Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol












14















How can we change any of the two dots of the ddots math symbol?



I can change both of them:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{xcolor}

begin{document}

$color{red}ddot{color{black}x}$

end{document}


Two colored dots



Something like:



Example 1



Example 2










share|improve this question



























    14















    How can we change any of the two dots of the ddots math symbol?



    I can change both of them:



    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{xcolor}

    begin{document}

    $color{red}ddot{color{black}x}$

    end{document}


    Two colored dots



    Something like:



    Example 1



    Example 2










    share|improve this question

























      14












      14








      14


      1






      How can we change any of the two dots of the ddots math symbol?



      I can change both of them:



      documentclass{article}

      usepackage{xcolor}

      begin{document}

      $color{red}ddot{color{black}x}$

      end{document}


      Two colored dots



      Something like:



      Example 1



      Example 2










      share|improve this question














      How can we change any of the two dots of the ddots math symbol?



      I can change both of them:



      documentclass{article}

      usepackage{xcolor}

      begin{document}

      $color{red}ddot{color{black}x}$

      end{document}


      Two colored dots



      Something like:



      Example 1



      Example 2







      math-mode formatting color






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 21 at 9:25









      manoooohmanooooh

      1,1631517




      1,1631517






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          17














          The following uses two slightly shifted coloured dot macros. The placement is not perfect and might be really bad for some letters.



          documentclass{article}

          % for colours
          usepackage{xcolor}
          % for mighty interface to define new macros, it also loads the l3 kernel
          usepackage{xparse}
          % for mathrlap
          usepackage{mathtools}

          % change to the coding language of LaTeX3 (in which spaces are ignored, that why
          % I can do stuff like { #2 } etc., also _ is a character now and can be part of
          % macro names)
          ExplSyntaxOn
          % define a user facing macro, it takes one optional argument, which by default
          % is empty and a mandatory one (neither of them can contain a par). The
          % optional argument will be split at a "," once.
          NewDocumentCommand cddot { >{SplitArgument{1}{,}}O{} m }
          {
          % pass on the now split argument #1 and the mandatory argument #2. #1 will
          % be something like { #1.1 } { #1.2 }
          __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 { #2 }
          }
          % define a new internal macro (cs_new_protected:Npn is like protecteddef)
          cs_new_protected:Npn __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 #2 #3
          {
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % check whether the first argument is blank (meaning it only contains spaces
          % or nothing), if it isn't blank change the color. It will be blank if you
          % don't use an optional argument or if you start your optional argument with
          % a ","
          tl_if_blank:nF { #1 } { color { #1 } }
          % mathrlap will print its argument without really taking any space, phantom
          % will only take the space of #3, mkern-1.5mu will move the dot slightly to
          % the left
          mathrlap { mkern-1.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the group containing the first color
          group_end:
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % IfValueT will check whether the second part of the split argument was
          % available (so will result in True if there was a comma in [#1]). If there
          % was a second argument assume it is the second color
          IfValueT { #2 } { color { #2 } }
          % again mathrlap and a phantom #3, this time shifting the dot slightly to
          % the right by 2mu
          mathrlap { mkern+2.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the second color's group
          group_end:
          % print #3 without further ado (since we used mathrlap previously we're
          % still on the same spot and due to the phantom #3 will only be printed
          % visible once
          #3
          }
          % end the LaTeX3 programming syntax
          ExplSyntaxOff

          begin{document}
          % without optional argument
          $cddot{x}$

          % with the first half of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue]{x}$

          % with the second half of the optional argument
          $cddot[,green]{x}$

          % with both halves of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue,green]{x}$

          % for comparison
          $ddot{x}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:46








          • 2





            @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 9:50








          • 2





            It would be fantastic.

