A table is not shrinking to predefined maximum size (beamer)












3















I am trying to create two tables and put them beside each other. Each table should shrink to the rectangle shown in green while maintaining the aspect ratio. However, it does not seem that this is the case. Replacing the table with a blind text seems to work well.





documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}

usecolortheme{seahorse}
useoutertheme{miniframes}
useinnertheme{inmargin}

usepackage{adjustbox}
usepackage{ragged2e}

% ========== Table packages ==========
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}

% ========== Equations and math packages ==========
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb, amsfonts}


usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
% BEGIN_FOLD

MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}

AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}


% END_FOLD


% Set margins
newlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}{5mm}
newlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}{5mm}

% Command to change margins for a page wide
makeatletter
newcommand{framePageWide}{
defGm@lmargin{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}%
defGm@rmargin{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}%
textwidth=dimexprpaperwidth-Gm@lmargin-Gm@rmarginrelax
hsizetextwidth
columnwidthtextwidth
hoffset=dimexpr-beamer@leftsidebar+Gm@lmargin-widthTextMarginLeftPageWiderelax
}
makeatother

begin{document}

newcolumntype{q}[1]{>{raggedright arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{w}[1]{>{centering arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{e}[1]{>{raggedleft arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}

{framePageWide

begin{frame}{Results}

begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With Our Approach}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{(Extended Brown's Method)}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $4.3times10^{-6}$ & $5times10^{-6}$
\

2383-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.8times10^{-6}$ & $6times10^{-6}$
\

3120-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.2times10^{-6}$ & $4times10^{-6}$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}
hfill
begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{Conventional Brown's Method}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $0.089$ & $0.092$ & $0.1000$
\

2383-bus & $163.8$ & $166.2$ & $172.5$
\

3120-bus & $387.2$ & $398.8$ & $415.6$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}

end{frame}

}



end{document}









share|improve this question


















  • 3





    Shrinking elements that contain text is really not a good idea. Use a smaller font size or change the layout of your table to make it fit in the available space. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425453/… for more information

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:32








  • 1





    For example you could save some space by using shorter column headers

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:34











  • @samcarter I know but if the contents were scaled while maintaining aspect ratio, it would not be that hard to just zoom to the area of interest. Also, the idea here is not to rescale the table to be much smaller that the text is not readable but rather to force the table to fit exactly the specified size which helps create neater slides (e.g., preventing it from overlapping with adjacent contents)

    – Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
    Mar 21 at 11:07






  • 1





    Maintaining the same aspect ratio is not the point. The problem is that when you scale down the text, you will still get the letter shapes which are made for normal size. If you use a smaller font size instead, you will get other letter shapes that are made to be easily read at this size.

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 11:48






  • 1





    Do you really have to repeat the System Size column? Without it the table would most likely fit without the need to scale it.

    – leandriis
    Mar 21 at 12:33
















3















I am trying to create two tables and put them beside each other. Each table should shrink to the rectangle shown in green while maintaining the aspect ratio. However, it does not seem that this is the case. Replacing the table with a blind text seems to work well.





documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}

usecolortheme{seahorse}
useoutertheme{miniframes}
useinnertheme{inmargin}

usepackage{adjustbox}
usepackage{ragged2e}

% ========== Table packages ==========
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}

% ========== Equations and math packages ==========
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb, amsfonts}


usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
% BEGIN_FOLD

MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}

AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}


% END_FOLD


% Set margins
newlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}{5mm}
newlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}{5mm}

% Command to change margins for a page wide
makeatletter
newcommand{framePageWide}{
defGm@lmargin{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}%
defGm@rmargin{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}%
textwidth=dimexprpaperwidth-Gm@lmargin-Gm@rmarginrelax
hsizetextwidth
columnwidthtextwidth
hoffset=dimexpr-beamer@leftsidebar+Gm@lmargin-widthTextMarginLeftPageWiderelax
}
makeatother

begin{document}

newcolumntype{q}[1]{>{raggedright arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{w}[1]{>{centering arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{e}[1]{>{raggedleft arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}

