Issues developing Fibonacci Search algorithm with R.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












[edited] I compiled this code for an Operations Research class. I ended up submitting another format that relied on R packages; however, I feel that I am close to a functioning algorithm.



I derived this code from another R program I complied for the 'Golden Search' algorithm. That program conducted 'bracket' searches until it found the optimal min/max. Each time I run this algorithm, it fails to conduct a 'bracket' search. After multiple hours, I have failed to find the issue. Any help finding the error in my code would be appreciated.



My submitted (and confirmed) algorithm returned a minimum (x) value of 0.8095 with a f(x) value of -24.3445 utilizing a Fibonacci search method.



# Step One: Initialization

## Input user-defined function
f = function(x)
{
(x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))
}

## Input user-defined parameters
Lb <- 0 ### Lower Bound
Ub <- 2 ### Upper Bound
Tl <- .3 ### Tolerance

n <- (Ub-Lb)/Tl
n<- as.integer(n)

fibonacci.search = function(f, lower.bound, upper.bound, tolerance)
{
iteration = 0

Fn = fibonacci(n, sequence = FALSE)

### Use the fibonacci ratios to set the initial test points

x1 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound))
x2 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound))

### Evaluate the function at the test points
f1 = f(x1)
f2 = f(x2)

while ((lower.bound - upper.bound) > tolerance)
{
iteration = iteration + 1
n = n - 1
cat('', 'n')
cat('Iteration #', iteration, 'n')
cat('f1 =', f1, 'n')
cat('f2 =', f2, 'n')

if (f1 < f2)
{
cat('f(x1) < f(x2)', 'n')
# If f(x1) < f(x2), then the new interval is [x1,b]:
# a becomes the previous x1, b does not change

lower.bound = x1
upper.bound = upper.bound

# x1 becomes the previous x2, n = n-1

x1 = x2
f1 = f2

cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

### Find the new x2 using the formula in Step2.
x2 = lower.bound + (fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound)
cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')
f2 = f(x2)
}
else
{
cat('f(x1) > f(x2)', 'n')
# If f(x1) > f(x2), then the new interval is [a,x2]:
# a does not change, b becomes the previous x2

upper.bound = x2
lower.bound = lower.bound

# x2 becomes the previous x1, n = n-1

x2 = x1
f2 = f1

cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

# Find the new x1 using the formula in Step2.
x1 = lower.bound + (fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound)
cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x2, 'n')
f1 = f(x1)
}
}

### Use the mid-point of the final interval as the estimate of the optimzer
cat('', 'n')
cat('Final Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
cat('Final Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
estimated.minimizer = (lower.bound + upper.bound)/2
cat('Estimated Minimum Value (x) =', estimated.minimizer, 'n')
cat('Estimated F(x)', f(estimated.minimizer),'n')

# Step Three: Results

## Plot the curve of the user-defined function
curve(f, from = Lb, to = Ub, main = expression("(x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))"))

## Plot the solution as a point
points(estimated.minimizer, f(estimated.minimizer), col="red", pch=19)

## Draw a square around the optima to highlight it
rect(estimated.minimizer-0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)-01, estimated.minimizer+0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)+01, lwd=2)
}

# Step Two: Loop Function
fibonacci.search(f, Lb, Ub, Tl)









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    [edited] I compiled this code for an Operations Research class. I ended up submitting another format that relied on R packages; however, I feel that I am close to a functioning algorithm.



    I derived this code from another R program I complied for the 'Golden Search' algorithm. That program conducted 'bracket' searches until it found the optimal min/max. Each time I run this algorithm, it fails to conduct a 'bracket' search. After multiple hours, I have failed to find the issue. Any help finding the error in my code would be appreciated.



    My submitted (and confirmed) algorithm returned a minimum (x) value of 0.8095 with a f(x) value of -24.3445 utilizing a Fibonacci search method.



    # Step One: Initialization

    ## Input user-defined function
    f = function(x)
    {
    (x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))
    }

    ## Input user-defined parameters
    Lb <- 0 ### Lower Bound
    Ub <- 2 ### Upper Bound
    Tl <- .3 ### Tolerance

    n <- (Ub-Lb)/Tl
    n<- as.integer(n)

    fibonacci.search = function(f, lower.bound, upper.bound, tolerance)
    {
    iteration = 0

    Fn = fibonacci(n, sequence = FALSE)

    ### Use the fibonacci ratios to set the initial test points

    x1 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound))
    x2 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound))

