Ubuntu Server 18.04.1 Netplan and UFW











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Ok, so I want to make a router using Ubuntu Server 18.04 ( already have the hardware and it all works, I have IPfire currently on it). I’ve looked at all the router distros and they seem rather limited in scope.



Sources



The article:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/04/the-ars-guide-to-building-a-linux-router-from-scratch/



The firewall guide:
https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/firewall.html



Ubuntu Server now uses netplan. I've looked at the documentation and it’s fairly clear I am not exactly skilled at this usage of the OS. I was hoping maybe someone could help me “translate” the way this article does it (the way I am more familiar) into the more modern implementation.



How would I make a netplan version of this?



# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).

# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The WAN interface, marked Lan1 on the case
auto p4p1
iface p4p1 inet dhcp

# The LAN interface, marked Lan2 on the case
auto p1p1
iface p1p1 inet static
address 192.168.99.1
netmask 255.255.255.0


Also, I would prefer to use UFW over directly using iptables, as most of the rules in UFW are also what most of the article states.
One key difference from the article is he has this for the NAT section.



From article



*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# p4p1 is WAN interface, #p1p1 is LAN interface
-A POSTROUTING -o p4p1 -j MASQUERADE

COMMIT


From firewall guide



# nat Table rules
*nat
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# Forward traffic from eth1 through eth0.
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE

# don’t delete the ‘COMMIT’ line or these nat table rules won’t be processed
COMMIT


But, after I figure out those two sections. I should be able to handle the rest. Any help would be great!










share|improve this question






















  • I solved it. With netplan, there isn't any need to set up the WAN and LAN inputs. This is pretty much taken care of during installation. The firewall rules are pretty much minimal and worked.
    – soundconjurer
    Aug 20 at 13:39










  • I had some trouble with netplan and bridged interfaces with dnsmasq -dnsmasq wouldn't come up on time. Its a known issue, and not fixed yet. I seem to recall it worked ok with 2 ports only. I'd strongly suggest dumping netplan. I went with firewalld so I'm not much help with your actual question but
    – Journeyman Geek
    Nov 18 at 13:47

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Ok, so I want to make a router using Ubuntu Server 18.04 ( already have the hardware and it all works, I have IPfire currently on it). I’ve looked at all the router distros and they seem rather limited in scope.



Sources



The article:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/04/the-ars-guide-to-building-a-linux-router-from-scratch/



The firewall guide:
https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/firewall.html



Ubuntu Server now uses netplan. I've looked at the documentation and it’s fairly clear I am not exactly skilled at this usage of the OS. I was hoping maybe someone could help me “translate” the way this article does it (the way I am more familiar) into the more modern implementation.



How would I make a netplan version of this?



# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).

# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The WAN interface, marked Lan1 on the case
auto p4p1
iface p4p1 inet dhcp

# The LAN interface, marked Lan2 on the case
auto p1p1
iface p1p1 inet static
address 192.168.99.1
netmask 255.255.255.0


Also, I would prefer to use UFW over directly using iptables, as most of the rules in UFW are also what most of the article states.
One key difference from the article is he has this for the NAT section.



From article



*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# p4p1 is WAN interface, #p1p1 is LAN interface
-A POSTROUTING -o p4p1 -j MASQUERADE

COMMIT


From firewall guide



# nat Table rules
*nat
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# Forward traffic from eth1 through eth0.
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE

# don’t delete the ‘COMMIT’ line or these nat table rules won’t be processed
COMMIT


But, after I figure out those two sections. I should be able to handle the rest. Any help would be great!










share|improve this question






















  • I solved it. With netplan, there isn't any need to set up the WAN and LAN inputs. This is pretty much taken care of during installation. The firewall rules are pretty much minimal and worked.
    – soundconjurer
    Aug 20 at 13:39










  • I had some trouble with netplan and bridged interfaces with dnsmasq -dnsmasq wouldn't come up on time. Its a known issue, and not fixed yet. I seem to recall it worked ok with 2 ports only. I'd strongly suggest dumping netplan. I went with firewalld so I'm not much help with your actual question but
    – Journeyman Geek
    Nov 18 at 13:47















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Ok, so I want to make a router using Ubuntu Server 18.04 ( already have the hardware and it all works, I have IPfire currently on it). I’ve looked at all the router distros and they seem rather limited in scope.



Sources



The article:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/04/the-ars-guide-to-building-a-linux-router-from-scratch/



The firewall guide:
https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/firewall.html



Ubuntu Server now uses netplan. I've looked at the documentation and it’s fairly clear I am not exactly skilled at this usage of the OS. I was hoping maybe someone could help me “translate” the way this article does it (the way I am more familiar) into the more modern implementation.