{framePageWide

begin{frame}{Results}

begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With Our Approach}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{(Extended Brown's Method)}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $4.3times10^{-6}$ & $5times10^{-6}$
\

2383-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.8times10^{-6}$ & $6times10^{-6}$
\

3120-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.2times10^{-6}$ & $4times10^{-6}$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}
hfill
begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{Conventional Brown's Method}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $0.089$ & $0.092$ & $0.1000$
\

2383-bus & $163.8$ & $166.2$ & $172.5$
\

3120-bus & $387.2$ & $398.8$ & $415.6$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}

end{frame}

}



end{document}









share|improve this question


















  • 3





    Shrinking elements that contain text is really not a good idea. Use a smaller font size or change the layout of your table to make it fit in the available space. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425453/… for more information

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:32








  • 1





    For example you could save some space by using shorter column headers

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:34











  • @samcarter I know but if the contents were scaled while maintaining aspect ratio, it would not be that hard to just zoom to the area of interest. Also, the idea here is not to rescale the table to be much smaller that the text is not readable but rather to force the table to fit exactly the specified size which helps create neater slides (e.g., preventing it from overlapping with adjacent contents)

    – Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
    Mar 21 at 11:07






  • 1





    Maintaining the same aspect ratio is not the point. The problem is that when you scale down the text, you will still get the letter shapes which are made for normal size. If you use a smaller font size instead, you will get other letter shapes that are made to be easily read at this size.

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 11:48






  • 1





    Do you really have to repeat the System Size column? Without it the table would most likely fit without the need to scale it.

    – leandriis
    Mar 21 at 12:33














3












3








3








I am trying to create two tables and put them beside each other. Each table should shrink to the rectangle shown in green while maintaining the aspect ratio. However, it does not seem that this is the case. Replacing the table with a blind text seems to work well.





documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}

usecolortheme{seahorse}
useoutertheme{miniframes}
useinnertheme{inmargin}

usepackage{adjustbox}
usepackage{ragged2e}

% ========== Table packages ==========
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}

% ========== Equations and math packages ==========
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb, amsfonts}


usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
% BEGIN_FOLD

MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}

AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}


% END_FOLD


% Set margins
newlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}{5mm}
newlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}{5mm}

% Command to change margins for a page wide
makeatletter
newcommand{framePageWide}{
defGm@lmargin{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}%
defGm@rmargin{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}%
textwidth=dimexprpaperwidth-Gm@lmargin-Gm@rmarginrelax
hsizetextwidth
columnwidthtextwidth
hoffset=dimexpr-beamer@leftsidebar+Gm@lmargin-widthTextMarginLeftPageWiderelax
}
makeatother

begin{document}

newcolumntype{q}[1]{>{raggedright arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{w}[1]{>{centering arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{e}[1]{>{raggedleft arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}

{framePageWide

begin{frame}{Results}

begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With Our Approach}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{(Extended Brown's Method)}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $4.3times10^{-6}$ & $5times10^{-6}$
\

2383-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.8times10^{-6}$ & $6times10^{-6}$
\

3120-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.2times10^{-6}$ & $4times10^{-6}$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}
hfill
begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{Conventional Brown's Method}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $0.089$ & $0.092$ & $0.1000$
\

2383-bus & $163.8$ & $166.2$ & $172.5$
\

3120-bus & $387.2$ & $398.8$ & $415.6$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}

end{frame}

}



end{document}









share|improve this question














I am trying to create two tables and put them beside each other. Each table should shrink to the rectangle shown in green while maintaining the aspect ratio. However, it does not seem that this is the case. Replacing the table with a blind text seems to work well.





documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}

usecolortheme{seahorse}
useoutertheme{miniframes}
useinnertheme{inmargin}

usepackage{adjustbox}
usepackage{ragged2e}

% ========== Table packages ==========
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}

