How to understand the order of convergence $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|^p$ (Convergence of a power function...











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













By definition, a sequence $x_k in mathbb{R}, k in mathbb{N}$
converges with order $p in [1,infty)$ to $x := lim_{ktoinfty}
x_k$
if begin{align} exists C in [0,infty): forall k in
mathbb{N}: |x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|^p end{align}




Assume $x_k$ is a sequence of approximations to $x$, then $|x_k - x|$ denotes the error of approximation at $k$-th iteration, and goes to zero as $k to infty$. I can understand the inequality $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ that implies the error must go smaller and smaller along the iterations. But I don't understand the motivation to put a power of $p$ on the previous step. Any practical meaning of taking $p$-th power of error $|x_k - x|^p$?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    By definition, a sequence $x_k in mathbb{R}, k in mathbb{N}$
    converges with order $p in [1,infty)$ to $x := lim_{ktoinfty}
    x_k$
    if begin{align} exists C in [0,infty): forall k in
    mathbb{N}: |x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|^p end{align}




    Assume $x_k$ is a sequence of approximations to $x$, then $|x_k - x|$ denotes the error of approximation at $k$-th iteration, and goes to zero as $k to infty$. I can understand the inequality $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ that implies the error must go smaller and smaller along the iterations. But I don't understand the motivation to put a power of $p$ on the previous step. Any practical meaning of taking $p$-th power of error $|x_k - x|^p$?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      By definition, a sequence $x_k in mathbb{R}, k in mathbb{N}$
      converges with order $p in [1,infty)$ to $x := lim_{ktoinfty}
      x_k$
      if begin{align} exists C in [0,infty): forall k in
      mathbb{N}: |x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|^p end{align}




      Assume $x_k$ is a sequence of approximations to $x$, then $|x_k - x|$ denotes the error of approximation at $k$-th iteration, and goes to zero as $k to infty$. I can understand the inequality $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ that implies the error must go smaller and smaller along the iterations. But I don't understand the motivation to put a power of $p$ on the previous step. Any practical meaning of taking $p$-th power of error $|x_k - x|^p$?










      share|cite|improve this question














      By definition, a sequence $x_k in mathbb{R}, k in mathbb{N}$
      converges with order $p in [1,infty)$ to $x := lim_{ktoinfty}
      x_k$
      if begin{align} exists C in [0,infty): forall k in
      mathbb{N}: |x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|^p end{align}




      Assume $x_k$ is a sequence of approximations to $x$, then $|x_k - x|$ denotes the error of approximation at $k$-th iteration, and goes to zero as $k to infty$. I can understand the inequality $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ that implies the error must go smaller and smaller along the iterations. But I don't understand the motivation to put a power of $p$ on the previous step. Any practical meaning of taking $p$-th power of error $|x_k - x|^p$?







      numerical-methods approximation numerical-linear-algebra numerical-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      Analysis Newbie

      39617




      39617






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Consider a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_{n+1} = x_n^p$ with $p > 1$ and $x_0 < 1$. That's a special case, where $C = 1$.



          Now take the logarithm. You should then be able to find an explicit formula for $x_n$. As $p$ varies, how does the rate change at which $x_n$ converges to 0? For example, how many steps are needed to guarantee $x_n < varepsilon$ for a given $varepsilon$?



          By the way, the estimate $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ does not imply that the error goes to zero. This happens only if $C < 1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995410%2fhow-to-understand-the-order-of-convergence-x-k1-x-le-c-x-k-x-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest
































            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Consider a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_{n+1} = x_n^p$ with $p > 1$ and $x_0 < 1$. That's a special case, where $C = 1$.



            Now take the logarithm. You should then be able to find an explicit formula for $x_n$. As $p$ varies, how does the rate change at which $x_n$ converges to 0? For example, how many steps are needed to guarantee $x_n < varepsilon$ for a given $varepsilon$?



            By the way, the estimate $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ does not imply that the error goes to zero. This happens only if $C < 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Consider a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_{n+1} = x_n^p$ with $p > 1$ and $x_0 < 1$. That's a special case, where $C = 1$.



              Now take the logarithm. You should then be able to find an explicit formula for $x_n$. As $p$ varies, how does the rate change at which $x_n$ converges to 0? For example, how many steps are needed to guarantee $x_n < varepsilon$ for a given $varepsilon$?



              By the way, the estimate $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ does not imply that the error goes to zero. This happens only if $C < 1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Consider a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_{n+1} = x_n^p$ with $p > 1$ and $x_0 < 1$. That's a special case, where $C = 1$.



                Now take the logarithm. You should then be able to find an explicit formula for $x_n$. As $p$ varies, how does the rate change at which $x_n$ converges to 0? For example, how many steps are needed to guarantee $x_n < varepsilon$ for a given $varepsilon$?



                By the way, the estimate $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ does not imply that the error goes to zero. This happens only if $C < 1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Consider a sequence of positive numbers $x_n$ such that $x_{n+1} = x_n^p$ with $p > 1$ and $x_0 < 1$. That's a special case, where $C = 1$.



                Now take the logarithm. You should then be able to find an explicit formula for $x_n$. As $p$ varies, how does the rate change at which $x_n$ converges to 0? For example, how many steps are needed to guarantee $x_n < varepsilon$ for a given $varepsilon$?



                By the way, the estimate $|x_{k+1} - x| le C |x_k - x|$ does not imply that the error goes to zero. This happens only if $C < 1$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                Hans Engler

                9,90411836




                9,90411836






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995410%2fhow-to-understand-the-order-of-convergence-x-k1-x-le-c-x-k-x-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest




















































































                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?