How did Lang use locally compact to deduce $|x|=1$ has minimum?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.



It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."



$textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)



Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.



    It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."



    $textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)



    Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.



      It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."



      $textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)



      Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $K$ be a complete field w.r.t non-trivial absolute value $|-|$ and $V$ a normed vector space over $K$. Let $||-||=u(-)$ be sup norm w.r.t a fixed basis of $V$ over $K$ and $||-||'=v(-)$ be another norm. Note that $kin K,||kx||=|k|cdot||x||$ and we have this similarly for $||-||'$.



      It is clear that w.r.t the fixed basis $forall xin V,v(x)leq c u(x)$ which indicates continuity of $v$ against topology defined by $u$. Then Lang said "Hence $v$ has a minimum on the unit sphere w.r.t $u$(by local compactness)."



      $textbf{Q:}$ How did Lang use local compactness to deduce minimum here? Here is my reasoning. Since absolute value is non-trivial, I can define $O$ and $exists |a|<1$. Now $a^nOcong O$ by multiplication. Since $K$ is locally compact, I can shrink $O$ by multiplication of $a^n$ into the compact neighborhood of $0$. Since $O$ is closed by definition, for some $n$, $a^nO$ is compact which forces $O$ compact by homeomorphism. Now boundary(i.e. unit sphere) is closed in compact set and hence it is compact. (This is rather elaborate reasoning by assuming $K$ is topological field to start with though it is not hard to demonstrate this is compatible with $|-|$.)



      Alternatively one can realize compactness by direct application of $a^n U$ with $U$ being the set of norm 1 elements. This is trivially closed and use continuity argument of $a^n$ to shrink to a closed subset of compact neighborhood of $0$. Hence it is compact and achieve the minimum.







      abstract-algebra general-topology number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      user45765

      2,3432719




      2,3432719



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995361%2fhow-did-lang-use-locally-compact-to-deduce-x-1-has-minimum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest





































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995361%2fhow-did-lang-use-locally-compact-to-deduce-x-1-has-minimum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest




















































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?