Can I use Eisenstein's criterion to show $x^{4}-2x^{3}+2x^{2}+x+4$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}$? [duplicate]












1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$

    1 answer





Can I use Eisenstein's criterion to show $x^{4}-2x^{3}+2x^{2}+x+4$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}$?




Can I say that there does not exist a prime that divides both $2$ and $1$? Or is there another way to show it is reducible? Do I just use rational root test?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Did, amWhy, Martin Sleziak, Brahadeesh, user10354138 Dec 2 '18 at 6:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Eisenstein's criterion is for irreducibility, not reducibility.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    And rational root test only gives you (or excludes the existence of) linear factors. This polynomial may be the product of two irreducible quadratic factors, and the rational root test doesn't say (as easily) anything about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:24












  • $begingroup$
    See also: Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 4:05
















1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$

    1 answer





Can I use Eisenstein's criterion to show $x^{4}-2x^{3}+2x^{2}+x+4$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}$?




Can I say that there does not exist a prime that divides both $2$ and $1$? Or is there another way to show it is reducible? Do I just use rational root test?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Did, amWhy, Martin Sleziak, Brahadeesh, user10354138 Dec 2 '18 at 6:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Eisenstein's criterion is for irreducibility, not reducibility.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    And rational root test only gives you (or excludes the existence of) linear factors. This polynomial may be the product of two irreducible quadratic factors, and the rational root test doesn't say (as easily) anything about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:24












  • $begingroup$
    See also: Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 4:05














1












1








1





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$

    1 answer





Can I use Eisenstein's criterion to show $x^{4}-2x^{3}+2x^{2}+x+4$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}$?




Can I say that there does not exist a prime that divides both $2$ and $1$? Or is there another way to show it is reducible? Do I just use rational root test?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$

    1 answer





Can I use Eisenstein's criterion to show $x^{4}-2x^{3}+2x^{2}+x+4$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}$?




Can I say that there does not exist a prime that divides both $2$ and $1$? Or is there another way to show it is reducible? Do I just use rational root test?





This question already has an answer here:




  • Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$

    1 answer








field-theory irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 1 '18 at 20:06









numericalorangenumericalorange

1,765311




1,765311




marked as duplicate by Did, amWhy, Martin Sleziak, Brahadeesh, user10354138 Dec 2 '18 at 6:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Did, amWhy, Martin Sleziak, Brahadeesh, user10354138 Dec 2 '18 at 6:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Eisenstein's criterion is for irreducibility, not reducibility.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    And rational root test only gives you (or excludes the existence of) linear factors. This polynomial may be the product of two irreducible quadratic factors, and the rational root test doesn't say (as easily) anything about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:24












  • $begingroup$
    See also: Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 4:05














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Eisenstein's criterion is for irreducibility, not reducibility.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:12










  • $begingroup$
    And rational root test only gives you (or excludes the existence of) linear factors. This polynomial may be the product of two irreducible quadratic factors, and the rational root test doesn't say (as easily) anything about that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 1 '18 at 20:24












  • $begingroup$
    See also: Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 4:05








5




5




$begingroup$
Eisenstein's criterion is for irreducibility, not reducibility.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 1 '18 at 20:12




$begingroup$
Eisenstein's criterion is for irreducibility, not reducibility.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 1 '18 at 20:12












$begingroup$
And rational root test only gives you (or excludes the existence of) linear factors. This polynomial may be the product of two irreducible quadratic factors, and the rational root test doesn't say (as easily) anything about that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 1 '18 at 20:24






$begingroup$
And rational root test only gives you (or excludes the existence of) linear factors. This polynomial may be the product of two irreducible quadratic factors, and the rational root test doesn't say (as easily) anything about that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 1 '18 at 20:24














$begingroup$
See also: Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 4:05




$begingroup$
See also: Factoring/Reducing a polynomial $x^4 -2x^3 + 2x^2 + x + 4$
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 4:05










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

You can check this yourself. The basic theorem is that, if this factors over the rationals, in fact it factors over the integers.




The second result states that if a non-constant polynomial with
integer coefficients is irreducible over the integers, then it is also
irreducible if it is considered as a polynomial over the rationals.




This is called Gauss's Lemma; one of them, anyway. Writing as $(x^2 + ax + c)(x^2 + bx + d),$ we find $cd = 4,$ so we have some four possibilities to investigate:
$$ (x^2 + ax + 1)(x^2 + bx + 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax + 2)(x^2 + bx + 2),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 1)(x^2 + bx - 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 2)(x^2 + bx -2),$$
where, in each one, we see if we can find integer values for $a,b$ that make the multiplication come out as your $x^4 - 2 x^3 + 2 x^2 + x + 4. $ It is pretty easy (in each of four) to find the coefficient of $x^3$ as a combination of $a,b,$ it is also easy to find the coefficient of $x.$ If any of the four gives integer values, the final thing is to see how the coefficient of $x^2$ comes out.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:07










  • $begingroup$
    @numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:16


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

You can check this yourself. The basic theorem is that, if this factors over the rationals, in fact it factors over the integers.




