Verify proofs related to monotonicity of $x_{n+1} = {1over 2}(x_n+y_n)$ and $y_{n+1} = sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 +...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Let ${x_n}$ and ${y_n}$ be sequences defined by recurrence relations:
$$
begin{cases}
x_{n+1} = {1over 2}(x_n+y_n)\
y_{n+1} = sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)} \
x_1 = a > 0\
y_1 = b > 0 \
nin mathbb N
end{cases}
$$

Prove that:




  1. ${forall n ge 2: y_n ge x_n}$

  2. ${forall n ge 2: x_{n+1} > x_n}$

  3. ${forall n ge 2: y_n> y_{n+1}}$




First notice that $x_n > 0$ and $y_n > 0$. We'll need that fact during the proofs.



Statement $(1)$



$Box$ Check for $y_2$ and $x_2$:
$$
x_2 = {1over 2}(a + b)\
y_2 = sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)}
$$



Suppose $y_2 > x_2$:
$$
sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)} > {1over 2}(a + b) iff \
iff {1over 2}(a^2 + b^2) > left({1over 2}(a + b)right)^2 iff \
iff a^2 + b^2> frac{a^2 + 2ab + b^2}{2} iff 2a^2 + 2b^2>a^2 + 2ab + b^2 iff\
iff a^2 + b^2>2ab
$$

This is true. Suppose $y_{n+1} > x_{n+1}$:
$$
frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}} = frac{sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}}{{1over 2}(x_n + y_n)} iff \
iff left(frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}}right)^2 = 2cdotfrac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2}
$$



We need:
$$
frac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2} > {1over 2} iff 2x_n^2 + 2y_n^2>x_n^2 +2x_ny_n + y_n^2 iff \
iff x_n^2 + y_n^2 > 2x_ny_n
$$



Which yields a true statements for $x_n, y_n >0$. Thus:



$$
y_n > x_ntag*{$blacksquare$}
$$



Statement $(2)$



$Box$ I'm skipping the base case for induction, it's very similar to the above and in the end yields:



$$
a^2 + b^2 > 2ab
$$



Suppose $x_n < x_{n+1}$, consider the following fraction:
$$
frac{x_{n+3}}{x_{n+2}} = frac{{1over 2}(x_{n+2} + y_{n+2})}{{1over 2}(x_{n+1} + y_{n+1})} = frac{x_{n+2} + y_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} stackrel{y_n ge x_n}{ge} frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}}
$$



We want it to be greater than $1$:



$$
frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} > 1 iff 2x_{n+2} > x_{n+1} + y_{n+1} > 2x_{n+1} implies x_{n+2} > x_{n+1}
$$



Thus:
$$
x_{n+2} < x_{n+3}
$$



which completes the induction $tag*{$blacksquare$}$



Statement $(3)$



This is done similarly to case $(2)$. Once again the base case for $y_2$ and $y_3$ yields $a^2 + b^2 > 2ab$. The assumption here is $y_n > y_{n+1}$. Then we need to show that:
$$
frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1
$$



So suppose:



$$
frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1 iff frac{x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2}{x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2} < 1 iff x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2 < x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2 iff \
iff x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
$$



We know by $(2)$ that $x_n$ is increasing, therefore:



$$
0 < x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2 iff 0 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
$$



Since both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are greater than $0$:
$$
y_{n+2}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 iff y_{n+2} < y_{n+1}
$$



Thus $y_n$ is decreasing.



I'm kindly asking to verify my proofs as otherwise i have no one to refer to. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite













    Let ${x_n}$ and ${y_n}$ be sequences defined by recurrence relations:
    $$
    begin{cases}
    x_{n+1} = {1over 2}(x_n+y_n)\
    y_{n+1} = sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)} \
    x_1 = a > 0\
    y_1 = b > 0 \
    nin mathbb N
    end{cases}
    $$

    Prove that:




    1. ${forall n ge 2: y_n ge x_n}$

    2. ${forall n ge 2: x_{n+1} > x_n}$

    3. ${forall n ge 2: y_n> y_{n+1}}$




    First notice that $x_n > 0$ and $y_n > 0$. We'll need that fact during the proofs.



