Cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in ac-aux





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







79















This is my first time trying to compile and install anything on a linux machine. I got the latest version of https://github.com/processone/exmpp via git and read the instructions which state:




2. Build and install



Exmpp uses the Autotools. Therefore
the process is quite common:



$ ./configure
$ make
$ sudo make install



after type ./configure I get the error




Cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in ac-aux




Google was of little to no help. Not sure at all what I'm supposed to do. Any help would be much appreciated










share|improve this question































    79















    This is my first time trying to compile and install anything on a linux machine. I got the latest version of https://github.com/processone/exmpp via git and read the instructions which state:




    2. Build and install



    Exmpp uses the Autotools. Therefore
    the process is quite common:



    $ ./configure
    $ make
    $ sudo make install



    after type ./configure I get the error




    Cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in ac-aux




    Google was of little to no help. Not sure at all what I'm supposed to do. Any help would be much appreciated










    share|improve this question



























      79












      79








      79


      35






      This is my first time trying to compile and install anything on a linux machine. I got the latest version of https://github.com/processone/exmpp via git and read the instructions which state:




      2. Build and install



      Exmpp uses the Autotools. Therefore
      the process is quite common:



      $ ./configure
      $ make
      $ sudo make install



      after type ./configure I get the error




      Cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in ac-aux




      Google was of little to no help. Not sure at all what I'm supposed to do. Any help would be much appreciated










      share|improve this question
















      This is my first time trying to compile and install anything on a linux machine. I got the latest version of https://github.com/processone/exmpp via git and read the instructions which state:




      2. Build and install



      Exmpp uses the Autotools. Therefore
      the process is quite common:



      $ ./configure
      $ make
      $ sudo make install



      after type ./configure I get the error




      Cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in ac-aux




      Google was of little to no help. Not sure at all what I'm supposed to do. Any help would be much appreciated







      install-from-source configure






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 18 '15 at 20:19









      BH2017

      3,7401860108




      3,7401860108










      asked Feb 23 '11 at 6:14









      MicahMicah

      529179




      529179






















          10 Answers
          10






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          103














          I got it to create the configure script using the following tools:



          libtoolize --force
          aclocal
          autoheader
          automake --force-missing --add-missing
          autoconf
          ./configure


          I don't have all the dependencies so I can't test it right now, but this is generally how you would create a configure script from an ac file.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

            – sebastian_k
            Feb 23 '11 at 7:05








          • 11





            Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

            – Qix
            Oct 2 '15 at 9:41






          • 1





            @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

            – Sergei
            Feb 21 '16 at 20:01








          • 4





            @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

            – Qix
            Feb 22 '16 at 19:53






          • 4





            @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

            – Qix
            Feb 26 '16 at 1:04





















          39














          Well, I tried sebastian_k's answer and it didn't work for me (./configure crashed midway through with an extremely weird error).



          What did, however work for me was copying the instructions used in this build log I found



          The short version(so you don't have to wade through it yourself) is:



          $ autoreconf -vif
          $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/erlang/lib
          $ make
          $ sudo make install





          share|improve this answer





















          • 16





            +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

            – Nemo
            May 8 '15 at 18:46






          • 2





            +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

            – weberc2
            Jan 30 '17 at 19:32











          • @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

            – Avindra Goolcharan
            Nov 5 '17 at 0:06



















          9














          This question, and most of the other answers here, arise from a misunderstanding of how projects using the GNU Build System (a.k.a. Autotools) are distributed. In fact, in the case of the Erlang XMPP library mentioned by the OP, the misunderstanding appears to be on the part of the developers.



          Obtaining the software the right way



          If all you want to do is compile and install a project released with the GNU Autotools, then you should not check it out from the source control system. You should instead download the packaged source release provided by the developer. These normally take the form of tarballs distributed on the project's website. For projects that are hosted entirely on GitHub, Savannah, or some similar hosting service, these tarballs will usually be found behind some link labelled "Download" or "Releases". You untar the package and utter some variant of the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install incantation. That's all; you don't need to invoke any of the GNU Autotools, and don't even need to have the GNU Autotools installed on your system.



          The reason that you, the user, don't need the GNU Autotools to compile an Autotools-packaged project is that the developer has already used the various Autotools programs to generate a "distribution tarball" that can be used to build the software on any Unix-like system. The distribution tarball contains a highly portable configure script that scans the build environment, checks for dependencies, and constructs a Makefile customized to your system.



          So when do you need Autotools?



