an approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.



I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.



I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):



%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)

lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);

N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;

% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;

theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1

z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);

B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;

B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;


p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;


and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)



%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;

% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;

pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );


relError = (p-pApprox)/p;


I will be happy for any suggestions!



Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):



The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)



$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$



For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$



Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).

We have



$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$

which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}

where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.



For the Engeworth approximation:



$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).



The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 12:56










  • Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
    – Rafael
    Nov 14 at 13:02












  • Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 13:05















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.



I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.



I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):



%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)

lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);

N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;

% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;

theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1

z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);

B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;

B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;


p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;


and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)



%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;

% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;

pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );


relError = (p-pApprox)/p;


I will be happy for any suggestions!



Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):



The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)



$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$



For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$



Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).

We have



$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$

which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}

where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.



For the Engeworth approximation:



$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).



The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 12:56










  • Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
    – Rafael
    Nov 14 at 13:02












  • Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 13:05













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.



I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.



I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):



%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)

lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);

N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;

% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;

theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1

z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);

B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;

B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;


p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;


and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)



%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;

% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;

pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );


relError = (p-pApprox)/p;


I will be happy for any suggestions!



Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):



The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)



$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$



For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$



Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).

We have



$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$

which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}

where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.



For the Engeworth approximation:



$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).



The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.










share|cite|improve this question















Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.



I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.



I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):



%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)

lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);

N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;

% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;

theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1

z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);

B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;

B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;


p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;


and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)



%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;

% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;

pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );


relError = (p-pApprox)/p;


I will be happy for any suggestions!



Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):



The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)



$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$



For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$



Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).

We have



$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$

which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}

where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.



For the Engeworth approximation:



$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).



The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.







matlab hypergeometric-function approximation-theory article-writing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 13:48

























asked Nov 14 at 12:53









Rafael

133




133












  • While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 12:56










  • Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
    – Rafael
    Nov 14 at 13:02












  • Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 13:05


















  • While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 12:56










  • Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
    – Rafael
    Nov 14 at 13:02












  • Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 14 at 13:05
















While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56




While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56












Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02






Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02














Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05




Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998241%2fan-approximation-to-the-generalized-hypergeometric-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998241%2fan-approximation-to-the-generalized-hypergeometric-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?