Escape character in LaTeX
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
I need to output the below text but since is a special character, I cannot:
[RegularExpression(@"d+")]
Also sometimes I need use dollar sign $
as well but it seems to be a special char, too.
What is the way to escape those in LaTeX?
UPDATE:
I used verb
as suggested but I am unable to run commands inside it. Also, in the output the font and the opacity of the text is different than the default one:
verb|[RegularExpression(newline @"d+")]|
symbols tex-core characters
add a comment |
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
I need to output the below text but since is a special character, I cannot:
[RegularExpression(@"d+")]
Also sometimes I need use dollar sign $
as well but it seems to be a special char, too.
What is the way to escape those in LaTeX?
UPDATE:
I used verb
as suggested but I am unable to run commands inside it. Also, in the output the font and the opacity of the text is different than the default one:
verb|[RegularExpression(newline @"d+")]|
symbols tex-core characters
2
In short: cespedes.org/blog/85/how-to-escape-latex-special-characters
– caw
Oct 10 '13 at 0:09
add a comment |
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
up vote
114
down vote
favorite
I need to output the below text but since is a special character, I cannot:
[RegularExpression(@"d+")]
Also sometimes I need use dollar sign $
as well but it seems to be a special char, too.
What is the way to escape those in LaTeX?
UPDATE:
I used verb
as suggested but I am unable to run commands inside it. Also, in the output the font and the opacity of the text is different than the default one:
verb|[RegularExpression(newline @"d+")]|
symbols tex-core characters
I need to output the below text but since is a special character, I cannot:
[RegularExpression(@"d+")]
Also sometimes I need use dollar sign $
as well but it seems to be a special char, too.
What is the way to escape those in LaTeX?
UPDATE:
I used verb
as suggested but I am unable to run commands inside it. Also, in the output the font and the opacity of the text is different than the default one:
verb|[RegularExpression(newline @"d+")]|
symbols tex-core characters
symbols tex-core characters
edited Mar 25 '12 at 0:27
lockstep
189k52585719
189k52585719
asked Nov 12 '11 at 15:55
tugberk
1,31741824
1,31741824
2
In short: cespedes.org/blog/85/how-to-escape-latex-special-characters
– caw
Oct 10 '13 at 0:09
add a comment |
2
In short: cespedes.org/blog/85/how-to-escape-latex-special-characters
– caw
Oct 10 '13 at 0:09
2
2
In short: cespedes.org/blog/85/how-to-escape-latex-special-characters
– caw
Oct 10 '13 at 0:09
In short: cespedes.org/blog/85/how-to-escape-latex-special-characters
– caw
Oct 10 '13 at 0:09
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
181
down vote
accepted
The following ten characters have special meanings in (La)TeX:
&
%
$
#
_
{
}
~
^
Outside verb
, the first seven of them can be typeset by prepending a backslash; for the other three, use the macros textasciitilde
, textasciicircum
, and textbackslash
.
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
& % $ # _ { }
textasciitilde
textasciicircum
textbackslash
end{document}
Note that the seven "single non-letter" macros don't gobble the space following them.
For the last three that do gobble up the space after them you can try one of these methods to add space.
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by usingnewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
orrenewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.
– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
It's worth adding that[
(and]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For exampleitem [a]bc
will not print[a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).
– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Usually text like that is typeset in typewriter type and so there's a slick way to arrange it
verb|[RegularExpression(@"d+")]|
After verb
should go a character that's not used in the text to print "verbatim" and the same character should follow the text.
This command has a drawback: it can't be used in the argument of other commands.
There's a second "solution" which can come handy if it's needed a limited number of times:
texttt{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
where commands inside the argument to texttt
are allowed. It's not even necessary to use texttt
:
textsf{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
will work as well (when T1 font encoding is active) and will print the string in sans serif type.
2
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
2
@egreg: in your definition ofpseudoverb
, you've got[1}
instead of[1]
. And a drawback you don't mention ofdetokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).
– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
I needed a way to escape all special characters and I found this Perl function:
sub latex_escape {
my $paragraph = shift;
# Replace a with $backslash$
# This is made more complicated because the dollars will be escaped
# by the subsequent replacement. Easiest to add backslash
# now and then add the dollars
$paragraph =~ s/\/\backslash/g;
# Must be done after escape of since this command adds latex escapes
# Replace characters that can be escaped
$paragraph =~ s/([$#&%_{}])/\$1/g;
# Replace ^ characters with ^{} so that $^F works okay
$paragraph =~ s/(^)/\$1{}/g;
# Replace tilde (~) with texttt{~{}}
$paragraph =~ s/~/\texttt{\~{}}/g;
# Now add the dollars around each backslash
$paragraph =~ s/(\backslash)/$$1$/g;
return $paragraph;
}
For example it will convert this:
& % $ # _ { } ~ ^ today
into this:
& % $ # _ { } texttt{~{}} ^{} $backslash$ $backslash$today
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
181
down vote
accepted
The following ten characters have special meanings in (La)TeX:
&
%
$
#
_
{
}
~
^
Outside verb
, the first seven of them can be typeset by prepending a backslash; for the other three, use the macros textasciitilde
, textasciicircum
, and textbackslash
.
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
& % $ # _ { }
textasciitilde
textasciicircum
textbackslash
end{document}
Note that the seven "single non-letter" macros don't gobble the space following them.
For the last three that do gobble up the space after them you can try one of these methods to add space.
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by usingnewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
orrenewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.
– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
It's worth adding that[
(and]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For exampleitem [a]bc
will not print[a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).
– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
add a comment |
up vote
181
down vote
accepted
The following ten characters have special meanings in (La)TeX:
&
%
$
#
_
{
}
~
^
Outside verb
, the first seven of them can be typeset by prepending a backslash; for the other three, use the macros textasciitilde
, textasciicircum
, and textbackslash
.
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
& % $ # _ { }
textasciitilde
textasciicircum
textbackslash
end{document}
Note that the seven "single non-letter" macros don't gobble the space following them.
For the last three that do gobble up the space after them you can try one of these methods to add space.
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by usingnewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
orrenewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.
– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
It's worth adding that[
(and]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For exampleitem [a]bc
will not print[a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).
– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
add a comment |
up vote
181
down vote
accepted
up vote
181
down vote
accepted
The following ten characters have special meanings in (La)TeX:
&
%
$
#
_
{
}
~
^
Outside verb
, the first seven of them can be typeset by prepending a backslash; for the other three, use the macros textasciitilde
, textasciicircum
, and textbackslash
.
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
& % $ # _ { }
textasciitilde
textasciicircum
textbackslash
end{document}
Note that the seven "single non-letter" macros don't gobble the space following them.
For the last three that do gobble up the space after them you can try one of these methods to add space.
The following ten characters have special meanings in (La)TeX:
&
%
$
#
_
{
}
~
^
Outside verb
, the first seven of them can be typeset by prepending a backslash; for the other three, use the macros textasciitilde
, textasciicircum
, and textbackslash
.
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
& % $ # _ { }
textasciitilde
textasciicircum
textbackslash
end{document}
Note that the seven "single non-letter" macros don't gobble the space following them.
For the last three that do gobble up the space after them you can try one of these methods to add space.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35
Community♦
1
1
answered Nov 12 '11 at 16:41
lockstep
189k52585719
189k52585719
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by usingnewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
orrenewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.
– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
It's worth adding that[
(and]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For exampleitem [a]bc
will not print[a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).
– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
add a comment |
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by usingnewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
orrenewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.
– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
It's worth adding that[
(and]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For exampleitem [a]bc
will not print[a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).
– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by using
newcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
or renewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In pdfLaTeX I have defined a new command textampersand by using
newcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
or renewcommand*{textampersand}[0]{&}
. In XeLaTeX it is already available, I think.– matth
May 9 '12 at 17:35
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
In terms of preventing characters gobbling the space after them, you can use usepackage{xspace} and then xspace directly after the character that might gobble the space to prevent this.
