Is a DM allowed to add restrictions mid-campaign? How can I deal with that?











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












This afternoon we had our first session of D&D 5e with a group we found on the internet.



After finishing our first encounter, I did the following:




  • Put me next to the Wizard.

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for traps using Perception (he is proficient).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check the corpses for items using Investigation (he is also proficient on that).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for what is inside the wooden barrels.


But the DM said that Guidance has a cooldown of a minute per cast (which isn't true), and so it will take me at least 3 minutes.



On the corpses, the Wizard found a rusty scimitar. So I cast Guidance on him in order to let him check the price of the item using Investigation.



The value of the item was 0. So, I asked the DM how will I transmute that with Artisan's Blessing (I'm a Forge Cleric) having 0 value and he said I should do an Arcana check. But I said I'm not proficient and I character is not intelligent (INT -2). He answered that I can't if I am not proficient.

After that, I barely convince him to use Religion instead of Arcana since my channeling ability is from my Gods, and I used Guidance to improve the check. The roll was 3 + 1 = 4, and so the item was useless in any sense.



So my question is: Is allowed a GM to make restrictions on the fly?



Guidance has no cooldown time and as far as I know, an item can't have a literally 0 price. I only choose the forge cleric because I thought I would be able to transmute my metallic enemies items into useful ones!



Is there something I can do at respect? I'm not sure how to handle this situation.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    How experienced is your DM? Is this the first time they ran 5e?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ, it seems experienced. I mean, he had the Pro (pay-to-use) account in roll20. You wouldn't spend money on something if you aren't experienced. Also, when I joined its group, I found on the roll20 forum a lot of histories about a world he was running (then he removed the posts) before us, which seemed made by him. So I could say he has experience of this.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago








  • 2




    How experienced is the DM with 5e, specifically?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ. From Roll20: "Member since 06/20/15 / GM of 12 games / 1118 Hours Played / 251 Forum Posts"
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












This afternoon we had our first session of D&D 5e with a group we found on the internet.



After finishing our first encounter, I did the following:




  • Put me next to the Wizard.

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for traps using Perception (he is proficient).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check the corpses for items using Investigation (he is also proficient on that).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for what is inside the wooden barrels.


But the DM said that Guidance has a cooldown of a minute per cast (which isn't true), and so it will take me at least 3 minutes.



On the corpses, the Wizard found a rusty scimitar. So I cast Guidance on him in order to let him check the price of the item using Investigation.



The value of the item was 0. So, I asked the DM how will I transmute that with Artisan's Blessing (I'm a Forge Cleric) having 0 value and he said I should do an Arcana check. But I said I'm not proficient and I character is not intelligent (INT -2). He answered that I can't if I am not proficient.

After that, I barely convince him to use Religion instead of Arcana since my channeling ability is from my Gods, and I used Guidance to improve the check. The roll was 3 + 1 = 4, and so the item was useless in any sense.



So my question is: Is allowed a GM to make restrictions on the fly?



Guidance has no cooldown time and as far as I know, an item can't have a literally 0 price. I only choose the forge cleric because I thought I would be able to transmute my metallic enemies items into useful ones!



Is there something I can do at respect? I'm not sure how to handle this situation.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    How experienced is your DM? Is this the first time they ran 5e?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ, it seems experienced. I mean, he had the Pro (pay-to-use) account in roll20. You wouldn't spend money on something if you aren't experienced. Also, when I joined its group, I found on the roll20 forum a lot of histories about a world he was running (then he removed the posts) before us, which seemed made by him. So I could say he has experience of this.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago








  • 2




    How experienced is the DM with 5e, specifically?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ. From Roll20: "Member since 06/20/15 / GM of 12 games / 1118 Hours Played / 251 Forum Posts"
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1






1





This afternoon we had our first session of D&D 5e with a group we found on the internet.



After finishing our first encounter, I did the following:




  • Put me next to the Wizard.

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for traps using Perception (he is proficient).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check the corpses for items using Investigation (he is also proficient on that).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for what is inside the wooden barrels.


But the DM said that Guidance has a cooldown of a minute per cast (which isn't true), and so it will take me at least 3 minutes.



On the corpses, the Wizard found a rusty scimitar. So I cast Guidance on him in order to let him check the price of the item using Investigation.



