$N$ should not be complete!!












-3












$begingroup$


The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.



And thanks for help in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:01








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:07
















-3












$begingroup$


The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.



And thanks for help in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:01








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:07














-3












-3








-3





$begingroup$


The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.



And thanks for help in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The sequence ($frac{1}{n}$) is a Cauchy sequence in $N$ but does not converge in $N$ as it converges to $0$.Then $N$ should not be complete. But $N$ is the closed subset of $R$ which is a complete metric space .Hence, $N$ should be complete and from here also link text Please clear my doubt.



And thanks for help in advance.







general-topology metric-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 1 '18 at 19:53









SejySejy

445




445








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:01








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:07














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:01








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:07








2




2




$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01






$begingroup$
$1/n$ is not a sequence in $mathbb{N}$, it is a sequence in, say, $mathbb{Q}$ or $mathbb{R}$.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Dec 1 '18 at 20:01






1




1




$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07




$begingroup$
"The sequence (1/n) is a Cauchy sequence in N" No, it isn't. $frac 1n$ is not a natural number. So ${frac 1n} not subset mathbb N$ and it is not a "sequence in $mathbb N$".
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 1 '18 at 20:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.



To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.



More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.



SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.



[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
    $endgroup$
    – Sejy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:15











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021743%2fn-should-not-be-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.



To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.



More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.



SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.



[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
    $endgroup$
    – Sejy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
















1












$begingroup$

$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.



To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.



More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.



SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.



[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
    $endgroup$
    – Sejy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:15














1












1








1





$begingroup$

$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.



To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.



More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.



SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.



[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$frac 1n$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $mathbb N$ as $frac 1n not in mathbb N$ for any $n ne 1$.



To be a cauchy sequence OF NATURAL NUMBERS there must come a point where all the terms are less than $1$ apart. As all the terms ARE natural numbers[$*$] that means there comes a point where all the terms are equal. In other words the sequence is "constant for all but finite terms". And such sequences do converge to the constant.



More formally. If ${m_i} subset mathbb N$ is causchy so that for any $epsilon > 0$ then there is an $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p| < epsilon$. Then if $epsilon < 1$ then there is some $M$ so that $n,p > M implies |m_n - m_p | < 1$ which means $m_n = m_p$ for ALL $n,p> M$. And $m_n = m_p = c$ for some $c in mathbb N$.



SO $m_ito c$. Yep. It's complete.



[$*$] That's what "being a sequence in $X$" means. It means all the terms are elements of $X$. So ${frac 1n}$ must certainly is NOT a sequence "in $mathbb N$".







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 1 '18 at 20:05









fleabloodfleablood

70.8k22686




70.8k22686












  • $begingroup$
    Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
    $endgroup$
    – Sejy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:15


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
    $endgroup$
    – Sejy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:15
















$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15




$begingroup$
Thank u so much all you .I was not able to find where I was going wrong !!
$endgroup$
– Sejy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:15


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021743%2fn-should-not-be-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?