% ========== Equations and math packages ==========
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb, amsfonts}


usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
% BEGIN_FOLD

MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}

AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}


% END_FOLD


% Set margins
newlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}{5mm}
newlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}
setlength{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}{5mm}

% Command to change margins for a page wide
makeatletter
newcommand{framePageWide}{
defGm@lmargin{widthTextMarginLeftPageWide}%
defGm@rmargin{widthTextMarginRightPageWide}%
textwidth=dimexprpaperwidth-Gm@lmargin-Gm@rmarginrelax
hsizetextwidth
columnwidthtextwidth
hoffset=dimexpr-beamer@leftsidebar+Gm@lmargin-widthTextMarginLeftPageWiderelax
}
makeatother

begin{document}

newcolumntype{q}[1]{>{raggedright arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{w}[1]{>{centering arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}
newcolumntype{e}[1]{>{raggedleft arraybackslashhspace{0pt}}m{#1}}

{framePageWide

begin{frame}{Results}

begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With Our Approach}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{(Extended Brown's Method)}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $4.3times10^{-6}$ & $5times10^{-6}$
\

2383-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.8times10^{-6}$ & $6times10^{-6}$
\

3120-bus & $3times10^{-6}$ & $3.2times10^{-6}$ & $4times10^{-6}$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}
hfill
begin{adjustbox}{minipage={0.45textwidth}, max totalsize={0.45textwidth}{!}, cframe=SpringGreen3 0.3mm}

begin{tabular}{w{2cm} @{extracolsep{1mm}}|w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm} w{1.5cm}}

toprule

multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size} & multicolumn{3}{c}{Time Needed With}
\

& multicolumn{3}{c}{Conventional Brown's Method}
\
Xcline{2-4}{0.25mm}

& min & mean & max
\
Xhline{0.25mm}

200-bus & $0.089$ & $0.092$ & $0.1000$
\

2383-bus & $163.8$ & $166.2$ & $172.5$
\

3120-bus & $387.2$ & $398.8$ & $415.6$
\

bottomrule

end{tabular}

end{adjustbox}

end{frame}

}



end{document}






tables beamer






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 21 at 10:25









Al-Motasem AldaoudeyehAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh

1,869414




1,869414








  • 3





    Shrinking elements that contain text is really not a good idea. Use a smaller font size or change the layout of your table to make it fit in the available space. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425453/… for more information

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:32








  • 1





    For example you could save some space by using shorter column headers

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:34











  • @samcarter I know but if the contents were scaled while maintaining aspect ratio, it would not be that hard to just zoom to the area of interest. Also, the idea here is not to rescale the table to be much smaller that the text is not readable but rather to force the table to fit exactly the specified size which helps create neater slides (e.g., preventing it from overlapping with adjacent contents)

    – Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
    Mar 21 at 11:07






  • 1





    Maintaining the same aspect ratio is not the point. The problem is that when you scale down the text, you will still get the letter shapes which are made for normal size. If you use a smaller font size instead, you will get other letter shapes that are made to be easily read at this size.

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 11:48






  • 1





    Do you really have to repeat the System Size column? Without it the table would most likely fit without the need to scale it.

    – leandriis
    Mar 21 at 12:33














  • 3





    Shrinking elements that contain text is really not a good idea. Use a smaller font size or change the layout of your table to make it fit in the available space. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425453/… for more information

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:32








  • 1





    For example you could save some space by using shorter column headers

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 10:34











  • @samcarter I know but if the contents were scaled while maintaining aspect ratio, it would not be that hard to just zoom to the area of interest. Also, the idea here is not to rescale the table to be much smaller that the text is not readable but rather to force the table to fit exactly the specified size which helps create neater slides (e.g., preventing it from overlapping with adjacent contents)

    – Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
    Mar 21 at 11:07






  • 1





    Maintaining the same aspect ratio is not the point. The problem is that when you scale down the text, you will still get the letter shapes which are made for normal size. If you use a smaller font size instead, you will get other letter shapes that are made to be easily read at this size.