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:52






          • 2





            @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:08






          • 1





            @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:18



















          14














          Adapting from the definition of dddot in amsmath. The bottom line in the picture shows the symbol superimposed on each other; the difference is really negligible.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{xcolor}

          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{colorddot}[3]{%
          % #1=color of first dot, #2=color of second dot, #3=accentee
          {mathop{kernz@#3}limits^{%
          vbox to-1.55ex@{%
          kern-tw@ex@
          hbox{normalfontkern0.05emtextcolor{#1}{.}kern-0.085emtextcolor{#2}{.}}
          vss
          }%
          }}%
          }
          makeatother

          begin{document}

          $ddot{x}$

          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$

          $ddot{x}$llap{$colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$}
          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$llap{$ddot{x}$}

          end{document}


          Beware that the different colors will make the dots to appear misaligned.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Mar 21 at 10:26








          • 2





            @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 10:33






          • 2





            Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:39






          • 1





            @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 11:44






          • 1





            @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:46



















          13














          One may just use the accents package, which was made for this.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{accents}
          usepackage{pgffor}
          usepackage{xcolor}
          newcommand{ColorDots}[2]{accentset{foreach X in {#1}
          {textcolor{X}{boldsymbol{.}}}}{#2}}
          begin{document}
          $accentset{boldsymbol{..}}{x}$ $ColorDots{red,blue}{y}$ $ColorDots{red}{z}$
          $ColorDots{red,orange,blue}{X}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer



















          • 3





            Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

            – Skillmon
            Mar 22 at 20:09












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480644%2fchange-the-color-of-a-single-dot-in-ddot-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          17














          The following uses two slightly shifted coloured dot macros. The placement is not perfect and might be really bad for some letters.



          documentclass{article}

          % for colours
          usepackage{xcolor}
          % for mighty interface to define new macros, it also loads the l3 kernel
          usepackage{xparse}
          % for mathrlap
          usepackage{mathtools}

          % change to the coding language of LaTeX3 (in which spaces are ignored, that why
          % I can do stuff like { #2 } etc., also _ is a character now and can be part of
          % macro names)
          ExplSyntaxOn
          % define a user facing macro, it takes one optional argument, which by default
          % is empty and a mandatory one (neither of them can contain a par). The
          % optional argument will be split at a "," once.
          NewDocumentCommand cddot { >{SplitArgument{1}{,}}O{} m }
          {
          % pass on the now split argument #1 and the mandatory argument #2. #1 will
          % be something like { #1.1 } { #1.2 }
          __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 { #2 }
          }
          % define a new internal macro (cs_new_protected:Npn is like protecteddef)
          cs_new_protected:Npn __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 #2 #3
          {
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % check whether the first argument is blank (meaning it only contains spaces
          % or nothing), if it isn't blank change the color. It will be blank if you
          % don't use an optional argument or if you start your optional argument with
          % a ","
          tl_if_blank:nF { #1 } { color { #1 } }
          % mathrlap will print its argument without really taking any space, phantom
          % will only take the space of #3, mkern-1.5mu will move the dot slightly to
          % the left
          mathrlap { mkern-1.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the group containing the first color
          group_end:
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % IfValueT will check whether the second part of the split argument was
          % available (so will result in True if there was a comma in [#1]). If there
          % was a second argument assume it is the second color
          IfValueT { #2 } { color { #2 } }
          % again mathrlap and a phantom #3, this time shifting the dot slightly to
          % the right by 2mu
          mathrlap { mkern+2.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the second color's group
          group_end:
          % print #3 without further ado (since we used mathrlap previously we're
          % still on the same spot and due to the phantom #3 will only be printed
          % visible once
          #3
          }
          % end the LaTeX3 programming syntax
          ExplSyntaxOff

          begin{document}
          % without optional argument
          $cddot{x}$

          % with the first half of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue]{x}$

          % with the second half of the optional argument
          $cddot[,green]{x}$

          % with both halves of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue,green]{x}$

          % for comparison
          $ddot{x}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:46








          • 2





            @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 9:50








          • 2





            It would be fantastic.

