Given a regular language L, prove or disprove L' is regular












0












$begingroup$


Given $NFA$ $N$ , $L(N)$ regular language and two words $w1$,$w2$ $in$ $sum^*$ such that $w1$ $neq$ $w2$.
I have to prove or disprove that



$L'=$ {$zin sum^*|exists$ $w1,w2$ :$w1z$ $in$ $L(N)$ $wedge$ $w2z$ $notin$ $L(N)$} is regular.



I believe this is correct but I'm having a hard time proving it.
Any help will do.
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are $w_1$ and $w_2$ fixed words? The description of $L’$ seems to use any string, presumably in $Sigma^*$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by "fixed words"?
    $endgroup$
    – Avishai Yaniv
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are we to solve the problem for some given two words $w_1$ and $w_2$? Because the definition of $L’$ allows the words to change depending on the value of $z$. I’m asking if the words can vary based on $z$ or if they’re “fixed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:18
















0












$begingroup$


Given $NFA$ $N$ , $L(N)$ regular language and two words $w1$,$w2$ $in$ $sum^*$ such that $w1$ $neq$ $w2$.
I have to prove or disprove that



$L'=$ {$zin sum^*|exists$ $w1,w2$ :$w1z$ $in$ $L(N)$ $wedge$ $w2z$ $notin$ $L(N)$} is regular.



I believe this is correct but I'm having a hard time proving it.
Any help will do.
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are $w_1$ and $w_2$ fixed words? The description of $L’$ seems to use any string, presumably in $Sigma^*$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by "fixed words"?
    $endgroup$
    – Avishai Yaniv
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are we to solve the problem for some given two words $w_1$ and $w_2$? Because the definition of $L’$ allows the words to change depending on the value of $z$. I’m asking if the words can vary based on $z$ or if they’re “fixed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:18














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Given $NFA$ $N$ , $L(N)$ regular language and two words $w1$,$w2$ $in$ $sum^*$ such that $w1$ $neq$ $w2$.
I have to prove or disprove that



$L'=$ {$zin sum^*|exists$ $w1,w2$ :$w1z$ $in$ $L(N)$ $wedge$ $w2z$ $notin$ $L(N)$} is regular.



I believe this is correct but I'm having a hard time proving it.
Any help will do.
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Given $NFA$ $N$ , $L(N)$ regular language and two words $w1$,$w2$ $in$ $sum^*$ such that $w1$ $neq$ $w2$.
I have to prove or disprove that



$L'=$ {$zin sum^*|exists$ $w1,w2$ :$w1z$ $in$ $L(N)$ $wedge$ $w2z$ $notin$ $L(N)$} is regular.



I believe this is correct but I'm having a hard time proving it.
Any help will do.
Thanks in advance.







computer-science formal-languages automata






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '18 at 17:29









Avishai YanivAvishai Yaniv

173




173












  • $begingroup$
    Are $w_1$ and $w_2$ fixed words? The description of $L’$ seems to use any string, presumably in $Sigma^*$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by "fixed words"?
    $endgroup$
    – Avishai Yaniv
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are we to solve the problem for some given two words $w_1$ and $w_2$? Because the definition of $L’$ allows the words to change depending on the value of $z$. I’m asking if the words can vary based on $z$ or if they’re “fixed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:18


















  • $begingroup$
    Are $w_1$ and $w_2$ fixed words? The description of $L’$ seems to use any string, presumably in $Sigma^*$.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean by "fixed words"?
    $endgroup$
    – Avishai Yaniv
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are we to solve the problem for some given two words $w_1$ and $w_2$? Because the definition of $L’$ allows the words to change depending on the value of $z$. I’m asking if the words can vary based on $z$ or if they’re “fixed”.
    $endgroup$
    – Joey Kilpatrick
    Nov 30 '18 at 20:18
















$begingroup$
Are $w_1$ and $w_2$ fixed words? The description of $L’$ seems to use any string, presumably in $Sigma^*$.
$endgroup$
– Joey Kilpatrick
Nov 30 '18 at 18:02




$begingroup$
Are $w_1$ and $w_2$ fixed words? The description of $L’$ seems to use any string, presumably in $Sigma^*$.
$endgroup$
– Joey Kilpatrick
Nov 30 '18 at 18:02