    – samcarter
    Mar 21 at 11:48






  • 1





    Do you really have to repeat the System Size column? Without it the table would most likely fit without the need to scale it.

    – leandriis
    Mar 21 at 12:33








3




3





Shrinking elements that contain text is really not a good idea. Use a smaller font size or change the layout of your table to make it fit in the available space. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425453/… for more information

– samcarter
Mar 21 at 10:32







Shrinking elements that contain text is really not a good idea. Use a smaller font size or change the layout of your table to make it fit in the available space. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425453/… for more information

– samcarter
Mar 21 at 10:32






1




1





For example you could save some space by using shorter column headers

– samcarter
Mar 21 at 10:34





For example you could save some space by using shorter column headers

– samcarter
Mar 21 at 10:34













@samcarter I know but if the contents were scaled while maintaining aspect ratio, it would not be that hard to just zoom to the area of interest. Also, the idea here is not to rescale the table to be much smaller that the text is not readable but rather to force the table to fit exactly the specified size which helps create neater slides (e.g., preventing it from overlapping with adjacent contents)

– Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
Mar 21 at 11:07





@samcarter I know but if the contents were scaled while maintaining aspect ratio, it would not be that hard to just zoom to the area of interest. Also, the idea here is not to rescale the table to be much smaller that the text is not readable but rather to force the table to fit exactly the specified size which helps create neater slides (e.g., preventing it from overlapping with adjacent contents)

– Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
Mar 21 at 11:07




1




1





Maintaining the same aspect ratio is not the point. The problem is that when you scale down the text, you will still get the letter shapes which are made for normal size. If you use a smaller font size instead, you will get other letter shapes that are made to be easily read at this size.

– samcarter
Mar 21 at 11:48





Maintaining the same aspect ratio is not the point. The problem is that when you scale down the text, you will still get the letter shapes which are made for normal size. If you use a smaller font size instead, you will get other letter shapes that are made to be easily read at this size.

– samcarter
Mar 21 at 11:48




1




1





Do you really have to repeat the System Size column? Without it the table would most likely fit without the need to scale it.

– leandriis
Mar 21 at 12:33





Do you really have to repeat the System Size column? Without it the table would most likely fit without the need to scale it.

– leandriis
Mar 21 at 12:33










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














i would redesign your tables as follows:




  • remove first column in the second table

  • remove hfill between tables

  • use S column type from siunitx package

  • for tables use tabularx


enter image description here



documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
usecolortheme{seahorse}
useoutertheme{miniframes}
useinnertheme{inmargin}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{ragged2e}
% ========== Table packages ==========
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcommandmcx[1]{multicolumn{1}{>{centeringarraybackslash}X}{#1}}
% ========== Equations and math packages ==========
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
% BEGIN_FOLD
MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}
AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}

begin{document}
begin{frame}{Results}
small
begin{tabularx}{0.55linewidth}{@{} p{3.8em}
S[table-format=1.0e1]
S[table-format=1.1e1]
S[table-format=1.0e1]
@{} }
toprule
multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size}
& multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
With Our Approach\
(Extended Brown's Method)}} \
cmidrule(lr){2-4}
& mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
\
midrule
200-bus & 3e6 & 4.3e6 & 5e6 \
2383-bus & 3e6 & 3.8e6 & 6e6 \
3120-bus & 3e6 & 3.2e6 & 4e6 \
bottomrule
end{tabularx}begin{tabularx}{0.4linewidth}{@{}
S[table-format=3.3]
S[table-format=3.3]
S[table-format=3.3]
@{} }
toprule
multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
With Conventional\
Brown's Method}} \
cmidrule(lr){1-3}
mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
\
midrule
0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{frame}
end{document}





share|improve this answer

































    3














    Here's another suggestion for combining the two tables into a single table. It uses a tabular* environment, with width set to textwidth. The S column type of the siunitx package is employed to format and align the numeric cells. I'd also make the frame title a lot more descriptive.