The value of the item was 0. So, I asked the DM how will I transmute that with Artisan's Blessing (I'm a Forge Cleric) having 0 value and he said I should do an Arcana check. But I said I'm not proficient and I character is not intelligent (INT -2). He answered that I can't if I am not proficient.

After that, I barely convince him to use Religion instead of Arcana since my channeling ability is from my Gods, and I used Guidance to improve the check. The roll was 3 + 1 = 4, and so the item was useless in any sense.



So my question is: Is allowed a GM to make restrictions on the fly?



Guidance has no cooldown time and as far as I know, an item can't have a literally 0 price. I only choose the forge cleric because I thought I would be able to transmute my metallic enemies items into useful ones!



Is there something I can do at respect? I'm not sure how to handle this situation.










share|improve this question















This afternoon we had our first session of D&D 5e with a group we found on the internet.



After finishing our first encounter, I did the following:




  • Put me next to the Wizard.

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for traps using Perception (he is proficient).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check the corpses for items using Investigation (he is also proficient on that).

  • Cast Guidance on him.

  • Send him to check for what is inside the wooden barrels.


But the DM said that Guidance has a cooldown of a minute per cast (which isn't true), and so it will take me at least 3 minutes.



On the corpses, the Wizard found a rusty scimitar. So I cast Guidance on him in order to let him check the price of the item using Investigation.



The value of the item was 0. So, I asked the DM how will I transmute that with Artisan's Blessing (I'm a Forge Cleric) having 0 value and he said I should do an Arcana check. But I said I'm not proficient and I character is not intelligent (INT -2). He answered that I can't if I am not proficient.

After that, I barely convince him to use Religion instead of Arcana since my channeling ability is from my Gods, and I used Guidance to improve the check. The roll was 3 + 1 = 4, and so the item was useless in any sense.



So my question is: Is allowed a GM to make restrictions on the fly?



Guidance has no cooldown time and as far as I know, an item can't have a literally 0 price. I only choose the forge cleric because I thought I would be able to transmute my metallic enemies items into useful ones!



Is there something I can do at respect? I'm not sure how to handle this situation.







dnd-5e gm-techniques house-rules






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 15 hours ago









V2Blast

17.8k247113




17.8k247113










asked 19 hours ago









Ender Look

5041418




5041418








  • 1




    How experienced is your DM? Is this the first time they ran 5e?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ, it seems experienced. I mean, he had the Pro (pay-to-use) account in roll20. You wouldn't spend money on something if you aren't experienced. Also, when I joined its group, I found on the roll20 forum a lot of histories about a world he was running (then he removed the posts) before us, which seemed made by him. So I could say he has experience of this.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago








  • 2




    How experienced is the DM with 5e, specifically?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ. From Roll20: "Member since 06/20/15 / GM of 12 games / 1118 Hours Played / 251 Forum Posts"
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago














  • 1




    How experienced is your DM? Is this the first time they ran 5e?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ, it seems experienced. I mean, he had the Pro (pay-to-use) account in roll20. You wouldn't spend money on something if you aren't experienced. Also, when I joined its group, I found on the roll20 forum a lot of histories about a world he was running (then he removed the posts) before us, which seemed made by him. So I could say he has experience of this.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago








  • 2




    How experienced is the DM with 5e, specifically?
    – Mike Q
    19 hours ago










  • @MikeQ. From Roll20: "Member since 06/20/15 / GM of 12 games / 1118 Hours Played / 251 Forum Posts"
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago








1




1




How experienced is your DM? Is this the first time they ran 5e?
– Mike Q
19 hours ago




How experienced is your DM? Is this the first time they ran 5e?
– Mike Q
19 hours ago












@MikeQ, it seems experienced. I mean, he had the Pro (pay-to-use) account in roll20. You wouldn't spend money on something if you aren't experienced. Also, when I joined its group, I found on the roll20 forum a lot of histories about a world he was running (then he removed the posts) before us, which seemed made by him. So I could say he has experience of this.
– Ender Look
19 hours ago






@MikeQ, it seems experienced. I mean, he had the Pro (pay-to-use) account in roll20. You wouldn't spend money on something if you aren't experienced. Also, when I joined its group, I found on the roll20 forum a lot of histories about a world he was running (then he removed the posts) before us, which seemed made by him. So I could say he has experience of this.
– Ender Look
19 hours ago






2




2




How experienced is the DM with 5e, specifically?
– Mike Q
19 hours ago




How experienced is the DM with 5e, specifically?
– Mike Q
19 hours ago












@MikeQ. From Roll20: "Member since 06/20/15 / GM of 12 games / 1118 Hours Played / 251 Forum Posts"
– Ender Look
19 hours ago




@MikeQ. From Roll20: "Member since 06/20/15 / GM of 12 games / 1118 Hours Played / 251 Forum Posts"
– Ender Look
19 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
36
down vote













The DM can override the written rules at their table.



