Why is integral not equal to zero even though the path is closed?












0














I have an integral $$int{z^{i}}dz$$ the path is $e^{it}$ where $t$ is between $0$ and $2pi$. Why is it not equal to zero even though the path is closed.










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    I have an integral $$int{z^{i}}dz$$ the path is $e^{it}$ where $t$ is between $0$ and $2pi$. Why is it not equal to zero even though the path is closed.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      I have an integral $$int{z^{i}}dz$$ the path is $e^{it}$ where $t$ is between $0$ and $2pi$. Why is it not equal to zero even though the path is closed.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I have an integral $$int{z^{i}}dz$$ the path is $e^{it}$ where $t$ is between $0$ and $2pi$. Why is it not equal to zero even though the path is closed.







      complex-analysis contour-integration complex-integration






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 18:13









      Snookie

      1,30017




      1,30017










      asked Nov 20 at 12:03









      ryszard eggink

      308110




      308110






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          You need to be careful about the definition of $z^i$ as it is singular at $0$. If you insert a branch cut somewhere then the contour is no longer closed. If you do not, you cannot apply Cauchy's theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            3














            You seem to believe that $z^i$ has a well-defined meaning, at least as a function from $mathbb C$ into itself. It hasn't. The number $z^i$ is any number of the form $e^{ilog z}$, where $log z$ is any logarihtm of $z$ (and, in particular, $z^i$ has no meaning if $z=0$). And you will find no way of choosing, for each $zinmathbb{C}setminus{0}$, a number $z^i$ in such a way that the function that you get is continuous, and much less analytic.






            share|cite|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006235%2fwhy-is-integral-not-equal-to-zero-even-though-the-path-is-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5














              You need to be careful about the definition of $z^i$ as it is singular at $0$. If you insert a branch cut somewhere then the contour is no longer closed. If you do not, you cannot apply Cauchy's theorem.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                5














                You need to be careful about the definition of $z^i$ as it is singular at $0$. If you insert a branch cut somewhere then the contour is no longer closed. If you do not, you cannot apply Cauchy's theorem.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  5












                  5








                  5






                  You need to be careful about the definition of $z^i$ as it is singular at $0$. If you insert a branch cut somewhere then the contour is no longer closed. If you do not, you cannot apply Cauchy's theorem.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  You need to be careful about the definition of $z^i$ as it is singular at $0$. If you insert a branch cut somewhere then the contour is no longer closed. If you do not, you cannot apply Cauchy's theorem.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 20 at 12:10









                  Richard Martin

                  1,63618




                  1,63618























                      3














                      You seem to believe that $z^i$ has a well-defined meaning, at least as a function from $mathbb C$ into itself. It hasn't. The number $z^i$ is any number of the form $e^{ilog z}$, where $log z$ is any logarihtm of $z$ (and, in particular, $z^i$ has no meaning if $z=0$). And you will find no way of choosing, for each $zinmathbb{C}setminus{0}$, a number $z^i$ in such a way that the function that you get is continuous, and much less analytic.






                      share|cite|improve this answer




























                        3














                        You seem to believe that $z^i$ has a well-defined meaning, at least as a function from $mathbb C$ into itself. It hasn't. The number $z^i$ is any number of the form $e^{ilog z}$, where $log z$ is any logarihtm of $z$ (and, in particular, $z^i$ has no meaning if $z=0$). And you will find no way of choosing, for each $zinmathbb{C}setminus{0}$, a number $z^i$ in such a way that the function that you get is continuous, and much less analytic.






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          3












                          3








                          3






                          You seem to believe that $z^i$ has a well-defined meaning, at least as a function from $mathbb C$ into itself. It hasn't. The number $z^i$ is any number of the form $e^{ilog z}$, where $log z$ is any logarihtm of $z$ (and, in particular, $z^i$ has no meaning if $z=0$). And you will find no way of choosing, for each $zinmathbb{C}setminus{0}$, a number $z^i$ in such a way that the function that you get is continuous, and much less analytic.






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          You seem to believe that $z^i$ has a well-defined meaning, at least as a function from $mathbb C$ into itself. It hasn't. The number $z^i$ is any number of the form $e^{ilog z}$, where $log z$ is any logarihtm of $z$ (and, in particular, $z^i$ has no meaning if $z=0$). And you will find no way of choosing, for each $zinmathbb{C}setminus{0}$, a number $z^i$ in such a way that the function that you get is continuous, and much less analytic.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Nov 20 at 18:06

























                          answered Nov 20 at 12:29









                          José Carlos Santos

                          149k22117219




                          149k22117219






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006235%2fwhy-is-integral-not-equal-to-zero-even-though-the-path-is-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                              ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                              Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?