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:52






          • 2





            @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:08






          • 1





            @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:18
















          17














          The following uses two slightly shifted coloured dot macros. The placement is not perfect and might be really bad for some letters.



          documentclass{article}

          % for colours
          usepackage{xcolor}
          % for mighty interface to define new macros, it also loads the l3 kernel
          usepackage{xparse}
          % for mathrlap
          usepackage{mathtools}

          % change to the coding language of LaTeX3 (in which spaces are ignored, that why
          % I can do stuff like { #2 } etc., also _ is a character now and can be part of
          % macro names)
          ExplSyntaxOn
          % define a user facing macro, it takes one optional argument, which by default
          % is empty and a mandatory one (neither of them can contain a par). The
          % optional argument will be split at a "," once.
          NewDocumentCommand cddot { >{SplitArgument{1}{,}}O{} m }
          {
          % pass on the now split argument #1 and the mandatory argument #2. #1 will
          % be something like { #1.1 } { #1.2 }
          __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 { #2 }
          }
          % define a new internal macro (cs_new_protected:Npn is like protecteddef)
          cs_new_protected:Npn __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 #2 #3
          {
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % check whether the first argument is blank (meaning it only contains spaces
          % or nothing), if it isn't blank change the color. It will be blank if you
          % don't use an optional argument or if you start your optional argument with
          % a ","
          tl_if_blank:nF { #1 } { color { #1 } }
          % mathrlap will print its argument without really taking any space, phantom
          % will only take the space of #3, mkern-1.5mu will move the dot slightly to
          % the left
          mathrlap { mkern-1.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the group containing the first color
          group_end:
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % IfValueT will check whether the second part of the split argument was
          % available (so will result in True if there was a comma in [#1]). If there
          % was a second argument assume it is the second color
          IfValueT { #2 } { color { #2 } }
          % again mathrlap and a phantom #3, this time shifting the dot slightly to
          % the right by 2mu
          mathrlap { mkern+2.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the second color's group
          group_end:
          % print #3 without further ado (since we used mathrlap previously we're
          % still on the same spot and due to the phantom #3 will only be printed
          % visible once
          #3
          }
          % end the LaTeX3 programming syntax
          ExplSyntaxOff

          begin{document}
          % without optional argument
          $cddot{x}$

          % with the first half of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue]{x}$

          % with the second half of the optional argument
          $cddot[,green]{x}$

          % with both halves of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue,green]{x}$

          % for comparison
          $ddot{x}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:46








          • 2





            @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 9:50








          • 2





            It would be fantastic.

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:52






          • 2





            @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:08






          • 1





            @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:18














          17












          17








          17







          The following uses two slightly shifted coloured dot macros. The placement is not perfect and might be really bad for some letters.



          documentclass{article}

          % for colours
          usepackage{xcolor}
          % for mighty interface to define new macros, it also loads the l3 kernel
          usepackage{xparse}
          % for mathrlap
          usepackage{mathtools}

          % change to the coding language of LaTeX3 (in which spaces are ignored, that why
          % I can do stuff like { #2 } etc., also _ is a character now and can be part of
          % macro names)
          ExplSyntaxOn
          % define a user facing macro, it takes one optional argument, which by default
          % is empty and a mandatory one (neither of them can contain a par). The
          % optional argument will be split at a "," once.
          NewDocumentCommand cddot { >{SplitArgument{1}{,}}O{} m }
          {
          % pass on the now split argument #1 and the mandatory argument #2. #1 will
          % be something like { #1.1 } { #1.2 }
          __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 { #2 }
          }
          % define a new internal macro (cs_new_protected:Npn is like protecteddef)
          cs_new_protected:Npn __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 #2 #3
          {
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % check whether the first argument is blank (meaning it only contains spaces
          % or nothing), if it isn't blank change the color. It will be blank if you
          % don't use an optional argument or if you start your optional argument with
          % a ","
          tl_if_blank:nF { #1 } { color { #1 } }
          % mathrlap will print its argument without really taking any space, phantom
          % will only take the space of #3, mkern-1.5mu will move the dot slightly to
          % the left
          mathrlap { mkern-1.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the group containing the first color
          group_end:
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % IfValueT will check whether the second part of the split argument was
          % available (so will result in True if there was a comma in [#1]). If there
          % was a second argument assume it is the second color
          IfValueT { #2 } { color { #2 } }
          % again mathrlap and a phantom #3, this time shifting the dot slightly to
          % the right by 2mu
          mathrlap { mkern+2.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the second color's group
          group_end:
          % print #3 without further ado (since we used mathrlap previously we're
          % still on the same spot and due to the phantom #3 will only be printed
          % visible once
          #3
          }
          % end the LaTeX3 programming syntax
          ExplSyntaxOff

          begin{document}
          % without optional argument
          $cddot{x}$

          % with the first half of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue]{x}$