$begingroup$
what do you mean by "fixed words"?
$endgroup$
– Avishai Yaniv
Nov 30 '18 at 20:13




$begingroup$
what do you mean by "fixed words"?
$endgroup$
– Avishai Yaniv
Nov 30 '18 at 20:13












$begingroup$
Are we to solve the problem for some given two words $w_1$ and $w_2$? Because the definition of $L’$ allows the words to change depending on the value of $z$. I’m asking if the words can vary based on $z$ or if they’re “fixed”.
$endgroup$
– Joey Kilpatrick
Nov 30 '18 at 20:18




$begingroup$
Are we to solve the problem for some given two words $w_1$ and $w_2$? Because the definition of $L’$ allows the words to change depending on the value of $z$. I’m asking if the words can vary based on $z$ or if they’re “fixed”.
$endgroup$
– Joey Kilpatrick
Nov 30 '18 at 20:18










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The automaton $A$ for $L'$ can work like this:




  1. Without reading any input, it guesses a $w_1$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_1$ is remembered.


  2. $A$ guesses a $w_2$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is again done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_2$ is remembered.

  3. Now $A$ reads the input $z$ and simulates two cmputations of $N$ in parallel: that of $w_1z$ and that of $w_2z$. If the former ends in some final state while the latter does not, $A$ accepts.


For fixed $w_1$ and $w_2$ you could do the same without the guessing. However, it would be more efficient to do the simulations of $N$ once on paper and let $A$ start from there directly.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020373%2fgiven-a-regular-language-l-prove-or-disprove-l-is-regular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    The automaton $A$ for $L'$ can work like this:




    1. Without reading any input, it guesses a $w_1$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_1$ is remembered.


    2. $A$ guesses a $w_2$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is again done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_2$ is remembered.

    3. Now $A$ reads the input $z$ and simulates two cmputations of $N$ in parallel: that of $w_1z$ and that of $w_2z$. If the former ends in some final state while the latter does not, $A$ accepts.


    For fixed $w_1$ and $w_2$ you could do the same without the guessing. However, it would be more efficient to do the simulations of $N$ once on paper and let $A$ start from there directly.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The automaton $A$ for $L'$ can work like this:




      1. Without reading any input, it guesses a $w_1$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_1$ is remembered.


      2. $A$ guesses a $w_2$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is again done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_2$ is remembered.

      3. Now $A$ reads the input $z$ and simulates two cmputations of $N$ in parallel: that of $w_1z$ and that of $w_2z$. If the former ends in some final state while the latter does not, $A$ accepts.


      For fixed $w_1$ and $w_2$ you could do the same without the guessing. However, it would be more efficient to do the simulations of $N$ once on paper and let $A$ start from there directly.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The automaton $A$ for $L'$ can work like this:




        1. Without reading any input, it guesses a $w_1$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_1$ is remembered.


        2. $A$ guesses a $w_2$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is again done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_2$ is remembered.

        3. Now $A$ reads the input $z$ and simulates two cmputations of $N$ in parallel: that of $w_1z$ and that of $w_2z$. If the former ends in some final state while the latter does not, $A$ accepts.


        For fixed $w_1$ and $w_2$ you could do the same without the guessing. However, it would be more efficient to do the simulations of $N$ once on paper and let $A$ start from there directly.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The automaton $A$ for $L'$ can work like this:




        1. Without reading any input, it guesses a $w_1$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_1$ is remembered.


        2. $A$ guesses a $w_2$ and simulates $N$ on this string. The guessing is again done letter by letter with $lambda$-transitions. The states in which $N$ ends after reading $w_2$ is remembered.

        3. Now $A$ reads the input $z$ and simulates two cmputations of $N$ in parallel: that of $w_1z$ and that of $w_2z$. If the former ends in some final state while the latter does not, $A$ accepts.


        For fixed $w_1$ and $w_2$ you could do the same without the guessing. However, it would be more efficient to do the simulations of $N$ once on paper and let $A$ start from there directly.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 '18 at 18:00









        Peter LeupoldPeter Leupold

        56526




        56526






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020373%2fgiven-a-regular-language-l-prove-or-disprove-l-is-regular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?