    Statement $(1)$



    $Box$ Check for $y_2$ and $x_2$:
    $$
    x_2 = {1over 2}(a + b)\
    y_2 = sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)}
    $$



    Suppose $y_2 > x_2$:
    $$
    sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)} > {1over 2}(a + b) iff \
    iff {1over 2}(a^2 + b^2) > left({1over 2}(a + b)right)^2 iff \
    iff a^2 + b^2> frac{a^2 + 2ab + b^2}{2} iff 2a^2 + 2b^2>a^2 + 2ab + b^2 iff\
    iff a^2 + b^2>2ab
    $$

    This is true. Suppose $y_{n+1} > x_{n+1}$:
    $$
    frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}} = frac{sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}}{{1over 2}(x_n + y_n)} iff \
    iff left(frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}}right)^2 = 2cdotfrac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2}
    $$



    We need:
    $$
    frac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2} > {1over 2} iff 2x_n^2 + 2y_n^2>x_n^2 +2x_ny_n + y_n^2 iff \
    iff x_n^2 + y_n^2 > 2x_ny_n
    $$



    Which yields a true statements for $x_n, y_n >0$. Thus:



    $$
    y_n > x_ntag*{$blacksquare$}
    $$



    Statement $(2)$



    $Box$ I'm skipping the base case for induction, it's very similar to the above and in the end yields:



    $$
    a^2 + b^2 > 2ab
    $$



    Suppose $x_n < x_{n+1}$, consider the following fraction:
    $$
    frac{x_{n+3}}{x_{n+2}} = frac{{1over 2}(x_{n+2} + y_{n+2})}{{1over 2}(x_{n+1} + y_{n+1})} = frac{x_{n+2} + y_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} stackrel{y_n ge x_n}{ge} frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}}
    $$



    We want it to be greater than $1$:



    $$
    frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} > 1 iff 2x_{n+2} > x_{n+1} + y_{n+1} > 2x_{n+1} implies x_{n+2} > x_{n+1}
    $$



    Thus:
    $$
    x_{n+2} < x_{n+3}
    $$



    which completes the induction $tag*{$blacksquare$}$



    Statement $(3)$



    This is done similarly to case $(2)$. Once again the base case for $y_2$ and $y_3$ yields $a^2 + b^2 > 2ab$. The assumption here is $y_n > y_{n+1}$. Then we need to show that:
    $$
    frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1
    $$



    So suppose:



    $$
    frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1 iff frac{x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2}{x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2} < 1 iff x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2 < x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2 iff \
    iff x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
    $$



    We know by $(2)$ that $x_n$ is increasing, therefore:



    $$
    0 < x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2 iff 0 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
    $$



    Since both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are greater than $0$:
    $$
    y_{n+2}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 iff y_{n+2} < y_{n+1}
    $$



    Thus $y_n$ is decreasing.



    I'm kindly asking to verify my proofs as otherwise i have no one to refer to. Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite












      Let ${x_n}$ and ${y_n}$ be sequences defined by recurrence relations:
      $$
      begin{cases}
      x_{n+1} = {1over 2}(x_n+y_n)\
      y_{n+1} = sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)} \
      x_1 = a > 0\
      y_1 = b > 0 \
      nin mathbb N
      end{cases}
      $$

      Prove that:




      1. ${forall n ge 2: y_n ge x_n}$

      2. ${forall n ge 2: x_{n+1} > x_n}$

      3. ${forall n ge 2: y_n> y_{n+1}}$




      First notice that $x_n > 0$ and $y_n > 0$. We'll need that fact during the proofs.



