Broken package after update: linux-headers, error: BrokenCount >0
Ubuntu 12.04.
After an update, I get a red warning icon in the system tray, warning about an error: broken count >0
Opening Update manager, I see that the broken package is linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (new install)
Specificaly I have my ubuntu on an AspireOne with 8gb internal storage.
I tried apt-get clean
as suggested in another question on this site, and tried reinstalling the package in Synaptic.
I have tried to reboot but to no avail.
I have also tried apt-get install --fix-broken
and I get the following:
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
[sudo] password for elina:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 38 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/977 kB of archives.
After this operation 11,3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]; y
(Reading database ... 437051 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (from .../linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable to create `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h'): No space left on device
No apport report written because the error message indicates a disk full error
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I've tried all suggestions I could find:
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get autoclean
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get -f install
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
Then I saw that on the error there was a mention about free space. So I did a df -h and the result was:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 7,0G 5,5G 1,1G 84% /
udev 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none 242M 352K 242M 1% /run/shm
I see that on my root folder I have 1.1Gb free. The broken package is
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
which only takes up 11.3Mb on my hard drive.
I'm soooo lost.
I really hope there is something I'm missing here. I don't want to go about reformatting this bucket. It's really not worth the time.
Any help for fixing this would be hot.
apt updates
|
show 1 more comment
Ubuntu 12.04.
After an update, I get a red warning icon in the system tray, warning about an error: broken count >0
Opening Update manager, I see that the broken package is linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (new install)
Specificaly I have my ubuntu on an AspireOne with 8gb internal storage.
I tried apt-get clean
as suggested in another question on this site, and tried reinstalling the package in Synaptic.
I have tried to reboot but to no avail.
I have also tried apt-get install --fix-broken
and I get the following:
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
[sudo] password for elina:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 38 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/977 kB of archives.
After this operation 11,3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]; y
(Reading database ... 437051 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (from .../linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable to create `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h'): No space left on device
No apport report written because the error message indicates a disk full error
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I've tried all suggestions I could find:
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get autoclean
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get -f install
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
Then I saw that on the error there was a mention about free space. So I did a df -h and the result was:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 7,0G 5,5G 1,1G 84% /
udev 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none 242M 352K 242M 1% /run/shm
I see that on my root folder I have 1.1Gb free. The broken package is
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
which only takes up 11.3Mb on my hard drive.
I'm soooo lost.
I really hope there is something I'm missing here. I don't want to go about reformatting this bucket. It's really not worth the time.
Any help for fixing this would be hot.
apt updates
Could you post the output of this command?sudo parted /dev/sda print
– MiJyn
Nov 28 '12 at 18:28
of course. here it is:elina@AcerAspireONE:~$ sudo parted /dev/sda print [sudo] password for elina: Model: ATA SSDPAMM0008G1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 8070MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 7546MB 7545MB primary ext4 boot 2 7547MB 8069MB 522MB extended 5 7547MB 8069MB 522MB logical linux-swap(v1)
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:18
Just I can't seem to be able to add line breaks... ??? I'm supposed to add 2 spaces at the end of each line to make the line break but no go? why?
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:21
possibly related: askubuntu.com/questions/195014/i-cant-update-my-ubuntu
– David Cary
Feb 5 '14 at 6:39
Not the same problem David. I have the solution below. The thing was with the inodes. Read my answer below.
– escozul
Feb 5 '14 at 12:22
|
show 1 more comment
Ubuntu 12.04.
After an update, I get a red warning icon in the system tray, warning about an error: broken count >0
Opening Update manager, I see that the broken package is linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (new install)
Specificaly I have my ubuntu on an AspireOne with 8gb internal storage.
I tried apt-get clean
as suggested in another question on this site, and tried reinstalling the package in Synaptic.
I have tried to reboot but to no avail.
I have also tried apt-get install --fix-broken
and I get the following:
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
[sudo] password for elina:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 38 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/977 kB of archives.
After this operation 11,3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]; y
(Reading database ... 437051 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (from .../linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable to create `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h'): No space left on device
No apport report written because the error message indicates a disk full error
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I've tried all suggestions I could find:
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get autoclean
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get -f install
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
Then I saw that on the error there was a mention about free space. So I did a df -h and the result was:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 7,0G 5,5G 1,1G 84% /
udev 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none 242M 352K 242M 1% /run/shm
I see that on my root folder I have 1.1Gb free. The broken package is
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
which only takes up 11.3Mb on my hard drive.
