Second Order Matrix ODE












2












$begingroup$


Given the equation $frac{d^2X}{dt^2} = MX$ and the appropriate initial values, how would one go about solving this equation?
I've looked at Qualitative dependence of solution to second-order matrix differential equation on eigenvalues, which was very useful but I don't really understand how the change of basis was performed nor how the eigenvalues could be found.



Are there any resources that explain how to tackle second order matrix equations out there?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you don't know how to find eigenvalues of a matrix then I suggest you find an introductory text on linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Eddy
    Dec 31 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, @Eddy. My question was less about the process which I understand, than the reasons for doing so - why do we do those things? Are there any links you can point me to if you can't explain it yourself?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Low
    Jan 2 at 14:17
















2












$begingroup$


Given the equation $frac{d^2X}{dt^2} = MX$ and the appropriate initial values, how would one go about solving this equation?
I've looked at Qualitative dependence of solution to second-order matrix differential equation on eigenvalues, which was very useful but I don't really understand how the change of basis was performed nor how the eigenvalues could be found.



Are there any resources that explain how to tackle second order matrix equations out there?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you don't know how to find eigenvalues of a matrix then I suggest you find an introductory text on linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Eddy
    Dec 31 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, @Eddy. My question was less about the process which I understand, than the reasons for doing so - why do we do those things? Are there any links you can point me to if you can't explain it yourself?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Low
    Jan 2 at 14:17














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Given the equation $frac{d^2X}{dt^2} = MX$ and the appropriate initial values, how would one go about solving this equation?
I've looked at Qualitative dependence of solution to second-order matrix differential equation on eigenvalues, which was very useful but I don't really understand how the change of basis was performed nor how the eigenvalues could be found.



Are there any resources that explain how to tackle second order matrix equations out there?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Given the equation $frac{d^2X}{dt^2} = MX$ and the appropriate initial values, how would one go about solving this equation?
I've looked at Qualitative dependence of solution to second-order matrix differential equation on eigenvalues, which was very useful but I don't really understand how the change of basis was performed nor how the eigenvalues could be found.



Are there any resources that explain how to tackle second order matrix equations out there?







matrices ordinary-differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 31 '18 at 8:37









Jonathan LowJonathan Low

635




635












  • $begingroup$
    If you don't know how to find eigenvalues of a matrix then I suggest you find an introductory text on linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Eddy
    Dec 31 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, @Eddy. My question was less about the process which I understand, than the reasons for doing so - why do we do those things? Are there any links you can point me to if you can't explain it yourself?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Low
    Jan 2 at 14:17


















  • $begingroup$
    If you don't know how to find eigenvalues of a matrix then I suggest you find an introductory text on linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Eddy
    Dec 31 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, @Eddy. My question was less about the process which I understand, than the reasons for doing so - why do we do those things? Are there any links you can point me to if you can't explain it yourself?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Low
    Jan 2 at 14:17
















$begingroup$
If you don't know how to find eigenvalues of a matrix then I suggest you find an introductory text on linear algebra.
$endgroup$
– Eddy
Dec 31 '18 at 18:04




$begingroup$
If you don't know how to find eigenvalues of a matrix then I suggest you find an introductory text on linear algebra.
$endgroup$
– Eddy
Dec 31 '18 at 18:04












$begingroup$
Sorry, @Eddy. My question was less about the process which I understand, than the reasons for doing so - why do we do those things? Are there any links you can point me to if you can't explain it yourself?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Low
Jan 2 at 14:17




$begingroup$
Sorry, @Eddy. My question was less about the process which I understand, than the reasons for doing so - why do we do those things? Are there any links you can point me to if you can't explain it yourself?
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Low
Jan 2 at 14:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The idea is to simplify the equation by transforming it to the form
$$
frac{dY} {dt} = D Y
$$

where $D$ is a constant diagonal matrix. This matrix equation is can be easily rewritten as a system of equations where each equation only features a single element of $Y$:
$$
frac{dY_{ij}} {dt} = D_{ii} Y_{ij} quad forall i, j
$$

The problem is, what systems of the form
$$
frac{dX} {dt} = M X
$$

where $M$ is a constant matrix, can transform variables so that we get an equation of the simplified firm above? Well, if $M$ is a matrix with a complete set of right eigenvectors which form a matrix $R$, then the corresponding matrix of left eigenvectors is $R^{-1}$ and the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues is $Lambda=R^{-1}MR$. So, how do we get a nice diagonal matrix in our equation? If we premultiply by $R^{-1} $ and insert a factor of $I=RR^{-1}$ between $M$ and $X$ then
$$
R^{-1} frac{dX} {dt} = R^{-1} M R R^{-1} X
$$

$$
frac{dR^{-1}X} {dt} = Lambda R^{-1} X
$$

Using a letter to the repeated combination, $eta=R^{-1} X$, yields
$$
frac{deta} {dt} = Lambda eta
$$

which is in the simplified form desired.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057514%2fsecond-order-matrix-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The idea is to simplify the equation by transforming it to the form
    $$
    frac{dY} {dt} = D Y
    $$

    where $D$ is a constant diagonal matrix. This matrix equation is can be easily rewritten as a system of equations where each equation only features a single element of $Y$:
    $$
    frac{dY_{ij}} {dt} = D_{ii} Y_{ij} quad forall i, j
    $$