          The only reason you should need to install and invoke the GNU Autotools yourself is if you want to do development work on a project built with Autotools. And even then, you probably won't need the Autotools unless you change the project's dependencies. In that case, you would indeed need to check out the original source, make appropriate changes to the Autotools-specific input files (configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc.), and run the Autotools on them to generate a new configure file. If you want to independently publish the revised package, then you would use the Makefile generated by Autotools to generate a new distribution tarball, and then publish that tarball somewhere online.



          The problem is that some developers make their source repository publically available but neglect to publish their distribution tarballs (or make it difficult to find where they are published). For example, rather than publishing their distribution tarballs as GitHub Releases, the Erlang XMPP library's GitHub Releases are tarballs of the raw source repository. This makes it impossible to compile the project without the GNU Autotools, defeating the entire purpose of using Autotools in the first place.



          TL;DR summary



          The GNU Autotools are something that developers use to make portable source code packages for users. Users should download and compile from these source packages, not the original code from the source control system. If the developers don't provide these source packages, then they aren't using Autotools correctly, and should be gently slapped with a wet trout until they see the error of their ways.






          share|improve this answer
























          • How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

            – Pilot6
            Sep 1 '17 at 10:56






          • 3





            It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

            – Psychonaut
            Sep 1 '17 at 11:02






          • 1





            This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

            – William Pursell
            Sep 1 '17 at 14:43






          • 1





            @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

            – Psychonaut
            Sep 1 '17 at 14:51



















          4














          I've had this problem, and found it was due to the following line in configure.ac:



          AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])


          The line wasn't bad per se, however it needed to be moved closer to the top of the configure.ac file.






          share|improve this answer































            2














            Please do the following to fix this problem,



            sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool


            Then do the installation



            sh autogen.sh --prefix=prefered_install_path
            make
            make install





            share|improve this answer

































              2














              When trying to compile GNU Octave from Mercurial repository, you may come across this problem. The fix is to run ./bootstrap while being in the root of the source tree.






              share|improve this answer































                1














                sudo apt-get install automake autoconf



                its works sucessfully






                share|improve this answer

































                  0














                  I had a similar problem when i tried to ./configure a source code and got the same error as posted. Finally resolved my issues by entering the code:



                  sudo apt-get install autotools-dev





                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 2





                    Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                    – Mauricio Scheffer
                    Apr 20 '14 at 1:30











                  • Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                    – PJunior
                    Jul 18 '15 at 20:20













                  • I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                    – Boann
                    Feb 23 at 18:41





















                  0














                  After installing autogen package this error got resolved in wolfSSL build.



                  sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool





                  share|improve this answer































                    0














                    I had slightly different error:



                    configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in "." "./.." "./../.."



                    It turns out configure couldn't find build-aux/install-sh.
                    I linked it like so



                    ln -s build-aux/install-sh .



                    then it builds.



                    Hope that helps someone out there!






                    share|improve this answer
























                      Your Answer








                      StackExchange.ready(function() {
                      var channelOptions = {
                      tags: "".split(" "),
                      id: "89"
                      };
                      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                      createEditor();
                      });
                      }
                      else {
                      createEditor();
                      }
                      });

                      function createEditor() {
                      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                      heartbeatType: 'answer',
                      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                      convertImagesToLinks: true,
                      noModals: true,
                      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                      reputationToPostImages: 10,
                      bindNavPrevention: true,
                      postfix: "",
                      imageUploader: {
                      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                      allowUrls: true
                      },
                      onDemand: true,
                      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                      });


                      }
                      });














                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f27677%2fcannot-find-install-sh-install-sh-or-shtool-in-ac-aux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown

























                      10 Answers
                      10






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes








                      10 Answers
                      10






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes









                      active

                      oldest

                      votes






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes









                      103














                      I got it to create the configure script using the following tools:



                      libtoolize --force
                      aclocal
                      autoheader
                      automake --force-missing --add-missing
                      autoconf
                      ./configure


                      I don't have all the dependencies so I can't test it right now, but this is generally how you would create a configure script from an ac file.






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 2





                        The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

                        – sebastian_k
                        Feb 23 '11 at 7:05








                      • 11





                        Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

                        – Qix
                        Oct 2 '15 at 9:41






                      • 1





                        @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

                        – Sergei
                        Feb 21 '16 at 20:01








                      • 4





                        @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 22 '16 at 19:53






                      • 4





                        @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 26 '16 at 1:04


















                      103














                      I got it to create the configure script using the following tools:



                      libtoolize --force
                      aclocal
                      autoheader
                      automake --force-missing --add-missing
                      autoconf
                      ./configure


                      I don't have all the dependencies so I can't test it right now, but this is generally how you would create a configure script from an ac file.