    ### Evaluate the function at the test points
    f1 = f(x1)
    f2 = f(x2)

    while ((lower.bound - upper.bound) > tolerance)
    {
    iteration = iteration + 1
    n = n - 1
    cat('', 'n')
    cat('Iteration #', iteration, 'n')
    cat('f1 =', f1, 'n')
    cat('f2 =', f2, 'n')

    if (f1 < f2)
    {
    cat('f(x1) < f(x2)', 'n')
    # If f(x1) < f(x2), then the new interval is [x1,b]:
    # a becomes the previous x1, b does not change

    lower.bound = x1
    upper.bound = upper.bound

    # x1 becomes the previous x2, n = n-1

    x1 = x2
    f1 = f2

    cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
    cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
    cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

    ### Find the new x2 using the formula in Step2.
    x2 = lower.bound + (fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound)
    cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')
    f2 = f(x2)
    }
    else
    {
    cat('f(x1) > f(x2)', 'n')
    # If f(x1) > f(x2), then the new interval is [a,x2]:
    # a does not change, b becomes the previous x2

    upper.bound = x2
    lower.bound = lower.bound

    # x2 becomes the previous x1, n = n-1

    x2 = x1
    f2 = f1

    cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
    cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
    cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

    # Find the new x1 using the formula in Step2.
    x1 = lower.bound + (fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound)
    cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x2, 'n')
    f1 = f(x1)
    }
    }

    ### Use the mid-point of the final interval as the estimate of the optimzer
    cat('', 'n')
    cat('Final Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
    cat('Final Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
    estimated.minimizer = (lower.bound + upper.bound)/2
    cat('Estimated Minimum Value (x) =', estimated.minimizer, 'n')
    cat('Estimated F(x)', f(estimated.minimizer),'n')

    # Step Three: Results

    ## Plot the curve of the user-defined function
    curve(f, from = Lb, to = Ub, main = expression("(x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))"))

    ## Plot the solution as a point
    points(estimated.minimizer, f(estimated.minimizer), col="red", pch=19)

    ## Draw a square around the optima to highlight it
    rect(estimated.minimizer-0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)-01, estimated.minimizer+0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)+01, lwd=2)
    }

    # Step Two: Loop Function
    fibonacci.search(f, Lb, Ub, Tl)









    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      [edited] I compiled this code for an Operations Research class. I ended up submitting another format that relied on R packages; however, I feel that I am close to a functioning algorithm.



      I derived this code from another R program I complied for the 'Golden Search' algorithm. That program conducted 'bracket' searches until it found the optimal min/max. Each time I run this algorithm, it fails to conduct a 'bracket' search. After multiple hours, I have failed to find the issue. Any help finding the error in my code would be appreciated.



      My submitted (and confirmed) algorithm returned a minimum (x) value of 0.8095 with a f(x) value of -24.3445 utilizing a Fibonacci search method.



      # Step One: Initialization

      ## Input user-defined function
      f = function(x)
      {
      (x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))
      }

      ## Input user-defined parameters
      Lb <- 0 ### Lower Bound
      Ub <- 2 ### Upper Bound
      Tl <- .3 ### Tolerance

      n <- (Ub-Lb)/Tl
      n<- as.integer(n)

      fibonacci.search = function(f, lower.bound, upper.bound, tolerance)
      {
      iteration = 0

      Fn = fibonacci(n, sequence = FALSE)

      ### Use the fibonacci ratios to set the initial test points

      x1 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound))
      x2 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound))

      ### Evaluate the function at the test points
      f1 = f(x1)
      f2 = f(x2)

      while ((lower.bound - upper.bound) > tolerance)
      {
      iteration = iteration + 1
      n = n - 1
      cat('', 'n')
      cat('Iteration #', iteration, 'n')
      cat('f1 =', f1, 'n')
      cat('f2 =', f2, 'n')

      if (f1 < f2)
      {
      cat('f(x1) < f(x2)', 'n')
      # If f(x1) < f(x2), then the new interval is [x1,b]:
      # a becomes the previous x1, b does not change

      lower.bound = x1
      upper.bound = upper.bound

      # x1 becomes the previous x2, n = n-1

      x1 = x2
      f1 = f2

      cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

      ### Find the new x2 using the formula in Step2.
      x2 = lower.bound + (fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound)
      cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')
      f2 = f(x2)
      }
      else
      {
      cat('f(x1) > f(x2)', 'n')
      # If f(x1) > f(x2), then the new interval is [a,x2]:
      # a does not change, b becomes the previous x2

      upper.bound = x2
      lower.bound = lower.bound

      # x2 becomes the previous x1, n = n-1

      x2 = x1
      f2 = f1

      cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

      # Find the new x1 using the formula in Step2.
      x1 = lower.bound + (fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound)
      cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x2, 'n')
      f1 = f(x1)
      }
      }

      ### Use the mid-point of the final interval as the estimate of the optimzer
      cat('', 'n')
      cat('Final Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
      cat('Final Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
      estimated.minimizer = (lower.bound + upper.bound)/2
      cat('Estimated Minimum Value (x) =', estimated.minimizer, 'n')
      cat('Estimated F(x)', f(estimated.minimizer),'n')