D&D 5e has a concept of Rule Zero, which basically means that the DM has final say in any ruling. This means they can impose restrictions outside of the written rules.



Maybe your DM is using a variant ruleset, or maybe they are mixing up the game mechanics with previous editions of D&D, or maybe they simply interpret the written rules differently. It may help to ask why they are using different rules. You may also want to point out the following:





  • Guidance has a 1 minute duration, not a 1 minute cooldown. An affected creature can benefit from Guidance once, up to 1 minute after you cast it, although their skill check activity may also take time to perform. See PHB p203:



A spell's duration is the length of time the spell persists.





  • Characters may roll skill checks without having proficiency in those skills. See PHB p174:



Without proficiency in the skill, the individual makes a normal ability check.




Regarding the 0gp item: The rules do not specify some minimum price for items. It is reasonable that a rusty chunk of metal would have no market value.



Of course, just because the DM can change the rules, does not mean they should. And it sounds like your DM's overriding of the rules is causing frustration at the table. And that's bad.



You and your DM need to come to an agreement about the rules.



You have a certain understanding of the rules and gameplay, and your DM has a different understanding. The two of you are trying to play different games. Unless this gap is addressed, the disagreements will continue.



For example, your DM asks for many skill checks, possibly to have more difficult non-combat challenges. But you want to use at-will Guidance to make those checks easier, for free. The DM's motives are clashing with yours, causing an antagonistic DM-versus-player situation. Both the player and DM are frustrated as a result.



To handle this situation, you and your DM need to resolve your disagreements about the rules, and expected difficulty, and figure out what game you want to play. First, ask your DM why they are using different rules outside of the written ones that you know. Second, consider scheduling a session zero for the DM and players communicate their expectations for the game. Agree to a mutual understanding of the rules before continuing the game.






share|improve this answer























  • In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago






  • 12




    I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
    – ravery
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
    – illustro
    9 hours ago


















up vote
11
down vote













The GM's role is to keep the game moving, and make sure everyone is having fun, and following the rules.



Of course, in some situations rules can be bent or broken to allow for certain situations, or in preference of a different approach - i.e. homebrew. If you don't agree with these situations, it might be best to talk to the GM to get an understanding of what they want to achieve.



In regards to your Guidance cantrip casting - this seems like something to discuss between the both of you. From the GM's perspective, casting Guidance consistently might seem like overkill, and if you are always casting it, it raises the minimum DC from 10 to 12. Sure, it's not much, but it changes the flow of the game.



In regards to your situation with the Scimitar - well, it's an old rusty Scimitar. Likely worthless, and if you tried to sell it, even that would take a fairly high Diplomacy check to even try to convince anyone it was worthwhile, and as for transmuting it, well, usually anything to do with magical knowledge is an Arcana check. The Artisan's Blessing does not require any skill checks to complete, but the ritual itself is an hour long, and potentially the GM just wanted to keep the game moving, or they did not see any worth in carrying out the ritual on an old rusty scimitar that was effectively just a piece of scrap.



All that being said, the GM is the one running the game. Their goal is to keep things moving, and make sure that everyone is having fun. And remember - the game is meant to be fun for everyone - that includes the GM.






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
    – Theik
    13 hours ago








  • 6




    @Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
    – Bilkokuya
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    @Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
    – DocWeird
    9 hours ago


















up vote
-2
down vote













The DM is free to do anything, but this one was not a good idea



I do not see malice here, just inexperience1.



There are three possibilities:




  1. Misinterpreted the rules

  2. Mistakenly thought that Guidence is too strong

  3. Actual malice (hates you or your character)


I think it is 2, because of the word "cooldown", it sounds like a homerule to nerf Guidance specifically.

However, it does not need nerfing, it is already balanced. The Cleric's only real out-of-combat utility cantrip provides a small bonus to ability checks, and requires concentration.



What you can do



Talk to your DM about this concern.