I'm soooo lost.
I really hope there is something I'm missing here. I don't want to go about reformatting this bucket. It's really not worth the time.
Any help for fixing this would be hot.
apt updates
Ubuntu 12.04.
After an update, I get a red warning icon in the system tray, warning about an error: broken count >0
Opening Update manager, I see that the broken package is linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (new install)
Specificaly I have my ubuntu on an AspireOne with 8gb internal storage.
I tried apt-get clean
as suggested in another question on this site, and tried reinstalling the package in Synaptic.
I have tried to reboot but to no avail.
I have also tried apt-get install --fix-broken
and I get the following:
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
[sudo] password for elina:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 38 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/977 kB of archives.
After this operation 11,3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]; y
(Reading database ... 437051 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae (from .../linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable to create `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae/include/config/usb/gspca/sonixb.h'): No space left on device
No apport report written because the error message indicates a disk full error
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I've tried all suggestions I could find:
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get autoclean
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get -f install
sudo apt-get install --fix-broken
Then I saw that on the error there was a mention about free space. So I did a df -h and the result was:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 7,0G 5,5G 1,1G 84% /
udev 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none 242M 352K 242M 1% /run/shm
I see that on my root folder I have 1.1Gb free. The broken package is
linux-headers-3.2.0-33-generic-pae_3.2.0-33.52_i386.deb
which only takes up 11.3Mb on my hard drive.
I'm soooo lost.
I really hope there is something I'm missing here. I don't want to go about reformatting this bucket. It's really not worth the time.
Any help for fixing this would be hot.
apt updates
apt updates
edited Mar 2 '17 at 21:58
karel
57.2k12127146
57.2k12127146
asked Nov 28 '12 at 18:25
escozul
106117
106117
Could you post the output of this command?sudo parted /dev/sda print
– MiJyn
Nov 28 '12 at 18:28
of course. here it is:elina@AcerAspireONE:~$ sudo parted /dev/sda print [sudo] password for elina: Model: ATA SSDPAMM0008G1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 8070MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 7546MB 7545MB primary ext4 boot 2 7547MB 8069MB 522MB extended 5 7547MB 8069MB 522MB logical linux-swap(v1)
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:18
Just I can't seem to be able to add line breaks... ??? I'm supposed to add 2 spaces at the end of each line to make the line break but no go? why?
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:21
possibly related: askubuntu.com/questions/195014/i-cant-update-my-ubuntu
– David Cary
Feb 5 '14 at 6:39
Not the same problem David. I have the solution below. The thing was with the inodes. Read my answer below.
– escozul
Feb 5 '14 at 12:22
|
show 1 more comment
Could you post the output of this command?sudo parted /dev/sda print
– MiJyn
Nov 28 '12 at 18:28
of course. here it is:elina@AcerAspireONE:~$ sudo parted /dev/sda print [sudo] password for elina: Model: ATA SSDPAMM0008G1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 8070MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 7546MB 7545MB primary ext4 boot 2 7547MB 8069MB 522MB extended 5 7547MB 8069MB 522MB logical linux-swap(v1)
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:18
Just I can't seem to be able to add line breaks... ??? I'm supposed to add 2 spaces at the end of each line to make the line break but no go? why?
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:21
possibly related: askubuntu.com/questions/195014/i-cant-update-my-ubuntu
– David Cary
Feb 5 '14 at 6:39
Not the same problem David. I have the solution below. The thing was with the inodes. Read my answer below.
– escozul
Feb 5 '14 at 12:22
Could you post the output of this command?
sudo parted /dev/sda print
– MiJyn
Nov 28 '12 at 18:28
Could you post the output of this command?
sudo parted /dev/sda print
– MiJyn
Nov 28 '12 at 18:28
of course. here it is:
elina@AcerAspireONE:~$ sudo parted /dev/sda print [sudo] password for elina: Model: ATA SSDPAMM0008G1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 8070MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 7546MB 7545MB primary ext4 boot 2 7547MB 8069MB 522MB extended 5 7547MB 8069MB 522MB logical linux-swap(v1)
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:18
of course. here it is:
elina@AcerAspireONE:~$ sudo parted /dev/sda print [sudo] password for elina: Model: ATA SSDPAMM0008G1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 8070MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 7546MB 7545MB primary ext4 boot 2 7547MB 8069MB 522MB extended 5 7547MB 8069MB 522MB logical linux-swap(v1)
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:18
Just I can't seem to be able to add line breaks... ??? I'm supposed to add 2 spaces at the end of each line to make the line break but no go? why?
