Does the Detect Evil and Good let the player know what kind of ground they have found?











up vote
19
down vote

favorite
1












In D&D 5e, detect evil and good states that:




If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




To me, it's unclear if the caster would detect some consecrated ground, then would it be possible for them to mistake it for desecrated? Or vice versa? Do they just know this ground has been touched by the gods or specifically if there were good or evil ones?



I'm not asking with regards to a specific situation that happened in play, I'm just curious how it should go as intended by the game writers.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    19
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    In D&D 5e, detect evil and good states that:




    If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




    To me, it's unclear if the caster would detect some consecrated ground, then would it be possible for them to mistake it for desecrated? Or vice versa? Do they just know this ground has been touched by the gods or specifically if there were good or evil ones?



    I'm not asking with regards to a specific situation that happened in play, I'm just curious how it should go as intended by the game writers.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      19
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      19
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      In D&D 5e, detect evil and good states that:




      If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




      To me, it's unclear if the caster would detect some consecrated ground, then would it be possible for them to mistake it for desecrated? Or vice versa? Do they just know this ground has been touched by the gods or specifically if there were good or evil ones?



      I'm not asking with regards to a specific situation that happened in play, I'm just curious how it should go as intended by the game writers.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      In D&D 5e, detect evil and good states that:




      If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




      To me, it's unclear if the caster would detect some consecrated ground, then would it be possible for them to mistake it for desecrated? Or vice versa? Do they just know this ground has been touched by the gods or specifically if there were good or evil ones?



      I'm not asking with regards to a specific situation that happened in play, I'm just curious how it should go as intended by the game writers.







      dnd-5e spells






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      enkryptor

      23.5k1080195




      23.5k1080195






      New contributor




      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 8 hours ago









      Rugnir

      1964




      1964




      New contributor




      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Rugnir is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          12
          down vote













          In the strictest RAW, it unclear, but reasonable RAI would mean a yes.



          RAW



          "Spells only do what they say they do."



          The spell says you can locate the ground, not that you can identify it as consecrated vs desecrated. However, you could also read it as being able to locate consecrated ground, and being to locate desecrated ground, in which case the answer would be yes.



          RAI



          Definitely. First, what would the point of a detection spell named Detect Good and Evil be if it didn't tell you what you detected was good or evil? If you wanted to just see magic, you could use detect magic. Second, in 3.5 edition, the spell Detect Evil was actually based on alignment.






          share|improve this answer























          • A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
            – NautArch
            6 hours ago






          • 3




            By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
            – Rubiksmoose
            6 hours ago






          • 3




            -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
            – A Very Large Bear
            5 hours ago








          • 1




            To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
            – Cyberspark
            5 hours ago






          • 1




            @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
            – Ryan Thompson
            5 mins ago


















          up vote
          12
          down vote













          RAW: You do not know whether it is consecrated or desecrated




          If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




          As written, the spell does not allow for determining the difference between consecrated and desecrated only detecting the presence and location of either. All it says is: if [there is a consecrated or desecrated place within 30 feet] then [you are able to locate it].



          In 5e, spells do only what they say they do and the spell does not allow any way to differentiate the two types of places, it detects both. It doesn't even say that you get to choose one to look for when you cast it. If the spell allowed you to tell the difference between the two it would say so.



          The same thing applies to the first part of the spell as well:




          For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located. 




          You can't tell what precise creature type something is, only that it falls into that list and are able to locate it.



          Other features have wording (which this spell does not) that specifically allows for this



          Compare this to Divine Sense (the paladin ability) which specifically allows you to know the type of creatures:




          Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover. You know the type (celestial, fiend, or undead) of any being whose presence you sense, but not its identity (the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich, for instance). 




          The first part of this ability is almost identical to the wording of detect good and evil, yet the ability still needs that second sentence to allow it to specifically identify the type.



          See also detect poison and disease which also has the language allowing the poisons to be identified.




          For the duration, you can sense the presence and location of poisons, poisonous creatures, and diseases within 30 feet of you. You also identify the kind of poison, poisonous creature, or disease in each case.




          If detect good and evil was intended to work this way, it would have included a similar specification.



