How did Einstein integrate $frac{partial tau}{partial x'}+frac{v}{c^2-v^2}frac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$?












5















In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation



$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$



where





  • $tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)

  • $x'=x-vt$


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)


  • $c$ is a constant


  • $x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables


and he derives that



$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$



where $a=a(v)$




Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.



Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It seems like this question could be of help for you.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:18








  • 6




    The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:26












  • @NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:28


















5















In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation



$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$



where





  • $tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)

  • $x'=x-vt$


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)


  • $c$ is a constant


  • $x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables


and he derives that



$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$



where $a=a(v)$




Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.



Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It seems like this question could be of help for you.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:18








  • 6




    The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:26












  • @NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:28
















5












5








5


1






In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation



$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$



where





  • $tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)

  • $x'=x-vt$


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)


  • $c$ is a constant


  • $x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables


and he derives that



$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$



where $a=a(v)$




Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.



Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?










share|cite|improve this question
















In his paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", Einstein writes the equation



$$dfrac{partial tau}{partial x'}+dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}dfrac{partial tau}{partial t}=0$$



where





  • $tau=tau(x',y,z,t)$ is a linear function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt$)

  • $x'=x-vt$


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial y}=0$ (i.e. $B=0$)


  • $dfrac{partial tau}{partial z}=0$ (i.e. $C=0$)


  • $c$ is a constant


  • $x,x',y,z,t,v$ are variables


and he derives that



$$tau=aleft(t-dfrac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)$$



where $a=a(v)$




Could someone please walk me through step-by-step how he derived this? I am not very familiar with integrals invovling partial derivatives, so I would be appreciative if any answers are quite explicit.



Additionally, if I modified the question to say that $tau$ was an affine function (i.e. $tau=Ax'+By+Cz+Dt+E$), would it make any difference to the result (I suspect it wouldn't)?







linear-algebra pde linear-transformations partial-derivative






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 30 '18 at 17:13









TheSimpliFire

12.7k62260




12.7k62260










asked Dec 30 '18 at 15:55









Rational FunctionRational Function

719




719












  • It seems like this question could be of help for you.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:18








  • 6




    The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:26












  • @NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:28




















  • It seems like this question could be of help for you.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:18








  • 6




    The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:26












  • @NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
    – mrtaurho
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:28


















It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18






It seems like this question could be of help for you.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:18






6




6




The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26






The question is strictly about the derivation of the differential equation's solution. Hadn't the OP mentioned physics at all, it would still be a perfectly fine question for this site.
– Niki Di Giano
Dec 30 '18 at 16:26














@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28






@NikiDiGiano I guess I overreacted. I retracted my close vote but the question I found on physics stackexchange could be useful nevertheless.
– mrtaurho
Dec 30 '18 at 16:28












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














From the definitions given:
$$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
Also:
$$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
From the differential equation we get:
$$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$

Now using the definition given for $tau$:
$$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
$$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:39












  • I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










  • Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:52



















7














There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
$$
frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$

where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
$$
begin{cases}xi= x'\
u=t-k x'
end{cases}
qquad
text{or equivalently,}qquad
begin{cases}x'=xi\
t=u+kxi.
end{cases}
$$

This gives
$$
frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
$$

meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
$$
tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
$$

for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:18






  • 1




    Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:35



















0














Making the change of variables



$$
x'=x- vt\
t'=alpha t
$$



we have



$$
(v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
$$



so choosing



$$
alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
$$



we get



$$
frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056953%2fhow-did-einstein-integrate-frac-partial-tau-partial-x-fracvc2-v2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    From the definitions given:
    $$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
    Also:
    $$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
    From the differential equation we get:
    $$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
    implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$

    Now using the definition given for $tau$:
    $$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
    So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
    $$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
    The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:39












    • I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










    • Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
















    8














    From the definitions given:
    $$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
    Also:
    $$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
    From the differential equation we get:
    $$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
    implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$

    Now using the definition given for $tau$:
    $$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
    So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
    $$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
    The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:39












    • I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










    • Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:52














    8












    8








    8






    From the definitions given:
    $$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
    Also:
    $$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
    From the differential equation we get:
    $$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
    implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$

    Now using the definition given for $tau$:
    $$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
    So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
    $$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
    The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    From the definitions given:
    $$partial_{x'}tau = A, quad partial_t tau = D$$
    Also:
    $$partial_{y}tau = B = 0, quad partial_z tau = C = 0$$
    From the differential equation we get:
    $$A + frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D = 0 \
    implies A = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}D$$