  1. Ask if he gutted Guidance knowingly. I assume yes, but he might still be convinced.

  2. If not convinced, ask for this cantrip to be replaced2, as it is not the one you picked from the book (that one does not have cooldown).

  3. If he still refuses, than there is some malice, and I would look for another group/DM.




1) An experienced DW would not think Guidance overpowered. One with some experience might think so, but would announce every house-rule before the characters are chosen.

2) Normally cantrips cannot be replaced, but you would not have picked this one if he anounced his house-rule in time.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
    – Theik
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
    – András
    9 hours ago






  • 6




    Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
    – András
    9 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135337%2fis-a-dm-allowed-to-add-restrictions-mid-campaign-how-can-i-deal-with-that%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest
































3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
36
down vote













The DM can override the written rules at their table.



D&D 5e has a concept of Rule Zero, which basically means that the DM has final say in any ruling. This means they can impose restrictions outside of the written rules.



Maybe your DM is using a variant ruleset, or maybe they are mixing up the game mechanics with previous editions of D&D, or maybe they simply interpret the written rules differently. It may help to ask why they are using different rules. You may also want to point out the following:





  • Guidance has a 1 minute duration, not a 1 minute cooldown. An affected creature can benefit from Guidance once, up to 1 minute after you cast it, although their skill check activity may also take time to perform. See PHB p203:



A spell's duration is the length of time the spell persists.





  • Characters may roll skill checks without having proficiency in those skills. See PHB p174:



Without proficiency in the skill, the individual makes a normal ability check.




Regarding the 0gp item: The rules do not specify some minimum price for items. It is reasonable that a rusty chunk of metal would have no market value.



Of course, just because the DM can change the rules, does not mean they should. And it sounds like your DM's overriding of the rules is causing frustration at the table. And that's bad.



You and your DM need to come to an agreement about the rules.



You have a certain understanding of the rules and gameplay, and your DM has a different understanding. The two of you are trying to play different games. Unless this gap is addressed, the disagreements will continue.



For example, your DM asks for many skill checks, possibly to have more difficult non-combat challenges. But you want to use at-will Guidance to make those checks easier, for free. The DM's motives are clashing with yours, causing an antagonistic DM-versus-player situation. Both the player and DM are frustrated as a result.



To handle this situation, you and your DM need to resolve your disagreements about the rules, and expected difficulty, and figure out what game you want to play. First, ask your DM why they are using different rules outside of the written ones that you know. Second, consider scheduling a session zero for the DM and players communicate their expectations for the game. Agree to a mutual understanding of the rules before continuing the game.






share|improve this answer























  • In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago






  • 12




    I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
    – ravery
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
    – illustro
    9 hours ago















up vote
36
down vote













The DM can override the written rules at their table.



D&D 5e has a concept of Rule Zero, which basically means that the DM has final say in any ruling. This means they can impose restrictions outside of the written rules.



Maybe your DM is using a variant ruleset, or maybe they are mixing up the game mechanics with previous editions of D&D, or maybe they simply interpret the written rules differently. It may help to ask why they are using different rules. You may also want to point out the following:





  • Guidance has a 1 minute duration, not a 1 minute cooldown. An affected creature can benefit from Guidance once, up to 1 minute after you cast it, although their skill check activity may also take time to perform. See PHB p203:



A spell's duration is the length of time the spell persists.





  • Characters may roll skill checks without having proficiency in those skills. See PHB p174:



Without proficiency in the skill, the individual makes a normal ability check.




Regarding the 0gp item: The rules do not specify some minimum price for items. It is reasonable that a rusty chunk of metal would have no market value.



Of course, just because the DM can change the rules, does not mean they should. And it sounds like your DM's overriding of the rules is causing frustration at the table. And that's bad.



You and your DM need to come to an agreement about the rules.



You have a certain understanding of the rules and gameplay, and your DM has a different understanding. The two of you are trying to play different games. Unless this gap is addressed, the disagreements will continue.



For example, your DM asks for many skill checks, possibly to have more difficult non-combat challenges. But you want to use at-will Guidance to make those checks easier, for free. The DM's motives are clashing with yours, causing an antagonistic DM-versus-player situation. Both the player and DM are frustrated as a result.



To handle this situation, you and your DM need to resolve your disagreements about the rules, and expected difficulty, and figure out what game you want to play. First, ask your DM why they are using different rules outside of the written ones that you know. Second, consider scheduling a session zero for the DM and players communicate their expectations for the game. Agree to a mutual understanding of the rules before continuing the game.






share|improve this answer























  • In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago






  • 12




    I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
    – ravery
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
    – illustro
    9 hours ago













up vote
36
down vote










up vote
36
down vote









The DM can override the written rules at their table.