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:21
Just I can't seem to be able to add line breaks... ??? I'm supposed to add 2 spaces at the end of each line to make the line break but no go? why?
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:21
possibly related: askubuntu.com/questions/195014/i-cant-update-my-ubuntu
– David Cary
Feb 5 '14 at 6:39
possibly related: askubuntu.com/questions/195014/i-cant-update-my-ubuntu
– David Cary
Feb 5 '14 at 6:39
Not the same problem David. I have the solution below. The thing was with the inodes. Read my answer below.
– escozul
Feb 5 '14 at 12:22
Not the same problem David. I have the solution below. The thing was with the inodes. Read my answer below.
– escozul
Feb 5 '14 at 12:22
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I actually found the solution to my problems. It seemed that using root to launch nautilus caused all inodes to go up to 100%. Had to clean those up in the trashes of the root. So I did the following:
df -i
That gave me the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 456125 4435 100% /
udev 60125 491 59634 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 403 61540 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
woops! inodes in use 100%? that means lots and lots of tiny files stored somewhere. Where?
I used the command:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
That gave a huge list of files which seemed ok except the fact that the root trashes was full of files in:
/root/.local/share/Trash/files/
So I ran:
sudo rm -r /root/.local/share/Trash/files/
and:
sudo touch /forcefsck
and then restarting to let the last command do its thing.
After that, running:
df -i
and df -Th
produced the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 196674 263886 43% /
udev 60125 487 59638 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 393 61550 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
$ df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 7,0G 4,7G 2,0G 71% /
udev devtmpfs 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none tmpfs 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none tmpfs 242M 356K 242M 1% /run/shm
iNodes were back to normal and I actually saw a slight increase in disk space (from 1,1 to 2,0 Gb) That made the system very fast too so there was a positive side effect to fixing the issue since my computer now seems to be lightning fast!
I want to note that if you suffer from the same issue, any folder in your system might hold those tiny files that fill up your inodes. Carefully examining the list that is created using:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
will help you find which folder needs correction.
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
add a comment |
I had the same error while installing wine with update manager, and the only thing that helped was removing all my packages with rm /var/lib/apt/lists* -vf
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
It removed my packages, then I launched Software Center.
It said that it had broken packages, so I chose to repair them.
It downloaded the necessary packages.
After it everything went well.
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
add a comment |
I found the same problem recently but the culprit was Ubuntu itself. Due to the way it "does not" handles "rotation".
Previous versions of the linux-headers-generic package as well as the linux-images packages never got removed. If it was the last two or three no problem, but there were almost 20 versions of the kernel and kernel headers. the linux-headers package has a huge number of files, which eats up all your i-nodes. With removing all but the last tree kernels headers (previous linux-headers-generic-3.2.0-?) I went down from 100% i-nodes used to 45% used.
At first I didn't know what was causing the problem but after reading about your case I checked my i-nodes count and was a 100% full, well in practice like 200 free inodes from almost 700.000.
Just removing the previous linux-headers packages does the trick. Synaptic makes it easier with the GUI + search feature and order feature.
I write this also as a help to people encountering this problem recently.
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
add a comment |
All these answers didn't help me. But I found this page, and using the ideas there I could bring my inode count down from 100% to about 50% quickly: http://www.pkdavies.co.uk/142-dpkg-no-space-left-on-device.html
The idea is, basically to locate the folders which are eating up inodes.
In a terminal, cd to root to start:
# cd /
Then search for the folders eating up most inodes:
# for i in `ls -1A`; do echo "`find $i | sort -u | wc -l` $i"; done | sort -rn | head -20
That will give you a list of folders.
Follow the above steps again to cd into the folder with the highest count of inodes, and run the search command again.
I found lots of unused and uninstalled kernels which still took up space and inodes in the kernel sources folders, for example under /usr/src/linux-headers-*
.
BEWARE, DO NOT REMOVE THE SOURCES FOR THE INSTALLED KERNEL --- CHECK OUT WITH uname -rv
WHICH ONE THAT IS
Therefore, after I found the folders, I removed the obsolete directories one at a time, for example with
root@gamma:/usr/src# sudo rm -rf linux-headers-3.2.0-30
After this I could run this successfully to repair my system:
# apt-get -f install
Hope this helps.