How would I make a netplan version of this?



# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).

# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The WAN interface, marked Lan1 on the case
auto p4p1
iface p4p1 inet dhcp

# The LAN interface, marked Lan2 on the case
auto p1p1
iface p1p1 inet static
address 192.168.99.1
netmask 255.255.255.0


Also, I would prefer to use UFW over directly using iptables, as most of the rules in UFW are also what most of the article states.
One key difference from the article is he has this for the NAT section.



From article



*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# p4p1 is WAN interface, #p1p1 is LAN interface
-A POSTROUTING -o p4p1 -j MASQUERADE

COMMIT


From firewall guide



# nat Table rules
*nat
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# Forward traffic from eth1 through eth0.
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE

# don’t delete the ‘COMMIT’ line or these nat table rules won’t be processed
COMMIT


But, after I figure out those two sections. I should be able to handle the rest. Any help would be great!










share|improve this question













Ok, so I want to make a router using Ubuntu Server 18.04 ( already have the hardware and it all works, I have IPfire currently on it). I’ve looked at all the router distros and they seem rather limited in scope.



Sources



The article:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/04/the-ars-guide-to-building-a-linux-router-from-scratch/



The firewall guide:
https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/firewall.html



Ubuntu Server now uses netplan. I've looked at the documentation and it’s fairly clear I am not exactly skilled at this usage of the OS. I was hoping maybe someone could help me “translate” the way this article does it (the way I am more familiar) into the more modern implementation.



How would I make a netplan version of this?



# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).

# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The WAN interface, marked Lan1 on the case
auto p4p1
iface p4p1 inet dhcp

# The LAN interface, marked Lan2 on the case
auto p1p1
iface p1p1 inet static
address 192.168.99.1
netmask 255.255.255.0


Also, I would prefer to use UFW over directly using iptables, as most of the rules in UFW are also what most of the article states.
One key difference from the article is he has this for the NAT section.



From article



*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# p4p1 is WAN interface, #p1p1 is LAN interface
-A POSTROUTING -o p4p1 -j MASQUERADE

COMMIT


From firewall guide



# nat Table rules
*nat
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]

# Forward traffic from eth1 through eth0.
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE

# don’t delete the ‘COMMIT’ line or these nat table rules won’t be processed
COMMIT


But, after I figure out those two sections. I should be able to handle the rest. Any help would be great!







networking server iptables firewall ufw






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 1 at 1:26









soundconjurer

65




65












  • I solved it. With netplan, there isn't any need to set up the WAN and LAN inputs. This is pretty much taken care of during installation. The firewall rules are pretty much minimal and worked.
    – soundconjurer
    Aug 20 at 13:39










  • I had some trouble with netplan and bridged interfaces with dnsmasq -dnsmasq wouldn't come up on time. Its a known issue, and not fixed yet. I seem to recall it worked ok with 2 ports only. I'd strongly suggest dumping netplan. I went with firewalld so I'm not much help with your actual question but
    – Journeyman Geek
    Nov 18 at 13:47




















  • I solved it. With netplan, there isn't any need to set up the WAN and LAN inputs. This is pretty much taken care of during installation. The firewall rules are pretty much minimal and worked.
    – soundconjurer
    Aug 20 at 13:39










  • I had some trouble with netplan and bridged interfaces with dnsmasq -dnsmasq wouldn't come up on time. Its a known issue, and not fixed yet. I seem to recall it worked ok with 2 ports only. I'd strongly suggest dumping netplan. I went with firewalld so I'm not much help with your actual question but
    – Journeyman Geek
    Nov 18 at 13:47


















I solved it. With netplan, there isn't any need to set up the WAN and LAN inputs. This is pretty much taken care of during installation. The firewall rules are pretty much minimal and worked.
– soundconjurer
Aug 20 at 13:39




I solved it. With netplan, there isn't any need to set up the WAN and LAN inputs. This is pretty much taken care of during installation. The firewall rules are pretty much minimal and worked.
– soundconjurer
Aug 20 at 13:39












I had some trouble with netplan and bridged interfaces with dnsmasq -dnsmasq wouldn't come up on time. Its a known issue, and not fixed yet. I seem to recall it worked ok with 2 ports only. I'd strongly suggest dumping netplan. I went with firewalld so I'm not much help with your actual question but
– Journeyman Geek
Nov 18 at 13:47






I had some trouble with netplan and bridged interfaces with dnsmasq -dnsmasq wouldn't come up on time. Its a known issue, and not fixed yet. I seem to recall it worked ok with 2 ports only. I'd strongly suggest dumping netplan. I went with firewalld so I'm not much help with your actual question but
– Journeyman Geek
Nov 18 at 13:47












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













As per my comments - I wouldn't use netplan here. Its perfectly fine until you try bridging and I couldn't get it to work reliably. IMO its not ready. As of 18.04 switching back to the classic ifup network management is the smart thing to do.



