Convexity Bound of Rankin-Selberg L-Function











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Let $f,g$ be primitive modularforms of arbitrary levels $N_1,N_2$, trivial nebentypus and same weight $k$. Let $L(fotimes g,s)=zeta(2s)sum_{ngeq1}frac{lambda_f(n)lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$ be the Rankin-Selberg L-Function where $lambda_f$ and $lambda_g$ are the respective normalized Hecke-Eigenvalues.



I'm looking for a simple upper bound of $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ in the level aspect which holds under general assumptions as given above. In nearly every piece of literature on subconvexity bounds (e.g. Introduction of "Rankin Selberg L-functions in the level aspect" by Kowalski, Michel, Vanderkam) there is the hint that the convexity bound ($sqrt N$ in the level aspect, $k$ in the weight aspect) is achieved by applying the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle. As far as I understood, this requires another bound of the function on the edges of the vertical strip $0<Re(s)<1$. So my questions are




  • Is there an elementary proof to this problem?

  • What bound can I use for $L(fotimes g, 1)$?

  • How do I take care of the residue in $s=1$ for $f=overline{g}$?







convex-analysis analytic-number-theory modular-forms l-functions






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday





















New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Nodt Greenish

266




266




New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday














  • 1




    I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
    – reuns
    yesterday












  • Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday






  • 1




    By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
    – Peter Humphries
    yesterday










  • Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday










  • @reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
    – Nodt Greenish
    yesterday








1




1




I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday






I'd say : add finitely many Euler factors to $L(fotimes g, s)$ to obtain a Dirichlet series $H(s)$ with functional equation. Obtain a bound $H(1+it) = O(log^m(t))$ (in the same way you showed the PNT for $L(f,s)$ ?). Use the functional equation to obtain a bound for $H(it)$. Apply the convexity theorem. I don't know if the implied constants are effective. What the found for $L(fotimes g,frac12+it)$ would be useful for ?
– reuns
yesterday














Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




Thanks for your comment. I use the bound as a factor for a more general result which applies not only to newforms but to arbitrary cusp forms. The readers can insert a stronger bound if they want quantitatively better results but I just need an elementarily introduced placeholder instead of a reference to an article of 30 pages about any subconvexity bound.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




1




1




By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday




By the way, $L(s,f otimes g)$ is not equal to $sum_{n = 1}^{infty} frac{lambda_f(n) lambda_g(n)}{n^s}$. Rather, it is equal (up to some Euler factors at bad primes) to this Dirichlet series times $L(2s,chi_f chi_g)$, where $chi_f, chi_g$ are the nebentypen of $f$ and $g$.
– Peter Humphries
yesterday












Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




Alright, so I need a factor of $zeta(2s)$. Thanks for that reminder @PeterHumphries, I will watch out for that in my notation.
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday












@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday




@reuns I define $H(s)=(2pi)^{-2s}Gamma(s+k-1)Gamma(s)L(s,fotimes g)$ which allows the functional equation $H(1-s)=H(s)$ for $fneq g$. So for $L(fotimes f,s)$ I need another estimation...
– Nodt Greenish
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994407%2fconvexity-bound-of-rankin-selberg-l-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest
































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



    We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



    All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



      We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



      All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



        We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



        All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        To provide a brief answer which can be found in "Analytic Number Theory" of Iwaniec and Kowalsky:



        We use the absolute convergence of $L(f,s)$ in $sigma>1$ (or the bound $|lambda(n)|leq tau(n)$), the functional equation, Stirling's estimate for the gamma function and the Phragmen-Lindelöf convexity principle.



        All mentioned formulas can be found in the book as well.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 hours ago









        Nodt Greenish

        266




        266




        New contributor




        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Nodt Greenish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Nodt Greenish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994407%2fconvexity-bound-of-rankin-selberg-l-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest




















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?