Chai - Expect an object to have deep property of an array ignore order











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I need to check if the payment has a property named transactions with expected values:



expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions', [
TRANSACTION_ID_1,
TRANSACTION_ID_2,
]);


As the order of transactions is not specified, the test doesn't pass all the time.



How can I solve the problem without changing the test structure?



Note: I've found deep-equal-in-any-order plugin, but it seems it doesn't get any help.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I need to check if the payment has a property named transactions with expected values:



    expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions', [
    TRANSACTION_ID_1,
    TRANSACTION_ID_2,
    ]);


    As the order of transactions is not specified, the test doesn't pass all the time.



    How can I solve the problem without changing the test structure?



    Note: I've found deep-equal-in-any-order plugin, but it seems it doesn't get any help.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I need to check if the payment has a property named transactions with expected values:



      expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions', [
      TRANSACTION_ID_1,
      TRANSACTION_ID_2,
      ]);


      As the order of transactions is not specified, the test doesn't pass all the time.



      How can I solve the problem without changing the test structure?



      Note: I've found deep-equal-in-any-order plugin, but it seems it doesn't get any help.










      share|improve this question















      I need to check if the payment has a property named transactions with expected values:



      expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions', [
      TRANSACTION_ID_1,
      TRANSACTION_ID_2,
      ]);


      As the order of transactions is not specified, the test doesn't pass all the time.



      How can I solve the problem without changing the test structure?



      Note: I've found deep-equal-in-any-order plugin, but it seems it doesn't get any help.







      javascript node.js testing chai






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 13 at 7:54









      Krupesh Kotecha

      2,05011134




      2,05011134










      asked Nov 13 at 7:10









      Mosius

      653518




      653518
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Iterate through array and check if it includes each item.



          [TRANSACTION_ID_1, TRANSACTION_ID_2].forEach(id => {
          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.includes(id);
          });


          If you need to check transactions is unordered array of expected IDs, then check for the length as well.



          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.has.lengthOf(2);


          When transactions has all of the expected ids and has same length of expected ids, then it equals to the expected ids when ordered properly.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
            – Mosius
            Nov 13 at 11:11










          • I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
            – emil
            Nov 14 at 10:48











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53275649%2fchai-expect-an-object-to-have-deep-property-of-an-array-ignore-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Iterate through array and check if it includes each item.



          [TRANSACTION_ID_1, TRANSACTION_ID_2].forEach(id => {
          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.includes(id);
          });


          If you need to check transactions is unordered array of expected IDs, then check for the length as well.



          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.has.lengthOf(2);


          When transactions has all of the expected ids and has same length of expected ids, then it equals to the expected ids when ordered properly.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
            – Mosius
            Nov 13 at 11:11










          • I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
            – emil
            Nov 14 at 10:48















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Iterate through array and check if it includes each item.



          [TRANSACTION_ID_1, TRANSACTION_ID_2].forEach(id => {
          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.includes(id);
          });


          If you need to check transactions is unordered array of expected IDs, then check for the length as well.



          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.has.lengthOf(2);


          When transactions has all of the expected ids and has same length of expected ids, then it equals to the expected ids when ordered properly.






          share|improve this answer





















          • I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
            – Mosius
            Nov 13 at 11:11










          • I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
            – emil
            Nov 14 at 10:48













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Iterate through array and check if it includes each item.



          [TRANSACTION_ID_1, TRANSACTION_ID_2].forEach(id => {
          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.includes(id);
          });


          If you need to check transactions is unordered array of expected IDs, then check for the length as well.



          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.has.lengthOf(2);


          When transactions has all of the expected ids and has same length of expected ids, then it equals to the expected ids when ordered properly.






          share|improve this answer












          Iterate through array and check if it includes each item.



          [TRANSACTION_ID_1, TRANSACTION_ID_2].forEach(id => {
          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.includes(id);
          });


          If you need to check transactions is unordered array of expected IDs, then check for the length as well.



          expect(payment).to.have.deep.property('transactions').that.has.lengthOf(2);


          When transactions has all of the expected ids and has same length of expected ids, then it equals to the expected ids when ordered properly.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 13 at 10:38









          emil

          1,87821424




          1,87821424












          • I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
            – Mosius
            Nov 13 at 11:11










          • I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
            – emil
            Nov 14 at 10:48


















          • I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
            – Mosius
            Nov 13 at 11:11










          • I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
            – emil
            Nov 14 at 10:48
















          I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
          – Mosius
          Nov 13 at 11:11




          I wonder if there is any solution that doesn't require a loop
          – Mosius
          Nov 13 at 11:11












          I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
          – emil
          Nov 14 at 10:48




          I doubt if there is. You could sort both of the arrays and assert too.
          – emil
          Nov 14 at 10:48


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53275649%2fchai-expect-an-object-to-have-deep-property-of-an-array-ignore-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?