      Statement $(1)$



      $Box$ Check for $y_2$ and $x_2$:
      $$
      x_2 = {1over 2}(a + b)\
      y_2 = sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)}
      $$



      Suppose $y_2 > x_2$:
      $$
      sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)} > {1over 2}(a + b) iff \
      iff {1over 2}(a^2 + b^2) > left({1over 2}(a + b)right)^2 iff \
      iff a^2 + b^2> frac{a^2 + 2ab + b^2}{2} iff 2a^2 + 2b^2>a^2 + 2ab + b^2 iff\
      iff a^2 + b^2>2ab
      $$

      This is true. Suppose $y_{n+1} > x_{n+1}$:
      $$
      frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}} = frac{sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}}{{1over 2}(x_n + y_n)} iff \
      iff left(frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}}right)^2 = 2cdotfrac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2}
      $$



      We need:
      $$
      frac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2} > {1over 2} iff 2x_n^2 + 2y_n^2>x_n^2 +2x_ny_n + y_n^2 iff \
      iff x_n^2 + y_n^2 > 2x_ny_n
      $$



      Which yields a true statements for $x_n, y_n >0$. Thus:



      $$
      y_n > x_ntag*{$blacksquare$}
      $$



      Statement $(2)$



      $Box$ I'm skipping the base case for induction, it's very similar to the above and in the end yields:



      $$
      a^2 + b^2 > 2ab
      $$



      Suppose $x_n < x_{n+1}$, consider the following fraction:
      $$
      frac{x_{n+3}}{x_{n+2}} = frac{{1over 2}(x_{n+2} + y_{n+2})}{{1over 2}(x_{n+1} + y_{n+1})} = frac{x_{n+2} + y_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} stackrel{y_n ge x_n}{ge} frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}}
      $$



      We want it to be greater than $1$:



      $$
      frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} > 1 iff 2x_{n+2} > x_{n+1} + y_{n+1} > 2x_{n+1} implies x_{n+2} > x_{n+1}
      $$



      Thus:
      $$
      x_{n+2} < x_{n+3}
      $$



      which completes the induction $tag*{$blacksquare$}$



      Statement $(3)$



      This is done similarly to case $(2)$. Once again the base case for $y_2$ and $y_3$ yields $a^2 + b^2 > 2ab$. The assumption here is $y_n > y_{n+1}$. Then we need to show that:
      $$
      frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1
      $$



      So suppose:



      $$
      frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1 iff frac{x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2}{x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2} < 1 iff x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2 < x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2 iff \
      iff x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
      $$



      We know by $(2)$ that $x_n$ is increasing, therefore:



      $$
      0 < x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2 iff 0 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
      $$



      Since both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are greater than $0$:
      $$
      y_{n+2}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 iff y_{n+2} < y_{n+1}
      $$



      Thus $y_n$ is decreasing.



      I'm kindly asking to verify my proofs as otherwise i have no one to refer to. Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Let ${x_n}$ and ${y_n}$ be sequences defined by recurrence relations:
      $$
      begin{cases}
      x_{n+1} = {1over 2}(x_n+y_n)\
      y_{n+1} = sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)} \
      x_1 = a > 0\
      y_1 = b > 0 \
      nin mathbb N
      end{cases}
      $$

      Prove that:




      1. ${forall n ge 2: y_n ge x_n}$

      2. ${forall n ge 2: x_{n+1} > x_n}$

      3. ${forall n ge 2: y_n> y_{n+1}}$




      First notice that $x_n > 0$ and $y_n > 0$. We'll need that fact during the proofs.



      Statement $(1)$



      $Box$ Check for $y_2$ and $x_2$:
      $$
      x_2 = {1over 2}(a + b)\
      y_2 = sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)}
      $$



      Suppose $y_2 > x_2$:
      $$
      sqrt{{1over 2}(a^2 + b^2)} > {1over 2}(a + b) iff \
      iff {1over 2}(a^2 + b^2) > left({1over 2}(a + b)right)^2 iff \
      iff a^2 + b^2> frac{a^2 + 2ab + b^2}{2} iff 2a^2 + 2b^2>a^2 + 2ab + b^2 iff\
      iff a^2 + b^2>2ab
      $$

      This is true. Suppose $y_{n+1} > x_{n+1}$:
      $$
      frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}} = frac{sqrt{{1over 2}(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}}{{1over 2}(x_n + y_n)} iff \
      iff left(frac{y_{n+1}}{x_{n+1}}right)^2 = 2cdotfrac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2}
      $$



