Question about a statement concerning normal subgroups












0














I'm asking the following: it is true that if $K$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ and $Kleq Hleq G$ then $K$ is normal in $H$? I tried to prove it but I failed to do so, so I'm starting to suspect that it is not true. Can you provide me a proof or a counterexample of this statement or hint about its proof?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I'm asking the following: it is true that if $K$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ and $Kleq Hleq G$ then $K$ is normal in $H$? I tried to prove it but I failed to do so, so I'm starting to suspect that it is not true. Can you provide me a proof or a counterexample of this statement or hint about its proof?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I'm asking the following: it is true that if $K$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ and $Kleq Hleq G$ then $K$ is normal in $H$? I tried to prove it but I failed to do so, so I'm starting to suspect that it is not true. Can you provide me a proof or a counterexample of this statement or hint about its proof?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I'm asking the following: it is true that if $K$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ and $Kleq Hleq G$ then $K$ is normal in $H$? I tried to prove it but I failed to do so, so I'm starting to suspect that it is not true. Can you provide me a proof or a counterexample of this statement or hint about its proof?







      abstract-algebra group-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 '18 at 17:30









      user573497user573497

      16619




      16619






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Hint:



          You know that



          $$;Klhd Gimplies g^{-1}kgin K;,;;text{for all elements};;kin K,,,,gin G;$$



          Now, $;Hsubset G; $, so...






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            1














            It is trivially true because $Ktrianglelefteq G$ is equivalent to $gKg^{-1}=K,,forall gin G$. This condition is met $forall gin H$, as $Hsubset G$. Note we do not need normality of $H$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
              – user573497
              Nov 22 '18 at 20:02











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009387%2fquestion-about-a-statement-concerning-normal-subgroups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Hint:



            You know that



            $$;Klhd Gimplies g^{-1}kgin K;,;;text{for all elements};;kin K,,,,gin G;$$



            Now, $;Hsubset G; $, so...






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              Hint:



              You know that



              $$;Klhd Gimplies g^{-1}kgin K;,;;text{for all elements};;kin K,,,,gin G;$$



              Now, $;Hsubset G; $, so...






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                Hint:



                You know that



                $$;Klhd Gimplies g^{-1}kgin K;,;;text{for all elements};;kin K,,,,gin G;$$



                Now, $;Hsubset G; $, so...






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Hint:



                You know that



                $$;Klhd Gimplies g^{-1}kgin K;,;;text{for all elements};;kin K,,,,gin G;$$



                Now, $;Hsubset G; $, so...







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 22 '18 at 17:39









                DonAntonioDonAntonio

                177k1492225




                177k1492225























                    1














                    It is trivially true because $Ktrianglelefteq G$ is equivalent to $gKg^{-1}=K,,forall gin G$. This condition is met $forall gin H$, as $Hsubset G$. Note we do not need normality of $H$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer

















                    • 1




                      Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
                      – user573497
                      Nov 22 '18 at 20:02
















                    1














                    It is trivially true because $Ktrianglelefteq G$ is equivalent to $gKg^{-1}=K,,forall gin G$. This condition is met $forall gin H$, as $Hsubset G$. Note we do not need normality of $H$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer

















                    • 1




                      Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
                      – user573497
                      Nov 22 '18 at 20:02














                    1












                    1








                    1






                    It is trivially true because $Ktrianglelefteq G$ is equivalent to $gKg^{-1}=K,,forall gin G$. This condition is met $forall gin H$, as $Hsubset G$. Note we do not need normality of $H$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    It is trivially true because $Ktrianglelefteq G$ is equivalent to $gKg^{-1}=K,,forall gin G$. This condition is met $forall gin H$, as $Hsubset G$. Note we do not need normality of $H$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 22 '18 at 17:44









                    Chris CusterChris Custer

                    10.9k3824




                    10.9k3824








                    • 1




                      Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
                      – user573497
                      Nov 22 '18 at 20:02














                    • 1




                      Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
                      – user573497
                      Nov 22 '18 at 20:02








                    1




                    1




                    Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
                    – user573497
                    Nov 22 '18 at 20:02




                    Oh, now I get it! Since $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ and $gkg^(-1)$ belongs to $K$ for all $g$ in $G$ it also holds for all $h$ in $H$.
                    – user573497
                    Nov 22 '18 at 20:02


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009387%2fquestion-about-a-statement-concerning-normal-subgroups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?