Identify the current kernel release and version withuname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f223143%2fbroken-package-after-update-linux-headers-error-brokencount-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I actually found the solution to my problems. It seemed that using root to launch nautilus caused all inodes to go up to 100%. Had to clean those up in the trashes of the root. So I did the following:
df -i
That gave me the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 456125 4435 100% /
udev 60125 491 59634 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 403 61540 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
woops! inodes in use 100%? that means lots and lots of tiny files stored somewhere. Where?
I used the command:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
That gave a huge list of files which seemed ok except the fact that the root trashes was full of files in:
/root/.local/share/Trash/files/
So I ran:
sudo rm -r /root/.local/share/Trash/files/
and:
sudo touch /forcefsck
and then restarting to let the last command do its thing.
After that, running:
df -i
and df -Th
produced the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 196674 263886 43% /
udev 60125 487 59638 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 393 61550 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
$ df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 7,0G 4,7G 2,0G 71% /
udev devtmpfs 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none tmpfs 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none tmpfs 242M 356K 242M 1% /run/shm
iNodes were back to normal and I actually saw a slight increase in disk space (from 1,1 to 2,0 Gb) That made the system very fast too so there was a positive side effect to fixing the issue since my computer now seems to be lightning fast!
I want to note that if you suffer from the same issue, any folder in your system might hold those tiny files that fill up your inodes. Carefully examining the list that is created using:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
will help you find which folder needs correction.
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
add a comment |
I actually found the solution to my problems. It seemed that using root to launch nautilus caused all inodes to go up to 100%. Had to clean those up in the trashes of the root. So I did the following:
df -i
That gave me the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 456125 4435 100% /
udev 60125 491 59634 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 403 61540 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
woops! inodes in use 100%? that means lots and lots of tiny files stored somewhere. Where?
I used the command:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
That gave a huge list of files which seemed ok except the fact that the root trashes was full of files in:
/root/.local/share/Trash/files/
So I ran:
sudo rm -r /root/.local/share/Trash/files/
and:
sudo touch /forcefsck
and then restarting to let the last command do its thing.
After that, running:
df -i
and df -Th
produced the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 196674 263886 43% /
udev 60125 487 59638 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 393 61550 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
$ df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 7,0G 4,7G 2,0G 71% /
udev devtmpfs 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none tmpfs 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none tmpfs 242M 356K 242M 1% /run/shm
iNodes were back to normal and I actually saw a slight increase in disk space (from 1,1 to 2,0 Gb) That made the system very fast too so there was a positive side effect to fixing the issue since my computer now seems to be lightning fast!
I want to note that if you suffer from the same issue, any folder in your system might hold those tiny files that fill up your inodes. Carefully examining the list that is created using:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
will help you find which folder needs correction.
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
add a comment |
I actually found the solution to my problems. It seemed that using root to launch nautilus caused all inodes to go up to 100%. Had to clean those up in the trashes of the root. So I did the following:
df -i
That gave me the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 456125 4435 100% /
udev 60125 491 59634 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 403 61540 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
woops! inodes in use 100%? that means lots and lots of tiny files stored somewhere. Where?
I used the command:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
That gave a huge list of files which seemed ok except the fact that the root trashes was full of files in:
/root/.local/share/Trash/files/
So I ran:
sudo rm -r /root/.local/share/Trash/files/
and:
sudo touch /forcefsck
and then restarting to let the last command do its thing.
After that, running:
df -i
and df -Th
produced the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 196674 263886 43% /
udev 60125 487 59638 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 393 61550 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
$ df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 7,0G 4,7G 2,0G 71% /
udev devtmpfs 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none tmpfs 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none tmpfs 242M 356K 242M 1% /run/shm
iNodes were back to normal and I actually saw a slight increase in disk space (from 1,1 to 2,0 Gb) That made the system very fast too so there was a positive side effect to fixing the issue since my computer now seems to be lightning fast!
I want to note that if you suffer from the same issue, any folder in your system might hold those tiny files that fill up your inodes. Carefully examining the list that is created using:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
will help you find which folder needs correction.