    enter image description here



    documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
    usecolortheme{seahorse}
    useoutertheme{miniframes}
    %useinnertheme{inmargin}

    usepackage{ragged2e,booktabs,array}
    usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,siunitx}

    begin{document}

    begin{frame}{Times needed with extended and conventional Brown's methods}
    sisetup{exponent-product=cdot}
    setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
    begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}}
    l S[table-format=1e-1]
    S[table-format=1.1e-1]
    S[table-format=1e-1]
    *{3}{S[table-format=3.3]} }

    toprule
    System Size & multicolumn{6}{c}{Times needed with dots} \
    cmidrule{2-7}
    & multicolumn{3}{c}{Ext. Brown's Method}
    & multicolumn{3}{c}{Conv. Brown's Method}\
    & multicolumn{3}{c}{(Our Method)}\
    cmidrule{2-4} cmidrule{5-7}
    & {min} & {mean} & {max} & {min} & {mean} & {max} \
    midrule
    phantom{2}200-bus
    & 3e-6 & 4.3e-6 & 5e-6 & 0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
    2383-bus & 3e-6 & 3.8e-6 & 6e-6 & 163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
    3120-bus & 3e-6 & 3.2e-6 & 4e-6 & 387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
    bottomrule
    end{tabular*}

    end{frame}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer


























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480654%2fa-table-is-not-shrinking-to-predefined-maximum-size-beamer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      i would redesign your tables as follows:




      • remove first column in the second table

      • remove hfill between tables

      • use S column type from siunitx package

      • for tables use tabularx


      enter image description here



      documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
      usecolortheme{seahorse}
      useoutertheme{miniframes}
      useinnertheme{inmargin}
      usepackage{siunitx}
      usepackage{ragged2e}
      % ========== Table packages ==========
      usepackage{booktabs}
      usepackage{makecell}
      usepackage{multirow}
      usepackage{tabularx}
      newcommandmcx[1]{multicolumn{1}{>{centeringarraybackslash}X}{#1}}
      % ========== Equations and math packages ==========
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
      % BEGIN_FOLD
      MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}
      AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}

      begin{document}
      begin{frame}{Results}
      small
      begin{tabularx}{0.55linewidth}{@{} p{3.8em}
      S[table-format=1.0e1]
      S[table-format=1.1e1]
      S[table-format=1.0e1]
      @{} }
      toprule
      multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size}
      & multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
      With Our Approach\
      (Extended Brown's Method)}} \
      cmidrule(lr){2-4}
      & mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
      \
      midrule
      200-bus & 3e6 & 4.3e6 & 5e6 \
      2383-bus & 3e6 & 3.8e6 & 6e6 \
      3120-bus & 3e6 & 3.2e6 & 4e6 \
      bottomrule
      end{tabularx}begin{tabularx}{0.4linewidth}{@{}
      S[table-format=3.3]
      S[table-format=3.3]
      S[table-format=3.3]
      @{} }
      toprule
      multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
      With Conventional\
      Brown's Method}} \
      cmidrule(lr){1-3}
      mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
      \
      midrule
      0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
      163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
      387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
      bottomrule
      end{tabularx}
      end{frame}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer






























        3














        i would redesign your tables as follows:




        • remove first column in the second table

        • remove hfill between tables

        • use S column type from siunitx package

        • for tables use tabularx


        enter image description here



        documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
        usecolortheme{seahorse}
        useoutertheme{miniframes}
        useinnertheme{inmargin}
        usepackage{siunitx}
        usepackage{ragged2e}
        % ========== Table packages ==========
        usepackage{booktabs}
        usepackage{makecell}
        usepackage{multirow}
        usepackage{tabularx}
        newcommandmcx[1]{multicolumn{1}{>{centeringarraybackslash}X}{#1}}
        % ========== Equations and math packages ==========
        usepackage{amsmath}
        usepackage{amssymb}
        usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
        % BEGIN_FOLD
        MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}
        AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}