D&D 5e has a concept of Rule Zero, which basically means that the DM has final say in any ruling. This means they can impose restrictions outside of the written rules.



Maybe your DM is using a variant ruleset, or maybe they are mixing up the game mechanics with previous editions of D&D, or maybe they simply interpret the written rules differently. It may help to ask why they are using different rules. You may also want to point out the following:





  • Guidance has a 1 minute duration, not a 1 minute cooldown. An affected creature can benefit from Guidance once, up to 1 minute after you cast it, although their skill check activity may also take time to perform. See PHB p203:



A spell's duration is the length of time the spell persists.





  • Characters may roll skill checks without having proficiency in those skills. See PHB p174:



Without proficiency in the skill, the individual makes a normal ability check.




Regarding the 0gp item: The rules do not specify some minimum price for items. It is reasonable that a rusty chunk of metal would have no market value.



Of course, just because the DM can change the rules, does not mean they should. And it sounds like your DM's overriding of the rules is causing frustration at the table. And that's bad.



You and your DM need to come to an agreement about the rules.



You have a certain understanding of the rules and gameplay, and your DM has a different understanding. The two of you are trying to play different games. Unless this gap is addressed, the disagreements will continue.



For example, your DM asks for many skill checks, possibly to have more difficult non-combat challenges. But you want to use at-will Guidance to make those checks easier, for free. The DM's motives are clashing with yours, causing an antagonistic DM-versus-player situation. Both the player and DM are frustrated as a result.



To handle this situation, you and your DM need to resolve your disagreements about the rules, and expected difficulty, and figure out what game you want to play. First, ask your DM why they are using different rules outside of the written ones that you know. Second, consider scheduling a session zero for the DM and players communicate their expectations for the game. Agree to a mutual understanding of the rules before continuing the game.






share|improve this answer














The DM can override the written rules at their table.



D&D 5e has a concept of Rule Zero, which basically means that the DM has final say in any ruling. This means they can impose restrictions outside of the written rules.



Maybe your DM is using a variant ruleset, or maybe they are mixing up the game mechanics with previous editions of D&D, or maybe they simply interpret the written rules differently. It may help to ask why they are using different rules. You may also want to point out the following:





  • Guidance has a 1 minute duration, not a 1 minute cooldown. An affected creature can benefit from Guidance once, up to 1 minute after you cast it, although their skill check activity may also take time to perform. See PHB p203:



A spell's duration is the length of time the spell persists.





  • Characters may roll skill checks without having proficiency in those skills. See PHB p174:



Without proficiency in the skill, the individual makes a normal ability check.




Regarding the 0gp item: The rules do not specify some minimum price for items. It is reasonable that a rusty chunk of metal would have no market value.



Of course, just because the DM can change the rules, does not mean they should. And it sounds like your DM's overriding of the rules is causing frustration at the table. And that's bad.



You and your DM need to come to an agreement about the rules.



You have a certain understanding of the rules and gameplay, and your DM has a different understanding. The two of you are trying to play different games. Unless this gap is addressed, the disagreements will continue.



For example, your DM asks for many skill checks, possibly to have more difficult non-combat challenges. But you want to use at-will Guidance to make those checks easier, for free. The DM's motives are clashing with yours, causing an antagonistic DM-versus-player situation. Both the player and DM are frustrated as a result.



To handle this situation, you and your DM need to resolve your disagreements about the rules, and expected difficulty, and figure out what game you want to play. First, ask your DM why they are using different rules outside of the written ones that you know. Second, consider scheduling a session zero for the DM and players communicate their expectations for the game. Agree to a mutual understanding of the rules before continuing the game.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 19 hours ago









Mike Q

9,52141965




9,52141965












  • In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago






  • 12




    I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
    – ravery
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
    – illustro
    9 hours ago


















  • In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
    – Ender Look
    19 hours ago






  • 12




    I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
    – ravery
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
    – illustro
    9 hours ago
















In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
– Ender Look
19 hours ago




In fact, his roll20 profile says he enjoys playing D&D 3.5, D&D 5E and Pathfinder.
– Ender Look
19 hours ago




12




12




I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
– ravery
19 hours ago






I might mention that although Guidance doesn't have a cool down, the searches do take time. It's not unreasonable for the DM to say that each search takes 1-5 minutes; which is what the DM may have been trying to do.
– ravery
19 hours ago






1




1




It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
– illustro
9 hours ago




It might also be worth mentioning the "potency" rule about overlapping spells from the PHB. It's possible the DM is using some variation of this to justify the "cool down period"
– illustro
9 hours ago












up vote
11
down vote













The GM's role is to keep the game moving, and make sure everyone is having fun, and following the rules.