    The problem is, what systems of the form
    $$
    frac{dX} {dt} = M X
    $$

    where $M$ is a constant matrix, can transform variables so that we get an equation of the simplified firm above? Well, if $M$ is a matrix with a complete set of right eigenvectors which form a matrix $R$, then the corresponding matrix of left eigenvectors is $R^{-1}$ and the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues is $Lambda=R^{-1}MR$. So, how do we get a nice diagonal matrix in our equation? If we premultiply by $R^{-1} $ and insert a factor of $I=RR^{-1}$ between $M$ and $X$ then
    $$
    R^{-1} frac{dX} {dt} = R^{-1} M R R^{-1} X
    $$

    $$
    frac{dR^{-1}X} {dt} = Lambda R^{-1} X
    $$

    Using a letter to the repeated combination, $eta=R^{-1} X$, yields
    $$
    frac{deta} {dt} = Lambda eta
    $$

    which is in the simplified form desired.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The idea is to simplify the equation by transforming it to the form
      $$
      frac{dY} {dt} = D Y
      $$

      where $D$ is a constant diagonal matrix. This matrix equation is can be easily rewritten as a system of equations where each equation only features a single element of $Y$:
      $$
      frac{dY_{ij}} {dt} = D_{ii} Y_{ij} quad forall i, j
      $$

      The problem is, what systems of the form
      $$
      frac{dX} {dt} = M X
      $$

      where $M$ is a constant matrix, can transform variables so that we get an equation of the simplified firm above? Well, if $M$ is a matrix with a complete set of right eigenvectors which form a matrix $R$, then the corresponding matrix of left eigenvectors is $R^{-1}$ and the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues is $Lambda=R^{-1}MR$. So, how do we get a nice diagonal matrix in our equation? If we premultiply by $R^{-1} $ and insert a factor of $I=RR^{-1}$ between $M$ and $X$ then
      $$
      R^{-1} frac{dX} {dt} = R^{-1} M R R^{-1} X
      $$

      $$
      frac{dR^{-1}X} {dt} = Lambda R^{-1} X
      $$

      Using a letter to the repeated combination, $eta=R^{-1} X$, yields
      $$
      frac{deta} {dt} = Lambda eta
      $$

      which is in the simplified form desired.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The idea is to simplify the equation by transforming it to the form
        $$
        frac{dY} {dt} = D Y
        $$

        where $D$ is a constant diagonal matrix. This matrix equation is can be easily rewritten as a system of equations where each equation only features a single element of $Y$:
        $$
        frac{dY_{ij}} {dt} = D_{ii} Y_{ij} quad forall i, j
        $$

        The problem is, what systems of the form
        $$
        frac{dX} {dt} = M X
        $$

        where $M$ is a constant matrix, can transform variables so that we get an equation of the simplified firm above? Well, if $M$ is a matrix with a complete set of right eigenvectors which form a matrix $R$, then the corresponding matrix of left eigenvectors is $R^{-1}$ and the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues is $Lambda=R^{-1}MR$. So, how do we get a nice diagonal matrix in our equation? If we premultiply by $R^{-1} $ and insert a factor of $I=RR^{-1}$ between $M$ and $X$ then
        $$
        R^{-1} frac{dX} {dt} = R^{-1} M R R^{-1} X
        $$

        $$
        frac{dR^{-1}X} {dt} = Lambda R^{-1} X
        $$

        Using a letter to the repeated combination, $eta=R^{-1} X$, yields
        $$
        frac{deta} {dt} = Lambda eta
        $$

        which is in the simplified form desired.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The idea is to simplify the equation by transforming it to the form
        $$
        frac{dY} {dt} = D Y
        $$

        where $D$ is a constant diagonal matrix. This matrix equation is can be easily rewritten as a system of equations where each equation only features a single element of $Y$:
        $$
        frac{dY_{ij}} {dt} = D_{ii} Y_{ij} quad forall i, j
        $$

        The problem is, what systems of the form
        $$
        frac{dX} {dt} = M X
        $$

        where $M$ is a constant matrix, can transform variables so that we get an equation of the simplified firm above? Well, if $M$ is a matrix with a complete set of right eigenvectors which form a matrix $R$, then the corresponding matrix of left eigenvectors is $R^{-1}$ and the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues is $Lambda=R^{-1}MR$. So, how do we get a nice diagonal matrix in our equation? If we premultiply by $R^{-1} $ and insert a factor of $I=RR^{-1}$ between $M$ and $X$ then
        $$
        R^{-1} frac{dX} {dt} = R^{-1} M R R^{-1} X
        $$

        $$
        frac{dR^{-1}X} {dt} = Lambda R^{-1} X
        $$

        Using a letter to the repeated combination, $eta=R^{-1} X$, yields
        $$
        frac{deta} {dt} = Lambda eta
        $$

        which is in the simplified form desired.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 2 at 17:22









        EddyEddy

        959612




        959612






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057514%2fsecond-order-matrix-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?