I don't use ufw in my own build but it can't be that hard to translate them (famous last words).



firewalld uses remarkably similar commands for these and they should translate directly to UFW. The commands are literally "classic" firewall commands. They're untested on ufw, and might need some tuning from someone who uses ufw.



I don't really like how the ufw notes gives a range of IPs over an interface (though you might be forced to), but it should translate to something like this. enp1s0 is my 'external' interface, and br0 is basically all my other interfaces bridged together



For reference, my firewalld setup looks like this:



sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -o  enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
sudo firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent


The second last command is critical



And that should translate to something like this.



#masquerade traffic coming out from enp1s0 
-A POSTROUTING 0 -o enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
# Forward and accept any traffic from br0 to enp1s0
-A FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
#accept traffic on existing connections
-A FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT


The default netplan configuration, as I recall gives all the outputs automatic IP addresses.



This is going to be a problem eventually when you run a DHCP server. You want a static IP address on that interface.



If you must, a minimal netplan config looks like this - I think it worked before I tried to bridge things.




  • enp1s0 is my external interface

  • enp1s0 is internal.


I'm not entirely sure why enp2s0 has dhcp enabled - you might be able to remove that stanza. Optional is useful since you might not always have something plugged into the port



network:
ethernets:
enp1s0:
addresses:
dhcp4: true
enp2s0:
addresses:
- 192.168.2.1/24
dhcp4: true
optional: true
version: 2





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1061276%2fubuntu-server-18-04-1-netplan-and-ufw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    As per my comments - I wouldn't use netplan here. Its perfectly fine until you try bridging and I couldn't get it to work reliably. IMO its not ready. As of 18.04 switching back to the classic ifup network management is the smart thing to do.



    I don't use ufw in my own build but it can't be that hard to translate them (famous last words).



    firewalld uses remarkably similar commands for these and they should translate directly to UFW. The commands are literally "classic" firewall commands. They're untested on ufw, and might need some tuning from someone who uses ufw.



    I don't really like how the ufw notes gives a range of IPs over an interface (though you might be forced to), but it should translate to something like this. enp1s0 is my 'external' interface, and br0 is basically all my other interfaces bridged together



    For reference, my firewalld setup looks like this:



    sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -o  enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
    sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
    sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
    sudo firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent


    The second last command is critical



    And that should translate to something like this.



    #masquerade traffic coming out from enp1s0 
    -A POSTROUTING 0 -o enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
    # Forward and accept any traffic from br0 to enp1s0
    -A FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
    #accept traffic on existing connections
    -A FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT


    The default netplan configuration, as I recall gives all the outputs automatic IP addresses.



    This is going to be a problem eventually when you run a DHCP server. You want a static IP address on that interface.



    If you must, a minimal netplan config looks like this - I think it worked before I tried to bridge things.




    • enp1s0 is my external interface

    • enp1s0 is internal.


    I'm not entirely sure why enp2s0 has dhcp enabled - you might be able to remove that stanza. Optional is useful since you might not always have something plugged into the port



    network:
    ethernets:
    enp1s0:
    addresses:
    dhcp4: true
    enp2s0:
    addresses:
    - 192.168.2.1/24
    dhcp4: true
    optional: true
    version: 2





    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      As per my comments - I wouldn't use netplan here. Its perfectly fine until you try bridging and I couldn't get it to work reliably. IMO its not ready. As of 18.04 switching back to the classic ifup network management is the smart thing to do.



      I don't use ufw in my own build but it can't be that hard to translate them (famous last words).



      firewalld uses remarkably similar commands for these and they should translate directly to UFW. The commands are literally "classic" firewall commands. They're untested on ufw, and might need some tuning from someone who uses ufw.



      I don't really like how the ufw notes gives a range of IPs over an interface (though you might be forced to), but it should translate to something like this. enp1s0 is my 'external' interface, and br0 is basically all my other interfaces bridged together



      For reference, my firewalld setup looks like this:



      sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -o  enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
      sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
      sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
      sudo firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent


      The second last command is critical



      And that should translate to something like this.



      #masquerade traffic coming out from enp1s0 
      -A POSTROUTING 0 -o enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
      # Forward and accept any traffic from br0 to enp1s0
      -A FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
      #accept traffic on existing connections
      -A FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT


      The default netplan configuration, as I recall gives all the outputs automatic IP addresses.