Of course, in some situations rules can be bent or broken to allow for certain situations, or in preference of a different approach - i.e. homebrew. If you don't agree with these situations, it might be best to talk to the GM to get an understanding of what they want to achieve.



In regards to your Guidance cantrip casting - this seems like something to discuss between the both of you. From the GM's perspective, casting Guidance consistently might seem like overkill, and if you are always casting it, it raises the minimum DC from 10 to 12. Sure, it's not much, but it changes the flow of the game.



In regards to your situation with the Scimitar - well, it's an old rusty Scimitar. Likely worthless, and if you tried to sell it, even that would take a fairly high Diplomacy check to even try to convince anyone it was worthwhile, and as for transmuting it, well, usually anything to do with magical knowledge is an Arcana check. The Artisan's Blessing does not require any skill checks to complete, but the ritual itself is an hour long, and potentially the GM just wanted to keep the game moving, or they did not see any worth in carrying out the ritual on an old rusty scimitar that was effectively just a piece of scrap.



All that being said, the GM is the one running the game. Their goal is to keep things moving, and make sure that everyone is having fun. And remember - the game is meant to be fun for everyone - that includes the GM.






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
    – Theik
    13 hours ago








  • 6




    @Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
    – Bilkokuya
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    @Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
    – DocWeird
    9 hours ago















up vote
11
down vote













The GM's role is to keep the game moving, and make sure everyone is having fun, and following the rules.



Of course, in some situations rules can be bent or broken to allow for certain situations, or in preference of a different approach - i.e. homebrew. If you don't agree with these situations, it might be best to talk to the GM to get an understanding of what they want to achieve.



In regards to your Guidance cantrip casting - this seems like something to discuss between the both of you. From the GM's perspective, casting Guidance consistently might seem like overkill, and if you are always casting it, it raises the minimum DC from 10 to 12. Sure, it's not much, but it changes the flow of the game.



In regards to your situation with the Scimitar - well, it's an old rusty Scimitar. Likely worthless, and if you tried to sell it, even that would take a fairly high Diplomacy check to even try to convince anyone it was worthwhile, and as for transmuting it, well, usually anything to do with magical knowledge is an Arcana check. The Artisan's Blessing does not require any skill checks to complete, but the ritual itself is an hour long, and potentially the GM just wanted to keep the game moving, or they did not see any worth in carrying out the ritual on an old rusty scimitar that was effectively just a piece of scrap.



All that being said, the GM is the one running the game. Their goal is to keep things moving, and make sure that everyone is having fun. And remember - the game is meant to be fun for everyone - that includes the GM.






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
    – Theik
    13 hours ago








  • 6




    @Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
    – Bilkokuya
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    @Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
    – DocWeird
    9 hours ago













up vote
11
down vote










up vote
11
down vote









The GM's role is to keep the game moving, and make sure everyone is having fun, and following the rules.



Of course, in some situations rules can be bent or broken to allow for certain situations, or in preference of a different approach - i.e. homebrew. If you don't agree with these situations, it might be best to talk to the GM to get an understanding of what they want to achieve.



In regards to your Guidance cantrip casting - this seems like something to discuss between the both of you. From the GM's perspective, casting Guidance consistently might seem like overkill, and if you are always casting it, it raises the minimum DC from 10 to 12. Sure, it's not much, but it changes the flow of the game.



In regards to your situation with the Scimitar - well, it's an old rusty Scimitar. Likely worthless, and if you tried to sell it, even that would take a fairly high Diplomacy check to even try to convince anyone it was worthwhile, and as for transmuting it, well, usually anything to do with magical knowledge is an Arcana check. The Artisan's Blessing does not require any skill checks to complete, but the ritual itself is an hour long, and potentially the GM just wanted to keep the game moving, or they did not see any worth in carrying out the ritual on an old rusty scimitar that was effectively just a piece of scrap.