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 2





                        The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

                        – sebastian_k
                        Feb 23 '11 at 7:05








                      • 11





                        Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

                        – Qix
                        Oct 2 '15 at 9:41






                      • 1





                        @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

                        – Sergei
                        Feb 21 '16 at 20:01








                      • 4





                        @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 22 '16 at 19:53






                      • 4





                        @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 26 '16 at 1:04
















                      103












                      103








                      103







                      I got it to create the configure script using the following tools:



                      libtoolize --force
                      aclocal
                      autoheader
                      automake --force-missing --add-missing
                      autoconf
                      ./configure


                      I don't have all the dependencies so I can't test it right now, but this is generally how you would create a configure script from an ac file.






                      share|improve this answer















                      I got it to create the configure script using the following tools:



                      libtoolize --force
                      aclocal
                      autoheader
                      automake --force-missing --add-missing
                      autoconf
                      ./configure


                      I don't have all the dependencies so I can't test it right now, but this is generally how you would create a configure script from an ac file.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Nov 4 '16 at 2:15









                      Evan Carroll

                      4,902113567




                      4,902113567










                      answered Feb 23 '11 at 6:30









                      sebastian_ksebastian_k

                      1,70321111




                      1,70321111








                      • 2





                        The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

                        – sebastian_k
                        Feb 23 '11 at 7:05








                      • 11





                        Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

                        – Qix
                        Oct 2 '15 at 9:41






                      • 1





                        @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

                        – Sergei
                        Feb 21 '16 at 20:01








                      • 4





                        @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 22 '16 at 19:53






                      • 4





                        @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 26 '16 at 1:04
















                      • 2





                        The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

                        – sebastian_k
                        Feb 23 '11 at 7:05








                      • 11





                        Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

                        – Qix
                        Oct 2 '15 at 9:41






                      • 1





                        @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

                        – Sergei
                        Feb 21 '16 at 20:01








                      • 4





                        @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 22 '16 at 19:53






                      • 4





                        @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

                        – Qix
                        Feb 26 '16 at 1:04










                      2




                      2





                      The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

                      – sebastian_k
                      Feb 23 '11 at 7:05







                      The instructions in the README were probably blindly copied from somewhere else. I have to admit that I don't understand every detail of the autoconf toolchain; it's basically a collection of macros that are generated and used to create your configure script (which, in turn, sets the stage for the compilation and installation process). I never had to fine-tune these things, so I'm not an expert, but there are some fairly extensive explanations here

                      – sebastian_k
                      Feb 23 '11 at 7:05






                      11




                      11





                      Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

                      – Qix
                      Oct 2 '15 at 9:41





                      Note to programmers: please stop using the automake toolchain. Please.

                      – Qix
                      Oct 2 '15 at 9:41




                      1




                      1





                      @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

                      – Sergei
                      Feb 21 '16 at 20:01







                      @Qix, could you, please, explain us why?

                      – Sergei
                      Feb 21 '16 at 20:01






                      4




                      4





                      @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

                      – Qix
                      Feb 22 '16 at 19:53





                      @Sergei it's messy, slow, and breaks constantly. It clutters up defines and is incredibly magic. Its way of handling dependencies (or lack thereof) gives cryptic error messages, and the files it produces are unreadable at best and nightmarishly broken at worst.

                      – Qix
                      Feb 22 '16 at 19:53




                      4




                      4





                      @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

                      – Qix
                      Feb 26 '16 at 1:04







                      @Sergei CMake is the most viable at this point in time in my opinion. I'm sure there will be something better in the (near) future.

                      – Qix
                      Feb 26 '16 at 1:04















                      39














                      Well, I tried sebastian_k's answer and it didn't work for me (./configure crashed midway through with an extremely weird error).



                      What did, however work for me was copying the instructions used in this build log I found



                      The short version(so you don't have to wade through it yourself) is:



                      $ autoreconf -vif
                      $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/erlang/lib
                      $ make
                      $ sudo make install





                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 16





                        +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

                        – Nemo
                        May 8 '15 at 18:46






                      • 2





                        +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

                        – weberc2
                        Jan 30 '17 at 19:32











                      • @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

                        – Avindra Goolcharan
                        Nov 5 '17 at 0:06
















                      39














                      Well, I tried sebastian_k's answer and it didn't work for me (./configure crashed midway through with an extremely weird error).