I actually found the solution to my problems. It seemed that using root to launch nautilus caused all inodes to go up to 100%. Had to clean those up in the trashes of the root. So I did the following:
df -i
That gave me the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 456125 4435 100% /
udev 60125 491 59634 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 403 61540 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
woops! inodes in use 100%? that means lots and lots of tiny files stored somewhere. Where?
I used the command:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
That gave a huge list of files which seemed ok except the fact that the root trashes was full of files in:
/root/.local/share/Trash/files/
So I ran:
sudo rm -r /root/.local/share/Trash/files/
and:
sudo touch /forcefsck
and then restarting to let the last command do its thing.
After that, running:
df -i
and df -Th
produced the following:
$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 460560 196674 263886 43% /
udev 60125 487 59638 1% /dev
tmpfs 61943 393 61550 1% /run
none 61943 3 61940 1% /run/lock
none 61943 8 61935 1% /run/shm
$ df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 ext4 7,0G 4,7G 2,0G 71% /
udev devtmpfs 235M 4,0K 235M 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 97M 816K 96M 1% /run
none tmpfs 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock
none tmpfs 242M 356K 242M 1% /run/shm
iNodes were back to normal and I actually saw a slight increase in disk space (from 1,1 to 2,0 Gb) That made the system very fast too so there was a positive side effect to fixing the issue since my computer now seems to be lightning fast!
I want to note that if you suffer from the same issue, any folder in your system might hold those tiny files that fill up your inodes. Carefully examining the list that is created using:
sudo du -h /* | grep '[0-9]M'
will help you find which folder needs correction.
edited Apr 25 '17 at 7:46
Zanna
50.1k13131240
50.1k13131240
answered Nov 30 '12 at 16:18
escozul
106117
106117
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
add a comment |
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside
/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
Problem occurring also with kernel 3.13.0.108.116. This post has been useful to frame quickly that the problem were the linux headers inside
/usr/src
. There were some 50 versions stored. Already after removing one old version the inode usage went down to 99%. Other answers in this threads were useful too.– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:43
add a comment |
I had the same error while installing wine with update manager, and the only thing that helped was removing all my packages with rm /var/lib/apt/lists* -vf
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
It removed my packages, then I launched Software Center.
It said that it had broken packages, so I chose to repair them.
It downloaded the necessary packages.
After it everything went well.
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
add a comment |
I had the same error while installing wine with update manager, and the only thing that helped was removing all my packages with rm /var/lib/apt/lists* -vf
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
It removed my packages, then I launched Software Center.
It said that it had broken packages, so I chose to repair them.
It downloaded the necessary packages.
After it everything went well.
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
add a comment |
I had the same error while installing wine with update manager, and the only thing that helped was removing all my packages with rm /var/lib/apt/lists* -vf
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
It removed my packages, then I launched Software Center.
It said that it had broken packages, so I chose to repair them.
It downloaded the necessary packages.
After it everything went well.
I had the same error while installing wine with update manager, and the only thing that helped was removing all my packages with rm /var/lib/apt/lists* -vf
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf
It removed my packages, then I launched Software Center.
It said that it had broken packages, so I chose to repair them.
It downloaded the necessary packages.
After it everything went well.
edited Dec 1 '12 at 14:59
devav2
24.5k126879
24.5k126879
answered Nov 30 '12 at 12:42
user111729
411
411
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
add a comment |
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
seems that the same error can be produced by a number of ways. In my case the solution was slightly different and I've added it below.
– escozul
Nov 30 '12 at 16:21
add a comment |
I found the same problem recently but the culprit was Ubuntu itself. Due to the way it "does not" handles "rotation".
Previous versions of the linux-headers-generic package as well as the linux-images packages never got removed. If it was the last two or three no problem, but there were almost 20 versions of the kernel and kernel headers. the linux-headers package has a huge number of files, which eats up all your i-nodes. With removing all but the last tree kernels headers (previous linux-headers-generic-3.2.0-?) I went down from 100% i-nodes used to 45% used.
At first I didn't know what was causing the problem but after reading about your case I checked my i-nodes count and was a 100% full, well in practice like 200 free inodes from almost 700.000.
Just removing the previous linux-headers packages does the trick. Synaptic makes it easier with the GUI + search feature and order feature.
I write this also as a help to people encountering this problem recently.
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
add a comment |
I found the same problem recently but the culprit was Ubuntu itself. Due to the way it "does not" handles "rotation".