– Savara
Dec 1 '15 at 12:24
It's worth adding that
[
(and ]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For example item [a]bc
will not print [a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
It's worth adding that
[
(and ]
) also have a special meaning in certain circumstances. For example item [a]bc
will not print [a]bc
(as it will be considered as an option passed to the command).– kebs
Nov 11 at 8:00
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Usually text like that is typeset in typewriter type and so there's a slick way to arrange it
verb|[RegularExpression(@"d+")]|
After verb
should go a character that's not used in the text to print "verbatim" and the same character should follow the text.
This command has a drawback: it can't be used in the argument of other commands.
There's a second "solution" which can come handy if it's needed a limited number of times:
texttt{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
where commands inside the argument to texttt
are allowed. It's not even necessary to use texttt
:
textsf{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
will work as well (when T1 font encoding is active) and will print the string in sans serif type.
2
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
2
@egreg: in your definition ofpseudoverb
, you've got[1}
instead of[1]
. And a drawback you don't mention ofdetokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).
– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Usually text like that is typeset in typewriter type and so there's a slick way to arrange it
verb|[RegularExpression(@"d+")]|
After verb
should go a character that's not used in the text to print "verbatim" and the same character should follow the text.
This command has a drawback: it can't be used in the argument of other commands.
There's a second "solution" which can come handy if it's needed a limited number of times:
texttt{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
where commands inside the argument to texttt
are allowed. It's not even necessary to use texttt
:
textsf{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
will work as well (when T1 font encoding is active) and will print the string in sans serif type.
2
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
2
@egreg: in your definition ofpseudoverb
, you've got[1}
instead of[1]
. And a drawback you don't mention ofdetokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).
– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
up vote
26
down vote
Usually text like that is typeset in typewriter type and so there's a slick way to arrange it
verb|[RegularExpression(@"d+")]|
After verb
should go a character that's not used in the text to print "verbatim" and the same character should follow the text.
This command has a drawback: it can't be used in the argument of other commands.
There's a second "solution" which can come handy if it's needed a limited number of times:
texttt{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
where commands inside the argument to texttt
are allowed. It's not even necessary to use texttt
:
textsf{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
will work as well (when T1 font encoding is active) and will print the string in sans serif type.
Usually text like that is typeset in typewriter type and so there's a slick way to arrange it
verb|[RegularExpression(@"d+")]|
After verb
should go a character that's not used in the text to print "verbatim" and the same character should follow the text.
This command has a drawback: it can't be used in the argument of other commands.
There's a second "solution" which can come handy if it's needed a limited number of times:
texttt{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
where commands inside the argument to texttt
are allowed. It's not even necessary to use texttt
:
textsf{[RegularExpression(@"stringd+")]}
will work as well (when T1 font encoding is active) and will print the string in sans serif type.
edited Jan 3 '12 at 21:26
answered Nov 12 '11 at 16:04
egreg
703k8618743151
703k8618743151
2
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
2
@egreg: in your definition ofpseudoverb
, you've got[1}
instead of[1]
. And a drawback you don't mention ofdetokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).
– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
add a comment |
2
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
2
@egreg: in your definition ofpseudoverb
, you've got[1}
instead of[1]
. And a drawback you don't mention ofdetokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).
– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
2
2
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
first solution is nice but I cannot use commands inside it. second solution breaks my entire document. Does every single little thing have to be so hard in LaTeX :)
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:22
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
Would you please modify your question and show some more cases?
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 16:27
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
sure, see it. I updated!