        begin{document}
        begin{frame}{Results}
        small
        begin{tabularx}{0.55linewidth}{@{} p{3.8em}
        S[table-format=1.0e1]
        S[table-format=1.1e1]
        S[table-format=1.0e1]
        @{} }
        toprule
        multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size}
        & multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
        With Our Approach\
        (Extended Brown's Method)}} \
        cmidrule(lr){2-4}
        & mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
        \
        midrule
        200-bus & 3e6 & 4.3e6 & 5e6 \
        2383-bus & 3e6 & 3.8e6 & 6e6 \
        3120-bus & 3e6 & 3.2e6 & 4e6 \
        bottomrule
        end{tabularx}begin{tabularx}{0.4linewidth}{@{}
        S[table-format=3.3]
        S[table-format=3.3]
        S[table-format=3.3]
        @{} }
        toprule
        multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
        With Conventional\
        Brown's Method}} \
        cmidrule(lr){1-3}
        mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
        \
        midrule
        0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
        163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
        387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
        bottomrule
        end{tabularx}
        end{frame}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          i would redesign your tables as follows:




          • remove first column in the second table

          • remove hfill between tables

          • use S column type from siunitx package

          • for tables use tabularx


          enter image description here



          documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
          usecolortheme{seahorse}
          useoutertheme{miniframes}
          useinnertheme{inmargin}
          usepackage{siunitx}
          usepackage{ragged2e}
          % ========== Table packages ==========
          usepackage{booktabs}
          usepackage{makecell}
          usepackage{multirow}
          usepackage{tabularx}
          newcommandmcx[1]{multicolumn{1}{>{centeringarraybackslash}X}{#1}}
          % ========== Equations and math packages ==========
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{amssymb}
          usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
          % BEGIN_FOLD
          MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}
          AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}

          begin{document}
          begin{frame}{Results}
          small
          begin{tabularx}{0.55linewidth}{@{} p{3.8em}
          S[table-format=1.0e1]
          S[table-format=1.1e1]
          S[table-format=1.0e1]
          @{} }
          toprule
          multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size}
          & multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
          With Our Approach\
          (Extended Brown's Method)}} \
          cmidrule(lr){2-4}
          & mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
          \
          midrule
          200-bus & 3e6 & 4.3e6 & 5e6 \
          2383-bus & 3e6 & 3.8e6 & 6e6 \
          3120-bus & 3e6 & 3.2e6 & 4e6 \
          bottomrule
          end{tabularx}begin{tabularx}{0.4linewidth}{@{}
          S[table-format=3.3]
          S[table-format=3.3]
          S[table-format=3.3]
          @{} }
          toprule
          multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
          With Conventional\
          Brown's Method}} \
          cmidrule(lr){1-3}
          mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
          \
          midrule
          0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
          163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
          387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
          bottomrule
          end{tabularx}
          end{frame}
          end{document}





          share|improve this answer















          i would redesign your tables as follows:




          • remove first column in the second table

          • remove hfill between tables

          • use S column type from siunitx package

          • for tables use tabularx


          enter image description here



          documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
          usecolortheme{seahorse}
          useoutertheme{miniframes}
          useinnertheme{inmargin}
          usepackage{siunitx}
          usepackage{ragged2e}
          % ========== Table packages ==========
          usepackage{booktabs}
          usepackage{makecell}
          usepackage{multirow}
          usepackage{tabularx}
          newcommandmcx[1]{multicolumn{1}{>{centeringarraybackslash}X}{#1}}
          % ========== Equations and math packages ==========
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{amssymb}
          usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
          % BEGIN_FOLD
          MTDeclareVersion[it]{charter}{T1}{bch}{m}{n}
          AtBeginDocument{MTversion*{charter}}

