important for an approximation):
$r$ can be very large;
$l$ can be very large;
$a$ is round about $0.02526$;
$b$ is very small, round about $300cdot10^{-6}$;
$x_0$ can be very large
I've no idea where to start what so ever. Thanks for any help or ideas
ordinary-differential-equations functions logarithms physics mathematical-physics
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think that numerical methods would be required.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 30 '18 at 16:36
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici I've no idea how or why
$endgroup$
– Klopjas
Dec 30 '18 at 16:42
$begingroup$
It's a separable equation, so it's solvable by quadratures in principle, but probably not explicitly in practice since you get a rather nasty integral...
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Dec 30 '18 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've the following DE, describing a physical phenomenon. And the prupose is to solve that DE:
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
The intial conditon is equal to $x(0)=x_0$.
For the constants (because that is maybe important for an approximation):
$r$ can be very large;
$l$ can be very large;
$a$ is round about $0.02526$;
$b$ is very small, round about $300cdot10^{-6}$;
$x_0$ can be very large
I've no idea where to start what so ever. Thanks for any help or ideas
ordinary-differential-equations functions logarithms physics mathematical-physics
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
$endgroup$
I've the following DE, describing a physical phenomenon. And the prupose is to solve that DE:
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
The intial conditon is equal to $x(0)=x_0$.
For the constants (because that is maybe important for an approximation):
$r$ can be very large;
$l$ can be very large;
$a$ is round about $0.02526$;
$b$ is very small, round about $300cdot10^{-6}$;
$x_0$ can be very large
I've no idea where to start what so ever. Thanks for any help or ideas
ordinary-differential-equations functions logarithms physics mathematical-physics
ordinary-differential-equations functions logarithms physics mathematical-physics
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
asked Dec 30 '18 at 14:33
KlopjasKlopjas
714
714
$begingroup$
I think that numerical methods would be required.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 30 '18 at 16:36
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici I've no idea how or why
$endgroup$
– Klopjas
Dec 30 '18 at 16:42
$begingroup$
It's a separable equation, so it's solvable by quadratures in principle, but probably not explicitly in practice since you get a rather nasty integral...
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Dec 30 '18 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that numerical methods would be required.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 30 '18 at 16:36
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici I've no idea how or why
$endgroup$
– Klopjas
Dec 30 '18 at 16:42
$begingroup$
It's a separable equation, so it's solvable by quadratures in principle, but probably not explicitly in practice since you get a rather nasty integral...
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Dec 30 '18 at 17:47
$begingroup$
I think that numerical methods would be required.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 30 '18 at 16:36
$begingroup$
I think that numerical methods would be required.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 30 '18 at 16:36
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici I've no idea how or why
$endgroup$
– Klopjas
Dec 30 '18 at 16:42
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici I've no idea how or why
$endgroup$
– Klopjas
Dec 30 '18 at 16:42
$begingroup$
It's a separable equation, so it's solvable by quadratures in principle, but probably not explicitly in practice since you get a rather nasty integral...
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Dec 30 '18 at 17:47
$begingroup$
It's a separable equation, so it's solvable by quadratures in principle, but probably not explicitly in practice since you get a rather nasty integral...
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Dec 30 '18 at 17:47
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
This is a separable ODE.
$$x'(t)=frac{dx}{dt}=-frac{1}{l}left(rx(t)+alnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)right)$$
$$dt=-frac{l}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}dx$$
$$t=-lintfrac{dx}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}$$
With the condition $x(0)=x_0$ :
$$t(x)=-lint_{x_0}^xfrac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$$
As far as I know there is no closed form of this integral in terms of a finite number of standard functions. The same for the inverse function $x(t)$.
So, the analytic solution is a function defined by an integral. This is very common in practice. One have to proceed with numerical integration.
It is very easy to draw $x(t)$ thanks to usual numerical integration : Draw $t(x)$ from the above integral. Plot the points $(t,x)$ instead of $(x,t)$ , i.e. with $t$ on horizontal axis and $x$ on vertical axis.
To compute the value of $x(t)$ at a given value $t$ , proceed to the numerical integration of $-lint_{x_0}frac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$ with $xi$ increasing up to reach the specified value $t$ . The value of $xi$ at this point gives the value of $x(t)$ .
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056875%2fsolving-an-de-involving-a-logarithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
This is a separable ODE.
$$x'(t)=frac{dx}{dt}=-frac{1}{l}left(rx(t)+alnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)right)$$
$$dt=-frac{l}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}dx$$
$$t=-lintfrac{dx}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}$$
With the condition $x(0)=x_0$ :
$$t(x)=-lint_{x_0}^xfrac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$$
As far as I know there is no closed form of this integral in terms of a finite number of standard functions. The same for the inverse function $x(t)$.