                      What did, however work for me was copying the instructions used in this build log I found



                      The short version(so you don't have to wade through it yourself) is:



                      $ autoreconf -vif
                      $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/erlang/lib
                      $ make
                      $ sudo make install





                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 16





                        +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

                        – Nemo
                        May 8 '15 at 18:46






                      • 2





                        +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

                        – weberc2
                        Jan 30 '17 at 19:32











                      • @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

                        – Avindra Goolcharan
                        Nov 5 '17 at 0:06














                      39












                      39








                      39







                      Well, I tried sebastian_k's answer and it didn't work for me (./configure crashed midway through with an extremely weird error).



                      What did, however work for me was copying the instructions used in this build log I found



                      The short version(so you don't have to wade through it yourself) is:



                      $ autoreconf -vif
                      $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/erlang/lib
                      $ make
                      $ sudo make install





                      share|improve this answer















                      Well, I tried sebastian_k's answer and it didn't work for me (./configure crashed midway through with an extremely weird error).



                      What did, however work for me was copying the instructions used in this build log I found



                      The short version(so you don't have to wade through it yourself) is:



                      $ autoreconf -vif
                      $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/erlang/lib
                      $ make
                      $ sudo make install






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Oct 7 '16 at 9:50

























                      answered Nov 10 '12 at 13:30









                      entropyentropy

                      49144




                      49144








                      • 16





                        +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

                        – Nemo
                        May 8 '15 at 18:46






                      • 2





                        +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

                        – weberc2
                        Jan 30 '17 at 19:32











                      • @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

                        – Avindra Goolcharan
                        Nov 5 '17 at 0:06














                      • 16





                        +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

                        – Nemo
                        May 8 '15 at 18:46






                      • 2





                        +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

                        – weberc2
                        Jan 30 '17 at 19:32











                      • @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

                        – Avindra Goolcharan
                        Nov 5 '17 at 0:06








                      16




                      16





                      +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

                      – Nemo
                      May 8 '15 at 18:46





                      +1. autoreconf -i is the correct answer (the v and f are usually optional)

                      – Nemo
                      May 8 '15 at 18:46




                      2




                      2





                      +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

                      – weberc2
                      Jan 30 '17 at 19:32





                      +1. This is the only answer that worked for me.

                      – weberc2
                      Jan 30 '17 at 19:32













                      @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

                      – Avindra Goolcharan
                      Nov 5 '17 at 0:06





                      @Nemo nice one. The accepted answer technically works, but yours is the simplest by far.

                      – Avindra Goolcharan
                      Nov 5 '17 at 0:06











                      9














                      This question, and most of the other answers here, arise from a misunderstanding of how projects using the GNU Build System (a.k.a. Autotools) are distributed. In fact, in the case of the Erlang XMPP library mentioned by the OP, the misunderstanding appears to be on the part of the developers.



                      Obtaining the software the right way



                      If all you want to do is compile and install a project released with the GNU Autotools, then you should not check it out from the source control system. You should instead download the packaged source release provided by the developer. These normally take the form of tarballs distributed on the project's website. For projects that are hosted entirely on GitHub, Savannah, or some similar hosting service, these tarballs will usually be found behind some link labelled "Download" or "Releases". You untar the package and utter some variant of the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install incantation. That's all; you don't need to invoke any of the GNU Autotools, and don't even need to have the GNU Autotools installed on your system.



                      The reason that you, the user, don't need the GNU Autotools to compile an Autotools-packaged project is that the developer has already used the various Autotools programs to generate a "distribution tarball" that can be used to build the software on any Unix-like system. The distribution tarball contains a highly portable configure script that scans the build environment, checks for dependencies, and constructs a Makefile customized to your system.



                      So when do you need Autotools?



                      The only reason you should need to install and invoke the GNU Autotools yourself is if you want to do development work on a project built with Autotools. And even then, you probably won't need the Autotools unless you change the project's dependencies. In that case, you would indeed need to check out the original source, make appropriate changes to the Autotools-specific input files (configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc.), and run the Autotools on them to generate a new configure file. If you want to independently publish the revised package, then you would use the Makefile generated by Autotools to generate a new distribution tarball, and then publish that tarball somewhere online.



                      The problem is that some developers make their source repository publically available but neglect to publish their distribution tarballs (or make it difficult to find where they are published). For example, rather than publishing their distribution tarballs as GitHub Releases, the Erlang XMPP library's GitHub Releases are tarballs of the raw source repository. This makes it impossible to compile the project without the GNU Autotools, defeating the entire purpose of using Autotools in the first place.