          begin{document}
          begin{frame}{Results}
          small
          begin{tabularx}{0.55linewidth}{@{} p{3.8em}
          S[table-format=1.0e1]
          S[table-format=1.1e1]
          S[table-format=1.0e1]
          @{} }
          toprule
          multirow{3}{=}{centering System Size}
          & multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
          With Our Approach\
          (Extended Brown's Method)}} \
          cmidrule(lr){2-4}
          & mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
          \
          midrule
          200-bus & 3e6 & 4.3e6 & 5e6 \
          2383-bus & 3e6 & 3.8e6 & 6e6 \
          3120-bus & 3e6 & 3.2e6 & 4e6 \
          bottomrule
          end{tabularx}begin{tabularx}{0.4linewidth}{@{}
          S[table-format=3.3]
          S[table-format=3.3]
          S[table-format=3.3]
          @{} }
          toprule
          multicolumn{3}{c}{makecell{Time Needed\
          With Conventional\
          Brown's Method}} \
          cmidrule(lr){1-3}
          mcx{min} & mcx{mean} & mcx{max}
          \
          midrule
          0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
          163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
          387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
          bottomrule
          end{tabularx}
          end{frame}
          end{document}






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 21 at 13:03

























          answered Mar 21 at 12:52









          ZarkoZarko

          128k868168




          128k868168























              3














              Here's another suggestion for combining the two tables into a single table. It uses a tabular* environment, with width set to textwidth. The S column type of the siunitx package is employed to format and align the numeric cells. I'd also make the frame title a lot more descriptive.



              enter image description here



              documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
              usecolortheme{seahorse}
              useoutertheme{miniframes}
              %useinnertheme{inmargin}

              usepackage{ragged2e,booktabs,array}
              usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,siunitx}

              begin{document}

              begin{frame}{Times needed with extended and conventional Brown's methods}
              sisetup{exponent-product=cdot}
              setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
              begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}}
              l S[table-format=1e-1]
              S[table-format=1.1e-1]
              S[table-format=1e-1]
              *{3}{S[table-format=3.3]} }

              toprule
              System Size & multicolumn{6}{c}{Times needed with dots} \
              cmidrule{2-7}
              & multicolumn{3}{c}{Ext. Brown's Method}
              & multicolumn{3}{c}{Conv. Brown's Method}\
              & multicolumn{3}{c}{(Our Method)}\
              cmidrule{2-4} cmidrule{5-7}
              & {min} & {mean} & {max} & {min} & {mean} & {max} \
              midrule
              phantom{2}200-bus
              & 3e-6 & 4.3e-6 & 5e-6 & 0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
              2383-bus & 3e-6 & 3.8e-6 & 6e-6 & 163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
              3120-bus & 3e-6 & 3.2e-6 & 4e-6 & 387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
              bottomrule
              end{tabular*}

              end{frame}
              end{document}





              share|improve this answer






























                3














                Here's another suggestion for combining the two tables into a single table. It uses a tabular* environment, with width set to textwidth. The S column type of the siunitx package is employed to format and align the numeric cells. I'd also make the frame title a lot more descriptive.



                enter image description here



                documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
                usecolortheme{seahorse}
                useoutertheme{miniframes}
                %useinnertheme{inmargin}

                usepackage{ragged2e,booktabs,array}
                usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,siunitx}

                begin{document}

                begin{frame}{Times needed with extended and conventional Brown's methods}
                sisetup{exponent-product=cdot}
                setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
                begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}}
                l S[table-format=1e-1]
                S[table-format=1.1e-1]
                S[table-format=1e-1]
                *{3}{S[table-format=3.3]} }

                toprule
                System Size & multicolumn{6}{c}{Times needed with dots} \
                cmidrule{2-7}
                & multicolumn{3}{c}{Ext. Brown's Method}
                & multicolumn{3}{c}{Conv. Brown's Method}\
                & multicolumn{3}{c}{(Our Method)}\
                cmidrule{2-4} cmidrule{5-7}
                & {min} & {mean} & {max} & {min} & {mean} & {max} \
                midrule
                phantom{2}200-bus
                & 3e-6 & 4.3e-6 & 5e-6 & 0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
                2383-bus & 3e-6 & 3.8e-6 & 6e-6 & 163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
                3120-bus & 3e-6 & 3.2e-6 & 4e-6 & 387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
                bottomrule
                end{tabular*}

                end{frame}
                end{document}





                share|improve this answer




























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  Here's another suggestion for combining the two tables into a single table. It uses a tabular* environment, with width set to textwidth. The S column type of the siunitx package is employed to format and align the numeric cells. I'd also make the frame title a lot more descriptive.



