Why does $underline{cd}:Gleq silp:Glequnderline{cd}+1$ hold?












0














Text Read:



I read the about text in a book but don't understand how or why this inequality is "straightforward" can anybody explain this to me?










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    Text Read:



    I read the about text in a book but don't understand how or why this inequality is "straightforward" can anybody explain this to me?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      Text Read:



      I read the about text in a book but don't understand how or why this inequality is "straightforward" can anybody explain this to me?










      share|cite|improve this question















      Text Read:



      I read the about text in a book but don't understand how or why this inequality is "straightforward" can anybody explain this to me?







      homology-cohomology group-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 16:51







      Rhoswyn

















      asked Nov 22 '18 at 16:40









      RhoswynRhoswyn

      381210




      381210






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          First, you can show that in the definition of $underline{cd}$, you can use ${mathbb Z}G$-projective modules in the second slot instead of ${mathbb Z}G$-free modules.



          The first inequality then follows from the fact that the second sup is taken over all ${mathbb Z}G$ modules rather than just ${mathbb Z}$-free modules.



          For the second inequality, take an arbitrary ${mathbb Z}G$ module $A$ and a free ${mathbb Z}G$ module $F$ mapping onto it, with kernel $K$:



          $$0 to K to F to A to 0$$



          Since $F$ is ${mathbb Z}$-free and $K$ is a subgroup of $F$ as an abelian group, it's also ${mathbb Z}$-free. The inequality then follows by looking at the long exact sequence for Ext.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
            – Rhoswyn
            Nov 22 '18 at 18:01











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009333%2fwhy-does-underlinecd-g-leq-silp-g-leq-underlinecd1-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          First, you can show that in the definition of $underline{cd}$, you can use ${mathbb Z}G$-projective modules in the second slot instead of ${mathbb Z}G$-free modules.



          The first inequality then follows from the fact that the second sup is taken over all ${mathbb Z}G$ modules rather than just ${mathbb Z}$-free modules.



          For the second inequality, take an arbitrary ${mathbb Z}G$ module $A$ and a free ${mathbb Z}G$ module $F$ mapping onto it, with kernel $K$:



          $$0 to K to F to A to 0$$



          Since $F$ is ${mathbb Z}$-free and $K$ is a subgroup of $F$ as an abelian group, it's also ${mathbb Z}$-free. The inequality then follows by looking at the long exact sequence for Ext.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
            – Rhoswyn
            Nov 22 '18 at 18:01
















          0














          First, you can show that in the definition of $underline{cd}$, you can use ${mathbb Z}G$-projective modules in the second slot instead of ${mathbb Z}G$-free modules.



          The first inequality then follows from the fact that the second sup is taken over all ${mathbb Z}G$ modules rather than just ${mathbb Z}$-free modules.



          For the second inequality, take an arbitrary ${mathbb Z}G$ module $A$ and a free ${mathbb Z}G$ module $F$ mapping onto it, with kernel $K$:



          $$0 to K to F to A to 0$$



          Since $F$ is ${mathbb Z}$-free and $K$ is a subgroup of $F$ as an abelian group, it's also ${mathbb Z}$-free. The inequality then follows by looking at the long exact sequence for Ext.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
            – Rhoswyn
            Nov 22 '18 at 18:01














          0












          0








          0






          First, you can show that in the definition of $underline{cd}$, you can use ${mathbb Z}G$-projective modules in the second slot instead of ${mathbb Z}G$-free modules.



          The first inequality then follows from the fact that the second sup is taken over all ${mathbb Z}G$ modules rather than just ${mathbb Z}$-free modules.



          For the second inequality, take an arbitrary ${mathbb Z}G$ module $A$ and a free ${mathbb Z}G$ module $F$ mapping onto it, with kernel $K$:



          $$0 to K to F to A to 0$$



          Since $F$ is ${mathbb Z}$-free and $K$ is a subgroup of $F$ as an abelian group, it's also ${mathbb Z}$-free. The inequality then follows by looking at the long exact sequence for Ext.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          First, you can show that in the definition of $underline{cd}$, you can use ${mathbb Z}G$-projective modules in the second slot instead of ${mathbb Z}G$-free modules.



          The first inequality then follows from the fact that the second sup is taken over all ${mathbb Z}G$ modules rather than just ${mathbb Z}$-free modules.



          For the second inequality, take an arbitrary ${mathbb Z}G$ module $A$ and a free ${mathbb Z}G$ module $F$ mapping onto it, with kernel $K$:



          $$0 to K to F to A to 0$$



          Since $F$ is ${mathbb Z}$-free and $K$ is a subgroup of $F$ as an abelian group, it's also ${mathbb Z}$-free. The inequality then follows by looking at the long exact sequence for Ext.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 '18 at 17:52









          Bruce IkenagaBruce Ikenaga

          1962




          1962












          • Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
            – Rhoswyn
            Nov 22 '18 at 18:01


















          • Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
            – Rhoswyn
            Nov 22 '18 at 18:01
















          Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
          – Rhoswyn
          Nov 22 '18 at 18:01




          Ahh okay, I was on the right lines for part of it. Can you expand on your last statement though? I'm not sure I follow it.
          – Rhoswyn
          Nov 22 '18 at 18:01


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009333%2fwhy-does-underlinecd-g-leq-silp-g-leq-underlinecd1-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?