All that being said, the GM is the one running the game. Their goal is to keep things moving, and make sure that everyone is having fun. And remember - the game is meant to be fun for everyone - that includes the GM.






share|improve this answer














The GM's role is to keep the game moving, and make sure everyone is having fun, and following the rules.



Of course, in some situations rules can be bent or broken to allow for certain situations, or in preference of a different approach - i.e. homebrew. If you don't agree with these situations, it might be best to talk to the GM to get an understanding of what they want to achieve.



In regards to your Guidance cantrip casting - this seems like something to discuss between the both of you. From the GM's perspective, casting Guidance consistently might seem like overkill, and if you are always casting it, it raises the minimum DC from 10 to 12. Sure, it's not much, but it changes the flow of the game.



In regards to your situation with the Scimitar - well, it's an old rusty Scimitar. Likely worthless, and if you tried to sell it, even that would take a fairly high Diplomacy check to even try to convince anyone it was worthwhile, and as for transmuting it, well, usually anything to do with magical knowledge is an Arcana check. The Artisan's Blessing does not require any skill checks to complete, but the ritual itself is an hour long, and potentially the GM just wanted to keep the game moving, or they did not see any worth in carrying out the ritual on an old rusty scimitar that was effectively just a piece of scrap.



All that being said, the GM is the one running the game. Their goal is to keep things moving, and make sure that everyone is having fun. And remember - the game is meant to be fun for everyone - that includes the GM.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 15 hours ago

























answered 19 hours ago









Ben

8,7411456126




8,7411456126








  • 13




    Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
    – Theik
    13 hours ago








  • 6




    @Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
    – Bilkokuya
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    @Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
    – DocWeird
    9 hours ago














  • 13




    Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
    – Theik
    13 hours ago








  • 6




    @Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
    – Bilkokuya
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    @Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
    – DocWeird
    9 hours ago








13




13




Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
– Theik
13 hours ago






Also worth mentioning is that this isn't an unreasonable house rule. Spamming guidance for every single action breaks gameplay flow and doesn't seem realistic. "PLEASE TYR, HELP ME OPEN THIS DOOR! PLEASE TYR, HELP THIS GUY CLIMB A PAIR OF STAIRS! PLEASE TYR, HELP ME GET OUT OF BED!" Invoking divine guidance for every little thing breaks the storyflow for lots of people. I also cracked down on it at my table.
– Theik
13 hours ago






6




6




@Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
– Bilkokuya
9 hours ago




@Theik On the flip-side, if every action is requiring a skill-check that can be helped with guidance, it may also be a sign that the GM is asking for too many dice-rolls when no roll is actually necessary.
– Bilkokuya
9 hours ago




2




2




@Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
– DocWeird
9 hours ago




@Theik there are actual earth religions that have their followers doing that for mundane, daily things - so how would it be far fetched that in a fantasy world, someone who has actual proof (been given magical, divine powers, maybe encountered their avatar, etc) of his or her god existing, actually does it? Just saying; gods are more real and zealots are more... zealotous (is that a word?). Have a nice day, Tyr willing. ;)
– DocWeird
9 hours ago










up vote
-2
down vote













The DM is free to do anything, but this one was not a good idea



I do not see malice here, just inexperience1.



There are three possibilities:




  1. Misinterpreted the rules

  2. Mistakenly thought that Guidence is too strong

  3. Actual malice (hates you or your character)


I think it is 2, because of the word "cooldown", it sounds like a homerule to nerf Guidance specifically.

However, it does not need nerfing, it is already balanced. The Cleric's only real out-of-combat utility cantrip provides a small bonus to ability checks, and requires concentration.



What you can do



Talk to your DM about this concern.




  1. Ask if he gutted Guidance knowingly. I assume yes, but he might still be convinced.

  2. If not convinced, ask for this cantrip to be replaced2, as it is not the one you picked from the book (that one does not have cooldown).

  3. If he still refuses, than there is some malice, and I would look for another group/DM.




1) An experienced DW would not think Guidance overpowered. One with some experience might think so, but would announce every house-rule before the characters are chosen.

2) Normally cantrips cannot be replaced, but you would not have picked this one if he anounced his house-rule in time.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
    – Theik
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
    – András
    9 hours ago






  • 6




    Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
    – András
    9 hours ago















up vote
-2
down vote













The DM is free to do anything, but this one was not a good idea



I do not see malice here, just inexperience1.