      # Step Three: Results

      ## Plot the curve of the user-defined function
      curve(f, from = Lb, to = Ub, main = expression("(x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))"))

      ## Plot the solution as a point
      points(estimated.minimizer, f(estimated.minimizer), col="red", pch=19)

      ## Draw a square around the optima to highlight it
      rect(estimated.minimizer-0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)-01, estimated.minimizer+0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)+01, lwd=2)
      }

      # Step Two: Loop Function
      fibonacci.search(f, Lb, Ub, Tl)









      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      [edited] I compiled this code for an Operations Research class. I ended up submitting another format that relied on R packages; however, I feel that I am close to a functioning algorithm.



      I derived this code from another R program I complied for the 'Golden Search' algorithm. That program conducted 'bracket' searches until it found the optimal min/max. Each time I run this algorithm, it fails to conduct a 'bracket' search. After multiple hours, I have failed to find the issue. Any help finding the error in my code would be appreciated.



      My submitted (and confirmed) algorithm returned a minimum (x) value of 0.8095 with a f(x) value of -24.3445 utilizing a Fibonacci search method.



      # Step One: Initialization

      ## Input user-defined function
      f = function(x)
      {
      (x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))
      }

      ## Input user-defined parameters
      Lb <- 0 ### Lower Bound
      Ub <- 2 ### Upper Bound
      Tl <- .3 ### Tolerance

      n <- (Ub-Lb)/Tl
      n<- as.integer(n)

      fibonacci.search = function(f, lower.bound, upper.bound, tolerance)
      {
      iteration = 0

      Fn = fibonacci(n, sequence = FALSE)

      ### Use the fibonacci ratios to set the initial test points

      x1 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound))
      x2 = lower.bound + ((fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound))

      ### Evaluate the function at the test points
      f1 = f(x1)
      f2 = f(x2)

      while ((lower.bound - upper.bound) > tolerance)
      {
      iteration = iteration + 1
      n = n - 1
      cat('', 'n')
      cat('Iteration #', iteration, 'n')
      cat('f1 =', f1, 'n')
      cat('f2 =', f2, 'n')

      if (f1 < f2)
      {
      cat('f(x1) < f(x2)', 'n')
      # If f(x1) < f(x2), then the new interval is [x1,b]:
      # a becomes the previous x1, b does not change

      lower.bound = x1
      upper.bound = upper.bound

      # x1 becomes the previous x2, n = n-1

      x1 = x2
      f1 = f2

      cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

      ### Find the new x2 using the formula in Step2.
      x2 = lower.bound + (fib(n-1)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound)
      cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')
      f2 = f(x2)
      }
      else
      {
      cat('f(x1) > f(x2)', 'n')
      # If f(x1) > f(x2), then the new interval is [a,x2]:
      # a does not change, b becomes the previous x2

      upper.bound = x2
      lower.bound = lower.bound

      # x2 becomes the previous x1, n = n-1

      x2 = x1
      f2 = f1

      cat('New Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
      cat('New Lower Test Point = ', x1, 'n')

      # Find the new x1 using the formula in Step2.
      x1 = lower.bound + (fib(n-2)/fib(n)) * (upper.bound - lower.bound)
      cat('New Upper Test Point = ', x2, 'n')
      f1 = f(x1)
      }
      }

      ### Use the mid-point of the final interval as the estimate of the optimzer
      cat('', 'n')
      cat('Final Lower Bound =', lower.bound, 'n')
      cat('Final Upper Bound =', upper.bound, 'n')
      estimated.minimizer = (lower.bound + upper.bound)/2
      cat('Estimated Minimum Value (x) =', estimated.minimizer, 'n')
      cat('Estimated F(x)', f(estimated.minimizer),'n')

      # Step Three: Results

      ## Plot the curve of the user-defined function
      curve(f, from = Lb, to = Ub, main = expression("(x^4)-(14*(x^3))+(60*(x^2))-(70*(x))"))

      ## Plot the solution as a point
      points(estimated.minimizer, f(estimated.minimizer), col="red", pch=19)

      ## Draw a square around the optima to highlight it
      rect(estimated.minimizer-0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)-01, estimated.minimizer+0.1, f(estimated.minimizer)+01, lwd=2)
      }

      # Step Two: Loop Function
      fibonacci.search(f, Lb, Ub, Tl)






      optimization fibonacci-numbers programming






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday





















      New contributor




      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 9 at 22:54









      Josh K

      11




      11




      New contributor




      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Josh K is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Josh K is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2992046%2fissues-developing-fibonacci-search-algorithm-with-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest





































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Josh K is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          Josh K is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Josh K is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Josh K is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2992046%2fissues-developing-fibonacci-search-algorithm-with-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest




















































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?