Beamer: avoid empty error list when using only inside itemize
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm using a list with itemize
as follows:
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
begin{itemize}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
end{itemize}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
This produces an error saying that I do have an empty list (the 2nd level itemize), although visually works fine.
I'm not using item<2->
because I don't want to occupy that space in the first slide.
Is there a way to prevent the error?
beamer itemize only
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm using a list with itemize
as follows:
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
begin{itemize}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
end{itemize}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
This produces an error saying that I do have an empty list (the 2nd level itemize), although visually works fine.
I'm not using item<2->
because I don't want to occupy that space in the first slide.
Is there a way to prevent the error?
beamer itemize only
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! How aboutitem<2-> Subtopic 1
instead ofonly<2->{item SubTopic 1}
?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:21
Thanks! Because I don't want to visually put a blank line if there is not item yet, the item<2-> puts a blank line in the first slide and fills it in the second. The only command do what I want.
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:25
Well, but that will result in an empty itemize in the first slide, as the error message says.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:27
Yes, that's the question. So do you think there is not a way to accomplish what I want?
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:28
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm using a list with itemize
as follows:
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
begin{itemize}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
end{itemize}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
This produces an error saying that I do have an empty list (the 2nd level itemize), although visually works fine.
I'm not using item<2->
because I don't want to occupy that space in the first slide.
Is there a way to prevent the error?
beamer itemize only
I'm using a list with itemize
as follows:
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
begin{itemize}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
end{itemize}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
This produces an error saying that I do have an empty list (the 2nd level itemize), although visually works fine.
I'm not using item<2->
because I don't want to occupy that space in the first slide.
Is there a way to prevent the error?
beamer itemize only
beamer itemize only
edited Dec 2 at 23:30
Kurt
34.5k846157
34.5k846157
asked Dec 2 at 23:19
Migdress
32
32
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! How aboutitem<2-> Subtopic 1
instead ofonly<2->{item SubTopic 1}
?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:21
Thanks! Because I don't want to visually put a blank line if there is not item yet, the item<2-> puts a blank line in the first slide and fills it in the second. The only command do what I want.
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:25
Well, but that will result in an empty itemize in the first slide, as the error message says.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:27
Yes, that's the question. So do you think there is not a way to accomplish what I want?
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:28
add a comment |
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! How aboutitem<2-> Subtopic 1
instead ofonly<2->{item SubTopic 1}
?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:21
Thanks! Because I don't want to visually put a blank line if there is not item yet, the item<2-> puts a blank line in the first slide and fills it in the second. The only command do what I want.
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:25
Well, but that will result in an empty itemize in the first slide, as the error message says.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:27
Yes, that's the question. So do you think there is not a way to accomplish what I want?
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:28
1
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! How about
item<2-> Subtopic 1
instead of only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
?– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:21
Welcome to TeX.SX! How about
item<2-> Subtopic 1
instead of only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
?– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:21
Thanks! Because I don't want to visually put a blank line if there is not item yet, the item<2-> puts a blank line in the first slide and fills it in the second. The only command do what I want.
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:25
Thanks! Because I don't want to visually put a blank line if there is not item yet, the item<2-> puts a blank line in the first slide and fills it in the second. The only command do what I want.
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:25
Well, but that will result in an empty itemize in the first slide, as the error message says.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:27
Well, but that will result in an empty itemize in the first slide, as the error message says.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:27
Yes, that's the question. So do you think there is not a way to accomplish what I want?
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:28
Yes, that's the question. So do you think there is not a way to accomplish what I want?
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Well, given you'd like to not have the whole sublevel of itemize
as the overlays unfold, you could use overlays also on the environment call.
documentclass{beamer}
begin{document}
begin{frame}
frametitle{Title}
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
only<2->{begin{itemize}}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
only<2->{end{itemize}}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
end{frame}
end{document}
But this is a somewhat fragile construction, you can easily end up with an inconsistent structure, if you get your overlays wrong.
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
1
The trick isconvert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799
– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to getconvert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Well, given you'd like to not have the whole sublevel of itemize
as the overlays unfold, you could use overlays also on the environment call.
documentclass{beamer}
begin{document}
begin{frame}
frametitle{Title}
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
only<2->{begin{itemize}}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
only<2->{end{itemize}}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
end{frame}
end{document}
But this is a somewhat fragile construction, you can easily end up with an inconsistent structure, if you get your overlays wrong.
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
1
The trick isconvert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799
– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to getconvert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Well, given you'd like to not have the whole sublevel of itemize
as the overlays unfold, you could use overlays also on the environment call.
documentclass{beamer}
begin{document}
begin{frame}
frametitle{Title}
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
only<2->{begin{itemize}}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
only<2->{end{itemize}}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
end{frame}
end{document}
But this is a somewhat fragile construction, you can easily end up with an inconsistent structure, if you get your overlays wrong.
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
1
The trick isconvert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799
– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to getconvert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Well, given you'd like to not have the whole sublevel of itemize
as the overlays unfold, you could use overlays also on the environment call.
documentclass{beamer}
begin{document}
begin{frame}
frametitle{Title}
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
only<2->{begin{itemize}}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
only<2->{end{itemize}}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
end{frame}
end{document}
But this is a somewhat fragile construction, you can easily end up with an inconsistent structure, if you get your overlays wrong.
Well, given you'd like to not have the whole sublevel of itemize
as the overlays unfold, you could use overlays also on the environment call.
documentclass{beamer}
begin{document}
begin{frame}
frametitle{Title}
begin{itemize}
item SuperTopic 1
only<2->{begin{itemize}}
only<2->{item SubTopic 1}
only<3->{item SubTopic 2}
only<2->{end{itemize}}
item SuperTopic 2
end{itemize}
end{frame}
end{document}
But this is a somewhat fragile construction, you can easily end up with an inconsistent structure, if you get your overlays wrong.
edited Dec 2 at 23:50
marmot
81.8k491174
81.8k491174
answered Dec 2 at 23:32
gusbrs
6,4492838
6,4492838
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
1
The trick isconvert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799
– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to getconvert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
add a comment |
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
1
The trick isconvert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799
– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to getconvert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot Yes, that is usually in the key "If you really want this, you can have it, but I wouldn't do this myself..." :)
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:36
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
@marmot By the way, I'm trying to convert this to an animated gif as you taught me earlier, but no success. The document must be prepared for it, or a convert on any pdf should work?
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:37
1
1
The trick is
convert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
The trick is
convert -density 300 -delay 96 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif
from tex.stackexchange.com/a/136919/121799– marmot
Dec 2 at 23:45
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to get
convert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Yeah, that's what I was trying, to get
convert-im6.q16: not authorized multipage.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/ReadImage/412
. But never mind, I'll sort this out eventually.– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:47
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
@marmot Oh, thank you!
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462878%2fbeamer-avoid-empty-error-list-when-using-only-inside-itemize%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! How about
item<2-> Subtopic 1
instead ofonly<2->{item SubTopic 1}
?– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:21
Thanks! Because I don't want to visually put a blank line if there is not item yet, the item<2-> puts a blank line in the first slide and fills it in the second. The only command do what I want.
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:25
Well, but that will result in an empty itemize in the first slide, as the error message says.
– gusbrs
Dec 2 at 23:27
Yes, that's the question. So do you think there is not a way to accomplish what I want?
– Migdress
Dec 2 at 23:28