There are three possibilities:




  1. Misinterpreted the rules

  2. Mistakenly thought that Guidence is too strong

  3. Actual malice (hates you or your character)


I think it is 2, because of the word "cooldown", it sounds like a homerule to nerf Guidance specifically.

However, it does not need nerfing, it is already balanced. The Cleric's only real out-of-combat utility cantrip provides a small bonus to ability checks, and requires concentration.



What you can do



Talk to your DM about this concern.




  1. Ask if he gutted Guidance knowingly. I assume yes, but he might still be convinced.

  2. If not convinced, ask for this cantrip to be replaced2, as it is not the one you picked from the book (that one does not have cooldown).

  3. If he still refuses, than there is some malice, and I would look for another group/DM.




1) An experienced DW would not think Guidance overpowered. One with some experience might think so, but would announce every house-rule before the characters are chosen.

2) Normally cantrips cannot be replaced, but you would not have picked this one if he anounced his house-rule in time.






share|improve this answer

















  • 5




    Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
    – Theik
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
    – András
    9 hours ago






  • 6




    Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
    – András
    9 hours ago













up vote
-2
down vote










up vote
-2
down vote









The DM is free to do anything, but this one was not a good idea



I do not see malice here, just inexperience1.



There are three possibilities:




  1. Misinterpreted the rules

  2. Mistakenly thought that Guidence is too strong

  3. Actual malice (hates you or your character)


I think it is 2, because of the word "cooldown", it sounds like a homerule to nerf Guidance specifically.

However, it does not need nerfing, it is already balanced. The Cleric's only real out-of-combat utility cantrip provides a small bonus to ability checks, and requires concentration.



What you can do



Talk to your DM about this concern.




  1. Ask if he gutted Guidance knowingly. I assume yes, but he might still be convinced.

  2. If not convinced, ask for this cantrip to be replaced2, as it is not the one you picked from the book (that one does not have cooldown).

  3. If he still refuses, than there is some malice, and I would look for another group/DM.




1) An experienced DW would not think Guidance overpowered. One with some experience might think so, but would announce every house-rule before the characters are chosen.

2) Normally cantrips cannot be replaced, but you would not have picked this one if he anounced his house-rule in time.






share|improve this answer












The DM is free to do anything, but this one was not a good idea



I do not see malice here, just inexperience1.



There are three possibilities:




  1. Misinterpreted the rules

  2. Mistakenly thought that Guidence is too strong

  3. Actual malice (hates you or your character)


I think it is 2, because of the word "cooldown", it sounds like a homerule to nerf Guidance specifically.

However, it does not need nerfing, it is already balanced. The Cleric's only real out-of-combat utility cantrip provides a small bonus to ability checks, and requires concentration.



What you can do



Talk to your DM about this concern.




  1. Ask if he gutted Guidance knowingly. I assume yes, but he might still be convinced.

  2. If not convinced, ask for this cantrip to be replaced2, as it is not the one you picked from the book (that one does not have cooldown).

  3. If he still refuses, than there is some malice, and I would look for another group/DM.




1) An experienced DW would not think Guidance overpowered. One with some experience might think so, but would announce every house-rule before the characters are chosen.

2) Normally cantrips cannot be replaced, but you would not have picked this one if he anounced his house-rule in time.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 9 hours ago









András

24.5k1089181




24.5k1089181








  • 5




    Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
    – Theik
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
    – András
    9 hours ago






  • 6




    Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
    – András
    9 hours ago














  • 5




    Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
    – Theik
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
    – András
    9 hours ago






  • 6




    Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
    – András
    9 hours ago








5




5




Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
– Theik
9 hours ago




Or the more logical option 4: Doesn't feel like spamming guidance constantly is a good roleplaying experience. Some people care more for the story than the rolling aspect, and spamming guidance for every single thing in existence makes your character come across as somebody who can't even tie their shoelaces without divine intervention. This answer seems to hinge entirely on the idea that the DM is wrong, which is silly, because plenty of tables limit guidance spam.
– Theik
9 hours ago




1




1




The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
– András
9 hours ago




The DM house-ruled, and that should not be done in the middle of a campaign.
– András
9 hours ago




6




6




Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
– András
9 hours ago




Also, if the gods could help me do the dishes for free, I would use it.
– András
9 hours ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135337%2fis-a-dm-allowed-to-add-restrictions-mid-campaign-how-can-i-deal-with-that%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?