          The spell is named poorly, but that doesn't change how it works



          Some spells' names are confusing or downright deceptive1, but that doesn't change what the spells' descriptions say they do. In this case for example, detect good and evil doesn't detect alignment at all, but it senses creature types often associated with some alignments as well as objects and places that have been touched by divine power. Other than that it does do what it says: detect. The spell detects all of these things and allows them to be located. Nothing in the spell indicates or even implies that you can differentiate between the things that are found.



          Rules as Fun: Harmless to allow as a houserule



          Besides potentially stepping on the toes of the paladin feature Divine Sense, there really is nothing that would break by allowing the caster to know the type of creature or if ground was consecrated or desecrated. It would be a small boost in utility, but certainly nothing to be super concerned about. We play it this way at my table and have had no issues.



          Just note that this would be a houserule so not really allowable at Adventurers League tables or other tables that strictly adhere to RAW.





          1 - A few examples: Catnap, does not put creatures to sleep. Sacred flame does not do fire damage. Chill touch does not do cold damage and is also not a touch spell. Daylight does not actually create sunlight.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Rugnir is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135359%2fdoes-the-detect-evil-and-good-let-the-player-know-what-kind-of-ground-they-have%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest
































            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            12
            down vote













            In the strictest RAW, it unclear, but reasonable RAI would mean a yes.



            RAW



            "Spells only do what they say they do."



            The spell says you can locate the ground, not that you can identify it as consecrated vs desecrated. However, you could also read it as being able to locate consecrated ground, and being to locate desecrated ground, in which case the answer would be yes.



            RAI



            Definitely. First, what would the point of a detection spell named Detect Good and Evil be if it didn't tell you what you detected was good or evil? If you wanted to just see magic, you could use detect magic. Second, in 3.5 edition, the spell Detect Evil was actually based on alignment.






            share|improve this answer























            • A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
              – Rubiksmoose
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
              – A Very Large Bear
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
              – Cyberspark
              5 hours ago






            • 1




              @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
              – Ryan Thompson
              5 mins ago















            up vote
            12
            down vote













            In the strictest RAW, it unclear, but reasonable RAI would mean a yes.



            RAW



            "Spells only do what they say they do."



            The spell says you can locate the ground, not that you can identify it as consecrated vs desecrated. However, you could also read it as being able to locate consecrated ground, and being to locate desecrated ground, in which case the answer would be yes.



            RAI



            Definitely. First, what would the point of a detection spell named Detect Good and Evil be if it didn't tell you what you detected was good or evil? If you wanted to just see magic, you could use detect magic. Second, in 3.5 edition, the spell Detect Evil was actually based on alignment.






            share|improve this answer























            • A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
              – Rubiksmoose
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
              – A Very Large Bear
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
              – Cyberspark
              5 hours ago






            • 1




              @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
              – Ryan Thompson
              5 mins ago













            up vote
            12
            down vote










            up vote
            12
            down vote









            In the strictest RAW, it unclear, but reasonable RAI would mean a yes.



            RAW



            "Spells only do what they say they do."



            The spell says you can locate the ground, not that you can identify it as consecrated vs desecrated. However, you could also read it as being able to locate consecrated ground, and being to locate desecrated ground, in which case the answer would be yes.



            RAI



            Definitely. First, what would the point of a detection spell named Detect Good and Evil be if it didn't tell you what you detected was good or evil? If you wanted to just see magic, you could use detect magic. Second, in 3.5 edition, the spell Detect Evil was actually based on alignment.






            share|improve this answer














            In the strictest RAW, it unclear, but reasonable RAI would mean a yes.



            RAW



            "Spells only do what they say they do."



            The spell says you can locate the ground, not that you can identify it as consecrated vs desecrated. However, you could also read it as being able to locate consecrated ground, and being to locate desecrated ground, in which case the answer would be yes.