                      TL;DR summary



                      The GNU Autotools are something that developers use to make portable source code packages for users. Users should download and compile from these source packages, not the original code from the source control system. If the developers don't provide these source packages, then they aren't using Autotools correctly, and should be gently slapped with a wet trout until they see the error of their ways.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

                        – Pilot6
                        Sep 1 '17 at 10:56






                      • 3





                        It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 11:02






                      • 1





                        This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

                        – William Pursell
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:43






                      • 1





                        @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:51
















                      9














                      This question, and most of the other answers here, arise from a misunderstanding of how projects using the GNU Build System (a.k.a. Autotools) are distributed. In fact, in the case of the Erlang XMPP library mentioned by the OP, the misunderstanding appears to be on the part of the developers.



                      Obtaining the software the right way



                      If all you want to do is compile and install a project released with the GNU Autotools, then you should not check it out from the source control system. You should instead download the packaged source release provided by the developer. These normally take the form of tarballs distributed on the project's website. For projects that are hosted entirely on GitHub, Savannah, or some similar hosting service, these tarballs will usually be found behind some link labelled "Download" or "Releases". You untar the package and utter some variant of the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install incantation. That's all; you don't need to invoke any of the GNU Autotools, and don't even need to have the GNU Autotools installed on your system.



                      The reason that you, the user, don't need the GNU Autotools to compile an Autotools-packaged project is that the developer has already used the various Autotools programs to generate a "distribution tarball" that can be used to build the software on any Unix-like system. The distribution tarball contains a highly portable configure script that scans the build environment, checks for dependencies, and constructs a Makefile customized to your system.



                      So when do you need Autotools?



                      The only reason you should need to install and invoke the GNU Autotools yourself is if you want to do development work on a project built with Autotools. And even then, you probably won't need the Autotools unless you change the project's dependencies. In that case, you would indeed need to check out the original source, make appropriate changes to the Autotools-specific input files (configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc.), and run the Autotools on them to generate a new configure file. If you want to independently publish the revised package, then you would use the Makefile generated by Autotools to generate a new distribution tarball, and then publish that tarball somewhere online.



                      The problem is that some developers make their source repository publically available but neglect to publish their distribution tarballs (or make it difficult to find where they are published). For example, rather than publishing their distribution tarballs as GitHub Releases, the Erlang XMPP library's GitHub Releases are tarballs of the raw source repository. This makes it impossible to compile the project without the GNU Autotools, defeating the entire purpose of using Autotools in the first place.



                      TL;DR summary



                      The GNU Autotools are something that developers use to make portable source code packages for users. Users should download and compile from these source packages, not the original code from the source control system. If the developers don't provide these source packages, then they aren't using Autotools correctly, and should be gently slapped with a wet trout until they see the error of their ways.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

                        – Pilot6
                        Sep 1 '17 at 10:56






                      • 3





                        It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 11:02






                      • 1





                        This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

                        – William Pursell
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:43






                      • 1





                        @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:51














                      9












                      9








                      9







                      This question, and most of the other answers here, arise from a misunderstanding of how projects using the GNU Build System (a.k.a. Autotools) are distributed. In fact, in the case of the Erlang XMPP library mentioned by the OP, the misunderstanding appears to be on the part of the developers.



                      Obtaining the software the right way



                      If all you want to do is compile and install a project released with the GNU Autotools, then you should not check it out from the source control system. You should instead download the packaged source release provided by the developer. These normally take the form of tarballs distributed on the project's website. For projects that are hosted entirely on GitHub, Savannah, or some similar hosting service, these tarballs will usually be found behind some link labelled "Download" or "Releases". You untar the package and utter some variant of the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install incantation. That's all; you don't need to invoke any of the GNU Autotools, and don't even need to have the GNU Autotools installed on your system.



                      The reason that you, the user, don't need the GNU Autotools to compile an Autotools-packaged project is that the developer has already used the various Autotools programs to generate a "distribution tarball" that can be used to build the software on any Unix-like system. The distribution tarball contains a highly portable configure script that scans the build environment, checks for dependencies, and constructs a Makefile customized to your system.



                      So when do you need Autotools?



                      The only reason you should need to install and invoke the GNU Autotools yourself is if you want to do development work on a project built with Autotools. And even then, you probably won't need the Autotools unless you change the project's dependencies. In that case, you would indeed need to check out the original source, make appropriate changes to the Autotools-specific input files (configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc.), and run the Autotools on them to generate a new configure file. If you want to independently publish the revised package, then you would use the Makefile generated by Autotools to generate a new distribution tarball, and then publish that tarball somewhere online.



                      The problem is that some developers make their source repository publically available but neglect to publish their distribution tarballs (or make it difficult to find where they are published). For example, rather than publishing their distribution tarballs as GitHub Releases, the Erlang XMPP library's GitHub Releases are tarballs of the raw source repository. This makes it impossible to compile the project without the GNU Autotools, defeating the entire purpose of using Autotools in the first place.