                  enter image description here



                  documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
                  usecolortheme{seahorse}
                  useoutertheme{miniframes}
                  %useinnertheme{inmargin}

                  usepackage{ragged2e,booktabs,array}
                  usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,siunitx}

                  begin{document}

                  begin{frame}{Times needed with extended and conventional Brown's methods}
                  sisetup{exponent-product=cdot}
                  setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
                  begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}}
                  l S[table-format=1e-1]
                  S[table-format=1.1e-1]
                  S[table-format=1e-1]
                  *{3}{S[table-format=3.3]} }

                  toprule
                  System Size & multicolumn{6}{c}{Times needed with dots} \
                  cmidrule{2-7}
                  & multicolumn{3}{c}{Ext. Brown's Method}
                  & multicolumn{3}{c}{Conv. Brown's Method}\
                  & multicolumn{3}{c}{(Our Method)}\
                  cmidrule{2-4} cmidrule{5-7}
                  & {min} & {mean} & {max} & {min} & {mean} & {max} \
                  midrule
                  phantom{2}200-bus
                  & 3e-6 & 4.3e-6 & 5e-6 & 0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
                  2383-bus & 3e-6 & 3.8e-6 & 6e-6 & 163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
                  3120-bus & 3e-6 & 3.2e-6 & 4e-6 & 387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
                  bottomrule
                  end{tabular*}

                  end{frame}
                  end{document}





                  share|improve this answer















                  Here's another suggestion for combining the two tables into a single table. It uses a tabular* environment, with width set to textwidth. The S column type of the siunitx package is employed to format and align the numeric cells. I'd also make the frame title a lot more descriptive.



                  enter image description here



                  documentclass[aspectratio=169, xcolor={x11names}]{beamer}
                  usecolortheme{seahorse}
                  useoutertheme{miniframes}
                  %useinnertheme{inmargin}

                  usepackage{ragged2e,booktabs,array}
                  usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,siunitx}

                  begin{document}

                  begin{frame}{Times needed with extended and conventional Brown's methods}
                  sisetup{exponent-product=cdot}
                  setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
                  begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}}
                  l S[table-format=1e-1]
                  S[table-format=1.1e-1]
                  S[table-format=1e-1]
                  *{3}{S[table-format=3.3]} }

                  toprule
                  System Size & multicolumn{6}{c}{Times needed with dots} \
                  cmidrule{2-7}
                  & multicolumn{3}{c}{Ext. Brown's Method}
                  & multicolumn{3}{c}{Conv. Brown's Method}\
                  & multicolumn{3}{c}{(Our Method)}\
                  cmidrule{2-4} cmidrule{5-7}
                  & {min} & {mean} & {max} & {min} & {mean} & {max} \
                  midrule
                  phantom{2}200-bus
                  & 3e-6 & 4.3e-6 & 5e-6 & 0.089 & 0.092 & 0.100 \
                  2383-bus & 3e-6 & 3.8e-6 & 6e-6 & 163.8 & 166.2 & 172.5 \
                  3120-bus & 3e-6 & 3.2e-6 & 4e-6 & 387.2 & 398.8 & 415.6 \
                  bottomrule
                  end{tabular*}

                  end{frame}
                  end{document}






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 21 at 17:32

























                  answered Mar 21 at 16:08









                  MicoMico

                  284k31388778




                  284k31388778






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480654%2fa-table-is-not-shrinking-to-predefined-maximum-size-beamer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                      ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                      Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?