            RAI



            Definitely. First, what would the point of a detection spell named Detect Good and Evil be if it didn't tell you what you detected was good or evil? If you wanted to just see magic, you could use detect magic. Second, in 3.5 edition, the spell Detect Evil was actually based on alignment.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 7 hours ago









            Rubiksmoose

            42.6k5210324




            42.6k5210324










            answered 7 hours ago









            qazwsx

            42710




            42710












            • A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
              – Rubiksmoose
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
              – A Very Large Bear
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
              – Cyberspark
              5 hours ago






            • 1




              @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
              – Ryan Thompson
              5 mins ago


















            • A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
              – Rubiksmoose
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
              – A Very Large Bear
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
              – Cyberspark
              5 hours ago






            • 1




              @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
              – Ryan Thompson
              5 mins ago
















            A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
            – NautArch
            6 hours ago




            A good comparison would be against the language in the Paladin's Divine Sense ability.
            – NautArch
            6 hours ago




            3




            3




            By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
            – Rubiksmoose
            6 hours ago




            By "RAI" do you mean "Rules as Intended"? If so, what is your source (beyond your personal interpretation) for claiming that the designers intended the spell to work that way? It might be a harmless houserule, but you don't seem to make the case for it being the intended meaning.
            – Rubiksmoose
            6 hours ago




            3




            3




            -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
            – A Very Large Bear
            5 hours ago






            -1 I don't think you can take a a reading of it as 'locate consecrated ground or locate desecrated ground' like you say under your RAW section. The object of the rule sentence is a place or object that meets the condition of having been magically consecrated or desecrated. So you have a single mode of identification that will ID a place that meets either criteria, rather than two methods that identify a place that meets one of the criteria.
            – A Very Large Bear
            5 hours ago






            1




            1




            To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
            – Cyberspark
            5 hours ago




            To follow on from @Rubiksmoose on the intended - a fair reason would be (IIRC) there's no other way (bar Wish, I guess) to tell consecrated vs desecrated. Clerics couldn't be sure their own temples were consecrated to their own gods, which seems a little daft and quite the oversight
            – Cyberspark
            5 hours ago




            1




            1




            @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
            – Ryan Thompson
            5 mins ago




            @Rubiksmoose The spell does say "magically consecrated or desecrated", so presumably any consecrated or desecrated ground that could be detected by this spell would also be detected by detect magic.
            – Ryan Thompson
            5 mins ago












            up vote
            12
            down vote













            RAW: You do not know whether it is consecrated or desecrated




            If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




            As written, the spell does not allow for determining the difference between consecrated and desecrated only detecting the presence and location of either. All it says is: if [there is a consecrated or desecrated place within 30 feet] then [you are able to locate it].



            In 5e, spells do only what they say they do and the spell does not allow any way to differentiate the two types of places, it detects both. It doesn't even say that you get to choose one to look for when you cast it. If the spell allowed you to tell the difference between the two it would say so.



            The same thing applies to the first part of the spell as well:




            For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located. 




            You can't tell what precise creature type something is, only that it falls into that list and are able to locate it.



            Other features have wording (which this spell does not) that specifically allows for this



            Compare this to Divine Sense (the paladin ability) which specifically allows you to know the type of creatures:




            Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover. You know the type (celestial, fiend, or undead) of any being whose presence you sense, but not its identity (the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich, for instance). 




            The first part of this ability is almost identical to the wording of detect good and evil, yet the ability still needs that second sentence to allow it to specifically identify the type.



            See also detect poison and disease which also has the language allowing the poisons to be identified.




            For the duration, you can sense the presence and location of poisons, poisonous creatures, and diseases within 30 feet of you. You also identify the kind of poison, poisonous creature, or disease in each case.




            If detect good and evil was intended to work this way, it would have included a similar specification.



            The spell is named poorly, but that doesn't change how it works



            Some spells' names are confusing or downright deceptive1, but that doesn't change what the spells' descriptions say they do. In this case for example, detect good and evil doesn't detect alignment at all, but it senses creature types often associated with some alignments as well as objects and places that have been touched by divine power. Other than that it does do what it says: detect. The spell detects all of these things and allows them to be located. Nothing in the spell indicates or even implies that you can differentiate between the things that are found.



            Rules as Fun: Harmless to allow as a houserule



            Besides potentially stepping on the toes of the paladin feature Divine Sense, there really is nothing that would break by allowing the caster to know the type of creature or if ground was consecrated or desecrated. It would be a small boost in utility, but certainly nothing to be super concerned about. We play it this way at my table and have had no issues.