The second result states that if a non-constant polynomial with
integer coefficients is irreducible over the integers, then it is also
irreducible if it is considered as a polynomial over the rationals.




This is called Gauss's Lemma; one of them, anyway. Writing as $(x^2 + ax + c)(x^2 + bx + d),$ we find $cd = 4,$ so we have some four possibilities to investigate:
$$ (x^2 + ax + 1)(x^2 + bx + 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax + 2)(x^2 + bx + 2),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 1)(x^2 + bx - 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 2)(x^2 + bx -2),$$
where, in each one, we see if we can find integer values for $a,b$ that make the multiplication come out as your $x^4 - 2 x^3 + 2 x^2 + x + 4. $ It is pretty easy (in each of four) to find the coefficient of $x^3$ as a combination of $a,b,$ it is also easy to find the coefficient of $x.$ If any of the four gives integer values, the final thing is to see how the coefficient of $x^2$ comes out.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:07










  • $begingroup$
    @numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:16
















2












$begingroup$

You can check this yourself. The basic theorem is that, if this factors over the rationals, in fact it factors over the integers.




The second result states that if a non-constant polynomial with
integer coefficients is irreducible over the integers, then it is also
irreducible if it is considered as a polynomial over the rationals.




This is called Gauss's Lemma; one of them, anyway. Writing as $(x^2 + ax + c)(x^2 + bx + d),$ we find $cd = 4,$ so we have some four possibilities to investigate:
$$ (x^2 + ax + 1)(x^2 + bx + 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax + 2)(x^2 + bx + 2),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 1)(x^2 + bx - 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 2)(x^2 + bx -2),$$
where, in each one, we see if we can find integer values for $a,b$ that make the multiplication come out as your $x^4 - 2 x^3 + 2 x^2 + x + 4. $ It is pretty easy (in each of four) to find the coefficient of $x^3$ as a combination of $a,b,$ it is also easy to find the coefficient of $x.$ If any of the four gives integer values, the final thing is to see how the coefficient of $x^2$ comes out.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:07










  • $begingroup$
    @numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:16














2












2








2





$begingroup$

You can check this yourself. The basic theorem is that, if this factors over the rationals, in fact it factors over the integers.




The second result states that if a non-constant polynomial with
integer coefficients is irreducible over the integers, then it is also
irreducible if it is considered as a polynomial over the rationals.




This is called Gauss's Lemma; one of them, anyway. Writing as $(x^2 + ax + c)(x^2 + bx + d),$ we find $cd = 4,$ so we have some four possibilities to investigate:
$$ (x^2 + ax + 1)(x^2 + bx + 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax + 2)(x^2 + bx + 2),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 1)(x^2 + bx - 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 2)(x^2 + bx -2),$$
where, in each one, we see if we can find integer values for $a,b$ that make the multiplication come out as your $x^4 - 2 x^3 + 2 x^2 + x + 4. $ It is pretty easy (in each of four) to find the coefficient of $x^3$ as a combination of $a,b,$ it is also easy to find the coefficient of $x.$ If any of the four gives integer values, the final thing is to see how the coefficient of $x^2$ comes out.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You can check this yourself. The basic theorem is that, if this factors over the rationals, in fact it factors over the integers.




The second result states that if a non-constant polynomial with
integer coefficients is irreducible over the integers, then it is also
irreducible if it is considered as a polynomial over the rationals.




This is called Gauss's Lemma; one of them, anyway. Writing as $(x^2 + ax + c)(x^2 + bx + d),$ we find $cd = 4,$ so we have some four possibilities to investigate:
$$ (x^2 + ax + 1)(x^2 + bx + 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax + 2)(x^2 + bx + 2),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 1)(x^2 + bx - 4),$$
$$ (x^2 + ax - 2)(x^2 + bx -2),$$
where, in each one, we see if we can find integer values for $a,b$ that make the multiplication come out as your $x^4 - 2 x^3 + 2 x^2 + x + 4. $ It is pretty easy (in each of four) to find the coefficient of $x^3$ as a combination of $a,b,$ it is also easy to find the coefficient of $x.$ If any of the four gives integer values, the final thing is to see how the coefficient of $x^2$ comes out.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 1 '18 at 21:02

























answered Dec 1 '18 at 20:49









Will JagyWill Jagy

103k5102200




103k5102200








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:07










  • $begingroup$
    @numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:16














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:07










  • $begingroup$
    @numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Dec 1 '18 at 21:16








1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 1 '18 at 21:07




$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time to reply and help me! I understand now and excuse me for my elementary knowledge on the subject!
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Dec 1 '18 at 21:07












$begingroup$
@numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:16




$begingroup$
@numericalorange please let me know when you finish it, and what you come to conclude about factoring.
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Dec 1 '18 at 21:16



Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?