          % with the second half of the optional argument
          $cddot[,green]{x}$

          % with both halves of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue,green]{x}$

          % for comparison
          $ddot{x}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          The following uses two slightly shifted coloured dot macros. The placement is not perfect and might be really bad for some letters.



          documentclass{article}

          % for colours
          usepackage{xcolor}
          % for mighty interface to define new macros, it also loads the l3 kernel
          usepackage{xparse}
          % for mathrlap
          usepackage{mathtools}

          % change to the coding language of LaTeX3 (in which spaces are ignored, that why
          % I can do stuff like { #2 } etc., also _ is a character now and can be part of
          % macro names)
          ExplSyntaxOn
          % define a user facing macro, it takes one optional argument, which by default
          % is empty and a mandatory one (neither of them can contain a par). The
          % optional argument will be split at a "," once.
          NewDocumentCommand cddot { >{SplitArgument{1}{,}}O{} m }
          {
          % pass on the now split argument #1 and the mandatory argument #2. #1 will
          % be something like { #1.1 } { #1.2 }
          __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 { #2 }
          }
          % define a new internal macro (cs_new_protected:Npn is like protecteddef)
          cs_new_protected:Npn __manooooh_cddot:nnn #1 #2 #3
          {
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % check whether the first argument is blank (meaning it only contains spaces
          % or nothing), if it isn't blank change the color. It will be blank if you
          % don't use an optional argument or if you start your optional argument with
          % a ","
          tl_if_blank:nF { #1 } { color { #1 } }
          % mathrlap will print its argument without really taking any space, phantom
          % will only take the space of #3, mkern-1.5mu will move the dot slightly to
          % the left
          mathrlap { mkern-1.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the group containing the first color
          group_end:
          % start a new group
          group_begin:
          % IfValueT will check whether the second part of the split argument was
          % available (so will result in True if there was a comma in [#1]). If there
          % was a second argument assume it is the second color
          IfValueT { #2 } { color { #2 } }
          % again mathrlap and a phantom #3, this time shifting the dot slightly to
          % the right by 2mu
          mathrlap { mkern+2.25mu dot { phantom { #3 } } }
          % end the second color's group
          group_end:
          % print #3 without further ado (since we used mathrlap previously we're
          % still on the same spot and due to the phantom #3 will only be printed
          % visible once
          #3
          }
          % end the LaTeX3 programming syntax
          ExplSyntaxOff

          begin{document}
          % without optional argument
          $cddot{x}$

          % with the first half of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue]{x}$

          % with the second half of the optional argument
          $cddot[,green]{x}$

          % with both halves of the optional argument
          $cddot[blue,green]{x}$

          % for comparison
          $ddot{x}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 21 at 15:15

























          answered Mar 21 at 9:39









          SkillmonSkillmon

          24.1k12249




          24.1k12249













          • I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:46








          • 2





            @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 9:50








          • 2





            It would be fantastic.

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:52






          • 2





            @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:08






          • 1





            @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:18



















          • I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:46








          • 2





            @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 9:50








          • 2





            It would be fantastic.

            – manooooh
            Mar 21 at 9:52






          • 2





            @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:08






          • 1





            @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 10:18

















          I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

          – manooooh
          Mar 21 at 9:46







          I have never read about NewDocumentCommand. I compared the normal output with yours and they are indeed the same! Maybe adding more stuff will break the line spacing, but we need an example for that. Thanks for the answer!

          – manooooh
          Mar 21 at 9:46






          2




          2





          @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 9:50







          @manooooh NewDocumentCommand is part of xparse which is a LaTeX3 package to define macros with powerful syntax. Also I use tl_if_blank:nF which is part of LaTeX3's l3tl which is part of the L3 kernel. Do you want me to add comments to the code to explain it a bit?