            Just note that this would be a houserule so not really allowable at Adventurers League tables or other tables that strictly adhere to RAW.





            1 - A few examples: Catnap, does not put creatures to sleep. Sacred flame does not do fire damage. Chill touch does not do cold damage and is also not a touch spell. Daylight does not actually create sunlight.






            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              12
              down vote













              RAW: You do not know whether it is consecrated or desecrated




              If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




              As written, the spell does not allow for determining the difference between consecrated and desecrated only detecting the presence and location of either. All it says is: if [there is a consecrated or desecrated place within 30 feet] then [you are able to locate it].



              In 5e, spells do only what they say they do and the spell does not allow any way to differentiate the two types of places, it detects both. It doesn't even say that you get to choose one to look for when you cast it. If the spell allowed you to tell the difference between the two it would say so.



              The same thing applies to the first part of the spell as well:




              For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located. 




              You can't tell what precise creature type something is, only that it falls into that list and are able to locate it.



              Other features have wording (which this spell does not) that specifically allows for this



              Compare this to Divine Sense (the paladin ability) which specifically allows you to know the type of creatures:




              Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover. You know the type (celestial, fiend, or undead) of any being whose presence you sense, but not its identity (the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich, for instance). 




              The first part of this ability is almost identical to the wording of detect good and evil, yet the ability still needs that second sentence to allow it to specifically identify the type.



              See also detect poison and disease which also has the language allowing the poisons to be identified.




              For the duration, you can sense the presence and location of poisons, poisonous creatures, and diseases within 30 feet of you. You also identify the kind of poison, poisonous creature, or disease in each case.




              If detect good and evil was intended to work this way, it would have included a similar specification.



              The spell is named poorly, but that doesn't change how it works



              Some spells' names are confusing or downright deceptive1, but that doesn't change what the spells' descriptions say they do. In this case for example, detect good and evil doesn't detect alignment at all, but it senses creature types often associated with some alignments as well as objects and places that have been touched by divine power. Other than that it does do what it says: detect. The spell detects all of these things and allows them to be located. Nothing in the spell indicates or even implies that you can differentiate between the things that are found.



              Rules as Fun: Harmless to allow as a houserule



              Besides potentially stepping on the toes of the paladin feature Divine Sense, there really is nothing that would break by allowing the caster to know the type of creature or if ground was consecrated or desecrated. It would be a small boost in utility, but certainly nothing to be super concerned about. We play it this way at my table and have had no issues.



              Just note that this would be a houserule so not really allowable at Adventurers League tables or other tables that strictly adhere to RAW.





              1 - A few examples: Catnap, does not put creatures to sleep. Sacred flame does not do fire damage. Chill touch does not do cold damage and is also not a touch spell. Daylight does not actually create sunlight.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                12
                down vote










                up vote
                12
                down vote









                RAW: You do not know whether it is consecrated or desecrated




                If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




                As written, the spell does not allow for determining the difference between consecrated and desecrated only detecting the presence and location of either. All it says is: if [there is a consecrated or desecrated place within 30 feet] then [you are able to locate it].



                In 5e, spells do only what they say they do and the spell does not allow any way to differentiate the two types of places, it detects both. It doesn't even say that you get to choose one to look for when you cast it. If the spell allowed you to tell the difference between the two it would say so.



                The same thing applies to the first part of the spell as well:




                For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located. 




                You can't tell what precise creature type something is, only that it falls into that list and are able to locate it.



                Other features have wording (which this spell does not) that specifically allows for this



                Compare this to Divine Sense (the paladin ability) which specifically allows you to know the type of creatures:




                Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover. You know the type (celestial, fiend, or undead) of any being whose presence you sense, but not its identity (the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich, for instance). 




                The first part of this ability is almost identical to the wording of detect good and evil, yet the ability still needs that second sentence to allow it to specifically identify the type.



                See also detect poison and disease which also has the language allowing the poisons to be identified.




                For the duration, you can sense the presence and location of poisons, poisonous creatures, and diseases within 30 feet of you. You also identify the kind of poison, poisonous creature, or disease in each case.




