Proof lower level sets of continuous strictly convex function are closed












0












$begingroup$


I need to prove that the following set:
$$mathcal L:={xin mathbb{R}^n , : , f(x) leq f(x_0) }$$
which apparently is called lower level set, is compact. I've already proved boundedness and I just need to show closeness.



The function $f$ is twice continuously differentiable on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ and so it is continuous everywhere.



I am looking for a "simple" proof, i.e. one that uses the notion of continuity and the notion of closeness/openness, NOT the notion of semi-continuity, which is used in every single proof I've found.



My Attempt



$f$ is continuous on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ means that $forall xinmathbb{R}^n$:
$$forall epsilon >0, , exists delta > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n: ||x - y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||< epsilon$$
On the other hand, $mathcal L$ is closed means that its complement wrt $mathbb{R}^n$ is open, that is:
$$forall xinbar{mathcal{L}}, exists epsilon > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n , : , ||x - y||<epsilon Longrightarrow yin bar{mathcal{L}}$$



Now using continuity we know:
$$||x-y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||<epsilon Longrightarrow -epsilon < f(x) - f(y) < epsilon$$
And so $Longrightarrow f(y)-epsilon < f(x) < epsilon+f(y)$. How do I continue? Is this correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I need to prove that the following set:
    $$mathcal L:={xin mathbb{R}^n , : , f(x) leq f(x_0) }$$
    which apparently is called lower level set, is compact. I've already proved boundedness and I just need to show closeness.



    The function $f$ is twice continuously differentiable on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ and so it is continuous everywhere.



    I am looking for a "simple" proof, i.e. one that uses the notion of continuity and the notion of closeness/openness, NOT the notion of semi-continuity, which is used in every single proof I've found.



    My Attempt



    $f$ is continuous on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ means that $forall xinmathbb{R}^n$:
    $$forall epsilon >0, , exists delta > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n: ||x - y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||< epsilon$$
    On the other hand, $mathcal L$ is closed means that its complement wrt $mathbb{R}^n$ is open, that is:
    $$forall xinbar{mathcal{L}}, exists epsilon > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n , : , ||x - y||<epsilon Longrightarrow yin bar{mathcal{L}}$$



    Now using continuity we know:
    $$||x-y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||<epsilon Longrightarrow -epsilon < f(x) - f(y) < epsilon$$
    And so $Longrightarrow f(y)-epsilon < f(x) < epsilon+f(y)$. How do I continue? Is this correct?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      I need to prove that the following set:
      $$mathcal L:={xin mathbb{R}^n , : , f(x) leq f(x_0) }$$
      which apparently is called lower level set, is compact. I've already proved boundedness and I just need to show closeness.



      The function $f$ is twice continuously differentiable on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ and so it is continuous everywhere.



      I am looking for a "simple" proof, i.e. one that uses the notion of continuity and the notion of closeness/openness, NOT the notion of semi-continuity, which is used in every single proof I've found.



      My Attempt



      $f$ is continuous on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ means that $forall xinmathbb{R}^n$:
      $$forall epsilon >0, , exists delta > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n: ||x - y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||< epsilon$$
      On the other hand, $mathcal L$ is closed means that its complement wrt $mathbb{R}^n$ is open, that is:
      $$forall xinbar{mathcal{L}}, exists epsilon > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n , : , ||x - y||<epsilon Longrightarrow yin bar{mathcal{L}}$$



      Now using continuity we know:
      $$||x-y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||<epsilon Longrightarrow -epsilon < f(x) - f(y) < epsilon$$
      And so $Longrightarrow f(y)-epsilon < f(x) < epsilon+f(y)$. How do I continue? Is this correct?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I need to prove that the following set:
      $$mathcal L:={xin mathbb{R}^n , : , f(x) leq f(x_0) }$$
      which apparently is called lower level set, is compact. I've already proved boundedness and I just need to show closeness.



      The function $f$ is twice continuously differentiable on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ and so it is continuous everywhere.



      I am looking for a "simple" proof, i.e. one that uses the notion of continuity and the notion of closeness/openness, NOT the notion of semi-continuity, which is used in every single proof I've found.



      My Attempt



      $f$ is continuous on all of $mathbb{R}^n$ means that $forall xinmathbb{R}^n$:
      $$forall epsilon >0, , exists delta > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n: ||x - y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||< epsilon$$
      On the other hand, $mathcal L$ is closed means that its complement wrt $mathbb{R}^n$ is open, that is:
      $$forall xinbar{mathcal{L}}, exists epsilon > 0 , forall yin mathbb{R}^n , : , ||x - y||<epsilon Longrightarrow yin bar{mathcal{L}}$$



      Now using continuity we know:
      $$||x-y|| < delta Longrightarrow ||f(x)-f(y)||<epsilon Longrightarrow -epsilon < f(x) - f(y) < epsilon$$
      And so $Longrightarrow f(y)-epsilon < f(x) < epsilon+f(y)$. How do I continue? Is this correct?







      real-analysis calculus optimization






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 4 '18 at 18:57









      Euler_SalterEuler_Salter

      2,0671336




      2,0671336






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          If we define
          $$
          g(x)=f(x)-f(x_0)
          $$

          a continuous function, the set is
          $$
          g^{-1}((-infty,0])
          $$

          the preimage of a closed set under a continuous map.