    Now using the definition given for $tau$:
    $$tau = - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}Dx' + Dt = Dbigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg)$$
    So if you define $D=a$ you get the final expression for $tau$. As you have noticed, requiring $tau$ to be affine doesn't change the results at all - your $tau$ would be:
    $$ tau = abigg(t - frac{v}{c^2 - v^2}x'bigg) + E$$
    The reason $a=a(v)$ is because $D$, who is actually $a$ in disguise, does not depend on $x', y, z, t$ but is assumed to depend on $v$. Otherwise, the relation wouldn't be linear. Without further information, $a$ is a function of potentially anything except those four variables.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 30 '18 at 16:44

























    answered Dec 30 '18 at 16:21









    Niki Di GianoNiki Di Giano

    941211




    941211












    • Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:39












    • I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










    • Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:52


















    • Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:39












    • I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:45










    • Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 16:52
















    Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:39






    Thank you for your help so far. I am just thinking through your answer at the moment, trying to get my head round it. I am just trying to see how you got from $A=-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}D$ to $tau=aleft(t-frac{v}{c^2-v^2}x'right)+E$. Could you perhaps extend your answer a little to show every step?
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:39














    I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45




    I have added the missing intermediate step. It's just a matter of plugging the results in the original expression.
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:45












    Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:52




    Thank you very much, that makes perfect sense - brilliant answer!
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 16:52











    7














    There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
    $$
    begin{cases}xi= x'\
    u=t-k x'
    end{cases}
    qquad
    text{or equivalently,}qquad
    begin{cases}x'=xi\
    t=u+kxi.
    end{cases}
    $$

    This gives
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
    $$
    tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
    $$

    for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:18






    • 1




      Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:35
















    7














    There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
    $$
    begin{cases}xi= x'\
    u=t-k x'
    end{cases}
    qquad
    text{or equivalently,}qquad
    begin{cases}x'=xi\
    t=u+kxi.
    end{cases}
    $$

    This gives
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
    $$
    tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
    $$

    for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:18






    • 1




      Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:35














    7












    7








    7






    There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
    $$
    begin{cases}xi= x'\
    u=t-k x'
    end{cases}
    qquad
    text{or equivalently,}qquad
    begin{cases}x'=xi\
    t=u+kxi.
    end{cases}
    $$

    This gives
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
    $$
    tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
    $$

    for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).






    share|cite|improve this answer












    There is really no need to assume that $tau$ is linear or affine to derive the general form of $tau$. Write the equation as
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    where $k={v}/({c^2-v^2})$. Change coordinates from $(x',t)$ to $(xi,u)$ by
    $$
    begin{cases}xi= x'\
    u=t-k x'
    end{cases}
    qquad
    text{or equivalently,}qquad
    begin{cases}x'=xi\
    t=u+kxi.
    end{cases}
    $$

    This gives
    $$
    frac{partialtau}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'} frac{partial x'}{partialxi}+ frac{partialtau}{partial t}frac{partial t}{partialxi} = frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+kfrac{partialtau}{partial t} = 0 ,
    $$

    meaning that in the new coordinates, $tau$ is a function of only $u$. Hence
    $$
    tau=a(u)=a(t-k x'),
    $$

    for some function $a$. At this point, you can use the assumption that $tau$ is linear (or affine) to deduce that $a$ is linear (or affine).







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 30 '18 at 17:01









    timurtimur

    11.8k2043




    11.8k2043








    • 1




      Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:18






    • 1




      Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:35














    • 1




      Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
      – Rational Function
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:18






    • 1




      Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
      – Niki Di Giano
      Dec 30 '18 at 17:35








    1




    1




    Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:18




    Thank you, this is another interesting approach. I especially like that it finds a general form before invoking the linearity of $tau$, because it would allow us to proceed in a different way if for some reason we decided that the universe wasn't homogeneous (which forces $tau$ to be linear/affine). If only I could tick multiple answers!
    – Rational Function
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:18




    1




    1




    Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:35




    Indeed this answer is much more elegant than mine in my opinion. Props!
    – Niki Di Giano
    Dec 30 '18 at 17:35











    0














    Making the change of variables



    $$
    x'=x- vt\
    t'=alpha t
    $$



    we have



    $$
    (v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
    $$



    so choosing



    $$
    alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
    $$



    we get



    $$
    frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      Making the change of variables



      $$
      x'=x- vt\
      t'=alpha t
      $$



      we have



      $$
      (v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
      $$



      so choosing



      $$
      alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
      $$



      we get



      $$
      frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        Making the change of variables



        $$
        x'=x- vt\
        t'=alpha t
        $$



        we have



        $$
        (v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
        $$



        so choosing



        $$
        alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
        $$



        we get



        $$
        frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Making the change of variables



        $$
        x'=x- vt\
        t'=alpha t
        $$



        we have



        $$
        (v^2+alpha(c^2-v^2))frac{partialtau}{partial x'}+vfrac{partial tau}{partial t'}=0
        $$



        so choosing



        $$
        alpha = frac{v^2}{v^2-c^2}
        $$



        we get



        $$
        frac{partial tau}{partial t'} = 0Rightarrow tau(x',t') = f(x') = f(x-v t)
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 30 '18 at 19:17









        CesareoCesareo

        8,3413516




        8,3413516






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056953%2fhow-did-einstein-integrate-frac-partial-tau-partial-x-fracvc2-v2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?