Replacing square-root term in optimization constraint?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I am implementing an optimization problem using semi-definite problem. One of my constraints is of following form



$$trace(A*X)- (k * trace(A*X))+ (k * sqrt{trace(B*X)})==0$$



where k is a constant, $A$ and $B$ are constant complex hermitian matrices and $X$ is $m*m$ complex, hermitian semi definite matrix optimization variable.



It can be seen that the last terms $sqrt{trace(B*X)}$ is a problematic term. Since, I am writing my code using YALMIP, which is an external toolbox of MATLAB, sqrt on complex variable is not allowed in that toolbox. Is there any way to rewrite that particular term using some convex optimization tools so that I can implement it easily in YALMIP?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Why do you think a nonlinear equality constraint is convex to begin with?
    – LinAlg
    20 hours ago










  • I didn't say that the posted equation is convex. If I remove the sqrt term from the equation, then the equation is becomes linear in terms of X and thus convex. That's the reason I am asking is there any mathematical way to rewrite the sqrt term such that my equation become linear again and the sqrt term is handled separately in such a way that I maintain the convexity of my problem.
    – Muhammad Usman
    19 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I am implementing an optimization problem using semi-definite problem. One of my constraints is of following form



$$trace(A*X)- (k * trace(A*X))+ (k * sqrt{trace(B*X)})==0$$



where k is a constant, $A$ and $B$ are constant complex hermitian matrices and $X$ is $m*m$ complex, hermitian semi definite matrix optimization variable.



It can be seen that the last terms $sqrt{trace(B*X)}$ is a problematic term. Since, I am writing my code using YALMIP, which is an external toolbox of MATLAB, sqrt on complex variable is not allowed in that toolbox. Is there any way to rewrite that particular term using some convex optimization tools so that I can implement it easily in YALMIP?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Why do you think a nonlinear equality constraint is convex to begin with?
    – LinAlg
    20 hours ago










  • I didn't say that the posted equation is convex. If I remove the sqrt term from the equation, then the equation is becomes linear in terms of X and thus convex. That's the reason I am asking is there any mathematical way to rewrite the sqrt term such that my equation become linear again and the sqrt term is handled separately in such a way that I maintain the convexity of my problem.
    – Muhammad Usman
    19 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





I am implementing an optimization problem using semi-definite problem. One of my constraints is of following form



$$trace(A*X)- (k * trace(A*X))+ (k * sqrt{trace(B*X)})==0$$



where k is a constant, $A$ and $B$ are constant complex hermitian matrices and $X$ is $m*m$ complex, hermitian semi definite matrix optimization variable.



It can be seen that the last terms $sqrt{trace(B*X)}$ is a problematic term. Since, I am writing my code using YALMIP, which is an external toolbox of MATLAB, sqrt on complex variable is not allowed in that toolbox. Is there any way to rewrite that particular term using some convex optimization tools so that I can implement it easily in YALMIP?










share|cite|improve this question















I am implementing an optimization problem using semi-definite problem. One of my constraints is of following form



$$trace(A*X)- (k * trace(A*X))+ (k * sqrt{trace(B*X)})==0$$



where k is a constant, $A$ and $B$ are constant complex hermitian matrices and $X$ is $m*m$ complex, hermitian semi definite matrix optimization variable.



It can be seen that the last terms $sqrt{trace(B*X)}$ is a problematic term. Since, I am writing my code using YALMIP, which is an external toolbox of MATLAB, sqrt on complex variable is not allowed in that toolbox. Is there any way to rewrite that particular term using some convex optimization tools so that I can implement it easily in YALMIP?







convex-analysis convex-optimization






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 23 hours ago

























asked yesterday









Muhammad Usman

85




85












  • Why do you think a nonlinear equality constraint is convex to begin with?
    – LinAlg
    20 hours ago










  • I didn't say that the posted equation is convex. If I remove the sqrt term from the equation, then the equation is becomes linear in terms of X and thus convex. That's the reason I am asking is there any mathematical way to rewrite the sqrt term such that my equation become linear again and the sqrt term is handled separately in such a way that I maintain the convexity of my problem.
    – Muhammad Usman
    19 hours ago


















  • Why do you think a nonlinear equality constraint is convex to begin with?
    – LinAlg
    20 hours ago










  • I didn't say that the posted equation is convex. If I remove the sqrt term from the equation, then the equation is becomes linear in terms of X and thus convex. That's the reason I am asking is there any mathematical way to rewrite the sqrt term such that my equation become linear again and the sqrt term is handled separately in such a way that I maintain the convexity of my problem.
    – Muhammad Usman
    19 hours ago
















Why do you think a nonlinear equality constraint is convex to begin with?
– LinAlg
20 hours ago




Why do you think a nonlinear equality constraint is convex to begin with?
– LinAlg
20 hours ago












I didn't say that the posted equation is convex. If I remove the sqrt term from the equation, then the equation is becomes linear in terms of X and thus convex. That's the reason I am asking is there any mathematical way to rewrite the sqrt term such that my equation become linear again and the sqrt term is handled separately in such a way that I maintain the convexity of my problem.
– Muhammad Usman
19 hours ago




I didn't say that the posted equation is convex. If I remove the sqrt term from the equation, then the equation is becomes linear in terms of X and thus convex. That's the reason I am asking is there any mathematical way to rewrite the sqrt term such that my equation become linear again and the sqrt term is handled separately in such a way that I maintain the convexity of my problem.
– Muhammad Usman
19 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995347%2freplacing-square-root-term-in-optimization-constraint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest





































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995347%2freplacing-square-root-term-in-optimization-constraint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?