          If you are wedded to epsilon's and delta's, then pick $xin mathcal{L}^c$, then
          $$
          g(x)>0
          $$

          and for $epsilon=frac{g(x)}{2}$, we have for some $delta>0$ corresponding to this $epsilon$,
          $$
          g(y)>0
          $$

          for all $yin (x-delta,x+delta)$. So $(x-delta,x+delta)subset mathcal{L}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
            $endgroup$
            – Euler_Salter
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:06










          • $begingroup$
            I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:08











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025966%2fproof-lower-level-sets-of-continuous-strictly-convex-function-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          If we define
          $$
          g(x)=f(x)-f(x_0)
          $$

          a continuous function, the set is
          $$
          g^{-1}((-infty,0])
          $$

          the preimage of a closed set under a continuous map.



          If you are wedded to epsilon's and delta's, then pick $xin mathcal{L}^c$, then
          $$
          g(x)>0
          $$

          and for $epsilon=frac{g(x)}{2}$, we have for some $delta>0$ corresponding to this $epsilon$,
          $$
          g(y)>0
          $$

          for all $yin (x-delta,x+delta)$. So $(x-delta,x+delta)subset mathcal{L}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
            $endgroup$
            – Euler_Salter
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:06










          • $begingroup$
            I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:08
















          2












          $begingroup$

          If we define
          $$
          g(x)=f(x)-f(x_0)
          $$

          a continuous function, the set is
          $$
          g^{-1}((-infty,0])
          $$

          the preimage of a closed set under a continuous map.



          If you are wedded to epsilon's and delta's, then pick $xin mathcal{L}^c$, then
          $$
          g(x)>0
          $$

          and for $epsilon=frac{g(x)}{2}$, we have for some $delta>0$ corresponding to this $epsilon$,
          $$
          g(y)>0
          $$

          for all $yin (x-delta,x+delta)$. So $(x-delta,x+delta)subset mathcal{L}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
            $endgroup$
            – Euler_Salter
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:06










          • $begingroup$
            I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:08














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          If we define
          $$
          g(x)=f(x)-f(x_0)
          $$

          a continuous function, the set is
          $$
          g^{-1}((-infty,0])
          $$

          the preimage of a closed set under a continuous map.



          If you are wedded to epsilon's and delta's, then pick $xin mathcal{L}^c$, then
          $$
          g(x)>0
          $$

          and for $epsilon=frac{g(x)}{2}$, we have for some $delta>0$ corresponding to this $epsilon$,
          $$
          g(y)>0
          $$

          for all $yin (x-delta,x+delta)$. So $(x-delta,x+delta)subset mathcal{L}^c$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If we define
          $$
          g(x)=f(x)-f(x_0)
          $$

          a continuous function, the set is
          $$
          g^{-1}((-infty,0])
          $$

          the preimage of a closed set under a continuous map.



          If you are wedded to epsilon's and delta's, then pick $xin mathcal{L}^c$, then
          $$
          g(x)>0
          $$

          and for $epsilon=frac{g(x)}{2}$, we have for some $delta>0$ corresponding to this $epsilon$,
          $$
          g(y)>0
          $$

          for all $yin (x-delta,x+delta)$. So $(x-delta,x+delta)subset mathcal{L}^c$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 4 '18 at 19:07

























          answered Dec 4 '18 at 19:03









          qbertqbert

          22.1k32561




          22.1k32561












          • $begingroup$
            Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
            $endgroup$
            – Euler_Salter
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:06










          • $begingroup$
            I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:08


















          • $begingroup$
            Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
            $endgroup$
            – Euler_Salter
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:06










          • $begingroup$
            I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 4 '18 at 19:08
















          $begingroup$
          Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
          $endgroup$
          – Euler_Salter
          Dec 4 '18 at 19:06




          $begingroup$
          Can you please expand a little bit more? It seems interesting but I’m struggling to understand
          $endgroup$
          – Euler_Salter
          Dec 4 '18 at 19:06












          $begingroup$
          I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
          $endgroup$
          – qbert
          Dec 4 '18 at 19:08




          $begingroup$
          I added a solution using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. In general in topology, a continuous function is one which has the property that preimages of open sets are open. This then implies that preimages of closed sets are closed.
          $endgroup$
          – qbert
          Dec 4 '18 at 19:08


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025966%2fproof-lower-level-sets-of-continuous-strictly-convex-function-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?