Previous versions of the linux-headers-generic package as well as the linux-images packages never got removed. If it was the last two or three no problem, but there were almost 20 versions of the kernel and kernel headers. the linux-headers package has a huge number of files, which eats up all your i-nodes. With removing all but the last tree kernels headers (previous linux-headers-generic-3.2.0-?) I went down from 100% i-nodes used to 45% used.
At first I didn't know what was causing the problem but after reading about your case I checked my i-nodes count and was a 100% full, well in practice like 200 free inodes from almost 700.000.
Just removing the previous linux-headers packages does the trick. Synaptic makes it easier with the GUI + search feature and order feature.
I write this also as a help to people encountering this problem recently.
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
add a comment |
I found the same problem recently but the culprit was Ubuntu itself. Due to the way it "does not" handles "rotation".
Previous versions of the linux-headers-generic package as well as the linux-images packages never got removed. If it was the last two or three no problem, but there were almost 20 versions of the kernel and kernel headers. the linux-headers package has a huge number of files, which eats up all your i-nodes. With removing all but the last tree kernels headers (previous linux-headers-generic-3.2.0-?) I went down from 100% i-nodes used to 45% used.
At first I didn't know what was causing the problem but after reading about your case I checked my i-nodes count and was a 100% full, well in practice like 200 free inodes from almost 700.000.
Just removing the previous linux-headers packages does the trick. Synaptic makes it easier with the GUI + search feature and order feature.
I write this also as a help to people encountering this problem recently.
I found the same problem recently but the culprit was Ubuntu itself. Due to the way it "does not" handles "rotation".
Previous versions of the linux-headers-generic package as well as the linux-images packages never got removed. If it was the last two or three no problem, but there were almost 20 versions of the kernel and kernel headers. the linux-headers package has a huge number of files, which eats up all your i-nodes. With removing all but the last tree kernels headers (previous linux-headers-generic-3.2.0-?) I went down from 100% i-nodes used to 45% used.
At first I didn't know what was causing the problem but after reading about your case I checked my i-nodes count and was a 100% full, well in practice like 200 free inodes from almost 700.000.
Just removing the previous linux-headers packages does the trick. Synaptic makes it easier with the GUI + search feature and order feature.
I write this also as a help to people encountering this problem recently.
answered Jul 26 '13 at 16:37
RedComet
1312
1312
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
add a comment |
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.
udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
In my case there were some 50 versions of kernel version 3.13.0.
udev -rv
told me that I was running on 3.10.13-108, which was also the one listed as broken package (worryingly). Therefore I kept the versions 10* and 9* to stay on the side of caution. The inode usage has fallen from 100% to 41%– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:51
add a comment |
All these answers didn't help me. But I found this page, and using the ideas there I could bring my inode count down from 100% to about 50% quickly: http://www.pkdavies.co.uk/142-dpkg-no-space-left-on-device.html
The idea is, basically to locate the folders which are eating up inodes.
In a terminal, cd to root to start:
# cd /
Then search for the folders eating up most inodes:
# for i in `ls -1A`; do echo "`find $i | sort -u | wc -l` $i"; done | sort -rn | head -20
That will give you a list of folders.
Follow the above steps again to cd into the folder with the highest count of inodes, and run the search command again.
I found lots of unused and uninstalled kernels which still took up space and inodes in the kernel sources folders, for example under /usr/src/linux-headers-*
.
BEWARE, DO NOT REMOVE THE SOURCES FOR THE INSTALLED KERNEL --- CHECK OUT WITH uname -rv
WHICH ONE THAT IS
Therefore, after I found the folders, I removed the obsolete directories one at a time, for example with
root@gamma:/usr/src# sudo rm -rf linux-headers-3.2.0-30
After this I could run this successfully to repair my system:
# apt-get -f install
Hope this helps.
Identify the current kernel release and version withuname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
add a comment |
All these answers didn't help me. But I found this page, and using the ideas there I could bring my inode count down from 100% to about 50% quickly: http://www.pkdavies.co.uk/142-dpkg-no-space-left-on-device.html
The idea is, basically to locate the folders which are eating up inodes.
In a terminal, cd to root to start:
# cd /
Then search for the folders eating up most inodes:
# for i in `ls -1A`; do echo "`find $i | sort -u | wc -l` $i"; done | sort -rn | head -20
That will give you a list of folders.
Follow the above steps again to cd into the folder with the highest count of inodes, and run the search command again.
