Fix a formula with fraction 1/2 in subscript mode











up vote
7
down vote

favorite












At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



enter image description here



In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



Here my MWE for 2nd image:



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{mathtools}

begin{document}
begin{equation}
T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
end{equation}

begin{equation}
N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
end{equation}

end{document}









share|improve this question




























    up vote
    7
    down vote

    favorite












    At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



    enter image description here



    In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



    We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



    Here my MWE for 2nd image:



    enter image description here



    documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
    usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
    usepackage{mathtools}

    begin{document}
    begin{equation}
    T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
    end{equation}

    begin{equation}
    N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
    end{equation}

    end{document}









    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      7
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      7
      down vote

      favorite











      At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



      enter image description here



      In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



      We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



      Here my MWE for 2nd image:



      enter image description here



      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
      usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
      usepackage{mathtools}

      begin{document}
      begin{equation}
      T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
      end{equation}

      begin{equation}
      N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
      end{equation}

      end{document}









      share|improve this question















      At this time for my book I am writing some formulas for radioactive decay. I'm using actually newtxtext package as a text font and mt2pro as a mathematical character and formula font. In the attached code I use newtxmath so that everyone can compile it regularly keeping in mind that the situation is the same using mt2pro. Precisely I would like to write the fraction 1/2 similar to the image below (green rectangle),



      enter image description here



      In other words, the backslash should be very close to the number 1 and 2, because as you can see in the formula (2), the expression is not only not visually good.



      We appreciate your suggestions and your knowledge to make the visualization of my formulas better (especially the exponent of the formula (2)).



      Here my MWE for 2nd image:



      enter image description here



      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
      usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
      usepackage{mathtools}

      begin{document}
      begin{equation}
      T_{1/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
      end{equation}

      begin{equation}
      N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{1/2}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{1/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{1/2}}}
      end{equation}

      end{document}






      math-mode mtpro newtxmath newtx






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 13 at 9:48

























      asked Nov 12 at 22:41









      Sebastiano

      8,29541754




      8,29541754






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



          You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}

          newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}

          begin{document}

          begin{equation}
          T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
          end{equation}

          begin{equation}
          N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
          N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
          end{equation}

          end{document}


          I wouldn't touch the slash.



          enter image description here



          I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






          share|improve this answer






























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
            usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            usepackage{nicefrac}

            begin{document}
            begin{equation}
            T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
            end{equation}

            begin{equation}
            N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
            end{equation}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "85"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted










              The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



              You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}

              newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}

              begin{document}

              begin{equation}
              T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
              end{equation}

              begin{equation}
              N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
              N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
              end{equation}

              end{document}


              I wouldn't touch the slash.



              enter image description here



              I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                7
                down vote



                accepted










                The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



                You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}

                newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}

                begin{document}

                begin{equation}
                T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                end{equation}

                begin{equation}
                N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
                N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
                end{equation}

                end{document}


                I wouldn't touch the slash.



                enter image description here



                I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  7
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  7
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



                  You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}

                  newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}

                  begin{document}

                  begin{equation}
                  T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                  end{equation}

                  begin{equation}
                  N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
                  N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
                  end{equation}

                  end{document}


                  I wouldn't touch the slash.



                  enter image description here



                  I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.






                  share|improve this answer














                  The digit 1 is much thinner than the other digits. Most fonts, however, define it with a bounding box equal to the ones for the other digits, for the sake of alignment in tables.



                  You can solve the special case by defining a suitable command:



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}

                  newcommand{one}{mspace{-1mu}1mspace{-1.5mu}}

                  begin{document}

                  begin{equation}
                  T_{one/2}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                  end{equation}

                  begin{equation}
                  N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{one/2}}}=
                  N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{one/2}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{one/2}}}
                  end{equation}

                  end{document}


                  I wouldn't touch the slash.



                  enter image description here



                  I would also omit the step with the fraction at second level superscript: it is unreadable and actually an easy application of logarithms. A short explanation after the equation is more than sufficient.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 12 at 23:27

























                  answered Nov 12 at 23:09









                  egreg

                  698k8518523120




                  698k8518523120






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
                      usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
                      usepackage{mathtools}
                      usepackage{nicefrac}

                      begin{document}
                      begin{equation}
                      T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                      end{equation}

                      begin{equation}
                      N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
                      end{equation}

                      end{document}


                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
                        usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
                        usepackage{mathtools}
                        usepackage{nicefrac}

                        begin{document}
                        begin{equation}
                        T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                        end{equation}

                        begin{equation}
                        N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
                        end{equation}

                        end{document}


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
                          usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
                          usepackage{mathtools}
                          usepackage{nicefrac}

                          begin{document}
                          begin{equation}
                          T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                          end{equation}

                          begin{equation}
                          N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
                          end{equation}

                          end{document}


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer












                          documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{book}
                          usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
                          usepackage{mathtools}
                          usepackage{nicefrac}

                          begin{document}
                          begin{equation}
                          T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}=frac {ln 2}{lambda}=tau ln 2<tau
                          end{equation}

                          begin{equation}
                          N(t)=N_0e^{-frac{tln 2}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}=N_0e^{ln 2^{-frac t{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}}=N_0{2}^{-frac{t}{T_{nicefrac{1}{2}}}}
                          end{equation}

                          end{document}


                          enter image description here







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 12 at 22:50









                          daniel

                          3009




                          3009






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459701%2ffix-a-formula-with-fraction-1-2-in-subscript-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                              ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                              Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?