Poster, tcolorbox, and small math font size











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?



Thanks!



enter image description here



MWE:



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}

usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}

pagestyle{empty}

begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]

posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}

posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}

end{tcbposter}
end{document}


-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:



enter image description here










share|improve this question
























  • The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the lmodern and use this for math font
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:02






  • 1




    Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:07










  • @samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in lmodern, the sum symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:23










  • @samcarter : and the mathdesign shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:25






  • 1




    If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use lmodern and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale package
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:26















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?



Thanks!



enter image description here



MWE:



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}

usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}

pagestyle{empty}

begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]

posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}

posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}

end{tcbposter}
end{document}


-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:



enter image description here










share|improve this question
























  • The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the lmodern and use this for math font
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:02






  • 1




    Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:07










  • @samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in lmodern, the sum symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:23










  • @samcarter : and the mathdesign shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:25






  • 1




    If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use lmodern and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale package
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:26













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?



Thanks!



enter image description here



MWE:



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}

usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}

pagestyle{empty}

begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]

posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}

posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}

end{tcbposter}
end{document}


-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:



enter image description here










share|improve this question















I don't know why, but the math equation looks very small in my tcolorbox poster. Any idea why?



Thanks!



enter image description here



MWE:



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % To switch to the T1 encoding
% usepackage{lmodern} % To switch to Latin Modern
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}

usepackage[a0paper]{geometry}
usepackage[poster,most]{tcolorbox}

pagestyle{empty}

begin{document}
begin{tcbposter}[
coverage = {
spread,
% interior style={top color=yellow,bottom color=yellow!50!red},
top=25mm, bottom=25mm, left=15mm, right=15mm,
},
poster = {showframe=false,columns=3,rows=5,spacing=13mm},
boxes = {
enhanced standard jigsaw,sharp corners=downhill,
arc=10mm, boxrule=2mm,
coltitle=black!85,
boxsep=0pt,
top=15mm,bottom=15mm,right=15mm,left=15mm,
colback=white,opacityback=0.75,colframe=cyan!30!white!90!black,
title style={left color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
right color=cyan!20!white!90!black,
},
fonttitle=Largescshapebfseries,
valign=center,
},
fontsize = 36pt
]

posterbox[blankest,interior engine=path,height=10cm,
halign=center,valign=center,colupper=black,
]{name=title,column=1,span=3,below=top}{
{Hugebftextsc{I Want A Title With\[.3em]
Small Caps Enabled}}\[.3em]
textsc{Here are Some Names}
}

posterbox[adjusted title=Security]
{name=security,below=title,column=2,span=1}{
I am some text, and here is a formula $hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$, isn't it strange to have such a small formula?
$$hc(x,r) = sum x_i r_i bmod 2$$
}

end{tcbposter}
end{document}


-- EDIT --
Using usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} as proposed in comments works indeed (thanks!), but this font is a bit too different from the default one. The lmodern font on the other side gives an ugly sum symbol:



enter image description here







math-mode tcolorbox posters






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 at 22:27

























asked Nov 12 at 21:28









tobiasBora

1,202313




1,202313












  • The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the lmodern and use this for math font
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:02






  • 1




    Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:07










  • @samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in lmodern, the sum symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:23










  • @samcarter : and the mathdesign shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:25






  • 1




    If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use lmodern and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale package
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:26


















  • The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the lmodern and use this for math font
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:02






  • 1




    Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:07










  • @samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in lmodern, the sum symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:23










  • @samcarter : and the mathdesign shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
    – tobiasBora
    Nov 12 at 22:25






  • 1




    If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use lmodern and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale package
    – samcarter
    Nov 12 at 22:26
















The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the lmodern and use this for math font
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02




The math font you are currently using is not available in the size you want. A quick workaround could be to comment in the lmodern and use this for math font
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:02




1




1




Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07




Personally I would combine palatino with a math font which is a bit heavier, for example usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath} usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} usepackage{palatino}
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:07












@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in lmodern, the sum symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23




@samcarter thanks for the comments. if I comment in lmodern, the sum symbol looks ugly and really small (less than a letter)
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:23












@samcarter : and the mathdesign shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25




@samcarter : and the mathdesign shape indeed works, thanks! But I'm curious, is there a resizable math font that looks closer to the default one?
– tobiasBora
Nov 12 at 22:25




1




1




If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use lmodern and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale package
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26




If you want to stay close at the default look, I'd use lmodern and fix the sum symbol size with the exscale package
– samcarter
Nov 12 at 22:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.



If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale package:



usepackage{lmodern} 
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}


enter image description here



Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier



usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}


enter image description here



Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino package.



usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 11:41










  • @TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
    – samcarter
    Nov 13 at 11:43










  • @TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 12:21










  • @thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 21:09










  • @TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 21:12











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459688%2fposter-tcolorbox-and-small-math-font-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.



If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale package:



usepackage{lmodern} 
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}


enter image description here



Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier



usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}


enter image description here



Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino package.



usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 11:41










  • @TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
    – samcarter
    Nov 13 at 11:43










  • @TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 12:21










  • @thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 21:09










  • @TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 21:12















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.



If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale package:



usepackage{lmodern} 
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}


enter image description here



Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier



usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}


enter image description here



Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino package.



usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 11:41










  • @TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
    – samcarter
    Nov 13 at 11:43










  • @TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 12:21










  • @thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 21:09










  • @TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 21:12













up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.



If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale package:



usepackage{lmodern} 
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}


enter image description here



Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier



usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}


enter image description here



Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino package.



usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer














The problem is that the default math font you are using is not available in the size you request it. As a workaround use a math font with is scalable to this size.



If you want to keep the look of the default math font, you could comment in the lmodern package you already have in your preamble and fix some remaining problems with the exscale package:



usepackage{lmodern} 
usepackage{palatino}
usepackage{exscale}


enter image description here



Personally I would combine your palatino font with a math font which is a bit heavier



usepackage{amssymb, amsthm, amsmath}
usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
usepackage{palatino}


enter image description here



Or use a similar font which also provides math. This will also save you from using the outdated palatino package.



usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 13 at 11:44

























answered Nov 12 at 22:37









samcarter

81.5k791262




81.5k791262












  • Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 11:41










  • @TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
    – samcarter
    Nov 13 at 11:43










  • @TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 12:21










  • @thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 21:09










  • @TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 21:12


















  • Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 11:41










  • @TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
    – samcarter
    Nov 13 at 11:43










  • @TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 12:21










  • @thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
    – TeXnician
    Nov 13 at 21:09










  • @TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
    – thymaro
    Nov 13 at 21:12
















Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41




Isn't the use of palatino discouraged (l2tabu)?
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 11:41












@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43




@TeXnician Could very well be. I'll stress more to use usepackage{newpxtext,newpxmath} instead.
– samcarter
Nov 13 at 11:43












@TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21




@TeXnician what's the problem with palatino? Not that I'm using it, but I'm curious nonetheless.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 12:21












@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09




@thymaro Please read the section in l2tabu. I just know that the authors of l2tabu mostly know what they are writing about.
– TeXnician
Nov 13 at 21:09












@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12




@TeXnician right. That's actually what I did after posting the comment. I should have done that before, though. I should probably read the whole document again, now that my understanding of TeX has grown. Last time I read it, I didn't quite grasp its reach.
– thymaro
Nov 13 at 21:12


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459688%2fposter-tcolorbox-and-small-math-font-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?