I found lots of unused and uninstalled kernels which still took up space and inodes in the kernel sources folders, for example under /usr/src/linux-headers-*
.
BEWARE, DO NOT REMOVE THE SOURCES FOR THE INSTALLED KERNEL --- CHECK OUT WITH uname -rv
WHICH ONE THAT IS
Therefore, after I found the folders, I removed the obsolete directories one at a time, for example with
root@gamma:/usr/src# sudo rm -rf linux-headers-3.2.0-30
After this I could run this successfully to repair my system:
# apt-get -f install
Hope this helps.
Identify the current kernel release and version withuname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
add a comment |
All these answers didn't help me. But I found this page, and using the ideas there I could bring my inode count down from 100% to about 50% quickly: http://www.pkdavies.co.uk/142-dpkg-no-space-left-on-device.html
The idea is, basically to locate the folders which are eating up inodes.
In a terminal, cd to root to start:
# cd /
Then search for the folders eating up most inodes:
# for i in `ls -1A`; do echo "`find $i | sort -u | wc -l` $i"; done | sort -rn | head -20
That will give you a list of folders.
Follow the above steps again to cd into the folder with the highest count of inodes, and run the search command again.
I found lots of unused and uninstalled kernels which still took up space and inodes in the kernel sources folders, for example under /usr/src/linux-headers-*
.
BEWARE, DO NOT REMOVE THE SOURCES FOR THE INSTALLED KERNEL --- CHECK OUT WITH uname -rv
WHICH ONE THAT IS
Therefore, after I found the folders, I removed the obsolete directories one at a time, for example with
root@gamma:/usr/src# sudo rm -rf linux-headers-3.2.0-30
After this I could run this successfully to repair my system:
# apt-get -f install
Hope this helps.
All these answers didn't help me. But I found this page, and using the ideas there I could bring my inode count down from 100% to about 50% quickly: http://www.pkdavies.co.uk/142-dpkg-no-space-left-on-device.html
The idea is, basically to locate the folders which are eating up inodes.
In a terminal, cd to root to start:
# cd /
Then search for the folders eating up most inodes:
# for i in `ls -1A`; do echo "`find $i | sort -u | wc -l` $i"; done | sort -rn | head -20
That will give you a list of folders.
Follow the above steps again to cd into the folder with the highest count of inodes, and run the search command again.
I found lots of unused and uninstalled kernels which still took up space and inodes in the kernel sources folders, for example under /usr/src/linux-headers-*
.
BEWARE, DO NOT REMOVE THE SOURCES FOR THE INSTALLED KERNEL --- CHECK OUT WITH uname -rv
WHICH ONE THAT IS
Therefore, after I found the folders, I removed the obsolete directories one at a time, for example with
root@gamma:/usr/src# sudo rm -rf linux-headers-3.2.0-30
After this I could run this successfully to repair my system:
# apt-get -f install
Hope this helps.
edited Feb 5 '17 at 17:24
XavierStuvw
517422
517422
answered Nov 30 '14 at 15:31
woohoo
1848
1848
Identify the current kernel release and version withuname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
add a comment |
Identify the current kernel release and version withuname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.
– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
Identify the current kernel release and version with
uname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
Identify the current kernel release and version with
uname -rv
. This will be the one to stay well clear of when deleting the directories of old versions. Handle with care.– XavierStuvw
Feb 5 '17 at 16:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f223143%2fbroken-package-after-update-linux-headers-error-brokencount-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Could you post the output of this command?
sudo parted /dev/sda print
– MiJyn
Nov 28 '12 at 18:28
of course. here it is:
elina@AcerAspireONE:~$ sudo parted /dev/sda print [sudo] password for elina: Model: ATA SSDPAMM0008G1 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 8070MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 7546MB 7545MB primary ext4 boot 2 7547MB 8069MB 522MB extended 5 7547MB 8069MB 522MB logical linux-swap(v1)
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:18
Just I can't seem to be able to add line breaks... ??? I'm supposed to add 2 spaces at the end of each line to make the line break but no go? why?
– escozul
Nov 28 '12 at 22:21
possibly related: askubuntu.com/questions/195014/i-cant-update-my-ubuntu
– David Cary
Feb 5 '14 at 6:39
Not the same problem David. I have the solution below. The thing was with the inodes. Read my answer below.
– escozul
Feb 5 '14 at 12:22