How to prove $P(X_1=x_1,…,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot …cdot P(X_n=x_n)$?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose $n>1$ and $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ are $n$ independent random variables (say with expotentional distribution) with $X=sum_{i=1}^n X_n$.



Then $X_1,X_2,...,X_n,X$ are mutually independent random variables.



Thus according to the theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_probability_distribution#Additional_properties) $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)cdot P(X=x)$.



However, the answer was $P(X_1=x_1,...,X_n=x_n, X=X)=P(X_1=x_1)cdot ...cdot P(X_n=x_n)$.



How could that be?







probability statistics independence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago

























asked 5 hours ago









user9976437

466




466












  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago


















  • If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    5 hours ago










  • $X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
    – Fnacool
    5 hours ago










  • @HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • @Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
    – user9976437
    5 hours ago










  • Do you know what dependent means?
    – Mees de Vries
    4 hours ago
















If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
– Hagen von Eitzen
5 hours ago




If $n=1$, it should be obvious that there is a dependence
– Hagen von Eitzen
5 hours ago












$X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
– Fnacool
5 hours ago




$X$ is determined by the others. Also ${X=X}$ is an event with probability $1$, so the intersection of this event with any event $A$ has same the probability as $A$.
– Fnacool
5 hours ago












@HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
– user9976437
5 hours ago




@HagenvonEitzen But for $n>1$, $X$ and $X_i$ all have different probability distribution.
– user9976437
5 hours ago












@Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
– user9976437
5 hours ago




@Fnacool How to show they are dependent? And how to calculate this joint distribution? I'm not quite sure how to do this.
– user9976437
5 hours ago












Do you know what dependent means?
– Mees de Vries
4 hours ago




Do you know what dependent means?
– Mees de Vries
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



$because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



$therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



Hope it helps:)






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995471%2fhow-to-prove-px-1-x-1-x-n-x-n-x-x-px-1-x-1-cdot-cdot-px-n-x-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest
































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



    $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



    $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



    Hope it helps:)






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



      $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



      $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



      Hope it helps:)






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



        $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



        $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



        Hope it helps:)






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Random variable X is dependent on the other random variables.



        $because$ Take an example, Suppose $X_i = i forall iin{1,2,...,n}$.Then we can completely tell whether for a particular n-dimensional vector $x, X=x$ or not.



        $therefore$ The random variable X is not independent to other random variables,however, the result is true for $X_i's$ separately,i.e. $$P(X_1=x_1,X_2=x_2,...,X_n=x_n) = prod_{i=1}^nP(X_i=x_i)$$



        Hope it helps:)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Crazy for maths

        1324




        1324






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995471%2fhow-to-prove-px-1-x-1-x-n-x-n-x-x-px-1-x-1-cdot-cdot-px-n-x-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest




















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?