                      TL;DR summary



                      The GNU Autotools are something that developers use to make portable source code packages for users. Users should download and compile from these source packages, not the original code from the source control system. If the developers don't provide these source packages, then they aren't using Autotools correctly, and should be gently slapped with a wet trout until they see the error of their ways.






                      share|improve this answer













                      This question, and most of the other answers here, arise from a misunderstanding of how projects using the GNU Build System (a.k.a. Autotools) are distributed. In fact, in the case of the Erlang XMPP library mentioned by the OP, the misunderstanding appears to be on the part of the developers.



                      Obtaining the software the right way



                      If all you want to do is compile and install a project released with the GNU Autotools, then you should not check it out from the source control system. You should instead download the packaged source release provided by the developer. These normally take the form of tarballs distributed on the project's website. For projects that are hosted entirely on GitHub, Savannah, or some similar hosting service, these tarballs will usually be found behind some link labelled "Download" or "Releases". You untar the package and utter some variant of the standard ./configure && make && sudo make install incantation. That's all; you don't need to invoke any of the GNU Autotools, and don't even need to have the GNU Autotools installed on your system.



                      The reason that you, the user, don't need the GNU Autotools to compile an Autotools-packaged project is that the developer has already used the various Autotools programs to generate a "distribution tarball" that can be used to build the software on any Unix-like system. The distribution tarball contains a highly portable configure script that scans the build environment, checks for dependencies, and constructs a Makefile customized to your system.



                      So when do you need Autotools?



                      The only reason you should need to install and invoke the GNU Autotools yourself is if you want to do development work on a project built with Autotools. And even then, you probably won't need the Autotools unless you change the project's dependencies. In that case, you would indeed need to check out the original source, make appropriate changes to the Autotools-specific input files (configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc.), and run the Autotools on them to generate a new configure file. If you want to independently publish the revised package, then you would use the Makefile generated by Autotools to generate a new distribution tarball, and then publish that tarball somewhere online.



                      The problem is that some developers make their source repository publically available but neglect to publish their distribution tarballs (or make it difficult to find where they are published). For example, rather than publishing their distribution tarballs as GitHub Releases, the Erlang XMPP library's GitHub Releases are tarballs of the raw source repository. This makes it impossible to compile the project without the GNU Autotools, defeating the entire purpose of using Autotools in the first place.



                      TL;DR summary



                      The GNU Autotools are something that developers use to make portable source code packages for users. Users should download and compile from these source packages, not the original code from the source control system. If the developers don't provide these source packages, then they aren't using Autotools correctly, and should be gently slapped with a wet trout until they see the error of their ways.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Sep 1 '17 at 10:53









                      PsychonautPsychonaut

                      19314




                      19314













                      • How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

                        – Pilot6
                        Sep 1 '17 at 10:56






                      • 3





                        It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 11:02






                      • 1





                        This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

                        – William Pursell
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:43






                      • 1





                        @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:51



















                      • How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

                        – Pilot6
                        Sep 1 '17 at 10:56






                      • 3





                        It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 11:02






                      • 1





                        This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

                        – William Pursell
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:43






                      • 1





                        @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

                        – Psychonaut
                        Sep 1 '17 at 14:51

















                      How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

                      – Pilot6
                      Sep 1 '17 at 10:56





                      How is this long post related to the question? Did OP try to use autotools? They downloaded some soft and ran ./configure && make && sudo make install as you suggested in the second paragraph.

                      – Pilot6
                      Sep 1 '17 at 10:56




                      3




                      3





                      It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

                      – Psychonaut
                      Sep 1 '17 at 11:02





                      It's relevant because the software downloaded by the OP did not contain a correct configure script (and the most recent version in source control, plus the released tarballs, do not contain a configure script at all). Almost all the answers here are telling the OP to run Autotools. While this may work around the problem, it's important to understand the root cause: the developers are the ones responsible for running Autotools, and they haven't done this correctly (or at all).

                      – Psychonaut
                      Sep 1 '17 at 11:02




                      1




                      1





                      This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

                      – William Pursell
                      Sep 1 '17 at 14:43





                      This is a good answer, and although I like the phrase "gently slapped with a wet trout" it might be more appropriate to explicitly mention the the correct response is to report the bug upstream.