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 9:50






          2




          2





          It would be fantastic.

          – manooooh
          Mar 21 at 9:52





          It would be fantastic.

          – manooooh
          Mar 21 at 9:52




          2




          2





          @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 10:08





          @manooooh I've added loads of comments to the code, if you still have questions, feel free to ask.

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 10:08




          1




          1





          @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 10:18





          @manooooh the spaces are only a useful side effect (no unintentional spaces which is often an issue, especially for people not that experienced in writing their own macros), the main point being the _ and : in macro names, which is the internal convention of L3. Without ExplSyntaxOn I couldn't use macros like tl_if_blank:nF directly. The macro names in L3 are built from several parts, tl is the module it's taken from, _if_blank is the name/description, :nF means it takes two arguments, one a normal one, the second executed in the False branch.

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 10:18











          14














          Adapting from the definition of dddot in amsmath. The bottom line in the picture shows the symbol superimposed on each other; the difference is really negligible.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{xcolor}

          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{colorddot}[3]{%
          % #1=color of first dot, #2=color of second dot, #3=accentee
          {mathop{kernz@#3}limits^{%
          vbox to-1.55ex@{%
          kern-tw@ex@
          hbox{normalfontkern0.05emtextcolor{#1}{.}kern-0.085emtextcolor{#2}{.}}
          vss
          }%
          }}%
          }
          makeatother

          begin{document}

          $ddot{x}$

          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$

          $ddot{x}$llap{$colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$}
          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$llap{$ddot{x}$}

          end{document}


          Beware that the different colors will make the dots to appear misaligned.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Mar 21 at 10:26








          • 2





            @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 10:33






          • 2





            Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:39






          • 1





            @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 11:44






          • 1





            @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:46
















          14














          Adapting from the definition of dddot in amsmath. The bottom line in the picture shows the symbol superimposed on each other; the difference is really negligible.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{xcolor}

          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{colorddot}[3]{%
          % #1=color of first dot, #2=color of second dot, #3=accentee
          {mathop{kernz@#3}limits^{%
          vbox to-1.55ex@{%
          kern-tw@ex@
          hbox{normalfontkern0.05emtextcolor{#1}{.}kern-0.085emtextcolor{#2}{.}}
          vss
          }%
          }}%
          }
          makeatother

          begin{document}

          $ddot{x}$

          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$

          $ddot{x}$llap{$colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$}
          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$llap{$ddot{x}$}

          end{document}


          Beware that the different colors will make the dots to appear misaligned.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Mar 21 at 10:26








          • 2





            @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 10:33






          • 2





            Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:39






          • 1





            @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 11:44






          • 1





            @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:46














          14












          14








          14







          Adapting from the definition of dddot in amsmath. The bottom line in the picture shows the symbol superimposed on each other; the difference is really negligible.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{xcolor}

          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{colorddot}[3]{%
          % #1=color of first dot, #2=color of second dot, #3=accentee
          {mathop{kernz@#3}limits^{%
          vbox to-1.55ex@{%
          kern-tw@ex@
          hbox{normalfontkern0.05emtextcolor{#1}{.}kern-0.085emtextcolor{#2}{.}}
          vss
          }%
          }}%
          }
          makeatother

          begin{document}

          $ddot{x}$

          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$

          $ddot{x}$llap{$colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$}
          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$llap{$ddot{x}$}

          end{document}


          Beware that the different colors will make the dots to appear misaligned.



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          Adapting from the definition of dddot in amsmath. The bottom line in the picture shows the symbol superimposed on each other; the difference is really negligible.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{xcolor}

          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{colorddot}[3]{%
          % #1=color of first dot, #2=color of second dot, #3=accentee
          {mathop{kernz@#3}limits^{%
          vbox to-1.55ex@{%
          kern-tw@ex@
          hbox{normalfontkern0.05emtextcolor{#1}{.}kern-0.085emtextcolor{#2}{.}}
          vss
          }%
          }}%
          }
          makeatother

          begin{document}

          $ddot{x}$

          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$

          $ddot{x}$llap{$colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$}
          $colorddot{green}{blue}{x}$llap{$ddot{x}$}

          end{document}


          Beware that the different colors will make the dots to appear misaligned.