      We need:
      $$
      frac{(x_n^2 + y_n^2)}{x_n^2 + 2x_ny_n+y_n^2} > {1over 2} iff 2x_n^2 + 2y_n^2>x_n^2 +2x_ny_n + y_n^2 iff \
      iff x_n^2 + y_n^2 > 2x_ny_n
      $$



      Which yields a true statements for $x_n, y_n >0$. Thus:



      $$
      y_n > x_ntag*{$blacksquare$}
      $$



      Statement $(2)$



      $Box$ I'm skipping the base case for induction, it's very similar to the above and in the end yields:



      $$
      a^2 + b^2 > 2ab
      $$



      Suppose $x_n < x_{n+1}$, consider the following fraction:
      $$
      frac{x_{n+3}}{x_{n+2}} = frac{{1over 2}(x_{n+2} + y_{n+2})}{{1over 2}(x_{n+1} + y_{n+1})} = frac{x_{n+2} + y_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} stackrel{y_n ge x_n}{ge} frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}}
      $$



      We want it to be greater than $1$:



      $$
      frac{2x_{n+2}}{x_{n+1} + y_{n+1}} > 1 iff 2x_{n+2} > x_{n+1} + y_{n+1} > 2x_{n+1} implies x_{n+2} > x_{n+1}
      $$



      Thus:
      $$
      x_{n+2} < x_{n+3}
      $$



      which completes the induction $tag*{$blacksquare$}$



      Statement $(3)$



      This is done similarly to case $(2)$. Once again the base case for $y_2$ and $y_3$ yields $a^2 + b^2 > 2ab$. The assumption here is $y_n > y_{n+1}$. Then we need to show that:
      $$
      frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1
      $$



      So suppose:



      $$
      frac{y_{n+3}}{y_{n+2}} < 1 iff frac{x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2}{x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2} < 1 iff x_{n+2}^2 + y_{n+2}^2 < x_{n+1}^2 + y_{n+1}^2 iff \
      iff x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
      $$



      We know by $(2)$ that $x_n$ is increasing, therefore:



      $$
      0 < x_{n+2}^2 - x_{n+1}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2 iff 0 < y_{n+1}^2 - y_{n+2}^2
      $$



      Since both $x_n$ and $y_n$ are greater than $0$:
      $$
      y_{n+2}^2 < y_{n+1}^2 iff y_{n+2} < y_{n+1}
      $$



      Thus $y_n$ is decreasing.



      I'm kindly asking to verify my proofs as otherwise i have no one to refer to. Thank you.







      sequences-and-series algebra-precalculus proof-verification monotone-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 at 10:48

























      asked Nov 14 at 18:35









      roman

      9701815




      9701815






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          In Statement (2) you showed the fact you where supposing, probably just some typo with the induction. The rest looked fine






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
            – roman
            Nov 15 at 10:45











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998653%2fverify-proofs-related-to-monotonicity-of-x-n1-1-over-2x-ny-n-and-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          In Statement (2) you showed the fact you where supposing, probably just some typo with the induction. The rest looked fine






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
            – roman
            Nov 15 at 10:45















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          In Statement (2) you showed the fact you where supposing, probably just some typo with the induction. The rest looked fine






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
            – roman
            Nov 15 at 10:45













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          In Statement (2) you showed the fact you where supposing, probably just some typo with the induction. The rest looked fine






          share|cite|improve this answer












          In Statement (2) you showed the fact you where supposing, probably just some typo with the induction. The rest looked fine







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 14 at 18:47









          F.Tck

          111




          111












          • you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
            – roman
            Nov 15 at 10:45


















          • you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
            – roman
            Nov 15 at 10:45
















          you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
          – roman
          Nov 15 at 10:45




          you are right, i've updated the question. Thanks for spotting.
          – roman
          Nov 15 at 10:45


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998653%2fverify-proofs-related-to-monotonicity-of-x-n1-1-over-2x-ny-n-and-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?