Proving $alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$












0












$begingroup$


For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is $beta_delta$?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • $begingroup$
    What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29
















0












$begingroup$


For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is $beta_delta$?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • $begingroup$
    What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29














0












0








0





$begingroup$


For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For ordinals $alpha$, $beta$, $gamma$, if $gamma$ is a limit ordinal and $beta = sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$, why does below expression hold,
$$alpha+beta=alpha + sup{beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
Simply what I am asking is why,
$$alpha+beta=sup{alpha+beta_{delta}:delta<gamma}$$
holds? I tried to prove it by considering another $sup$ like $z$ then trying to prove that the $sup$ we've found is less that $z$. I don't know why and where in proof $gamma$ is limit ordinal is required?!



Edit I simply want to prove continuity property of ordinal addition. There was a question asked about what continuity of ordinals is here.







elementary-set-theory ordinals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 18:19









Andrés E. Caicedo

65.8k8160251




65.8k8160251










asked Dec 11 '18 at 5:36









FreeMindFreeMind

9381133




9381133












  • $begingroup$
    What is $beta_delta$?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • $begingroup$
    What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29


















  • $begingroup$
    What is $beta_delta$?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:37












  • $begingroup$
    What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:39












  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 5:52










  • $begingroup$
    No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
    $endgroup$
    – Henno Brandsma
    Dec 11 '18 at 6:33










  • $begingroup$
    @HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
    $endgroup$
    – FreeMind
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:29
















$begingroup$
What is $beta_delta$?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:37






$begingroup$
What is $beta_delta$?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:37














$begingroup$
What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:39






$begingroup$
What does hold for $gamma$ a limit, is $alpha + gamma = sup {alpha + beta: beta < gamma}$. Maybe that's what you mean? For some this is (part of) the definition of addition.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 5:39














$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
$endgroup$
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 5:52




$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma Yes, both say the same thing.
$endgroup$
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 5:52












$begingroup$
No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 6:33




$begingroup$
No they don’t say the same thing. But what’s your definition of addition?
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 11 '18 at 6:33












$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
$endgroup$
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 16:29




$begingroup$
@HennoBrandsma My reference is Jech book
$endgroup$
– FreeMind
Dec 11 '18 at 16:29










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034935%2fproving-alpha-beta-sup-alpha-beta-delta-delta-gamma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034935%2fproving-alpha-beta-sup-alpha-beta-delta-delta-gamma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?