                If detect good and evil was intended to work this way, it would have included a similar specification.



                The spell is named poorly, but that doesn't change how it works



                Some spells' names are confusing or downright deceptive1, but that doesn't change what the spells' descriptions say they do. In this case for example, detect good and evil doesn't detect alignment at all, but it senses creature types often associated with some alignments as well as objects and places that have been touched by divine power. Other than that it does do what it says: detect. The spell detects all of these things and allows them to be located. Nothing in the spell indicates or even implies that you can differentiate between the things that are found.



                Rules as Fun: Harmless to allow as a houserule



                Besides potentially stepping on the toes of the paladin feature Divine Sense, there really is nothing that would break by allowing the caster to know the type of creature or if ground was consecrated or desecrated. It would be a small boost in utility, but certainly nothing to be super concerned about. We play it this way at my table and have had no issues.



                Just note that this would be a houserule so not really allowable at Adventurers League tables or other tables that strictly adhere to RAW.





                1 - A few examples: Catnap, does not put creatures to sleep. Sacred flame does not do fire damage. Chill touch does not do cold damage and is also not a touch spell. Daylight does not actually create sunlight.






                share|improve this answer














                RAW: You do not know whether it is consecrated or desecrated




                If there is a place or object that has been magically consecrated or desecrated within 30 feet, you are also able to locate it.




                As written, the spell does not allow for determining the difference between consecrated and desecrated only detecting the presence and location of either. All it says is: if [there is a consecrated or desecrated place within 30 feet] then [you are able to locate it].



                In 5e, spells do only what they say they do and the spell does not allow any way to differentiate the two types of places, it detects both. It doesn't even say that you get to choose one to look for when you cast it. If the spell allowed you to tell the difference between the two it would say so.



                The same thing applies to the first part of the spell as well:




                For the duration, you know if there is an aberration, celestial, elemental, fey, fiend, or undead within 30 feet of you, as well as where the creature is located. 




                You can't tell what precise creature type something is, only that it falls into that list and are able to locate it.



                Other features have wording (which this spell does not) that specifically allows for this



                Compare this to Divine Sense (the paladin ability) which specifically allows you to know the type of creatures:




                Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover. You know the type (celestial, fiend, or undead) of any being whose presence you sense, but not its identity (the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich, for instance). 




                The first part of this ability is almost identical to the wording of detect good and evil, yet the ability still needs that second sentence to allow it to specifically identify the type.



                See also detect poison and disease which also has the language allowing the poisons to be identified.




                For the duration, you can sense the presence and location of poisons, poisonous creatures, and diseases within 30 feet of you. You also identify the kind of poison, poisonous creature, or disease in each case.




                If detect good and evil was intended to work this way, it would have included a similar specification.



                The spell is named poorly, but that doesn't change how it works



                Some spells' names are confusing or downright deceptive1, but that doesn't change what the spells' descriptions say they do. In this case for example, detect good and evil doesn't detect alignment at all, but it senses creature types often associated with some alignments as well as objects and places that have been touched by divine power. Other than that it does do what it says: detect. The spell detects all of these things and allows them to be located. Nothing in the spell indicates or even implies that you can differentiate between the things that are found.



                Rules as Fun: Harmless to allow as a houserule



                Besides potentially stepping on the toes of the paladin feature Divine Sense, there really is nothing that would break by allowing the caster to know the type of creature or if ground was consecrated or desecrated. It would be a small boost in utility, but certainly nothing to be super concerned about. We play it this way at my table and have had no issues.



                Just note that this would be a houserule so not really allowable at Adventurers League tables or other tables that strictly adhere to RAW.





                1 - A few examples: Catnap, does not put creatures to sleep. Sacred flame does not do fire damage. Chill touch does not do cold damage and is also not a touch spell. Daylight does not actually create sunlight.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 15 mins ago

























                answered 7 hours ago









                Rubiksmoose

                42.6k5210324




                42.6k5210324






















                    Rugnir is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    Rugnir is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Rugnir is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Rugnir is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135359%2fdoes-the-detect-evil-and-good-let-the-player-know-what-kind-of-ground-they-have%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest




















































































                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?