      This is going to be a problem eventually when you run a DHCP server. You want a static IP address on that interface.



      If you must, a minimal netplan config looks like this - I think it worked before I tried to bridge things.




      • enp1s0 is my external interface

      • enp1s0 is internal.


      I'm not entirely sure why enp2s0 has dhcp enabled - you might be able to remove that stanza. Optional is useful since you might not always have something plugged into the port



      network:
      ethernets:
      enp1s0:
      addresses:
      dhcp4: true
      enp2s0:
      addresses:
      - 192.168.2.1/24
      dhcp4: true
      optional: true
      version: 2





      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        As per my comments - I wouldn't use netplan here. Its perfectly fine until you try bridging and I couldn't get it to work reliably. IMO its not ready. As of 18.04 switching back to the classic ifup network management is the smart thing to do.



        I don't use ufw in my own build but it can't be that hard to translate them (famous last words).



        firewalld uses remarkably similar commands for these and they should translate directly to UFW. The commands are literally "classic" firewall commands. They're untested on ufw, and might need some tuning from someone who uses ufw.



        I don't really like how the ufw notes gives a range of IPs over an interface (though you might be forced to), but it should translate to something like this. enp1s0 is my 'external' interface, and br0 is basically all my other interfaces bridged together



        For reference, my firewalld setup looks like this:



        sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -o  enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
        sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
        sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
        sudo firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent


        The second last command is critical



        And that should translate to something like this.



        #masquerade traffic coming out from enp1s0 
        -A POSTROUTING 0 -o enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
        # Forward and accept any traffic from br0 to enp1s0
        -A FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
        #accept traffic on existing connections
        -A FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT


        The default netplan configuration, as I recall gives all the outputs automatic IP addresses.



        This is going to be a problem eventually when you run a DHCP server. You want a static IP address on that interface.



        If you must, a minimal netplan config looks like this - I think it worked before I tried to bridge things.




        • enp1s0 is my external interface

        • enp1s0 is internal.


        I'm not entirely sure why enp2s0 has dhcp enabled - you might be able to remove that stanza. Optional is useful since you might not always have something plugged into the port



        network:
        ethernets:
        enp1s0:
        addresses:
        dhcp4: true
        enp2s0:
        addresses:
        - 192.168.2.1/24
        dhcp4: true
        optional: true
        version: 2





        share|improve this answer














        As per my comments - I wouldn't use netplan here. Its perfectly fine until you try bridging and I couldn't get it to work reliably. IMO its not ready. As of 18.04 switching back to the classic ifup network management is the smart thing to do.



        I don't use ufw in my own build but it can't be that hard to translate them (famous last words).



        firewalld uses remarkably similar commands for these and they should translate directly to UFW. The commands are literally "classic" firewall commands. They're untested on ufw, and might need some tuning from someone who uses ufw.



        I don't really like how the ufw notes gives a range of IPs over an interface (though you might be forced to), but it should translate to something like this. enp1s0 is my 'external' interface, and br0 is basically all my other interfaces bridged together



        For reference, my firewalld setup looks like this:



        sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 nat POSTROUTING 0 -o  enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
        sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
        sudo firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
        sudo firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent


        The second last command is critical



        And that should translate to something like this.



        #masquerade traffic coming out from enp1s0 
        -A POSTROUTING 0 -o enp1s0 -j MASQUERADE
        # Forward and accept any traffic from br0 to enp1s0
        -A FORWARD 0 -i br0 -o enp1s0 -j ACCEPT
        #accept traffic on existing connections
        -A FORWARD 0 -i enp1s0 -o br0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT


        The default netplan configuration, as I recall gives all the outputs automatic IP addresses.



        This is going to be a problem eventually when you run a DHCP server. You want a static IP address on that interface.



        If you must, a minimal netplan config looks like this - I think it worked before I tried to bridge things.




        • enp1s0 is my external interface

        • enp1s0 is internal.


        I'm not entirely sure why enp2s0 has dhcp enabled - you might be able to remove that stanza. Optional is useful since you might not always have something plugged into the port



        network:
        ethernets:
        enp1s0:
        addresses:
        dhcp4: true
        enp2s0:
        addresses:
        - 192.168.2.1/24
        dhcp4: true
        optional: true
        version: 2






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 19 at 0:53

























        answered Nov 18 at 14:13









        Journeyman Geek

        2,7461628




        2,7461628






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1061276%2fubuntu-server-18-04-1-netplan-and-ufw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?