So, the analytic solution is a function defined by an integral. This is very common in practice. One have to proceed with numerical integration.
It is very easy to draw $x(t)$ thanks to usual numerical integration : Draw $t(x)$ from the above integral. Plot the points $(t,x)$ instead of $(x,t)$ , i.e. with $t$ on horizontal axis and $x$ on vertical axis.
To compute the value of $x(t)$ at a given value $t$ , proceed to the numerical integration of $-lint_{x_0}frac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$ with $xi$ increasing up to reach the specified value $t$ . The value of $xi$ at this point gives the value of $x(t)$ .
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
This is a separable ODE.
$$x'(t)=frac{dx}{dt}=-frac{1}{l}left(rx(t)+alnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)right)$$
$$dt=-frac{l}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}dx$$
$$t=-lintfrac{dx}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}$$
With the condition $x(0)=x_0$ :
$$t(x)=-lint_{x_0}^xfrac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$$
As far as I know there is no closed form of this integral in terms of a finite number of standard functions. The same for the inverse function $x(t)$.
So, the analytic solution is a function defined by an integral. This is very common in practice. One have to proceed with numerical integration.
It is very easy to draw $x(t)$ thanks to usual numerical integration : Draw $t(x)$ from the above integral. Plot the points $(t,x)$ instead of $(x,t)$ , i.e. with $t$ on horizontal axis and $x$ on vertical axis.
To compute the value of $x(t)$ at a given value $t$ , proceed to the numerical integration of $-lint_{x_0}frac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$ with $xi$ increasing up to reach the specified value $t$ . The value of $xi$ at this point gives the value of $x(t)$ .
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
This is a separable ODE.
$$x'(t)=frac{dx}{dt}=-frac{1}{l}left(rx(t)+alnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)right)$$
$$dt=-frac{l}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}dx$$
$$t=-lintfrac{dx}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}$$
With the condition $x(0)=x_0$ :
$$t(x)=-lint_{x_0}^xfrac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$$
As far as I know there is no closed form of this integral in terms of a finite number of standard functions. The same for the inverse function $x(t)$.
So, the analytic solution is a function defined by an integral. This is very common in practice. One have to proceed with numerical integration.
It is very easy to draw $x(t)$ thanks to usual numerical integration : Draw $t(x)$ from the above integral. Plot the points $(t,x)$ instead of $(x,t)$ , i.e. with $t$ on horizontal axis and $x$ on vertical axis.
To compute the value of $x(t)$ at a given value $t$ , proceed to the numerical integration of $-lint_{x_0}frac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$ with $xi$ increasing up to reach the specified value $t$ . The value of $xi$ at this point gives the value of $x(t)$ .
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
$endgroup$
$$x(t)cdot r+x'(t)cdot l+acdotlnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)=0spaceLongleftrightarrowspace x(t)=dots$$
This is a separable ODE.
$$x'(t)=frac{dx}{dt}=-frac{1}{l}left(rx(t)+alnleft(1+frac{x(t)}{b}right)right)$$
$$dt=-frac{l}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}dx$$
$$t=-lintfrac{dx}{rx+alnleft(1+frac{x}{b}right)}$$
With the condition $x(0)=x_0$ :
$$t(x)=-lint_{x_0}^xfrac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$$
As far as I know there is no closed form of this integral in terms of a finite number of standard functions. The same for the inverse function $x(t)$.
So, the analytic solution is a function defined by an integral. This is very common in practice. One have to proceed with numerical integration.
It is very easy to draw $x(t)$ thanks to usual numerical integration : Draw $t(x)$ from the above integral. Plot the points $(t,x)$ instead of $(x,t)$ , i.e. with $t$ on horizontal axis and $x$ on vertical axis.
To compute the value of $x(t)$ at a given value $t$ , proceed to the numerical integration of $-lint_{x_0}frac{dxi}{rxi+alnleft(1+frac{xi}{b}right)}$ with $xi$ increasing up to reach the specified value $t$ . The value of $xi$ at this point gives the value of $x(t)$ .
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:08
JJacquelinJJacquelin
45.8k21858
45.8k21858
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056875%2fsolving-an-de-involving-a-logarithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think that numerical methods would be required.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Dec 30 '18 at 16:36
$begingroup$
@ClaudeLeibovici I've no idea how or why
$endgroup$
– Klopjas
Dec 30 '18 at 16:42
$begingroup$
It's a separable equation, so it's solvable by quadratures in principle, but probably not explicitly in practice since you get a rather nasty integral...
$endgroup$
– Hans Lundmark
Dec 30 '18 at 17:47