                      – William Pursell
                      Sep 1 '17 at 14:43




                      1




                      1





                      @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

                      – Psychonaut
                      Sep 1 '17 at 14:51





                      @WilliamPursell I take it the pun is intended. :)

                      – Psychonaut
                      Sep 1 '17 at 14:51











                      4














                      I've had this problem, and found it was due to the following line in configure.ac:



                      AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])


                      The line wasn't bad per se, however it needed to be moved closer to the top of the configure.ac file.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        4














                        I've had this problem, and found it was due to the following line in configure.ac:



                        AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])


                        The line wasn't bad per se, however it needed to be moved closer to the top of the configure.ac file.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          4












                          4








                          4







                          I've had this problem, and found it was due to the following line in configure.ac:



                          AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])


                          The line wasn't bad per se, however it needed to be moved closer to the top of the configure.ac file.






                          share|improve this answer













                          I've had this problem, and found it was due to the following line in configure.ac:



                          AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])


                          The line wasn't bad per se, however it needed to be moved closer to the top of the configure.ac file.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered May 2 '16 at 11:29









                          Craig McQueenCraig McQueen

                          1477




                          1477























                              2














                              Please do the following to fix this problem,



                              sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool


                              Then do the installation



                              sh autogen.sh --prefix=prefered_install_path
                              make
                              make install





                              share|improve this answer






























                                2














                                Please do the following to fix this problem,



                                sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool


                                Then do the installation



                                sh autogen.sh --prefix=prefered_install_path
                                make
                                make install





                                share|improve this answer




























                                  2












                                  2








                                  2







                                  Please do the following to fix this problem,



                                  sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool


                                  Then do the installation



                                  sh autogen.sh --prefix=prefered_install_path
                                  make
                                  make install





                                  share|improve this answer















                                  Please do the following to fix this problem,



                                  sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool


                                  Then do the installation



                                  sh autogen.sh --prefix=prefered_install_path
                                  make
                                  make install






                                  share|improve this answer














                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer








                                  edited Nov 3 '16 at 8:13









                                  Evan Carroll

                                  4,902113567




                                  4,902113567










                                  answered Sep 2 '15 at 11:30









                                  Ravi HegdeRavi Hegde

                                  212




                                  212























                                      2














                                      When trying to compile GNU Octave from Mercurial repository, you may come across this problem. The fix is to run ./bootstrap while being in the root of the source tree.






                                      share|improve this answer




























                                        2














                                        When trying to compile GNU Octave from Mercurial repository, you may come across this problem. The fix is to run ./bootstrap while being in the root of the source tree.






                                        share|improve this answer


























                                          2












                                          2








                                          2







                                          When trying to compile GNU Octave from Mercurial repository, you may come across this problem. The fix is to run ./bootstrap while being in the root of the source tree.






                                          share|improve this answer













                                          When trying to compile GNU Octave from Mercurial repository, you may come across this problem. The fix is to run ./bootstrap while being in the root of the source tree.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered Mar 22 '17 at 13:45









                                          RuslanRuslan

                                          520717




                                          520717























                                              1














                                              sudo apt-get install automake autoconf



                                              its works sucessfully






                                              share|improve this answer






























                                                1














                                                sudo apt-get install automake autoconf



                                                its works sucessfully






                                                share|improve this answer




























                                                  1












                                                  1








                                                  1







                                                  sudo apt-get install automake autoconf



                                                  its works sucessfully






                                                  share|improve this answer















                                                  sudo apt-get install automake autoconf



                                                  its works sucessfully







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited Jun 12 '13 at 7:19









                                                  Radu Rădeanu

                                                  120k35253328




                                                  120k35253328










                                                  answered Jun 12 '13 at 6:47









                                                  Shafiul Karim BulanShafiul Karim Bulan

                                                  111




                                                  111























                                                      0














                                                      I had a similar problem when i tried to ./configure a source code and got the same error as posted. Finally resolved my issues by entering the code:



                                                      sudo apt-get install autotools-dev





                                                      share|improve this answer





















                                                      • 2





                                                        Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                                                        – Mauricio Scheffer
                                                        Apr 20 '14 at 1:30











                                                      • Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                                                        – PJunior
                                                        Jul 18 '15 at 20:20













                                                      • I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                                                        – Boann
                                                        Feb 23 at 18:41


















                                                      0














                                                      I had a similar problem when i tried to ./configure a source code and got the same error as posted. Finally resolved my issues by entering the code:



                                                      sudo apt-get install autotools-dev





                                                      share|improve this answer





















                                                      • 2





                                                        Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                                                        – Mauricio Scheffer
                                                        Apr 20 '14 at 1:30











                                                      • Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                                                        – PJunior
                                                        Jul 18 '15 at 20:20













                                                      • I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                                                        – Boann
                                                        Feb 23 at 18:41
















                                                      0












                                                      0








                                                      0







                                                      I had a similar problem when i tried to ./configure a source code and got the same error as posted. Finally resolved my issues by entering the code:



