Artin reciprocity












1












$begingroup$


The Artin reciprocity says that if $L/mathbb{Q}$ is a finite abelian extension with defining modulus $m$, then the sequence of groups



$$
1to I_{L,m}to (mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})^timesto Gal(L/mathbb{Q})to 1
$$



is exact.



I do not quite see why this is a substantial theorem, because it is simply saying that the Artin map (the third arrow) is surjective; $I_{L,m}$ is defined as the kernel of the Artin map, so the second arrow being injective is trivial. Also, why is it called "reciprocity"? Does this theorem have any interesting consequences?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Well it's supposed to generalize quadratic reciprocity and cubic reciprocity...
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:02










  • $begingroup$
    @Kenny Lau: How does it generalize them?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The most substantive part is that there is a defining modulus.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Lord Shark the Unknown: Isn't that the Kronecker-Weber theorem, rather than Artin reciprocity?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:34
















1












$begingroup$


The Artin reciprocity says that if $L/mathbb{Q}$ is a finite abelian extension with defining modulus $m$, then the sequence of groups



$$
1to I_{L,m}to (mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})^timesto Gal(L/mathbb{Q})to 1
$$



is exact.



I do not quite see why this is a substantial theorem, because it is simply saying that the Artin map (the third arrow) is surjective; $I_{L,m}$ is defined as the kernel of the Artin map, so the second arrow being injective is trivial. Also, why is it called "reciprocity"? Does this theorem have any interesting consequences?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Well it's supposed to generalize quadratic reciprocity and cubic reciprocity...
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:02










  • $begingroup$
    @Kenny Lau: How does it generalize them?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The most substantive part is that there is a defining modulus.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Lord Shark the Unknown: Isn't that the Kronecker-Weber theorem, rather than Artin reciprocity?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:34














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


The Artin reciprocity says that if $L/mathbb{Q}$ is a finite abelian extension with defining modulus $m$, then the sequence of groups



$$
1to I_{L,m}to (mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})^timesto Gal(L/mathbb{Q})to 1
$$



is exact.



I do not quite see why this is a substantial theorem, because it is simply saying that the Artin map (the third arrow) is surjective; $I_{L,m}$ is defined as the kernel of the Artin map, so the second arrow being injective is trivial. Also, why is it called "reciprocity"? Does this theorem have any interesting consequences?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The Artin reciprocity says that if $L/mathbb{Q}$ is a finite abelian extension with defining modulus $m$, then the sequence of groups



$$
1to I_{L,m}to (mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})^timesto Gal(L/mathbb{Q})to 1
$$



is exact.



I do not quite see why this is a substantial theorem, because it is simply saying that the Artin map (the third arrow) is surjective; $I_{L,m}$ is defined as the kernel of the Artin map, so the second arrow being injective is trivial. Also, why is it called "reciprocity"? Does this theorem have any interesting consequences?







class-field-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 31 '18 at 7:47









saisai

1376




1376












  • $begingroup$
    Well it's supposed to generalize quadratic reciprocity and cubic reciprocity...
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:02










  • $begingroup$
    @Kenny Lau: How does it generalize them?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The most substantive part is that there is a defining modulus.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Lord Shark the Unknown: Isn't that the Kronecker-Weber theorem, rather than Artin reciprocity?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:34


















  • $begingroup$
    Well it's supposed to generalize quadratic reciprocity and cubic reciprocity...
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:02










  • $begingroup$
    @Kenny Lau: How does it generalize them?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:13






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The most substantive part is that there is a defining modulus.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Lord Shark the Unknown: Isn't that the Kronecker-Weber theorem, rather than Artin reciprocity?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:34
















$begingroup$
Well it's supposed to generalize quadratic reciprocity and cubic reciprocity...
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Dec 31 '18 at 8:02




$begingroup$
Well it's supposed to generalize quadratic reciprocity and cubic reciprocity...
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Dec 31 '18 at 8:02












$begingroup$
@Kenny Lau: How does it generalize them?
$endgroup$
– sai
Dec 31 '18 at 8:13




$begingroup$
@Kenny Lau: How does it generalize them?
$endgroup$
– sai
Dec 31 '18 at 8:13




2




2




$begingroup$
The most substantive part is that there is a defining modulus.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:22




$begingroup$
The most substantive part is that there is a defining modulus.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 31 '18 at 8:22












$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Isn't that the Kronecker-Weber theorem, rather than Artin reciprocity?
$endgroup$
– sai
Dec 31 '18 at 8:34




$begingroup$
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Isn't that the Kronecker-Weber theorem, rather than Artin reciprocity?
$endgroup$
– sai
Dec 31 '18 at 8:34










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057498%2fartin-reciprocity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057498%2fartin-reciprocity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?