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 21 at 10:34

























          answered Mar 21 at 10:25









          egregegreg

          730k8819293243




          730k8819293243








          • 2





            Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Mar 21 at 10:26








          • 2





            @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 10:33






          • 2





            Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:39






          • 1





            @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 11:44






          • 1





            @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:46














          • 2





            Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Mar 21 at 10:26








          • 2





            @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 10:33






          • 2





            Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:39






          • 1





            @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

            – egreg
            Mar 21 at 11:44






          • 1





            @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

            – Skillmon
            Mar 21 at 11:46








          2




          2





          Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

          – Steven B. Segletes
          Mar 21 at 10:26







          Why is the kern slightly different between the cases? It is more than just an appearance.

          – Steven B. Segletes
          Mar 21 at 10:26






          2




          2





          @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

          – egreg
          Mar 21 at 10:33





          @StevenB.Segletes Refined. :-)

          – egreg
          Mar 21 at 10:33




          2




          2





          Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 11:39





          Did you just post a non-expl3 answer while I did?

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 11:39




          1




          1





          @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

          – egreg
          Mar 21 at 11:44





          @Skillmon Let's share the task of promoting expl3. ;-)

          – egreg
          Mar 21 at 11:44




          1




          1





          @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 11:46





          @egreg well, mine is a wild mix of expl3 and LaTeX2e stuff, unfortunately...

          – Skillmon
          Mar 21 at 11:46











          13














          One may just use the accents package, which was made for this.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{accents}
          usepackage{pgffor}
          usepackage{xcolor}
          newcommand{ColorDots}[2]{accentset{foreach X in {#1}
          {textcolor{X}{boldsymbol{.}}}}{#2}}
          begin{document}
          $accentset{boldsymbol{..}}{x}$ $ColorDots{red,blue}{y}$ $ColorDots{red}{z}$
          $ColorDots{red,orange,blue}{X}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer



















          • 3





            Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

            – Skillmon
            Mar 22 at 20:09
















          13














          One may just use the accents package, which was made for this.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{accents}
          usepackage{pgffor}
          usepackage{xcolor}
          newcommand{ColorDots}[2]{accentset{foreach X in {#1}
          {textcolor{X}{boldsymbol{.}}}}{#2}}
          begin{document}
          $accentset{boldsymbol{..}}{x}$ $ColorDots{red,blue}{y}$ $ColorDots{red}{z}$
          $ColorDots{red,orange,blue}{X}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer



















          • 3





            Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

            – Skillmon
            Mar 22 at 20:09














          13












          13








          13







          One may just use the accents package, which was made for this.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{accents}
          usepackage{pgffor}
          usepackage{xcolor}
          newcommand{ColorDots}[2]{accentset{foreach X in {#1}
          {textcolor{X}{boldsymbol{.}}}}{#2}}
          begin{document}
          $accentset{boldsymbol{..}}{x}$ $ColorDots{red,blue}{y}$ $ColorDots{red}{z}$
          $ColorDots{red,orange,blue}{X}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer













          One may just use the accents package, which was made for this.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{accents}
          usepackage{pgffor}
          usepackage{xcolor}
          newcommand{ColorDots}[2]{accentset{foreach X in {#1}
          {textcolor{X}{boldsymbol{.}}}}{#2}}
          begin{document}
          $accentset{boldsymbol{..}}{x}$ $ColorDots{red,blue}{y}$ $ColorDots{red}{z}$
          $ColorDots{red,orange,blue}{X}$
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 21 at 16:23









          marmotmarmot

          113k5145275




          113k5145275








          • 3





            Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

            – Skillmon
            Mar 22 at 20:09














          • 3





            Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

            – Skillmon
            Mar 22 at 20:09








          3




          3





          Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

          – Skillmon
          Mar 22 at 20:09





          Using a package which was made for it seems wrong :)

          – Skillmon
          Mar 22 at 20:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480644%2fchange-the-color-of-a-single-dot-in-ddot-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?