– tugberk
Nov 12 '11 at 16:31
2
2
@egreg: in your definition of
pseudoverb
, you've got [1}
instead of [1]
. And a drawback you don't mention of detokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@egreg: in your definition of
pseudoverb
, you've got [1}
instead of [1]
. And a drawback you don't mention of detokenize
is that it inserts spaces after macros names with more than one character (not sure if it's relevant for regular expressions).– Philippe Goutet
Nov 12 '11 at 22:11
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
@PhilippeGoutet Yes, you're right; I've deleted that part
– egreg
Nov 12 '11 at 22:14
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
I needed a way to escape all special characters and I found this Perl function:
sub latex_escape {
my $paragraph = shift;
# Replace a with $backslash$
# This is made more complicated because the dollars will be escaped
# by the subsequent replacement. Easiest to add backslash
# now and then add the dollars
$paragraph =~ s/\/\backslash/g;
# Must be done after escape of since this command adds latex escapes
# Replace characters that can be escaped
$paragraph =~ s/([$#&%_{}])/\$1/g;
# Replace ^ characters with ^{} so that $^F works okay
$paragraph =~ s/(^)/\$1{}/g;
# Replace tilde (~) with texttt{~{}}
$paragraph =~ s/~/\texttt{\~{}}/g;
# Now add the dollars around each backslash
$paragraph =~ s/(\backslash)/$$1$/g;
return $paragraph;
}
For example it will convert this:
& % $ # _ { } ~ ^ today
into this:
& % $ # _ { } texttt{~{}} ^{} $backslash$ $backslash$today
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
I needed a way to escape all special characters and I found this Perl function:
sub latex_escape {
my $paragraph = shift;
# Replace a with $backslash$
# This is made more complicated because the dollars will be escaped
# by the subsequent replacement. Easiest to add backslash
# now and then add the dollars
$paragraph =~ s/\/\backslash/g;
# Must be done after escape of since this command adds latex escapes
# Replace characters that can be escaped
$paragraph =~ s/([$#&%_{}])/\$1/g;
# Replace ^ characters with ^{} so that $^F works okay
$paragraph =~ s/(^)/\$1{}/g;
# Replace tilde (~) with texttt{~{}}
$paragraph =~ s/~/\texttt{\~{}}/g;
# Now add the dollars around each backslash
$paragraph =~ s/(\backslash)/$$1$/g;
return $paragraph;
}
For example it will convert this:
& % $ # _ { } ~ ^ today
into this:
& % $ # _ { } texttt{~{}} ^{} $backslash$ $backslash$today
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
I needed a way to escape all special characters and I found this Perl function:
sub latex_escape {
my $paragraph = shift;
# Replace a with $backslash$
# This is made more complicated because the dollars will be escaped
# by the subsequent replacement. Easiest to add backslash
# now and then add the dollars
$paragraph =~ s/\/\backslash/g;
# Must be done after escape of since this command adds latex escapes
# Replace characters that can be escaped
$paragraph =~ s/([$#&%_{}])/\$1/g;
# Replace ^ characters with ^{} so that $^F works okay
$paragraph =~ s/(^)/\$1{}/g;
# Replace tilde (~) with texttt{~{}}
$paragraph =~ s/~/\texttt{\~{}}/g;
# Now add the dollars around each backslash
$paragraph =~ s/(\backslash)/$$1$/g;
return $paragraph;
}
For example it will convert this:
& % $ # _ { } ~ ^ today
into this:
& % $ # _ { } texttt{~{}} ^{} $backslash$ $backslash$today
I needed a way to escape all special characters and I found this Perl function:
sub latex_escape {
my $paragraph = shift;
# Replace a with $backslash$
# This is made more complicated because the dollars will be escaped
# by the subsequent replacement. Easiest to add backslash
# now and then add the dollars
$paragraph =~ s/\/\backslash/g;
# Must be done after escape of since this command adds latex escapes
# Replace characters that can be escaped
$paragraph =~ s/([$#&%_{}])/\$1/g;
# Replace ^ characters with ^{} so that $^F works okay
$paragraph =~ s/(^)/\$1{}/g;
# Replace tilde (~) with texttt{~{}}
$paragraph =~ s/~/\texttt{\~{}}/g;
# Now add the dollars around each backslash
$paragraph =~ s/(\backslash)/$$1$/g;
return $paragraph;
}
For example it will convert this:
& % $ # _ { } ~ ^ today
into this:
& % $ # _ { } texttt{~{}} ^{} $backslash$ $backslash$today
edited Dec 2 at 23:37
Andrew
30.3k34380
30.3k34380
answered Jun 16 '13 at 11:44
ypid
77179
77179
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34580%2fescape-character-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
In short: cespedes.org/blog/85/how-to-escape-latex-special-characters
– caw
Oct 10 '13 at 0:09