                                                      sudo apt-get install autotools-dev





                                                      share|improve this answer















                                                      I had a similar problem when i tried to ./configure a source code and got the same error as posted. Finally resolved my issues by entering the code:



                                                      sudo apt-get install autotools-dev






                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      edited Jul 27 '15 at 23:03

























                                                      answered Feb 9 '13 at 16:35









                                                      retnanretnan

                                                      276




                                                      276








                                                      • 2





                                                        Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                                                        – Mauricio Scheffer
                                                        Apr 20 '14 at 1:30











                                                      • Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                                                        – PJunior
                                                        Jul 18 '15 at 20:20













                                                      • I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                                                        – Boann
                                                        Feb 23 at 18:41
















                                                      • 2





                                                        Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                                                        – Mauricio Scheffer
                                                        Apr 20 '14 at 1:30











                                                      • Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                                                        – PJunior
                                                        Jul 18 '15 at 20:20













                                                      • I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                                                        – Boann
                                                        Feb 23 at 18:41










                                                      2




                                                      2





                                                      Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                                                      – Mauricio Scheffer
                                                      Apr 20 '14 at 1:30





                                                      Error: Unable to locate package autotools.

                                                      – Mauricio Scheffer
                                                      Apr 20 '14 at 1:30













                                                      Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                                                      – PJunior
                                                      Jul 18 '15 at 20:20







                                                      Same here. Error: Unable to locate package autotools. Downvoted. Sorry.

                                                      – PJunior
                                                      Jul 18 '15 at 20:20















                                                      I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                                                      – Boann
                                                      Feb 23 at 18:41







                                                      I already have that package installed, whatever it is. Configure script is borked nonetheless.

                                                      – Boann
                                                      Feb 23 at 18:41













                                                      0














                                                      After installing autogen package this error got resolved in wolfSSL build.



                                                      sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool





                                                      share|improve this answer




























                                                        0














                                                        After installing autogen package this error got resolved in wolfSSL build.



                                                        sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool





                                                        share|improve this answer


























                                                          0












                                                          0








                                                          0







                                                          After installing autogen package this error got resolved in wolfSSL build.



                                                          sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool





                                                          share|improve this answer













                                                          After installing autogen package this error got resolved in wolfSSL build.



                                                          sudo apt-get install autogen libtool shtool






                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                          answered Feb 19 at 6:28









                                                          rashokrashok

                                                          1114




                                                          1114























                                                              0














                                                              I had slightly different error:



                                                              configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in "." "./.." "./../.."



                                                              It turns out configure couldn't find build-aux/install-sh.
                                                              I linked it like so



                                                              ln -s build-aux/install-sh .



                                                              then it builds.



                                                              Hope that helps someone out there!






                                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                                0














                                                                I had slightly different error:



                                                                configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in "." "./.." "./../.."



                                                                It turns out configure couldn't find build-aux/install-sh.
                                                                I linked it like so



                                                                ln -s build-aux/install-sh .



                                                                then it builds.



                                                                Hope that helps someone out there!






                                                                share|improve this answer


























                                                                  0












                                                                  0








                                                                  0







                                                                  I had slightly different error:



                                                                  configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in "." "./.." "./../.."



                                                                  It turns out configure couldn't find build-aux/install-sh.
                                                                  I linked it like so



                                                                  ln -s build-aux/install-sh .



                                                                  then it builds.



                                                                  Hope that helps someone out there!






                                                                  share|improve this answer













                                                                  I had slightly different error:



                                                                  configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in "." "./.." "./../.."



                                                                  It turns out configure couldn't find build-aux/install-sh.
                                                                  I linked it like so



                                                                  ln -s build-aux/install-sh .



                                                                  then it builds.



                                                                  Hope that helps someone out there!







                                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                                  answered Mar 5 at 18:28









                                                                  BarmaleyBarmaley

                                                                  1213




                                                                  1213






























                                                                      draft saved

                                                                      draft discarded




















































                                                                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                                                                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                      But avoid



                                                                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                      draft saved


                                                                      draft discarded














                                                                      StackExchange.ready(
                                                                      function () {
                                                                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f27677%2fcannot-find-install-sh-install-sh-or-shtool-in-ac-aux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                      }
                                                                      );

                                                                      Post as a guest















                                                                      Required, but never shown





















































                                                                      Required, but never shown














                                                                      Required, but never shown












                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                      Required, but never shown

































                                                                      Required, but never shown














                                                                      Required, but never shown












                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                      Popular posts from this blog

                                                                      Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                                                                      ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                                                                      Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?